First I would like to say that I enjoyed the Fury-Sabre presentation. However, the mis-identified images cry out to be given proper titles. They being rather numerous, I'm listing them here:
_05 = F-86 Sabre
_08 = FJ-4 Fury
_10 = F-86
_15 = FJ-4
_22 = FJ-4
_ 25 = FJ-4
_36 = FJ-4
_38 = FJ-1
_39 = F-86
_40 = FJ-4
_42 = FJ-4
_49= FJ-2
_72 = FJ-4
_81 = F-86
_82 = TF-86
_85 = F-86
_89 = FJ-2
_90 = FJ-2
Boy, I hope i got all of them right!

Traitor.

On Thu, 13 Sep 2018 10:37:30 -0700, The 'Brightness' control still
doesn't help > wrote:

>On Thu, 13 Sep 2018 17:41:26 +0200, DAN > wrote:
>
>>Stormin' Norman wrote:
>>
>>>It is rewarding to know these posts are scrutinized so thoroughly. I
>>>should have just marked the posts "FJ Fury" instead of including the
>>>"3".
>>
>>I definitely prefer quality over quantity. Precise and informative descriptions
>>make the value of historical pictures, for me.
>>
>>Conversely, vacuuming a site and dumping the results in a Usenet group with no,
>>wrong, or half-assed descriptions has rather questionable value IMO.
>
>The technical term is "shovelware", anything to attach political .sig
>lines to.
>
>>There is already plenty false information on the net as it is. "Social networks"
>>are cesspools full of ignoramus wannabes. In this group we have the good fortune
>>of having mostly quality posts by well-informed enthusiasts, even experts.
>>That's what makes abpa so enjoyable.
>>
>>
>>Your sudden ardor for sending pics to abpa is welcome. Much more so than the
>>political flamewars, of course.
>>You could add even more value by selecting well identified pics, even if fewer.