http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/

Todays "Astronomy Picture Of The Day" - it changes daily so this moonscape
is only on today Friday 12/14.

Man, what a panorama!

And it's not OT, as Frank Sinatra crooned, "Fly me to the moon"....

Cheers'n beers.. [_])
Don

ManhattanMan wrote:
> http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/
>
> Todays "Astronomy Picture Of The Day" - it changes daily so this moonscape
> is only on today Friday 12/14.
>
> Man, what a panorama!
>
> And it's not OT, as Frank Sinatra crooned, "Fly me to the moon"....
>
> Cheers'n beers.. [_])
> Don
>
>

This is my "homepage" on my browser.

--

Regards, Ross
C-172F 180HP
KSWI

"ManhattanMan" > wrote in message
...
> http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/
>
> Todays "Astronomy Picture Of The Day" - it changes daily so this moonscape
> is only on today Friday 12/14.
>
> Man, what a panorama!

Hoax! It's a hoax. The moon is a hoax!

(Great image. I hope people remember it's a panorama and that they have to
scroll to the right.)

I wonder if they feld a sudden urge to launch the vehicle of the rim of the
crater in lunar gravity. I should Photoshop an image of two aliens in the
General Lee doing a Dukes of Hazzard over the crater, and post it on the
CoastToCoastAM website. By next month the History Channel will have a show
exploring the alien moonshiner photo captured by the Apollo 17 crew in their
alleged faked lunar landing at Roswell.

-c

On Dec 14, 2:37 pm, "gatt" > wrote:
> "ManhattanMan" > wrote in message
>
> ...
>
> >http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/
>
> > Todays "Astronomy Picture Of The Day" - it changes daily so this moonscape
> > is only on today Friday 12/14.
>
> > Man, what a panorama!
>
> Hoax! It's a hoax. The moon is a hoax!
>
> (Great image. I hope people remember it's a panorama and that they have to
> scroll to the right.)
>
> I wonder if they feld a sudden urge to launch the vehicle of the rim of the
> crater in lunar gravity. I should Photoshop an image of two aliens in the
> General Lee doing a Dukes of Hazzard over the crater, and post it on the
> CoastToCoastAM website. By next month the History Channel will have a show
> exploring the alien moonshiner photo captured by the Apollo 17 crew in their
> alleged faked lunar landing at Roswell.
>
> -c

But where are the stars? It can't be a real photo since you can't see
any stars! ;-)
(note that this is one of the standard arguments of the moon mission
hoax proponents)

On Dec 14, 2:37 pm, "gatt" > wrote:
> "ManhattanMan" > wrote in message
>
> ...
>
> >http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/
>
> > Todays "Astronomy Picture Of The Day" - it changes daily so this moonscape
> > is only on today Friday 12/14.
>
> > Man, what a panorama!
>
> Hoax! It's a hoax. The moon is a hoax!
>
> (Great image. I hope people remember it's a panorama and that they have to
> scroll to the right.)
>
> I wonder if they feld a sudden urge to launch the vehicle of the rim of the
> crater in lunar gravity. I should Photoshop an image of two aliens in the
> General Lee doing a Dukes of Hazzard over the crater, and post it on the
> CoastToCoastAM website. By next month the History Channel will have a show
> exploring the alien moonshiner photo captured by the Apollo 17 crew in their
> alleged faked lunar landing at Roswell.
>
> -c

Oh, and it also can't be real because the moon doesn't have + signs
all over it...

> wrote in message
...
> On Dec 14, 2:37 pm, "gatt" > wrote:
>> "ManhattanMan" > wrote in message

>> >http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/


> Oh, and it also can't be real because the moon doesn't have + signs all
> over it...


Good point. The chemtrails brainwashed that concept clean out of my head.



-c

"ManhattanMan" > wrote in message
...
> http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/
>
> Todays "Astronomy Picture Of The Day" - it changes daily so this moonscape
> is only on today Friday 12/14.
>
> Man, what a panorama!
>
> And it's not OT, as Frank Sinatra crooned, "Fly me to the moon"....
>

Looks like southern Arizona to me.

"ManhattanMan" > wrote in message ...
> http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/
>
> Todays "Astronomy Picture Of The Day" - it changes daily so this moonscape
> is only on today Friday 12/14.
>
> Man, what a panorama!
>
> And it's not OT, as Frank Sinatra crooned, "Fly me to the moon"....
>
> Cheers'n beers.. [_])
> Don


Looks like they hold thes in hte archive:

http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap071214.html

Dan

On Dec 14, 9:56 am, "ManhattanMan" > wrote:
> http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/
>
> Todays "Astronomy Picture Of The Day" - it changes daily so this moonscape
> is only on today Friday 12/14.
>
> Man, what a panorama!
>
> And it's not OT, as Frank Sinatra crooned, "Fly me to themoon"....
>
> Cheers'n beers.. [_])
> Don

Mars has got silica, but where's all the sodium/salt?
- Brad Guth

On Dec 14, 10:14 am, Ross > wrote:
> ManhattanMan wrote:
> >http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/
>
> > Todays "Astronomy Picture Of The Day" - it changes daily so this moonscape
> > is only on today Friday 12/14.
>
> > Man, what a panorama!
>
> > And it's not OT, as Frank Sinatra crooned, "Fly me to themoon"....
>
> > Cheers'n beers.. [_])
> > Don
>
> This is my "homepage" on my browser.
>
> --
> Regards, Ross
> C-172F 180HP
> KSWI

BTW, why wasn't the NASA/Apollo moon as ever recorded by those
unfiltered optics not even the least bit dark or blue?

As of missions A11, A-14 and A16, where's Venus?
- Brad Guth

On Dec 14, 2:39 pm, wrote:
> On Dec 14, 2:37 pm, "gatt" > wrote:
>
>
>
> > "ManhattanMan" > wrote in message
>
> ...
>
> > >http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/
>
> > > Todays "Astronomy Picture Of The Day" - it changes daily so this moonscape
> > > is only on today Friday 12/14.
>
> > > Man, what a panorama!
>
> > Hoax! It's a hoax. Themoonis a hoax!
>
> > (Great image. I hope people remember it's a panorama and that they have to
> > scroll to the right.)
>
> > I wonder if they feld a sudden urge to launch the vehicle of the rim of the
> > crater in lunar gravity. I should Photoshop an image of two aliens in the
> > General Lee doing a Dukes of Hazzard over the crater, and post it on the
> > CoastToCoastAM website. By next month the History Channel will have a show
> > exploring the alien moonshiner photo captured by theApollo17 crew in their
> > alleged faked lunarlandingat Roswell.
>
> > -c
>
> Oh, and it also can't be real because the moon doesn't have + signs
> all over it...

BTW, why all those orchestrated Usenet postings of hard core sex
related damage control on behalf of our NASA, as stacks of such topics
that relate to what anyone searching for most of anything if using
words like apollo, moon, landing or hoax?

Are those Third Reich jews actually that afraid of the truth?
- Brad Guth

"BradGuth" > wrote in message
news:b6b7a0d2-c8bc-4ed4-8c80-

> BTW, why all those orchestrated Usenet postings of hard core sex
> related damage control on behalf of our NASA, as stacks of such topics
> that relate to what anyone searching for most of anything if using
> words like apollo, moon, landing or hoax?

What? Hard core sex related damage control huhzubawha?

> Are those Third Reich jews actually that afraid of the truth?


Uh...

On Dec 14, 9:56 am, "ManhattanMan" > wrote:
> http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/
>
> Todays "Astronomy Picture Of The Day" - it changes daily so this moonscape
> is only on today Friday 12/14.
>
> Man, what a panorama!
>
> And it's not OT, as Frank Sinatra crooned, "Fly me to themoon"....
>
> Cheers'n beers.. [_])
> Don

Why was that NASA/Apollo moon never once as having been recorded by
those unfiltered optics and upon such gamma/X-ray sensitive film as
depicting that moon as not hardly the least bit physically dark or
much less of any bluish tint, or anything the least bit like the blue/
purple saturated hue of what those missions of Japan and China are
recording?
Besides never any apparent bluish hue saturation of any kind, whereas
of those other missions of A11, A-14 and A16, where the hell is Venus
hidding?

BTW, why has the Google/NOVA Usenet suddenly obtained all of those
orchestrated or robo Usenet postings by "myceleb-best-" or the likes
of "gg55-mylexus-" of hard core sex related topics, as though
delivering clown like damage control on behalf of our NASA, by way of
having created all of those weird "MI5-Persecution" sorts of stacks
upon stacks of such silly topics that suit only to divert or rather to
dirty everything up, as to somewhat foil whenever anyone new is
searching for the most recent of information by way of using those
common search words like apollo, landing, moon, nasa or hoax.

Instead we get recent topics like these that keep popping up:
cougar sex sites
conceive after sex (2)
england sex chat
eutopia sex movie
ebony sex clips
Sussex County Nj
Bdsm Movie Tgp

Are those Third Reich and apparently MI5 Jews in charge of our
mutually perpetrated cold-war, and of pulling off that hocus-pocus
space race, actually still that deathly afraid of sharing the truth?
(apparently so)

Obviously the likes of "gatt" doesn't even get it.
- Brad Guth

On Dec 18, 9:48 am, "gatt" > wrote:
> "BradGuth" > wrote in message
>
> news:b6b7a0d2-c8bc-4ed4-8c80-
>
> > BTW, why all those orchestrated Usenet postings of hard core sex
> > related damage control on behalf of our NASA, as stacks of such topics
> > that relate to what anyone searching for most of anything if using
> > words likeapollo,moon,landingor hoax?
>
> What? Hard core sex related damage control huhzubawha?
>
> > Are those Third Reich jews actually that afraid of the truth?
>
> Uh...

Sorry, never mind. It's all way over your head.
- Brad Guth

BradGuth wrote:
> On Dec 14, 9:56 am, "ManhattanMan" > wrote:
>> http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/
>>
>> Todays "Astronomy Picture Of The Day" - it changes daily so this
>> moonscape is only on today Friday 12/14.
>>
>> Man, what a panorama!
>>
>> And it's not OT, as Frank Sinatra crooned, "Fly me to themoon"....
>>
>> Cheers'n beers.. [_])
>> Don
>
> Mars has got silica, but where's all the sodium/salt?
> - Brad Guth

Perhaps used to preserve your brain on your last visit? :)

On Dec 19, 12:44 pm, BradGuth > wrote:
> On Dec 18, 2:37 pm, "gatt" > wrote:
>
>
>
> > "BradGuth" > wrote in message
>
> > news:453d3e93-7e2d-4e4f-b1ed-
>
> > > Why was that NASA/Apollomoonnever once as having been recorded by
> > > those unfiltered optics and upon such gamma/X-ray sensitive film as
> > > depicting thatmoonas not hardly the least bit physically dark or
> > > much less of any bluish tint, or anything the least bit like the blue/
> > > purple saturated hue of what those missions of Japan and China are
> > > recording?
>
> > Another literary masterpiece.
>
> > The authority on this subject is MXManiac. Why don't you two start a thread
> > about it?
>
> > > Are those Third Reich and apparently MI5 Jews in charge of our
> > > mutually perpetrated cold-war, and of pulling off that hocus-pocus
> > > space race, actually still that deathly afraid of sharing the truth?
> > > (apparently so)
>
> > > Obviously the likes of "gatt" doesn't even get it.
>
> > What, that the Third Reich and the Jews are hoaxing the space race?
>
> > Of course I get it. You're a marginally-literate usenet whackjob. AKA
> > "k00k"
>
> > -c
>
> See what I mean. (obviously not)
>
> Can you tell us where the heck NASA and their teams of Apollo folks
> were hiding Venus?
>
> Can you explain as to why the NASA/Apollo moon wasn't hardly ever
> physically dark or otherwise the least bit blue within any of those
> unfiltered Kodak moments?
> - Brad Guth

No hiding needed, where should Venus be? A typical moon exposure
wouldn't capture Venus as the moon surface is too bright and the film
latitude too narrow. Second the hint of blue (and yellow and red) in
the moon is so slight you need digital photography and image
processing to pull it out. I know, I've done it.

Cheers

"gatt" > wrote in message
...
>
> "BradGuth" > wrote in message
> news:89a54833-10fc-4d55-9a83-
>
>> Can you tell us where the heck NASA and their teams of Apollo folks
>> were hiding Venus?
>
> Behind the moon?
>
> Call me kookie, but, it's dark out. ....where the heck is NASA hiding
> the sun?! EARTH IS A HOAX!
>

I thought it was hidden in the contrails.

