C J Campbell wrote:
> "Eyeball Kid" > wrote in message
> ...
> > In article >, C J Campbell
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > "Eyeball Kid" > wrote in message
> > > ...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Great post. No opposition response?
> > > >
> > > > Can anyone who believes that the Olson phone calls were
legitimate
> > > > explain what came from Aviation Week? Can we understand WHY
cell
> phones
> > > > won't work beyond a maximum altitude of 8k feet yet?
> > >
> > > Tell you what. What would you accept as evidence that I can place
phone
> > > calls from 10,000 feet using a PCS phone?
> >
> > The 8k ft. limit was published as part of a study on the efficacy
of
> > using cell phones aloft. It wasn't a figure pullout out of, well,
thin
> > air. From my personal point of view, the 8k figure is somewhat
> > relevant, but as the case is made on this narrow issue, I'd like to
> > hear more about your evidence.
> >
> > As an investigative issue, the 8k limit has soft teeth anyway.
>
> You see what I mean, Sport Pilot? There is no evidence that can
satisfy
> them. Please don't bring these people over here again.

Feel free to delete any forums you desire. I don't think they will
bother to read this one. Hurts to much to see that they are wrong.