Alan Minyard
March 18th 04, 06:46 PM
On Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:25:51 GMT, Vince Brannigan > wrote:
>
>
>Stephen Harding wrote:
>
>> Vince Brannigan wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Stephen Harding wrote:
>>
>> >>
>>
>>>> You're a law guy Vince, on what grounds does any UN action
>>>> rest? Majority vote of a largely non-elected group of
>>>> world "representatives" (I use the term extremely loosely)?
>>>>
>>>> It's a house of cards! A mirage! An institution that I
>>>> once believed had value primarily in its humanitarian efforts.
>>>> I now wonder if even that much can be granted to the
>>>> organizaton.
>>>
>>>
>>> It's charter is the law of the land in the USA
>>
>>
>> Meaning UN authority is legally binding "law" in the USA?
>>
>> I'll agree the principles of the Charter are incorporated in
>> various form into the US Constitution (for the most part). But
>> the mechanism of UN action can hardly make those actions truly
>> binding on the US.
>>
>> If it can, we're wasting an awful lot of time and money on
>> Presidents and Congressional delegations.
>>
>
>US Constitution
>
>Article. VI.
>
>Clause 2: This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which
>shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which
>shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the
>supreme Law of the Land;
>
>
>Got the idea?
>
>Vince
Gee, Vince, why don't you write a letter to the nice Osama guy and tell
him that he is in violation of the law, and would he please cease and
desist?? I am sure that he would gladly forgo violence once the great
"professor" told him to.
Al Minyard
>
>
>Stephen Harding wrote:
>
>> Vince Brannigan wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Stephen Harding wrote:
>>
>> >>
>>
>>>> You're a law guy Vince, on what grounds does any UN action
>>>> rest? Majority vote of a largely non-elected group of
>>>> world "representatives" (I use the term extremely loosely)?
>>>>
>>>> It's a house of cards! A mirage! An institution that I
>>>> once believed had value primarily in its humanitarian efforts.
>>>> I now wonder if even that much can be granted to the
>>>> organizaton.
>>>
>>>
>>> It's charter is the law of the land in the USA
>>
>>
>> Meaning UN authority is legally binding "law" in the USA?
>>
>> I'll agree the principles of the Charter are incorporated in
>> various form into the US Constitution (for the most part). But
>> the mechanism of UN action can hardly make those actions truly
>> binding on the US.
>>
>> If it can, we're wasting an awful lot of time and money on
>> Presidents and Congressional delegations.
>>
>
>US Constitution
>
>Article. VI.
>
>Clause 2: This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which
>shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which
>shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the
>supreme Law of the Land;
>
>
>Got the idea?
>
>Vince
Gee, Vince, why don't you write a letter to the nice Osama guy and tell
him that he is in violation of the law, and would he please cease and
desist?? I am sure that he would gladly forgo violence once the great
"professor" told him to.
Al Minyard