On Dec 18, 6:58 pm, WingFlaps > wrote:
> On Dec 19, 12:44 pm, BradGuth > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Dec 18, 2:37 pm, "gatt" > wrote:
>
> > > "BradGuth" > wrote in message
>
> > > news:453d3e93-7e2d-4e4f-b1ed-
>
> > > > Why was that NASA/Apollomoonnever once as having been recorded by
> > > > those unfiltered optics and upon such gamma/X-ray sensitive film as
> > > > depicting thatmoonas not hardly the least bit physically dark or
> > > > much less of any bluish tint, or anything the least bit like the blue/
> > > > purple saturated hue of what those missions of Japan and China are
> > > > recording?
>
> > > Another literary masterpiece.
>
> > > The authority on this subject is MXManiac. Why don't you two start a thread
> > > about it?
>
> > > > Are those Third Reich and apparently MI5 Jews in charge of our
> > > > mutually perpetrated cold-war, and of pulling off that hocus-pocus
> > > > space race, actually still that deathly afraid of sharing the truth?
> > > > (apparently so)
>
> > > > Obviously the likes of "gatt" doesn't even get it.
>
> > > What, that the Third Reich and the Jews are hoaxing the space race?
>
> > > Of course I get it. You're a marginally-literate usenet whackjob. AKA
> > > "k00k"
>
> > > -c
>
> > See what I mean. (obviously not)
>
> > Can you tell us where the heck NASA and their teams of Apollo folks
> > were hiding Venus?
>
> > Can you explain as to why the NASA/Apollo moon wasn't hardly ever
> > physically dark or otherwise the least bit blue within any of those
> > unfiltered Kodak moments?
> > - Brad Guth
>
> No hiding needed, where should Venus be? A typical moon exposure
> wouldn't capture Venus as the moon surface is too bright and the film
> latitude too narrow. Second the hint of blue (and yellow and red) in
> the moon is so slight you need digital photography and image
> processing to pull it out. I know, I've done it.
>
> Cheers- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Not to mention the fact that Venus is where? CLOSE TO THE SUN!!!
Who is going to point their camera toward the sun on the moon? Talk
about lens flare! The only reason we can see Venus on the earth is
because the sun is below the horizon.

"Matt W. Barrow" > wrote in message
...

>>
>> Call me kookie, but, it's dark out. ....where the heck is NASA hiding
>> the sun?! EARTH IS A HOAX!
>>
> I thought it was hidden in the contrails.

*whew* Thanks for correcting me.

Did you notice all the floating crosses in the photo, though? I'm not
convinced the whole thing isn't connected to Huckabee somehow. I better
shoot a note to Matt Drudge.

-c

"gatt" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Matt W. Barrow" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>>>
>>> Call me kookie, but, it's dark out. ....where the heck is NASA hiding
>>> the sun?! EARTH IS A HOAX!
>>>
>> I thought it was hidden in the contrails.
>
> *whew* Thanks for correcting me.
>
> Did you notice all the floating crosses in the photo, though? I'm not
> convinced the whole thing isn't connected to Huckabee somehow. I better
> shoot a note to Matt Drudge.
>

Better :cc copies to Art Bell and George Noory as well.

Is that what Hitler's brown-nosed minions think is always the answer
to everything that rocks your mainstream status quo boat? (drugs?)

Why don't you just tell us why those NASA/Apollo EVA Kodak moments
were not the least bit bluish?
- Brad Guth


wrote:
> On Dec 18, 4:44 pm, BradGuth > wrote:
> > On Dec 18, 2:37 pm, "gatt" > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > "BradGuth" > wrote in message
> >
> > > news:453d3e93-7e2d-4e4f-b1ed-
> >
> > > > Why was that NASA/Apollomoonnever once as having been recorded by
> > > > those unfiltered optics and upon such gamma/X-ray sensitive film as
> > > > depicting thatmoonas not hardly the least bit physically dark or
> > > > much less of any bluish tint, or anything the least bit like the blue/
> > > > purple saturated hue of what those missions of Japan and China are
> > > > recording?
> >
> > > Another literary masterpiece.
> >
> > > The authority on this subject is MXManiac. Why don't you two start a thread
> > > about it?
> >
> > > > Are those Third Reich and apparently MI5 Jews in charge of our
> > > > mutually perpetrated cold-war, and of pulling off that hocus-pocus
> > > > space race, actually still that deathly afraid of sharing the truth?
> > > > (apparently so)
> >
> > > > Obviously the likes of "gatt" doesn't even get it.
> >
> > > What, that the Third Reich and the Jews are hoaxing the space race?
> >
> > > Of course I get it. You're a marginally-literate usenet whackjob. AKA
> > > "k00k"
> >
> > > -c
> >
> > See what I mean. (obviously not)
> >
> > Can you tell us where the heck NASA and their teams of Apollo folks
> > were hiding Venus?
> >
> > Can you explain as to why the NASA/Apollo moon wasn't hardly ever
> > physically dark or otherwise the least bit blue within any of those
> > unfiltered Kodak moments?
> > - Brad Guth- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> Can you explain to us why you aren't taking the meds that your
> psychiatrist prescribed for you?
>
> As for Venus, they hid it up their sleeves. That is a standard slight
> of hand, even in space... or maybe, just maybe, Venus was never in
> view when those photos were taken... naw, no matter which way you
> look on the moon, you should ALWAYS see Venus, right?
>
> Face it, Neil Armstrong walked on the moon. You can pretend it never
> happened, and try to come up with all kinds of wacky reaons why it
> didn't, but you are simply wrong, and a nutjob at that.

On Dec 18, 5:58 pm, WingFlaps > wrote:
> On Dec 19, 12:44 pm, BradGuth > wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Dec 18, 2:37 pm, "gatt" > wrote:
>
> > > "BradGuth" > wrote in message
>
> > > news:453d3e93-7e2d-4e4f-b1ed-
>
> > > > Why was that NASA/Apollomoonnever once as having been recorded by
> > > > those unfiltered optics and upon such gamma/X-ray sensitive film as
> > > > depicting thatmoonas not hardly the least bit physically dark or
> > > > much less of any bluish tint, or anything the least bit like the blue/
> > > > purple saturated hue of what those missions of Japan and China are
> > > > recording?
>
> > > Another literary masterpiece.
>
> > > The authority on this subject is MXManiac. Why don't you two start a thread
> > > about it?
>
> > > > Are those Third Reich and apparently MI5 Jews in charge of our
> > > > mutually perpetrated cold-war, and of pulling off that hocus-pocus
> > > > space race, actually still that deathly afraid of sharing the truth?
> > > > (apparently so)
>
> > > > Obviously the likes of "gatt" doesn't even get it.
>
> > > What, that the Third Reich and the Jews are hoaxing the space race?
>
> > > Of course I get it. You're a marginally-literate usenet whackjob. AKA
> > > "k00k"
>
> > > -c
>
> > See what I mean. (obviously not)
>
> > Can you tell us where the heck NASA and their teams of Apollo folks
> > were hiding Venus?
>
> > Can you explain as to why the NASA/Apollomoonwasn't hardly ever
> > physically dark or otherwise the least bit blue within any of those
> > unfiltered Kodak moments?
> > - Brad Guth
>
> No hiding needed, where should Venus be? A typicalmoonexposure
> wouldn't capture Venus as themoonsurface is too bright and the film
> latitude too narrow. Second the hint of blue (and yellow and red) in
> themoonis so slight you need digital photography and image
> processing to pull it out. I know, I've done it.
>
> Cheers

Good Christ almighty on a stick, and such a liar to boot. Do all Yids
lie as a regular part of their incest mutated DNA code?
- Brad Guth

On Dec 19, 9:00 am, wrote:
> On Dec 18, 6:58 pm, WingFlaps > wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Dec 19, 12:44 pm, BradGuth > wrote:
>
> > > On Dec 18, 2:37 pm, "gatt" > wrote:
>
> > > > "BradGuth" > wrote in message
>
> > > > news:453d3e93-7e2d-4e4f-b1ed-
>
> > > > > Why was that NASA/Apollomoonnever once as having been recorded by
> > > > > those unfiltered optics and upon such gamma/X-ray sensitive film as
> > > > > depicting thatmoonas not hardly the least bit physically dark or
> > > > > much less of any bluish tint, or anything the least bit like the blue/
> > > > > purple saturated hue of what those missions of Japan and China are
> > > > > recording?
>
> > > > Another literary masterpiece.
>
> > > > The authority on this subject is MXManiac. Why don't you two start a thread
> > > > about it?
>
> > > > > Are those Third Reich and apparently MI5 Jews in charge of our
> > > > > mutually perpetrated cold-war, and of pulling off that hocus-pocus
> > > > > space race, actually still that deathly afraid of sharing the truth?
> > > > > (apparently so)
>
> > > > > Obviously the likes of "gatt" doesn't even get it.
>
> > > > What, that the Third Reich and the Jews are hoaxing the space race?
>
> > > > Of course I get it. You're a marginally-literate usenet whackjob. AKA
> > > > "k00k"
>
> > > > -c
>
> > > See what I mean. (obviously not)
>
> > > Can you tell us where the heck NASA and their teams of Apollo folks
> > > were hiding Venus?
>
> > > Can you explain as to why the NASA/Apollomoonwasn't hardly ever
> > > physically dark or otherwise the least bit blue within any of those
> > > unfiltered Kodak moments?
> > > - Brad Guth
>
> > No hiding needed, where should Venus be? A typicalmoonexposure
> > wouldn't capture Venus as themoonsurface is too bright and the film
> > latitude too narrow. Second the hint of blue (and yellow and red) in
> > themoonis so slight you need digital photography and image
> > processing to pull it out. I know, I've done it.
>
> > Cheers- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> Not to mention the fact that Venus is where? CLOSE TO THE SUN!!!
> Who is going to point their camera toward the sun on themoon? Talk
> about lens flare! The only reason we can see Venus on the earth is
> because the sun is below the horizon.

Two silly Yids of a feather?
- Brad Guth

On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 21:01:30 -0800 (PST), BradGuth wrote:

> Good Christ almighty on a stick, and such a liar to boot. Do all Yids
> lie as a regular part of their incest mutated DNA code?

*yawn*

We've already got a much better troll than you here.

--
Dallas

On Dec 21, 6:01 pm, BradGuth > wrote:
> On Dec 18, 5:58 pm, WingFlaps > wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Dec 19, 12:44 pm, BradGuth > wrote:
>
> > > On Dec 18, 2:37 pm, "gatt" > wrote:
>
> > > > "BradGuth" > wrote in message
>
> > > > news:453d3e93-7e2d-4e4f-b1ed-
>
> > > > > Why was that NASA/Apollomoonnever once as having been recorded by
> > > > > those unfiltered optics and upon such gamma/X-ray sensitive film as
> > > > > depicting thatmoonas not hardly the least bit physically dark or
> > > > > much less of any bluish tint, or anything the least bit like the blue/
> > > > > purple saturated hue of what those missions of Japan and China are
> > > > > recording?
>
> > > > Another literary masterpiece.
>
> > > > The authority on this subject is MXManiac. Why don't you two start a thread
> > > > about it?
>
> > > > > Are those Third Reich and apparently MI5 Jews in charge of our
> > > > > mutually perpetrated cold-war, and of pulling off that hocus-pocus
> > > > > space race, actually still that deathly afraid of sharing the truth?
> > > > > (apparently so)
>
> > > > > Obviously the likes of "gatt" doesn't even get it.
>
> > > > What, that the Third Reich and the Jews are hoaxing the space race?
>
> > > > Of course I get it. You're a marginally-literate usenet whackjob. AKA
> > > > "k00k"
>
> > > > -c
>
> > > See what I mean. (obviously not)
>
> > > Can you tell us where the heck NASA and their teams of Apollo folks
> > > were hiding Venus?
>
> > > Can you explain as to why the NASA/Apollomoonwasn't hardly ever
> > > physically dark or otherwise the least bit blue within any of those
> > > unfiltered Kodak moments?
> > > - Brad Guth
>
> > No hiding needed, where should Venus be? A typicalmoonexposure
> > wouldn't capture Venus as themoonsurface is too bright and the film
> > latitude too narrow. Second the hint of blue (and yellow and red) in
> > themoonis so slight you need digital photography and image
> > processing to pull it out. I know, I've done it.
>
> > Cheers
>
> Good Christ almighty on a stick, and such a liar to boot. Do all Yids
> lie as a regular part of their incest mutated DNA code?
> - Brad Guth

What a sad little man you are.

