Most of those sources are pretty left-of-center at least, and FAR to the left
at most. Anyone who quotes the "International Action Center" (A front for
the Workers' World Party) or "StopNATO" (a similar front) is using questionable
judgement.



wrote:
>DU ~ Depleted Uranium
>__________________________________________________ __________________________________
>
>
>
>http://www.antenna.nl/wise/uranium/
>
>http://www.axisoflogic.com/artman/publish/article_6161.shtml
>
>http://www.bringthemhomenow.org/stand/du.html
>
>http://www.bushflash.com/pl_lo.html
>
>http://www.cadu.org.uk/
>
>http://www.ccnr.org/du_hague.html
>
>http://www.chugoku-np.co.jp/abom/uran/index_e.html
>
>http://www.commondreams.org/headlines02/1112-01.htm
>
>http://www.csmonitor.com/atcsmonitor/specials/uranium/
>
>http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=04/04/05/1356248
>
>http://www.eoslifework.co.uk/du2012.htm
>
>http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/land/du.htm
>
>http://www.gulflink.osd.mil/faq_17apr.htm
>
>http://www.iacenter.org/depleted/du.htm
>
>http://www.miltoxproj.org/DU/DU_Titlepage/DU_Titlepage.htm
>
>http://www.mod.uk/issues/depleted_uranium/
>
>http://www.motherjones.com/news/special_reports/total_coverage/kosovo/reality_check/du.html
>
>http://www.nato.int/du/home.htm
>
>http://www.rimbaud.freeserve.co.uk/dhap99f.html
>
>http://www.stopnato.org.uk/du-watch/
>
>http://www.sundayherald.com/32522
>
>http://www.tv.cbc.ca/national/pgminfo/du/
>
>http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs257/en/
>
>http://mondediplo.com/2002/03/03uranium
>
>http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/in_depth/europe/2001/depleted_uranium/default.stm
>
>http://traprockpeace.org/depleteduranium.html
>
>__________________________________________________ __________________________________


Posted via www.My-Newsgroups.com - web to news gateway for usenet access!