Recently I flew a 172 to SBA. ILS 7 was in use, wind 250 at 7. The
runway is quite long so I wasn't concerned about the tailwind.
However, if I had been concerned about the wind direction, is it best
to ask the approach controller for a different runway? Or would the
tower deal with it? I assume approach is best since if he has others
inbound behind me they might be delayed as a flew a pattern to the
opposite runway.

I assume it would be poor form to turn out into a downwind for runway
25 without telling anyone ;)

On 06/20/06 16:45, Yossarian wrote:
> Recently I flew a 172 to SBA. ILS 7 was in use, wind 250 at 7. The
> runway is quite long so I wasn't concerned about the tailwind.
> However, if I had been concerned about the wind direction, is it best
> to ask the approach controller for a different runway? Or would the
> tower deal with it? I assume approach is best since if he has others
> inbound behind me they might be delayed as a flew a pattern to the
> opposite runway.
>
> I assume it would be poor form to turn out into a downwind for runway
> 25 without telling anyone ;)
>

The tower controller clears you to land, not the approach controller.

The ATIS for the field may tell you what runway/approach,etc.
is in use.

The approach controller will generally tell you when you will be
circling as well, as this involves (possibly) different minimums.

If the approach controller doesn't mention the circle and you
want it, just request it when you contact the tower controller

... XXX tower, Cessna XXX, inbound ILS 7, request circle 25



--
Mark Hansen, PP-ASEL, Instrument Airplane
Cal Aggie Flying Farmers
Sacramento, CA

Yossarian wrote:
> However, if I had been concerned about the wind direction, is it best
> to ask the approach controller for a different runway?

It's best to execute an approach that's available and most appropriate
for the landing conditions. This includes weather (including wind) and
traffic flow. The approach controller is probably aware of the landing
conditions, and will assign an appropriate approach. Check my example
below.

That being said, traffic flow is mostly someone else's problem. If the
PIC determines that an assigned approach compromises safety, it's his
responsibility to request a more appropriate approach.

> Or would the tower deal with it?

Tell the approach controller what you want. He'll coordinate it with
the tower controller.

> I assume it would be poor form to turn out into a downwind for runway
> 25 without telling anyone ;)

It's poor form to land at a towered airport without a clearance.

If you want to circle to land, let the approach controller know while
you're talking to him. If you decide you need to circle after you're
handed off, request it from the tower.

For example, the last time I flew to Palwaukee, the clouds were low and
scattered, and the wind was strong out of the southwest. ATIS advised
to expect ILS 16 with a circle to land 24, with "advise if unable". I
did the ILS 16 approach and was handed off to the tower, who asked
where I was parking. I reported parking in the NW corner, with the
field in sight, and the gave me clear to land on 30. That was ...
perfect!

Yossarian wrote:


> I assume it would be poor form to turn out into a downwind for runway
> 25 without telling anyone ;)
>
At an airport with an operating tower, it would be a serious violation.
At a non-towered airport it is your call, and ATC usually couldn't
care less.

I'll be the tie breaker on the specifics at KSBA. If you make the
decision to circle to a runway other than 7 early on, let approach
control know. The earlier the better. If they don't want to deal with
it they will tell you to restate your request to the tower when you are
shipped over to the tower. It's a variable, especially including
whether the Class D surface area is above or below VFR minimums. When
the airport is below VFR minimums, you are far more apt to get what you
want as to circle-to-land.

You can ask the approach controller since he can forword the request to
tower. However, landing with a tailwind should be part of any pilot's
IFR training. Luckily most runways lucky enough to have an ILS are also
long.

-robert, CFII

Yossarian wrote:
> Recently I flew a 172 to SBA. ILS 7 was in use, wind 250 at 7. The
> runway is quite long so I wasn't concerned about the tailwind.
> However, if I had been concerned about the wind direction, is it best
> to ask the approach controller for a different runway? Or would the
> tower deal with it? I assume approach is best since if he has others
> inbound behind me they might be delayed as a flew a pattern to the
> opposite runway.
>
> I assume it would be poor form to turn out into a downwind for runway
> 25 without telling anyone ;)

The local controller will let you land on whatever runway you want to land
on...but you might be delayed, and you might get the "at your own risk"
caveat.

Bob Gardner

"Yossarian" > wrote in message
oups.com...
> Recently I flew a 172 to SBA. ILS 7 was in use, wind 250 at 7. The
> runway is quite long so I wasn't concerned about the tailwind.
> However, if I had been concerned about the wind direction, is it best
> to ask the approach controller for a different runway? Or would the
> tower deal with it? I assume approach is best since if he has others
> inbound behind me they might be delayed as a flew a pattern to the
> opposite runway.
>
> I assume it would be poor form to turn out into a downwind for runway
> 25 without telling anyone ;)
>

"Yossarian" > wrote in message
oups.com...
>
> Recently I flew a 172 to SBA. ILS 7 was in use, wind 250 at 7. The
> runway is quite long so I wasn't concerned about the tailwind.
> However, if I had been concerned about the wind direction, is it best
> to ask the approach controller for a different runway? Or would the
> tower deal with it? I assume approach is best since if he has others
> inbound behind me they might be delayed as a flew a pattern to the
> opposite runway.
>

Sequencing of arrivals is the responsibility of approach control, your
request should be made there.


>
> I assume it would be poor form to turn out into a downwind for runway
> 25 without telling anyone ;)
>

Probably a bit more serious than that.

"Brien K. Meehan" > wrote in message
oups.com...
>
> It's best to execute an approach that's available and most appropriate
> for the landing conditions. This includes weather (including wind) and
> traffic flow. The approach controller is probably aware of the landing
> conditions, and will assign an appropriate approach. Check my example
> below.
>
> That being said, traffic flow is mostly someone else's problem. If the
> PIC determines that an assigned approach compromises safety, it's his
> responsibility to request a more appropriate approach.
>

Yes, and if traffic permits he will probably get it. If he can't go with
the flow there may be a bit of a wait for his request.

Robert M. Gary wrote:
> You can ask the approach controller since he can forword the request to
> tower. However, landing with a tailwind should be part of any pilot's
> IFR training. Luckily most runways lucky enough to have an ILS are also
> long.
>
Of course, if there is a different approach for the other runway, the
approach control is a valid place to ask.

Bob Gardner wrote:
> The local controller will let you land on whatever runway you want to land
> on...but you might be delayed, and you might get the "at your own risk"
> caveat.
>
You ask to Circle to Land on 1R when you're flying the ILS 19L appraoch
at Dulles and see what kind of response you get.