Cheers

On Dec 21, 12:51 am, WingFlaps > wrote:
> On Dec 21, 6:01 pm, BradGuth > wrote:
>
>
> > On Dec 18, 5:58 pm, WingFlaps > wrote:
>
> > > On Dec 19, 12:44 pm, BradGuth > wrote:
>
> > > > On Dec 18, 2:37 pm, "gatt" > wrote:
>
> > > > > "BradGuth" > wrote in message
>
> > > > > news:453d3e93-7e2d-4e4f-b1ed-
>
> > > > > > Why was that NASA/Apollo moon ever once as having been recorded by
> > > > > > those unfiltered optics and upon such gamma/X-ray sensitive film as
> > > > > > depicting that moon as not hardly the least bit physically dark or
> > > > > > much less of any bluish tint, or anything the least bit like the blue/
> > > > > > purple saturated hue of what those missions of Japan and China are
> > > > > > recording?
>
> > > > > Another literary masterpiece.
>
> > > > > The authority on this subject is MXManiac. Why don't you two start a thread
> > > > > about it?
>
> > > > > > Are those Third Reich and apparently MI5 Jews in charge of our
> > > > > > mutually perpetrated cold-war, and of pulling off that hocus-pocus
> > > > > > space race, actually still that deathly afraid of sharing the truth?
> > > > > > (apparently so)
>
> > > > > > Obviously the likes of "gatt" doesn't even get it.
>
> > > > > What, that the Third Reich and the Jews are hoaxing the space race?
>
> > > > > Of course I get it. You're a marginally-literate usenet whackjob. AKA
> > > > > "k00k"
>
> > > > > -c
>
> > > > See what I mean. (obviously not)
>
> > > > Can you tell us where the heck NASA and their teams of Apollo folks
> > > > were hiding Venus?
>
> > > > Can you explain as to why the NASA/Apollo moon wasn't hardly ever
> > > > physically dark or otherwise the least bit blue within any of those
> > > > unfiltered Kodak moments?
> > > > - Brad Guth
>
> > > No hiding needed, where should Venus be? A typical moon exposure
> > > wouldn't capture Venus as the moon surface is too bright and the film
> > > latitude too narrow. Second the hint of blue (and yellow and red) in
> > > the moon is so slight you need digital photography and image
> > > processing to pull it out. I know, I've done it.
>
> > > Cheers
>
> > Good Christ almighty on a stick, and such a liar to boot. Do all Yids
> > lie as a regular part of their incest mutated DNA code?
> > - Brad Guth
>
> What a sad little man you are.
>
> Cheers

Are you silly folks suggesting that Muslims are the ones in charge of
all the bad stuff associated with our MI5/CIA and of their NASA/Apollo
cloak and dagger fiasco of our mutually perpetrated cold war(s)?

That must also be why you pretend atheist folks keep running those key
words together with whatever adjoining words all the time. Sadly,
it's called mainstream status quo damage control.
- Brad Guth

On Dec 20, 9:35 pm, Dallas > wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 21:01:30 -0800 (PST), Brad Guth wrote:
> > Good Christ almighty on a stick, and such a liar to boot. Do all Yids
> > lie as a regular part of their incest mutated DNA code?
>
> *yawn*
>
> We've already got a much better troll than you here.
>
> --
> Dallas

Gee Whiz, why don't you folks want to keep impressing us trolls with
all of your superior expertise about our blue moon?

What's the matter with your 3D interactive orbital simulators?
- Brad Guth

BradGuth wrote:
>
> Are you silly folks suggesting that Muslims are the ones in charge of
> all the bad stuff associated with our MI5/CIA and of their NASA/Apollo
> cloak and dagger fiasco of our mutually perpetrated cold war(s)?
>
> That must also be why you pretend atheist folks keep running those key
> words together with whatever adjoining words all the time. Sadly,
> it's called mainstream status quo damage control.
> - Brad Guth

Don't you find it awkward to type while you're masterbating? I mean there
has to be some reason for the blood to drain from your little punk brain to
have these hallucinations.....
You'll go blind you know!

BradGuth wrote:

>
> Good Christ almighty on a stick, and such a liar to boot. Do all Yids
> lie as a regular part of their incest mutated DNA code?
> - Brad Guth


Yids? Really? At least you could come up with a more up-to-date way to
show that you are a racist moron.

Gig601XLBuilder > wrote:
> BradGuth wrote:

> >
> > Good Christ almighty on a stick, and such a liar to boot. Do all Yids
> > lie as a regular part of their incest mutated DNA code?
> > - Brad Guth


> Yids? Really? At least you could come up with a more up-to-date way to
> show that you are a racist moron.

Brad must have gotten tired of being spanked on sci.physics where he
is a well known babbling kook racist.

Perhaps he feels he will fair better in a group not heavy with Phd's
who pronounce him a drooling idiot.

Though it hardly takes a Phd to recognize that...


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

"BradGuth" > wrote in message news:

> Is that what Hitler's brown-nosed minions think is always the answer
> to everything that rocks your mainstream status quo boat? (drugs?)

Probably not a lot of drugs here, considering the forum.

> Why don't you just tell us why those NASA/Apollo EVA Kodak moments
> were not the least bit bluish?

LOL! It's not our job to prove your conspiracy geek theories for you, but,
I answered you previously and have no interest in repeating myself.

-c

"BradGuth" > wrote in message
news:894d9063-8e23-4f82-8641-

> Good Christ almighty on a stick,

The fact that he ended up on a "stick" is not relevant to the discussion
here.

> Do all Yids lie as a regular part of their incest mutated DNA code?

"Yids?" Is referring to somebody from New Zealand as a "yid" and then
making suggestions about incest and DNA code somehow supposed to fortify
your scientific argument, or are you just lashing out 'cause you've got
nothing left?

Which is it?

-c

"BradGuth" > wrote in message
news:d6e5c9ec-8a09-423d-9f60-

>> > Good Christ almighty on a stick, and such a liar to boot. Do all Yids
>> > lie as a regular part of their incest mutated DNA code?
>> > - Brad Guth
>>
>> What a sad little man you are.

> Are you silly folks suggesting that Muslims are the ones in charge of
> all the bad stuff associated with our MI5/CIA and of their NASA/Apollo
> cloak and dagger fiasco of our mutually perpetrated cold war(s)?

Who said anything about freakin' Muslims?!

> That must also be why you pretend atheist

Who said anything about atheists?! WTF are you talking about?!

You're flailing, man. So weakly that it's not even entertaining at this
point.

*plonk*

-c

"BradGuth" > wrote in message
news:0bbd14b3-91a4-44d4-bd57-

>> Not to mention the fact that Venus is where? CLOSE TO THE SUN!!!
>> Who is going to point their camera toward the sun on themoon? Talk
>> about lens flare! The only reason we can see Venus on the earth is
>> because the sun is below the horizon.
>
> Two silly Yids of a feather?

Attention, everybody: It has come to our attention that you have to be a
"Yid" to understand astronomy now.

Furthermore, the moon is blue. Like, uh, nickel. Or moldy cheese.

-c

Besides JAXA as having been excluding those natural color images of
our moon, is there any good technical reason(s) as to why the JAXA/
SELENE(KAGUYA) science via their "X-ray Spectrometer(XRS)" and "Gamma
Ray Spectrometer(GRS)" is being kept secret?

The Moon is not actually BLUE, except to the unfiltered eye. A good
orange/amber worth of an optical spectrum filter (as added onto their
otherwise bandpass coated lens) would have permitted a somewhat more
natural color looking moon, as though viewed from Earth by using a
quality telescope that's getting extensively filtered by our polluted
atmosphere and secondly by the rather extensive 8r(8X radius) worth of
sodium atmosphere associated with that moon.

However, it looks as though we're still being lied to again and again
by NASA's rusemasters in charge of snookering humanity for all it's
worth. In other words, it seems their MI5/CIA boss or MIB agent in
charge of damage control that's likely standing directly behind each
operator of all those spendy supercomputer work stations (with a
loaded gun pointed at each of their empty heads) is not about to allow
any public Usenet chat about our physically dark and such an unusually
blue moon, or much less about how their NASA and of those rad-hard
Apollo wizards, along with all that Semitic Third Reich kind of right
stuff as having so nicely managed to always avoid those blue saturated
hues as well as their having always hidden Venus at the same time.

JAXA / SELENE (KAGUYA)
http://www.selene.jaxa.jp/en/communication/com_information_e.htm#NEW_20071214A

Notice their intentional color removal of the moon itself, and of
those very same images as otherwise depicting mother Earth in full
color. (it's quite easy to prove this being the case)

Down on the same page are those other original full color images of
mostly the moon itself along with parts of the their spacecraft as
depicted within such a nifty bluish saturation hue. Remember that
Selene's quality optics had been custom bandpass coated in order to
cut out the vast bulk of UV and IR to start with.

The rather impressive blue saturated hue or color skewed amount of
color tint is clearly that of an expected color shift or blue
saturated image result, that's unavoidably their CCD obtained result
of the raw secondary/recoil worth of what most such reactive items as
getting UV saturated should always look like to such a bandpass
filtered CCD w/o having the necessary color correction filter, as
otherwise especially blue saturated as to that of what any unfiltered
Kodak film recorded image (via NASA/Apollo) should have depicted.

Unfortunately, the JAXA "KAGUYA Image Gallery" that's apparently
forever stuck with using the "Adobe(R) Flash Player(R)" is what
seriously sucks, as sharing far less than full resolution and
otherwise running extremely poorly on most computers w/o a super fast
internet connection and lots of extra PC memory.

The science from their "X-ray Spectrometer(XRS)" and "Gamma Ray
Spectrometer(GRS)" as likely being equally saturated at much greater
levels than expected, as such may also have to become excluded from
the general public, because of such data being so unexpectedly intense
or off-scale, in that an entirely new effort at obtaining such
intended science about the complex surface of our physically dark moon
may have to wait for the next available mission. Perhaps the lunar
exploration efforts by India will have adapted the necessary narrow
bandpass of sufficient optical spectrum filtering with sufficient
color correction, as well as for their science instruments having
either greater XRS/GRS scope or much tighter resolution in order to
properly deal with the unusual gamma and X-ray intensity of what that
naked and very anticathode moon actually represents.

KAGUYA/(SELENE) HDTV/CCD imaging getting its first full solar dosage
or skewed saturation of those pesky raw secondary photons, as for
looking rather deep blue.
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/10/20071021_kaguya_e.pdf
http://www.selene.jaxa.jp/index_e.htm
http://www.kaguya.jaxa.jp/en/
Notice as to all of the unavoidable UV secondary/recoil worth of
bluish and/or extra purple/violet saturation that KAGUYA/(SELENE) HDTV
is having to deal with, even though their having incorporated a
sufficient UV spectrum cut-off filter and currently using not more
than a few percent worth of their HDTV dynamic range(DR), even so
having no problems with recording the physically dark moon along with
Earth that's not even half the albedo worth of Venus which has greater
than 2.6 kw/m2 to work with. Far better images are soon enough going
to be accomplished, especially with those other onboard CCD
instruments that'll far exceed what most of our previous science about
our extremely unusual moon had to say.
- Brad Guth -

"gatt" > wrote:
> Furthermore, the moon is blue. Like, uh, nickel. Or moldy cheese.

You silly sod - it's not made of moldy cheese - it's probably made of Blue
Wensleydale. That's why humanity sent a man and his dog Gromit to the moon
- for the cheese!

BradGuth wrote:
>Besides JAXA as having been excluding those natural color images of
>our moon, is there any good technical reason(s) as to why the JAXA/
>SELENE(KAGUYA) science via their "X-ray Spectrometer(XRS)" and "Gamma
>Ray Spectrometer(GRS)" is being kept secret?
>

>- Brad Guth -

Nice try...you're an idiot.

and not a very good troll.

this was hilarious, thanks

--
Message posted via AviationKB.com
http://www.aviationkb.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx/aviation/200712/1

"Jim Logajan" > wrote in message
.. .
> "gatt" > wrote:
>> Furthermore, the moon is blue. Like, uh, nickel. Or moldy cheese.
>
> You silly sod - it's not made of moldy cheese - it's probably made of Blue
> Wensleydale. That's why humanity sent a man and his dog Gromit to the moon
> - for the cheese!

AHHHH, it makes so much more sense now.

