What does that tell you about how all the other legislation that gets
introduced?

wrote:
> While this is a good thing that he admitted he was wrong, what is really
> sad is that this guy introduced legislation to imposed restrictions while
> uneducated on the subject matter.
>
>>At least *some* politicians can admit that they were wrong and do the
>>right thing.

My thought exactly.

john smith > wrote:
> What does that tell you about how all the other legislation that gets
> introduced?
>

--
Mike Flyin'8

Legislation gets introduced because someone with lots of $$$ to donate
to candidates wants it introduced.



"john smith" > wrote in message
...
> What does that tell you about how all the other legislation that gets
> introduced?
>
> wrote:
>> While this is a good thing that he admitted he was wrong, what is really
>> sad is that this guy introduced legislation to imposed restrictions while
>> uneducated on the subject matter.
>>
>>>At least *some* politicians can admit that they were wrong and do the
>>>right thing.
>

On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 19:57:48 GMT, "Otis Winslow"
> wrote in
>::

>Legislation gets introduced because someone with lots of $$$ to donate
>to candidates wants it introduced.

And who would you speculate donated for the introduction of this bill?

An organization(s) that would get government contract(s) to perform the
security checks.

Larry Dighera wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 19:57:48 GMT, "Otis Winslow"
> > wrote in
> >::
>
>
>>Legislation gets introduced because someone with lots of $$$ to donate
>>to candidates wants it introduced.
>
>
> And who would you speculate donated for the introduction of this bill?
>
>

a Dumbo-crat;
a JF'n Dumbo-crat


"Tom Fleischman" > wrote in message
rthlink.net...
> From AOPA:
>
> WEINER AGREES NOT TO TARGET GA AFTER MEETING WITH AOPA
> New York Congressman Anthony Weiner won't be targeting fixed-wing
> general aviation aircraft with security legislation after all. AOPA
> President Phil Boyer and Vice President of Legislative Affairs Jon
> Hixson had a substantive discussion with Weiner on Wednesday afternoon
> to explain GA security and reiterate AOPA members' opposition to his
> current security bill. At the conclusion of the meeting, Weiner said,
> "Tell your members I will not be pursuing fixed-wing aircraft. I will
> do further study on helicopter operations in New York City with a
> better understanding of Part 91 versus charter and sightseeing
> operations." Weiner introduced legislation that would require
> airline-style security screening and "continuous contact with the FAA"
> for every GA flight, and prohibit flight over densely populated cities
> or within 1,500 feet of any building. Weiner indicated that he has a
> better appreciation now of the security measures in place for GA. See
> AOPA Online.
>
> At least *some* politicians can admit that they were wrong and do the
> right thing.

In article >,
"Otis Winslow" > wrote:

> Legislation gets introduced because someone with lots of $$$ to donate
> to candidates wants it introduced.
>

Or frequently just because a constituent asks him to, believe it or not.
In the past I was a member of a small group that found a rep friendly to
our cause, and each year he'd submit 5 or 6 bills for us. Most went
nowhere other than a committee hearing. I guarantee he wasn't doing it
because of $$$, because we didn't have any to give ;-)

In article
>,
Pixel Dent > wrote:

> In article >,
> "Otis Winslow" > wrote:
>
> > Legislation gets introduced because someone with lots of $$$ to donate
> > to candidates wants it introduced.
> >
>
> Or frequently just because a constituent asks him to, believe it or not.
> In the past I was a member of a small group that found a rep friendly to
> our cause, and each year he'd submit 5 or 6 bills for us. Most went
> nowhere other than a committee hearing. I guarantee he wasn't doing it
> because of $$$, because we didn't have any to give ;-)

Perhaps it was Bill MulCahy or Webbie, of
"alt.activism.noise.pollution". They are capable of such nonsense.