-c

LOL! Rad-hard Apollo wizards, Men in Black and the "Semitic Third Reich."
Gee, that's all he had to say. I'm a total believer now. -c



"BradGuth" > wrote in message
...
> Besides JAXA as having been excluding those natural color images of
> our moon, is there any good technical reason(s) as to why the JAXA/
> SELENE(KAGUYA) science via their "X-ray Spectrometer(XRS)" and "Gamma
> Ray Spectrometer(GRS)" is being kept secret?
>
> The Moon is not actually BLUE, except to the unfiltered eye. A good
> orange/amber worth of an optical spectrum filter (as added onto their
> otherwise bandpass coated lens) would have permitted a somewhat more
> natural color looking moon, as though viewed from Earth by using a
> quality telescope that's getting extensively filtered by our polluted
> atmosphere and secondly by the rather extensive 8r(8X radius) worth of
> sodium atmosphere associated with that moon.
>
> However, it looks as though we're still being lied to again and again
> by NASA's rusemasters in charge of snookering humanity for all it's
> worth. In other words, it seems their MI5/CIA boss or MIB agent in
> charge of damage control that's likely standing directly behind each
> operator of all those spendy supercomputer work stations (with a
> loaded gun pointed at each of their empty heads) is not about to allow
> any public Usenet chat about our physically dark and such an unusually
> blue moon, or much less about how their NASA and of those rad-hard
> Apollo wizards, along with all that Semitic Third Reich kind of right
> stuff as having so nicely managed to always avoid those blue saturated
> hues as well as their having always hidden Venus at the same time.
>
> JAXA / SELENE (KAGUYA)
> http://www.selene.jaxa.jp/en/communication/com_information_e.htm#NEW_20071214A
>
> Notice their intentional color removal of the moon itself, and of
> those very same images as otherwise depicting mother Earth in full
> color. (it's quite easy to prove this being the case)
>
> Down on the same page are those other original full color images of
> mostly the moon itself along with parts of the their spacecraft as
> depicted within such a nifty bluish saturation hue. Remember that
> Selene's quality optics had been custom bandpass coated in order to
> cut out the vast bulk of UV and IR to start with.
>
> The rather impressive blue saturated hue or color skewed amount of
> color tint is clearly that of an expected color shift or blue
> saturated image result, that's unavoidably their CCD obtained result
> of the raw secondary/recoil worth of what most such reactive items as
> getting UV saturated should always look like to such a bandpass
> filtered CCD w/o having the necessary color correction filter, as
> otherwise especially blue saturated as to that of what any unfiltered
> Kodak film recorded image (via NASA/Apollo) should have depicted.
>
> Unfortunately, the JAXA "KAGUYA Image Gallery" that's apparently
> forever stuck with using the "Adobe(R) Flash Player(R)" is what
> seriously sucks, as sharing far less than full resolution and
> otherwise running extremely poorly on most computers w/o a super fast
> internet connection and lots of extra PC memory.
>
> The science from their "X-ray Spectrometer(XRS)" and "Gamma Ray
> Spectrometer(GRS)" as likely being equally saturated at much greater
> levels than expected, as such may also have to become excluded from
> the general public, because of such data being so unexpectedly intense
> or off-scale, in that an entirely new effort at obtaining such
> intended science about the complex surface of our physically dark moon
> may have to wait for the next available mission. Perhaps the lunar
> exploration efforts by India will have adapted the necessary narrow
> bandpass of sufficient optical spectrum filtering with sufficient
> color correction, as well as for their science instruments having
> either greater XRS/GRS scope or much tighter resolution in order to
> properly deal with the unusual gamma and X-ray intensity of what that
> naked and very anticathode moon actually represents.
>
> KAGUYA/(SELENE) HDTV/CCD imaging getting its first full solar dosage
> or skewed saturation of those pesky raw secondary photons, as for
> looking rather deep blue.
> http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/10/20071021_kaguya_e.pdf
> http://www.selene.jaxa.jp/index_e.htm
> http://www.kaguya.jaxa.jp/en/
> Notice as to all of the unavoidable UV secondary/recoil worth of
> bluish and/or extra purple/violet saturation that KAGUYA/(SELENE) HDTV
> is having to deal with, even though their having incorporated a
> sufficient UV spectrum cut-off filter and currently using not more
> than a few percent worth of their HDTV dynamic range(DR), even so
> having no problems with recording the physically dark moon along with
> Earth that's not even half the albedo worth of Venus which has greater
> than 2.6 kw/m2 to work with. Far better images are soon enough going
> to be accomplished, especially with those other onboard CCD
> instruments that'll far exceed what most of our previous science about
> our extremely unusual moon had to say.
> - Brad Guth -

"Kloudy via AviationKB.com" <u33403@uwe> wrote in message
news:7d07b4aa19173@uwe...

>
> Nice try...you're an idiot.
>
> and not a very good troll.

He's not a troll, he's -dead serious- and since he used the word "Yid" and
"MIB" I totally 100% believe him now. His work here is clearly done.

-c

gatt wrote:

> "Yids?" Is referring to somebody from New Zealand as a "yid" and then
> making suggestions about incest and DNA code somehow supposed to fortify
> your scientific argument, or are you just lashing out 'cause you've got
> nothing left?
>
> Which is it?
>

Oh, if he was talking about NZers then I retract my earlier comment. ;)

Apparently the new and improved moon science via China and Japan do
not hardly exist as far as Usenet and especially the likes of NASA's
uplink.space.com firewall. Besides JAXA as having been recently
excluding those natural color images of our moon, is there any good
technical reason(s) as to why the JAXA/SELENE(KAGUYA) science via
their "X-ray Spectrometer(XRS)" and "Gamma Ray Spectrometer(GRS)" are
also being kept secret?

FYI: the Moon is not actually BLUE, except to the unfiltered eye. A
good orange/amber worth of an optical spectrum filter (as added onto
their otherwise bandpass coated lens) would have permitted a somewhat
more natural color looking moon, as though viewed from Earth by using
a quality telescope that's getting extensively filtered by our
polluted atmosphere and secondly by the rather extensive 8r(8X radius)
worth of the sodium(Na) saturated atmosphere that's associated with
our moon, of which our NASA/Apollo wizards that had to have been so
blinded by Venus, as for their having somehow missed entirely the
lunar element of sodium (Na11 solid @.97 g/cm3) that's continually
getting vaporised and leaving the moon's extremely hot surface as the
solar wind manages to create that 900,000 ~ 1,000,000 km comet like
tail of lunar Na.

However, at best it looks as though we're still being lied to again
and again by NASA's Usenet swarm of brown-nosed rusemasters in charge
of snookering humanity for all it's worth. In other words, it seems
their MI5/CIA boss or MIB agents in charge of their PR damage control
that's likely standing directly behind each operator of all those
spendy supercomputer work stations (with a loaded gun pointed at each
of their empty borg like heads) is not about to allow any public
Usenet chat about our physically dark and unusually blue moon of such
sodium, or much less share anything about how their NASA and of those
rad-hard Apollo wizards, along with all that Semitic Third Reich kind
of right stuff, as having so nicely managed via unfiltered optics to
always avoid those BLUE saturated hues as well as their having always
managed to hide Venus at the same time.

JAXA / SELENE (KAGUYA)
http://www.selene.jaxa.jp/en/communication/com_information_e.htm#NEW_20071214A

Notice their intentional color removal of the moon itself, and of
those very same images as otherwise depicting mother Earth in full
color. (it's quite easy to prove this being the case)

Down on that same page are a few of those other original full color
images of mostly the moon itself along with parts of the their
spacecraft as depicted within such a rather nifty bluish saturation
hue or tint. Remember that Selene's quality optics had been custom
bandpass coated in order to cut out the vast bulk of UV and IR to
start with, even to the point of attenuating some of the violet
spectrum.

The rather impressive blue saturated hue or color skewed amount of
bluish tint is clearly that offering an expected color shift or sort
of UV black-light forced blue saturated image result, as unavoidably
of their CCD obtained result from all the raw secondary/recoil worth
of what most such reactive items as getting UV saturated should look
like, as even to such a bandpass filtered CCD w/o having the necessary
deep color correction filter, as otherwise getting especially blue
saturated as to that of what any unfiltered Kodak film recorded image
(via NASA/Apollo) should have depicted.

Unfortunately, the JAXA "KAGUYA Image Gallery" that's apparently
forever stuck with using the "Adobe(R) Flash Player(R)" is what
seriously sucks, as sharing far less than full resolution and
otherwise running extremely poorly on most computers w/o a super fast
internet connection and having lots of extra PC memory to spare.

The science from their "X-ray Spectrometer(XRS)" and "Gamma Ray
Spectrometer(GRS)" as likely being equally saturated at much greater
levels than expected, as such may also have to become excluded from
the general public, because of such data being so unexpectedly intense
or off-scale, in that an entirely new effort at obtaining such
intended science about the complex surface of our physically dark moon
may have to wait for the next available mission. Perhaps the lunar
exploration efforts by India will have adapted the necessary narrow
bandpass of sufficient optical spectrum filtering with sufficient
color correction, as well as for their science instruments having
either greater XRS/GRS scope or much tighter resolution in order to
properly deal with the unusual gamma and X-ray intensity of what that
naked and very anticathode moon actually represents.

KAGUYA/(SELENE) HDTV/CCD imaging getting its first full solar dosage
or skewed saturation of those pesky raw secondary photons, as for
looking rather deep blue.
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/10/20071021_kaguya_e.pdf
http://www.selene.jaxa.jp/index_e.htm
http://www.kaguya.jaxa.jp/en/
Notice as to all of the unavoidable UV secondary/recoil worth of
looking bluish and/or extra purple/violet saturation that KAGUYA/
(SELENE) HDTV is having to deal with, even though their having
incorporated a sufficient UV spectrum cut-off filter and currently
using not more than a few percent worth of their HDTV dynamic
range(DR), yet having no problems with recording the physically dark
moon along with Earth that's not even worth half the albedo of Venus
which has greater than 2.6 kw/m2 of raw solar influx to work with.
Far better images are soon enough going to be accomplished, especially
with those other onboard CCD instruments that'll far exceed what most
of our previous science about our extremely unusual moon had to say.
- Brad Guth -


On Dec 14, 9:56 am, "ManhattanMan" > wrote:
> http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/
>
> Todays "Astronomy Picture Of The Day" - it changes daily so this moonscape
> is only on today Friday 12/14.
>
> Man, what a panorama!
>
> And it's not OT, as Frank Sinatra crooned, "Fly me to the moon"....
>
> Cheers'n beers.. [_])
> Don

BradGuth wrote:

>
> FYI: the Moon is not actually BLUE, except to the unfiltered eye.

Well if I put the right filter on the camera my **** can be pink.

On Dec 21, 2:40 pm, Gig601XLBuilder > wrote:
> BradGuth wrote:
>
> > FYI: the Moon is not actually BLUE, except to the unfiltered eye.
>
> Well if I put the right filter on the camera my **** can be pink.

Are you saying that China and Japan had each put blue bandpass filters
on their color cameras?
- Brad Guth -

On Dec 21, 10:45 am, "gatt" > wrote:
> "Jim Logajan" > wrote in message
>
> .. .
>
> > "gatt" > wrote:
> >> Furthermore, the moon is blue. Like, uh, nickel. Or moldy cheese.
>
> > You silly sod - it's not made of moldy cheese - it's probably made of Blue
> > Wensleydale. That's why humanity sent a man and his dog Gromit to the moon
> > - for the cheese!
>
> AHHHH, it makes so much more sense now.
>
> -c

But none of those NASA/Apollo EVAs of taking all of those unfiltered
Kodak moments and even of their more sensitive video were never
getting the least bit blue saturated. What gives?
- Brad Guth -

BradGuth > wrote:
> On Dec 21, 10:45 am, "gatt" > wrote:
>> "Jim Logajan" > wrote in message
>>
>> .. .
>>
>> > "gatt" > wrote:
>> >> Furthermore, the moon is blue. Like, uh, nickel. Or moldy
>> >> cheese.
>>
>> > You silly sod - it's not made of moldy cheese - it's probably made
>> > of Blue Wensleydale. That's why humanity sent a man and his dog
>> > Gromit to the moon - for the cheese!
>>
>> AHHHH, it makes so much more sense now.
>>
>> -c
>
> But none of those NASA/Apollo EVAs of taking all of those unfiltered
> Kodak moments and even of their more sensitive video were never
> getting the least bit blue saturated. What gives?

Brad,

The original post in this thread was technically off topic for this
forum, but the poster otherwise had good intentions and was just
providing a friendly FYI to fellow readers.

Your posts, however, are often incoherent and unclear in their intent.
They are not only off topic for this forum, they assume presumptions few
posters to this group appear to share and demand answers to questions
that none of us either care to deal with or have the expertise and
knowledge to address.

I assume (but honestly can't tell, since you fail to make explicit claims
or provide sane reasoning - you just toss out questions on off topic
subjects) you think the Apollo moon landings were faked. Even if that
were true, it has nothing to do with piloting of aircraft. And it has
nothing to do with appreciating awesome moonscapes, real or invented.
Hell, I've pointed people toward great space art by Chesley Bonestell,
all of it "fake" but nevertheless great and inspiring work.

No one here can stop you from posting, but they can stop paying
attention, and the fault for that would be with _you_ and how you present
yourself and respond to others. If your objective is to get yourself
universally ignored, you are on the right track. If your objective is
anything else, you need to rethink your entire approach.

Good luck - IMHO you'll need it.

BradGuth > wrote in news:7a965ed2-3abb-4b38-a61e-
:

> On Dec 21, 2:40 pm, Gig601XLBuilder > wrote:
>> BradGuth wrote:
>>
>> > FYI: the Moon is not actually BLUE, except to the unfiltered eye.
>>
>> Well if I put the right filter on the camera my **** can be pink.
>
> Are you saying that China and Japan had each put blue bandpass filters
> on their color cameras?
> - Brad Guth -
>

Why, do they **** pink?


Bertie

On Dec 21, 10:41 am, "Kloudy via AviationKB.com" <u33403@uwe> wrote:
> BradGuth wrote:
> >Besides JAXA as having been excluding those natural color images of
> >our moon, is there any good technical reason(s) as to why the JAXA/
> >SELENE(KAGUYA) science via their "X-ray Spectrometer(XRS)" and "Gamma
> >Ray Spectrometer(GRS)" is being kept secret?
>
> >-BradGuth-
>
> Nice try...you're an idiot.
>
> and not a very good troll.
>
> this was hilarious, thanks
>
> --
> Message posted via AviationKB.comhttp://www.aviationkb.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx/aviation/200712/1

Then where's that NASA/Apollo unfiltered Kodak moment of secondary/
recoil blue?

Or how about your sharing the other good one of where's Venus?
- Brad Guth -

On Dec 22, 4:02 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> BradGuth > wrote in news:7a965ed2-3abb-4b38-a61e-
> :
>
> > On Dec 21, 2:40 pm, Gig601XLBuilder > wrote:
> >> BradGuth wrote:
>
> >> > FYI: the Moon is not actually BLUE, except to the unfiltered eye.
>
> >> Well if I put the right filter on the camera my **** can be pink.
>
> > Are you saying that China and Japan had each put blue bandpass filters
> > on their color cameras?
> > -BradGuth-
>
> Why, do they **** pink?

Thanks for proving the obvious, that Yids of a feather flock
together.
- Brad Guth

BradGuth > wrote in news:8b969aa1-b7d9-4f71-b26b-
:

> On Dec 22, 4:02 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> BradGuth > wrote in news:7a965ed2-3abb-4b38-a61e-
>> :
>>
>> > On Dec 21, 2:40 pm, Gig601XLBuilder > wrote:
>> >> BradGuth wrote:
>>
>> >> > FYI: the Moon is not actually BLUE, except to the unfiltered eye.
>>
>> >> Well if I put the right filter on the camera my **** can be pink.
>>
>> > Are you saying that China and Japan had each put blue bandpass filters
>> > on their color cameras?
>> > -BradGuth-
>>
>> Why, do they **** pink?
>
> Thanks for proving the obvious, that Yids of a feather flock
> together.


Does this mean I have to get circumcised?


Bertie

On Dec 23, 12:22 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> > wrote in news:8b969aa1-b7d9-4f71-b26b-
> :
>
>
> > On Dec 22, 4:02 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> > wrote in news:7a965ed2-3abb-4b38-a61e-
> >> :
>
> >> > On Dec 21, 2:40 pm, Gig601XLBuilder > wrote:
> >> >>BradGuthwrote:
>
> >> >> > FYI: the Moon is not actually BLUE, except to the unfiltered eye.
>
> >> >> Well if I put the right filter on the camera my **** can be pink.
>
> >> > Are you saying that China and Japan had each put blue bandpass filters
> >> > on their color cameras?
> >> > -BradGuth-
>
> >> Why, do they **** pink?
>
> > Thanks for proving the obvious, that Yids of a feather flock
> > together.
>
> Does this mean I have to get circumcised?
>
> Bertie

If that's what it takes for the likes of yourself to tell us why
nothing of our NASA/Apollo ever managed to look the least bit bluish
(pretty damn neat Kodak film trick with such unfiltered cameras), and
as to why the albedo vibrance of Venus was never once within sight
from any EVA or orbital FOV.

BTW, our moon's albedo on average is physically dark as an open pit
coal mine. Go figure upon which other nearly white guano moon as
having been xenon arc lamp spectrum illuminated, that our rad-hard
Apollo wizards landed upon, instead of the reactive naked surface of
iron, cobalt, sodium and titanium of such a dry and dusty moon that's
so physically dark and as such unavoidably gamma and X-ray anticathode
nasty.
- Brad Guth

BradGuth > wrote in
:

> On Dec 23, 12:22 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> > wrote in news:8b969aa1-b7d9-4f71-b26b-
>> :
>>
>>
>> > On Dec 22, 4:02 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> > wrote in news:7a965ed2-3abb-4b38-a61e-
>> >> :
>>
>> >> > On Dec 21, 2:40 pm, Gig601XLBuilder >
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >>BradGuthwrote:
>>
>> >> >> > FYI: the Moon is not actually BLUE, except to the unfiltered
>> >> >> > eye.
>>
>> >> >> Well if I put the right filter on the camera my **** can be
>> >> >> pink.
>>
>> >> > Are you saying that China and Japan had each put blue bandpass
>> >> > filters on their color cameras?
>> >> > -BradGuth-
>>
>> >> Why, do they **** pink?
>>
>> > Thanks for proving the obvious, that Yids of a feather flock
>> > together.
>>
>> Does this mean I have to get circumcised?
>>
>> Bertie
>
> If that's what it takes for the likes of yourself to tell us why
> nothing of our NASA/Apollo ever managed to look the least bit bluish
> (pretty damn neat Kodak film trick with such unfiltered cameras), and
> as to why the albedo vibrance of Venus was never once within sight
> from any EVA or orbital FOV.


Well, I don;t think circumcisn would help with that. Anything else
jewish I can do to augment my comprehension of the universe and
photography?

>
> BTW, our moon's albedo on average is physically dark as an open pit
> coal mine. Go figure upon which other nearly white guano moon as
> having been xenon arc lamp spectrum illuminated, that our rad-hard
> Apollo wizards landed upon, instead of the reactive naked surface of
> iron, cobalt, sodium and titanium of such a dry and dusty moon that's
> so physically dark and as such unavoidably gamma and X-ray anticathode
> nasty.

I thought they landed on the Ementhal part.


Bertie

BradGuth > wrote in
:

> On Dec 21, 10:41 am, "Kloudy via AviationKB.com" <u33403@uwe> wrote:
>> BradGuth wrote:
>> >Besides JAXA as having been excluding those natural color images of
>> >our moon, is there any good technical reason(s) as to why the JAXA/
>> >SELENE(KAGUYA) science via their "X-ray Spectrometer(XRS)" and
>> >"Gamma Ray Spectrometer(GRS)" is being kept secret?
>>
>> >-BradGuth-
>>
>> Nice try...you're an idiot.
>>
>> and not a very good troll.
>>
>> this was hilarious, thanks
>>
>> --
>> Message posted via
>> AviationKB.comhttp://www.aviationkb.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx/aviation/20071
>> 2/1
>
> Then where's that NASA/Apollo unfiltered Kodak moment of secondary/
> recoil blue?
>
> Or how about your sharing the other good one of where's Venus?


Wasn't that an episode of Fireball XL5?


Bertie

"gatt" > wrote in
:

>
> "Kloudy via AviationKB.com" <u33403@uwe> wrote in message
> news:7d07b4aa19173@uwe...
>
>>
>> Nice try...you're an idiot.
>>
>> and not a very good troll.
>
> He's not a troll, he's -dead serious- and since he used the word "Yid"
> and "MIB" I totally 100% believe him now. His work here is clearly
> done.


I beg to differ. I think he's only just begun..


Bertie

BradGuth > wrote in
:

> On Dec 21, 12:51 am, WingFlaps > wrote:
>> On Dec 21, 6:01 pm, BradGuth > wrote:
>>
>>
>> > On Dec 18, 5:58 pm, WingFlaps > wrote:
>>
>> > > On Dec 19, 12:44 pm, BradGuth > wrote:
>>
>> > > > On Dec 18, 2:37 pm, "gatt" > wrote:
>>
>> > > > > "BradGuth" > wrote in message
>>
>> > > > > news:453d3e93-7e2d-4e4f-b1ed-
>>
>> > > > > > Why was that NASA/Apollo moon ever once as having been
>> > > > > > recorded by those unfiltered optics and upon such
>> > > > > > gamma/X-ray sensitive film as depicting that moon as not
>> > > > > > hardly the least bit physically dark or much less of any
>> > > > > > bluish tint, or anything the least bit like the blue/
>> > > > > > purple saturated hue of what those missions of Japan and
>> > > > > > China are recording?
>>
>> > > > > Another literary masterpiece.
>>
>> > > > > The authority on this subject is MXManiac. Why don't you two
>> > > > > start a thread about it?
>>
>> > > > > > Are those Third Reich and apparently MI5 Jews in charge of
>> > > > > > our mutually perpetrated cold-war, and of pulling off that
>> > > > > > hocus-pocus space race, actually still that deathly afraid
>> > > > > > of sharing the truth? (apparently so)
>>
>> > > > > > Obviously the likes of "gatt" doesn't even get it.
>>
>> > > > > What, that the Third Reich and the Jews are hoaxing the space
>> > > > > race?
>>
>> > > > > Of course I get it. You're a marginally-literate usenet
>> > > > > whackjob. AKA "k00k"
>>
>> > > > > -c
>>
>> > > > See what I mean. (obviously not)
>>
>> > > > Can you tell us where the heck NASA and their teams of Apollo
>> > > > folks were hiding Venus?
>>
>> > > > Can you explain as to why the NASA/Apollo moon wasn't hardly
>> > > > ever physically dark or otherwise the least bit blue within any
>> > > > of those unfiltered Kodak moments?
>> > > > - Brad Guth
>>
>> > > No hiding needed, where should Venus be? A typical moon exposure
>> > > wouldn't capture Venus as the moon surface is too bright and the
>> > > film latitude too narrow. Second the hint of blue (and yellow
>> > > and red) in the moon is so slight you need digital photography
>> > > and image processing to pull it out. I know, I've done it.
>>
>> > > Cheers
>>
>> > Good Christ almighty on a stick, and such a liar to boot. Do all
>> > Yids lie as a regular part of their incest mutated DNA code?
>> > - Brad Guth
>>
>> What a sad little man you are.
>>
>> Cheers
>
> Are you silly folks suggesting that Muslims are the ones in charge of
> all the bad stuff associated with our MI5/CIA and of their NASA/Apollo
> cloak and dagger fiasco of our mutually perpetrated cold war(s)?


Silly folks!

Everyone know that the Juwes are the men that will not be blamed for
nothing.

>
> That must also be why you pretend atheist folks keep running those key
> words together with whatever adjoining words all the time.


I'm not a prtend atheist. You made me Jewish, remember? I'm taking that
seriously and ordering a Buick this afternoon.

> Sadly, it's called mainstream status quo damage control.

Yes, so I've heard. I hate Status Quo anyway. They slid downhill fast after
"Pictures of matchstick men"

Bertie

BradGuth > wrote in
:

> Is that what Hitler's brown-nosed minions think is always the answer
> to everything that rocks your mainstream status quo boat? (drugs?)


Obviously you don;t feel the need for drugs. I agree, you don't need them.
Not one little bit.


>
> Why don't you just tell us why those NASA/Apollo EVA Kodak moments
> were not the least bit bluish?


BB King wasn't available?


Bertie

On Dec 23, 3:37 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> > wrote :
>
>
>
> > On Dec 23, 12:22 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> > wrote in news:8b969aa1-b7d9-4f71-b26b-
> >> :
>
> >> > On Dec 22, 4:02 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> > wrote in news:7a965ed2-3abb-4b38-a61e-
> >> >> :
>
> >> >> > On Dec 21, 2:40 pm, Gig601XLBuilder >
> >> >> > wrote:
> >> >> >>BradGuthwrote:
>
> >> >> >> > FYI: the Moon is not actually BLUE, except to the unfiltered
> >> >> >> > eye.
>
> >> >> >> Well if I put the right filter on the camera my **** can be
> >> >> >> pink.
>
> >> >> > Are you saying that China and Japan had each put blue bandpass
> >> >> > filters on their color cameras?
> >> >> > -BradGuth-
>
> >> >> Why, do they **** pink?
>
> >> > Thanks for proving the obvious, that Yids of a feather flock
> >> > together.
>
> >> Does this mean I have to get circumcised?
>
> >> Bertie
>
> > If that's what it takes for the likes of yourself to tell us why
> > nothing of our NASA/Apollo ever managed to look the least bit bluish
> > (pretty damn neat Kodak film trick with such unfiltered cameras), and
> > as to why the albedo vibrance of Venus was never once within sight
> > from any EVA or orbital FOV.
>
> Well, I don;t think circumcisn would help with that. Anything else
> jewish I can do to augment my comprehension of the universe and
> photography?
>
>
>
> > BTW, our moon's albedo on average is physically dark as an open pit
> > coal mine. Go figure upon which other nearly white guano moon as
> > having been xenon arc lamp spectrum illuminated, that our rad-hard
> > Apollo wizards landed upon, instead of the reactive naked surface of
> > iron, cobalt, sodium and titanium of such a dry and dusty moon that's
> > so physically dark and as such unavoidably gamma and X-ray anticathode
> > nasty.
>
> I thought they landed on the Ementhal part.
>
> Bertie

On average the moon's rather dim albedo of 0.11 is much like
terrestrial coal at 0.1, which means that if some of that moon is
worth 0.33, whereas other sooty near black basalt portions of less
than 0.05 must also exist, as in fact they each do exist. However,
nothing of our moon is ever going to represent itself as 0.75,
especially at the incoming angle of that morning sun unless you are
looking nearly directly towards the sun and without using a polarized
lens element for cutting the solar glare that's coming off that
physically dark surface.

There was no lunar aluminum, salts or even metallic sodium within
those supposed soil samples. Go figure.
- Brad Guth

On Dec 22, 12:49 pm, Jim Logajan > wrote:
> > wrote:
> > On Dec 21, 10:45 am, "gatt" > wrote:
> >> "Jim Logajan" > wrote in message
>
> .. .
>
> >> > "gatt" > wrote:
> >> >> Furthermore, the moon is blue. Like, uh, nickel. Or moldy
> >> >> cheese.
>
> >> > You silly sod - it's not made of moldy cheese - it's probably made
> >> > of Blue Wensleydale. That's why humanity sent a man and his dog
> >> > Gromit to the moon - for the cheese!
>
> >> AHHHH, it makes so much more sense now.
>
> >> -c
>
> > But none of those NASA/Apollo EVAs of taking all of those unfiltered
> > Kodak moments and even of their more sensitive video were never
> > getting the least bit blue saturated. What gives?
>
> Brad,
>
> The original post in this thread was technically off topic for this
> forum, but the poster otherwise had good intentions and was just
> providing a friendly FYI to fellow readers.

I suppose if his being yet another status quo or bust kind of
rusemaster is what makes you silly folks happy campers, then so be it.

>
> Your posts, however, are often incoherent and unclear in their intent.

My intent has always been clear, at least to an honestly open mindset
without the brown-nose status quo as so many of you folks seem to
always have.

>
> They are not only off topic for this forum, they assume presumptions few
> posters to this group appear to share and demand answers to questions
> that none of us either care to deal with or have the expertise and
> knowledge to address.

Now you're claiming as not being so all-knowing, but will gladly robo
defend the actions of others just because they're part of your pretend
atheism. Isn't that exactly what the likes of Hitler and even that of
our resident LLPOF warlord(GW Bush) counted on, and for the most part
got?

>
> I assume (but honestly can't tell, since you fail to make explicit claims
> or provide sane reasoning - you just toss out questions on off topic
> subjects) you think the Apollo moon landings were faked. Even if that
> were true, it has nothing to do with piloting of aircraft. And it has
> nothing to do with appreciating awesome moonscapes, real or invented.
> Hell, I've pointed people toward great space art by Chesley Bonestell,
> all of it "fake" but nevertheless great and inspiring work.

Again, if such bogus eye-candy is your hocus-pocus thing, then so be
it, but do not keep selling it as even remotely representing the NASA/
Apollo truth.

>
> No one here can stop you from posting, but they can stop paying
> attention, and the fault for that would be with _you_ and how you present
> yourself and respond to others. If your objective is to get yourself
> universally ignored, you are on the right track. If your objective is
> anything else, you need to rethink your entire approach.
>
> Good luck - IMHO you'll need it.

You folks already know about what I've discovered of Venus that's
looking as though extremely intelligent worthy, and you folks also
know that our moon's L1 is worth trillions upon trillions to whomever
is in charge of that nifty realm, especially if there's to be any such
Clarke Station or far better that of my LSE-CM/ISS established (most
likely by China).

The matter of my having been officially ignored is not from my doings,
and the sorts of PC traumatizing via Usenet spermware/****ware that I
have to continually put up with, isn't of my doings either.
- Brad Guth

BradGuth > wrote in
:

> On Dec 23, 3:37 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> > wrote
>> innews:34d0f922-04ac-4d7c-8acf-

>> om:
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Dec 23, 12:22 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> > wrote in news:8b969aa1-b7d9-4f71-b26b-
>> >> :
>>
>> >> > On Dec 22, 4:02 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> >> > wrote in
>> >> >>news:7a965ed2-3abb-4b38-a61e-
>> >> >> :
>>
>> >> >> > On Dec 21, 2:40 pm, Gig601XLBuilder
>> >> >> > > wrote:
>> >> >> >>BradGuthwrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> > FYI: the Moon is not actually BLUE, except to the
>> >> >> >> > unfiltered eye.
>>
>> >> >> >> Well if I put the right filter on the camera my **** can be
>> >> >> >> pink.
>>
>> >> >> > Are you saying that China and Japan had each put blue
>> >> >> > bandpass filters on their color cameras?
>> >> >> > -BradGuth-
>>
>> >> >> Why, do they **** pink?
>>
>> >> > Thanks for proving the obvious, that Yids of a feather flock
>> >> > together.
>>
>> >> Does this mean I have to get circumcised?
>>
>> >> Bertie
>>
>> > If that's what it takes for the likes of yourself to tell us why
>> > nothing of our NASA/Apollo ever managed to look the least bit
>> > bluish (pretty damn neat Kodak film trick with such unfiltered
>> > cameras), and as to why the albedo vibrance of Venus was never once
>> > within sight from any EVA or orbital FOV.
>>
>> Well, I don;t think circumcisn would help with that. Anything else
>> jewish I can do to augment my comprehension of the universe and
>> photography?
>>
>>
>>
>> > BTW, our moon's albedo on average is physically dark as an open pit
>> > coal mine. Go figure upon which other nearly white guano moon as
>> > having been xenon arc lamp spectrum illuminated, that our rad-hard
>> > Apollo wizards landed upon, instead of the reactive naked surface
>> > of iron, cobalt, sodium and titanium of such a dry and dusty moon
>> > that's so physically dark and as such unavoidably gamma and X-ray
>> > anticathode nasty.
>>
>> I thought they landed on the Ementhal part.
>>
>> Bertie
>
> On average the moon's rather dim albedo of 0.11 is much like
> terrestrial coal at 0.1, which means that if some of that moon is
> worth 0.33, whereas other sooty near black basalt portions of less
> than 0.05 must also exist, as in fact they each do exist. However,
> nothing of our moon is ever going to represent itself as 0.75,
> especially at the incoming angle of that morning sun unless you are
> looking nearly directly towards the sun and without using a polarized
> lens element for cutting the solar glare that's coming off that
> physically dark surface.


Yeah, it was so obviously a fake that I sent back my Kenner junior
astronaut set.


>
> There was no lunar aluminum, salts or even metallic sodium within
> those supposed soil samples. Go figure.

It is a mystery!

Bertie
>

On Dec 23, 5:19 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> > wrote :
>
> > On Dec 23, 3:37 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> > wrote
> >> innews:34d0f922-04ac-4d7c-8acf-
>
>
>
>
>
> >> om:
>
> >> > On Dec 23, 12:22 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> > wrote in news:8b969aa1-b7d9-4f71-b26b-
> >> >> :
>
> >> >> > On Dec 22, 4:02 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> >> > wrote in
> >> >> >>news:7a965ed2-3abb-4b38-a61e-
> >> >> >> :
>
> >> >> >> > On Dec 21, 2:40 pm, Gig601XLBuilder
> >> >> >> > > wrote:
> >> >> >> >>BradGuthwrote:
>
> >> >> >> >> > FYI: the Moon is not actually BLUE, except to the
> >> >> >> >> > unfiltered eye.
>
> >> >> >> >> Well if I put the right filter on the camera my **** can be
> >> >> >> >> pink.
>
> >> >> >> > Are you saying that China and Japan had each put blue
> >> >> >> > bandpass filters on their color cameras?
> >> >> >> > -BradGuth-
>
> >> >> >> Why, do they **** pink?
>
> >> >> > Thanks for proving the obvious, that Yids of a feather flock
> >> >> > together.
>
> >> >> Does this mean I have to get circumcised?
>
> >> >> Bertie
>
> >> > If that's what it takes for the likes of yourself to tell us why
> >> > nothing of our NASA/Apollo ever managed to look the least bit
> >> > bluish (pretty damn neat Kodak film trick with such unfiltered
> >> > cameras), and as to why the albedo vibrance of Venus was never once
> >> > within sight from any EVA or orbital FOV.
>
> >> Well, I don;t think circumcisn would help with that. Anything else
> >> jewish I can do to augment my comprehension of the universe and
> >> photography?
>
> >> > BTW, our moon's albedo on average is physically dark as an open pit
> >> > coal mine. Go figure upon which other nearly white guano moon as
> >> > having been xenon arc lamp spectrum illuminated, that our rad-hard
> >> > Apollo wizards landed upon, instead of the reactive naked surface
> >> > of iron, cobalt, sodium and titanium of such a dry and dusty moon
> >> > that's so physically dark and as such unavoidably gamma and X-ray
> >> > anticathode nasty.
>
> >> I thought they landed on the Ementhal part.
>
> >> Bertie
>
> > On average the moon's rather dim albedo of 0.11 is much like
> > terrestrial coal at 0.1, which means that if some of that moon is
> > worth 0.33, whereas other sooty near black basalt portions of less
> > than 0.05 must also exist, as in fact they each do exist. However,
> > nothing of our moon is ever going to represent itself as 0.75,
> > especially at the incoming angle of that morning sun unless you are
> > looking nearly directly towards the sun and without using a polarized
> > lens element for cutting the solar glare that's coming off that
> > physically dark surface.
>
> Yeah, it was so obviously a fake that I sent back my Kenner junior
> astronaut set.
>
>
> > There was no lunar aluminum, salts or even metallic sodium within
> > those supposed soil samples. Go figure.
>
> It is a mystery!

Much the same as our mutually perpetrated cold-war(s) that wasted all
of those decades, traumatized and/or having exterminated countless
millions of mostly innocent lives and cosing us trillions per decade
in the process is still a mystery (much the same as those Muslim WMD),
isn't it.
- Brad Guth -

BradGuth > wrote in
:

> On Dec 23, 5:19 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> > wrote
>> innews:33a8e9fd-0512-4fd0-b04b-5aba94241ab9
@a35g2000prf.googlegroups.c
>> om:
>>
>> > On Dec 23, 3:37 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> > wrote
>> >> innews:34d0f922-04ac-4d7c-8acf-
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >> om:
>>
>> >> > On Dec 23, 12:22 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> >> > wrote in
>> >> >>news:8b969aa1-b7d9-4f71-b26b-
>> >> >> :
>>
>> >> >> > On Dec 22, 4:02 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> >> >> > wrote in
>> >> >> >>news:7a965ed2-3abb-4b38-a61e-
>> >> >> >> :
>>
>> >> >> >> > On Dec 21, 2:40 pm, Gig601XLBuilder
>> >> >> >> > > wrote:
>> >> >> >> >>BradGuthwrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > FYI: the Moon is not actually BLUE, except to the
>> >> >> >> >> > unfiltered eye.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> Well if I put the right filter on the camera my **** can
>> >> >> >> >> be pink.
>>
>> >> >> >> > Are you saying that China and Japan had each put blue
>> >> >> >> > bandpass filters on their color cameras?
>> >> >> >> > -BradGuth-
>>
>> >> >> >> Why, do they **** pink?
>>
>> >> >> > Thanks for proving the obvious, that Yids of a feather flock
>> >> >> > together.
>>
>> >> >> Does this mean I have to get circumcised?
>>
>> >> >> Bertie
>>
>> >> > If that's what it takes for the likes of yourself to tell us why
>> >> > nothing of our NASA/Apollo ever managed to look the least bit
>> >> > bluish (pretty damn neat Kodak film trick with such unfiltered
>> >> > cameras), and as to why the albedo vibrance of Venus was never
>> >> > once within sight from any EVA or orbital FOV.
>>
>> >> Well, I don;t think circumcisn would help with that. Anything else
>> >> jewish I can do to augment my comprehension of the universe and
>> >> photography?
>>
>> >> > BTW, our moon's albedo on average is physically dark as an open
>> >> > pit coal mine. Go figure upon which other nearly white guano
>> >> > moon as having been xenon arc lamp spectrum illuminated, that
>> >> > our rad-hard Apollo wizards landed upon, instead of the reactive
>> >> > naked surface of iron, cobalt, sodium and titanium of such a dry
>> >> > and dusty moon that's so physically dark and as such unavoidably
>> >> > gamma and X-ray anticathode nasty.
>>
>> >> I thought they landed on the Ementhal part.
>>
>> >> Bertie
>>
>> > On average the moon's rather dim albedo of 0.11 is much like
>> > terrestrial coal at 0.1, which means that if some of that moon is
>> > worth 0.33, whereas other sooty near black basalt portions of less
>> > than 0.05 must also exist, as in fact they each do exist. However,
>> > nothing of our moon is ever going to represent itself as 0.75,
>> > especially at the incoming angle of that morning sun unless you are
>> > looking nearly directly towards the sun and without using a
>> > polarized lens element for cutting the solar glare that's coming
>> > off that physically dark surface.
>>
>> Yeah, it was so obviously a fake that I sent back my Kenner junior
>> astronaut set.
>>
>>
>> > There was no lunar aluminum, salts or even metallic sodium within
>> > those supposed soil samples. Go figure.
>>
>> It is a mystery!
>
> Much the same as our mutually perpetrated cold-war(s) that wasted all
> of those decades, traumatized and/or having exterminated countless
> millions of mostly innocent lives and cosing us trillions per decade
> in the process is still a mystery (much the same as those Muslim WMD),
> isn't it.


Yes, why would they need them when they have Donor Kebabs?

It's all so obvious.


Bertie

On Dec 23, 3:49 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> > wrote :
>
>
>
> > On Dec 21, 12:51 am, WingFlaps > wrote:
> >> On Dec 21, 6:01 > wrote:
>
> >> > On Dec 18, 5:58 pm, WingFlaps > wrote:
>
> >> > > On Dec 19, 12:44 > wrote:
>
> >> > > > On Dec 18, 2:37 pm, "gatt" > wrote:
>
> >> > > > > "BradGuth" > wrote in message
>
> >> > > > > news:453d3e93-7e2d-4e4f-b1ed-
>
> >> > > > > > Why was that NASA/Apollo moon ever once as having been
> >> > > > > > recorded by those unfiltered optics and upon such
> >> > > > > > gamma/X-ray sensitive film as depicting that moon as not
> >> > > > > > hardly the least bit physically dark or much less of any
> >> > > > > > bluish tint, or anything the least bit like the blue/
> >> > > > > > purple saturated hue of what those missions of Japan and
> >> > > > > > China are recording?
>
> >> > > > > Another literary masterpiece.
>
> >> > > > > The authority on this subject is MXManiac. Why don't you two
> >> > > > > start a thread about it?
>
> >> > > > > > Are those Third Reich and apparently MI5 Jews in charge of
> >> > > > > > our mutually perpetrated cold-war, and of pulling off that
> >> > > > > > hocus-pocus space race, actually still that deathly afraid
> >> > > > > > of sharing the truth? (apparently so)
>
> >> > > > > > Obviously the likes of "gatt" doesn't even get it.
>
> >> > > > > What, that the Third Reich and the Jews are hoaxing the space
> >> > > > > race?
>
> >> > > > > Of course I get it. You're a marginally-literate usenet
> >> > > > > whackjob. AKA "k00k"
>
> >> > > > > -c
>
> >> > > > See what I mean. (obviously not)
>
> >> > > > Can you tell us where the heck NASA and their teams of Apollo
> >> > > > folks were hiding Venus?
>
> >> > > > Can you explain as to why the NASA/Apollo moon wasn't hardly
> >> > > > ever physically dark or otherwise the least bit blue within any
> >> > > > of those unfiltered Kodak moments?
> >> > > > - Brad Guth
>
> >> > > No hiding needed, where should Venus be? A typical moon exposure
> >> > > wouldn't capture Venus as the moon surface is too bright and the
> >> > > film latitude too narrow. Second the hint of blue (and yellow
> >> > > and red) in the moon is so slight you need digital photography
> >> > > and image processing to pull it out. I know, I've done it.
>
> >> > > Cheers
>
> >> > Good Christ almighty on a stick, and such a liar to boot. Do all
> >> > Yids lie as a regular part of their incest mutated DNA code?
> >> > - Brad Guth
>
> >> What a sad little man you are.
>
> >> Cheers
>
> > Are you silly folks suggesting that Muslims are the ones in charge of
> > all the bad stuff associated with our MI5/CIA and of their NASA/Apollo
> > cloak and dagger fiasco of our mutually perpetrated cold war(s)?
>
> Silly folks!
>
> Everyone know that the Juwes are the men that will not be blamed for
> nothing.

Apparently there's no such thing as a bad Juwe.

>
> > That must also be why you pretend atheist folks keep running those key
> > words together with whatever adjoining words all the time.
>
> I'm not a prtend atheist. You made me Jewish, remember? I'm taking that
> seriously and ordering a Buick this afternoon.
>
> > Sadly, it's called mainstream status quo damage control.
>
> Yes, so I've heard. I hate Status Quo anyway. They slid downhill fast after
> "Pictures of matchstick men"
>
> Bertie

Some folks in this anti-think-tank of Usenet naysayland are without
remorse, especially of those going along with their own kind having
put Christ on a stick for that faith-based PR stunt.
- Brad Guth -

BradGuth > wrote in
:

> On Dec 23, 3:49 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> > wrote
>> innews:d6e5c9ec-8a09-423d-9f60-b90113deb910
@d4g2000prg.googlegroups.co
>> m:
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Dec 21, 12:51 am, WingFlaps > wrote:
>> >> On Dec 21, 6:01 > wrote:
>>
>> >> > On Dec 18, 5:58 pm, WingFlaps > wrote:
>>
>> >> > > On Dec 19, 12:44 > wrote:
>>
>> >> > > > On Dec 18, 2:37 pm, "gatt" > wrote:
>>
>> >> > > > > "BradGuth" > wrote in message
>>
>> >> > > > > news:453d3e93-7e2d-4e4f-b1ed-
>>
>> >> > > > > > Why was that NASA/Apollo moon ever once as having been
>> >> > > > > > recorded by those unfiltered optics and upon such
>> >> > > > > > gamma/X-ray sensitive film as depicting that moon as not
>> >> > > > > > hardly the least bit physically dark or much less of any
>> >> > > > > > bluish tint, or anything the least bit like the blue/
>> >> > > > > > purple saturated hue of what those missions of Japan and
>> >> > > > > > China are recording?
>>
>> >> > > > > Another literary masterpiece.
>>
>> >> > > > > The authority on this subject is MXManiac. Why don't you
>> >> > > > > two start a thread about it?
>>
>> >> > > > > > Are those Third Reich and apparently MI5 Jews in charge
>> >> > > > > > of our mutually perpetrated cold-war, and of pulling off
>> >> > > > > > that hocus-pocus space race, actually still that deathly
>> >> > > > > > afraid of sharing the truth? (apparently so)
>>
>> >> > > > > > Obviously the likes of "gatt" doesn't even get it.
>>
>> >> > > > > What, that the Third Reich and the Jews are hoaxing the
>> >> > > > > space race?
>>
>> >> > > > > Of course I get it. You're a marginally-literate usenet
>> >> > > > > whackjob. AKA "k00k"
>>
>> >> > > > > -c
>>
>> >> > > > See what I mean. (obviously not)
>>
>> >> > > > Can you tell us where the heck NASA and their teams of
>> >> > > > Apollo folks were hiding Venus?
>>
>> >> > > > Can you explain as to why the NASA/Apollo moon wasn't hardly
>> >> > > > ever physically dark or otherwise the least bit blue within
>> >> > > > any of those unfiltered Kodak moments?
>> >> > > > - Brad Guth
>>
>> >> > > No hiding needed, where should Venus be? A typical moon
>> >> > > exposure wouldn't capture Venus as the moon surface is too
>> >> > > bright and the film latitude too narrow. Second the hint of
>> >> > > blue (and yellow and red) in the moon is so slight you need
>> >> > > digital photography and image processing to pull it out. I
>> >> > > know, I've done it.
>>
>> >> > > Cheers
>>
>> >> > Good Christ almighty on a stick, and such a liar to boot. Do
>> >> > all Yids lie as a regular part of their incest mutated DNA code?
>> >> > - Brad Guth
>>
>> >> What a sad little man you are.
>>
>> >> Cheers
>>
>> > Are you silly folks suggesting that Muslims are the ones in charge
>> > of all the bad stuff associated with our MI5/CIA and of their
>> > NASA/Apollo cloak and dagger fiasco of our mutually perpetrated
>> > cold war(s)?
>>
>> Silly folks!
>>
>> Everyone know that the Juwes are the men that will not be blamed for
>> nothing.
>
> Apparently there's no such thing as a bad Juwe.


Do you even know what one is?


>
>>
>> > That must also be why you pretend atheist folks keep running those
>> > key words together with whatever adjoining words all the time.
>>
>> I'm not a prtend atheist. You made me Jewish, remember? I'm taking
>> that seriously and ordering a Buick this afternoon.
>>
>> > Sadly, it's called mainstream status quo damage control.
>>
>> Yes, so I've heard. I hate Status Quo anyway. They slid downhill fast
>> after "Pictures of matchstick men"
>>
>> Bertie
>
> Some folks in this anti-think-tank of Usenet naysayland are without
> remorse, especially of those going along with their own kind having
> put Christ on a stick for that faith-based PR stunt.


The *******s.


Bertie

On Dec 23, 6:03 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> BradGuth > wrote :
>
> > On Dec 23, 3:49 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> > wrote
> >> innews:d6e5c9ec-8a09-423d-9f60-b90113deb910
>
> @d4g2000prg.googlegroups.co
>
>
>
> >> m:
>
> >> > On Dec 21, 12:51 am, WingFlaps > wrote:
> >> >> On Dec 21, 6:01 > wrote:
>
> >> >> > On Dec 18, 5:58 pm, WingFlaps > wrote:
>
> >> >> > > On Dec 19, 12:44 > wrote:
>
> >> >> > > > On Dec 18, 2:37 pm, "gatt" > wrote:
>
> >> >> > > > > "BradGuth" > wrote in message
>
> >> >> > > > > news:453d3e93-7e2d-4e4f-b1ed-
>
> >> >> > > > > > Why was that NASA/Apollo moon ever once as having been
> >> >> > > > > > recorded by those unfiltered optics and upon such
> >> >> > > > > > gamma/X-ray sensitive film as depicting that moon as not
> >> >> > > > > > hardly the least bit physically dark or much less of any
> >> >> > > > > > bluish tint, or anything the least bit like the blue/
> >> >> > > > > > purple saturated hue of what those missions of Japan and
> >> >> > > > > > China are recording?
>
> >> >> > > > > Another literary masterpiece.
>
> >> >> > > > > The authority on this subject is MXManiac. Why don't you
> >> >> > > > > two start a thread about it?
>
> >> >> > > > > > Are those Third Reich and apparently MI5 Jews in charge
> >> >> > > > > > of our mutually perpetrated cold-war, and of pulling off
> >> >> > > > > > that hocus-pocus space race, actually still that deathly
> >> >> > > > > > afraid of sharing the truth? (apparently so)
>
> >> >> > > > > > Obviously the likes of "gatt" doesn't even get it.
>
> >> >> > > > > What, that the Third Reich and the Jews are hoaxing the
> >> >> > > > > space race?
>
> >> >> > > > > Of course I get it. You're a marginally-literate usenet
> >> >> > > > > whackjob. AKA "k00k"
>
> >> >> > > > > -c
>
> >> >> > > > See what I mean. (obviously not)
>
> >> >> > > > Can you tell us where the heck NASA and their teams of
> >> >> > > > Apollo folks were hiding Venus?
>
> >> >> > > > Can you explain as to why the NASA/Apollo moon wasn't hardly
> >> >> > > > ever physically dark or otherwise the least bit blue within
> >> >> > > > any of those unfiltered Kodak moments?
> >> >> > > > - Brad Guth
>
> >> >> > > No hiding needed, where should Venus be? A typical moon
> >> >> > > exposure wouldn't capture Venus as the moon surface is too
> >> >> > > bright and the film latitude too narrow. Second the hint of
> >> >> > > blue (and yellow and red) in the moon is so slight you need
> >> >> > > digital photography and image processing to pull it out. I
> >> >> > > know, I've done it.
>
> >> >> > > Cheers
>
> >> >> > Good Christ almighty on a stick, and such a liar to boot. Do
> >> >> > all Yids lie as a regular part of their incest mutated DNA code?
> >> >> > - Brad Guth
>
> >> >> What a sad little man you are.
>
> >> >> Cheers
>
> >> > Are you silly folks suggesting that Muslims are the ones in charge
> >> > of all the bad stuff associated with our MI5/CIA and of their
> >> > NASA/Apollo cloak and dagger fiasco of our mutually perpetrated
> >> > cold war(s)?
>
> >> Silly folks!
>
> >> Everyone know that the Juwes are the men that will not be blamed for
> >> nothing.
>
> > Apparently there's no such thing as a bad Juwe.
>
> Do you even know what one is?

Unlike yourself that obviously can't tell the difference between
absolute infomercial crapolla and yet another infowar spewed cesspool
of lies upon lies, whereas YES I can tell the difference between those
few bad Jews and of all those other mostly good Jews that would not
hurt a Muslim fly, though too bad for humanity and our environment
that their Zion orchestrated religion is what forbids policing their
own kind.
- Brad Guth

On Dec 21, 9:12 am, "gatt" > wrote:
> "BradGuth" > wrote in message news:
> > Is that what Hitler's brown-nosed minions think is always the answer
> > to everything that rocks your mainstream status quo boat? (drugs?)
>
> Probably not a lot of drugs here, considering the forum.
>
> > Why don't you just tell us why those NASA/Apollo EVA Kodak moments
> > were not the least bit bluish?
>
> LOL! It's not our job to prove your conspiracy geek theories for you, but,
> I answered you previously and have no interest in repeating myself.
>
> -c

Sorry to hear that you're such a lost cause.
- Brad Guth

On Dec 23, 3:51 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> BradGuth > wrote :
>
> > Is that what Hitler's brown-nosed minions think is always the answer
> > to everything that rocks your mainstream status quo boat? (drugs?)
>
> Obviously you don;t feel the need for drugs. I agree, you don't need them.
> Not one little bit.
>
> > Why don't you just tell us why those NASA/Apollo EVA Kodak moments
> > were not the least bit bluish?
>
> BB King wasn't available?
>
> Bertie

No wonder we're headed for WWIII. Remember that it was folks exactly
like your mindset that made it so entirely possible for the extent of
what Hitler accomplished.
- Brad Guth

On Dec 23, 5:54 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> BradGuth > wrote :
>
> > On Dec 23, 5:19 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> > wrote
> >> innews:33a8e9fd-0512-4fd0-b04b-5aba94241ab9
>
> @a35g2000prf.googlegroups.c
>
>
>
> >> om:
>
> >> > On Dec 23, 3:37 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> > wrote
> >> >> innews:34d0f922-04ac-4d7c-8acf-
>
> >>
>
> >> >> om:
>
> >> >> > On Dec 23, 12:22 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> >> > wrote in
> >> >> >>news:8b969aa1-b7d9-4f71-b26b-
> >> >> >> :
>
> >> >> >> > On Dec 22, 4:02 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> >> >> > wrote in
> >> >> >> >>news:7a965ed2-3abb-4b38-a61e-
> >> >> >> >> :
>
> >> >> >> >> > On Dec 21, 2:40 pm, Gig601XLBuilder
> >> >> >> >> > > wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >>BradGuthwrote:
>
> >> >> >> >> >> > FYI: the Moon is not actually BLUE, except to the
> >> >> >> >> >> > unfiltered eye.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> Well if I put the right filter on the camera my **** can
> >> >> >> >> >> be pink.
>
> >> >> >> >> > Are you saying that China and Japan had each put blue
> >> >> >> >> > bandpass filters on their color cameras?
> >> >> >> >> > -BradGuth-
>
> >> >> >> >> Why, do they **** pink?
>
> >> >> >> > Thanks for proving the obvious, that Yids of a feather flock
> >> >> >> > together.
>
> >> >> >> Does this mean I have to get circumcised?
>
> >> >> >> Bertie
>
> >> >> > If that's what it takes for the likes of yourself to tell us why
> >> >> > nothing of our NASA/Apollo ever managed to look the least bit
> >> >> > bluish (pretty damn neat Kodak film trick with such unfiltered
> >> >> > cameras), and as to why the albedo vibrance of Venus was never
> >> >> > once within sight from any EVA or orbital FOV.
>
> >> >> Well, I don;t think circumcisn would help with that. Anything else
> >> >> jewish I can do to augment my comprehension of the universe and
> >> >> photography?
>
> >> >> > BTW, our moon's albedo on average is physically dark as an open
> >> >> > pit coal mine. Go figure upon which other nearly white guano
> >> >> > moon as having been xenon arc lamp spectrum illuminated, that
> >> >> > our rad-hard Apollo wizards landed upon, instead of the reactive
> >> >> > naked surface of iron, cobalt, sodium and titanium of such a dry
> >> >> > and dusty moon that's so physically dark and as such unavoidably
> >> >> > gamma and X-ray anticathode nasty.
>
> >> >> I thought they landed on the Ementhal part.
>
> >> >> Bertie
>
> >> > On average the moon's rather dim albedo of 0.11 is much like
> >> > terrestrial coal at 0.1, which means that if some of that moon is
> >> > worth 0.33, whereas other sooty near black basalt portions of less
> >> > than 0.05 must also exist, as in fact they each do exist. However,
> >> > nothing of our moon is ever going to represent itself as 0.75,
> >> > especially at the incoming angle of that morning sun unless you are
> >> > looking nearly directly towards the sun and without using a
> >> > polarized lens element for cutting the solar glare that's coming
> >> > off that physically dark surface.
>
> >> Yeah, it was so obviously a fake that I sent back my Kenner junior
> >> astronaut set.
>
> >> > There was no lunar aluminum, salts or even metallic sodium within
> >> > those supposed soil samples. Go figure.
>
> >> It is a mystery!
>
> > Much the same as our mutually perpetrated cold-war(s) that wasted all
> > of those decades, traumatized and/or having exterminated countless
> > millions of mostly innocent lives and cosing us trillions per decade
> > in the process is still a mystery (much the same as those Muslim WMD),
> > isn't it.
>
> Yes, why would they need them when they have Donor Kebabs?
>
> It's all so obvious.
>
> Bertie

Have you gone and lost your little MI5/CIA clown car again?
- Brad Guth

On Dec 23, 3:39 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> "gatt" > wrote :
>
>
>
> > "Kloudy via AviationKB.com" <u33403@uwe> wrote in message
> >news:7d07b4aa19173@uwe...
>
> >> Nice try...you're an idiot.
>
> >> and not a very good troll.
>
> > He's not a troll, he's -dead serious- and since he used the word "Yid"
> > and "MIB" I totally 100% believe him now. His work here is clearly
> > done.
>
> I beg to differ. I think he's only just begun..
>
> Bertie

Thank God there are far more good than bad Yids, as otherwise we'd be
looking at WWIV by now. However, those pesky MI5/CIA as MIB spooks
and moles are doing their level Skull and Bones best at punching up
global inflation while getting us into WWIII.

On the other hand, do you really think the mostly Semitic Third Reich
is dead and gone?
- Brad Guth

BradGuth > wrote in
:

> On Dec 23, 5:54 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> BradGuth > wrote
>> innews:a9fd7526-c557-4250-a012-

>> om:
>>
>> > On Dec 23, 5:19 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> >> > wrote
>> >> innews:33a8e9fd-0512-4fd0-b04b-5aba94241ab9
>>
>> @a35g2000prf.googlegroups.c
>>
>>
>>
>> >> om:
>>
>> >> > On Dec 23, 3:37 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> >> > wrote
>> >> >> innews:34d0f922-04ac-4d7c-8acf-
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >> >> om:
>>
>> >> >> > On Dec 23, 12:22 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> >> >> > wrote in
>> >> >> >>news:8b969aa1-b7d9-4f71-b26b-
>> >> >> >> :
>>
>> >> >> >> > On Dec 22, 4:02 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> >> >> >> > wrote in
>> >> >> >> >>news:7a965ed2-3abb-4b38-a61e-
>> >> >> >> >> :
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > On Dec 21, 2:40 pm, Gig601XLBuilder
>> >> >> >> >> > > wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >>BradGuthwrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > FYI: the Moon is not actually BLUE, except to the
>> >> >> >> >> >> > unfiltered eye.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> Well if I put the right filter on the camera my ****
>> >> >> >> >> >> can be pink.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > Are you saying that China and Japan had each put blue
>> >> >> >> >> > bandpass filters on their color cameras?
>> >> >> >> >> > -BradGuth-
>>
>> >> >> >> >> Why, do they **** pink?
>>
>> >> >> >> > Thanks for proving the obvious, that Yids of a feather
>> >> >> >> > flock together.
>>
>> >> >> >> Does this mean I have to get circumcised?
>>
>> >> >> >> Bertie
>>
>> >> >> > If that's what it takes for the likes of yourself to tell us
>> >> >> > why nothing of our NASA/Apollo ever managed to look the least
>> >> >> > bit bluish (pretty damn neat Kodak film trick with such
>> >> >> > unfiltered cameras), and as to why the albedo vibrance of
>> >> >> > Venus was never once within sight from any EVA or orbital
>> >> >> > FOV.
>>
>> >> >> Well, I don;t think circumcisn would help with that. Anything
>> >> >> else jewish I can do to augment my comprehension of the
>> >> >> universe and photography?
>>
>> >> >> > BTW, our moon's albedo on average is physically dark as an
>> >> >> > open pit coal mine. Go figure upon which other nearly white
>> >> >> > guano moon as having been xenon arc lamp spectrum
>> >> >> > illuminated, that our rad-hard Apollo wizards landed upon,
>> >> >> > instead of the reactive naked surface of iron, cobalt, sodium
>> >> >> > and titanium of such a dry and dusty moon that's so
>> >> >> > physically dark and as such unavoidably gamma and X-ray
>> >> >> > anticathode nasty.
>>
>> >> >> I thought they landed on the Ementhal part.
>>
>> >> >> Bertie
>>
>> >> > On average the moon's rather dim albedo of 0.11 is much like
>> >> > terrestrial coal at 0.1, which means that if some of that moon
>> >> > is worth 0.33, whereas other sooty near black basalt portions of
>> >> > less than 0.05 must also exist, as in fact they each do exist.
>> >> > However, nothing of our moon is ever going to represent itself
>> >> > as 0.75, especially at the incoming angle of that morning sun
>> >> > unless you are looking nearly directly towards the sun and
>> >> > without using a polarized lens element for cutting the solar
>> >> > glare that's coming off that physically dark surface.
>>
>> >> Yeah, it was so obviously a fake that I sent back my Kenner junior
>> >> astronaut set.
>>
>> >> > There was no lunar aluminum, salts or even metallic sodium
>> >> > within those supposed soil samples. Go figure.
>>
>> >> It is a mystery!
>>
>> > Much the same as our mutually perpetrated cold-war(s) that wasted
>> > all of those decades, traumatized and/or having exterminated
>> > countless millions of mostly innocent lives and cosing us trillions
>> > per decade in the process is still a mystery (much the same as
>> > those Muslim WMD), isn't it.
>>
>> Yes, why would they need them when they have Donor Kebabs?
>>
>> It's all so obvious.
>>
>> Bertie
>
> Have you gone and lost your little MI5/CIA clown car again?

Nope, it's in the driveway.


Bertie

BradGuth > wrote in
:

> On Dec 23, 6:03 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> BradGuth > wrote
>> innews:a55ae1d4-c198-4105-93dc-3ca4ae02f398
@s8g2000prg.googlegroups.co
>> m:
>>
>> > On Dec 23, 3:49 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> >> > wrote
>> >> innews:d6e5c9ec-8a09-423d-9f60-b90113deb910
>>
>> @d4g2000prg.googlegroups.co
>>
>>
>>
>> >> m:
>>
>> >> > On Dec 21, 12:51 am, WingFlaps > wrote:
>> >> >> On Dec 21, 6:01 > wrote:
>>
>> >> >> > On Dec 18, 5:58 pm, WingFlaps >
>> >> >> > wrote:
>>
>> >> >> > > On Dec 19, 12:44 > wrote:
>>
>> >> >> > > > On Dec 18, 2:37 pm, "gatt" >
>> >> >> > > > wrote:
>>
>> >> >> > > > > "BradGuth" > wrote in message
>>
>> >> >> > > > > news:453d3e93-7e2d-4e4f-b1ed-
>>
>> >> >> > > > > > Why was that NASA/Apollo moon ever once as having
>> >> >> > > > > > been recorded by those unfiltered optics and upon
>> >> >> > > > > > such gamma/X-ray sensitive film as depicting that
>> >> >> > > > > > moon as not hardly the least bit physically dark or
>> >> >> > > > > > much less of any bluish tint, or anything the least
>> >> >> > > > > > bit like the blue/ purple saturated hue of what those
>> >> >> > > > > > missions of Japan and China are recording?
>>
>> >> >> > > > > Another literary masterpiece.
>>
>> >> >> > > > > The authority on this subject is MXManiac. Why don't
>> >> >> > > > > you two start a thread about it?
>>
>> >> >> > > > > > Are those Third Reich and apparently MI5 Jews in
>> >> >> > > > > > charge of our mutually perpetrated cold-war, and of
>> >> >> > > > > > pulling off that hocus-pocus space race, actually
>> >> >> > > > > > still that deathly afraid of sharing the truth?
>> >> >> > > > > > (apparently so)
>>
>> >> >> > > > > > Obviously the likes of "gatt" doesn't even get it.
>>
>> >> >> > > > > What, that the Third Reich and the Jews are hoaxing the
>> >> >> > > > > space race?
>>
>> >> >> > > > > Of course I get it. You're a marginally-literate
>> >> >> > > > > usenet whackjob. AKA "k00k"
>>
>> >> >> > > > > -c
>>
>> >> >> > > > See what I mean. (obviously not)
>>
>> >> >> > > > Can you tell us where the heck NASA and their teams of
>> >> >> > > > Apollo folks were hiding Venus?
>>
>> >> >> > > > Can you explain as to why the NASA/Apollo moon wasn't
>> >> >> > > > hardly ever physically dark or otherwise the least bit
>> >> >> > > > blue within any of those unfiltered Kodak moments?
>> >> >> > > > - Brad Guth
>>
>> >> >> > > No hiding needed, where should Venus be? A typical moon
>> >> >> > > exposure wouldn't capture Venus as the moon surface is too
>> >> >> > > bright and the film latitude too narrow. Second the hint
>> >> >> > > of blue (and yellow and red) in the moon is so slight you
>> >> >> > > need digital photography and image processing to pull it
>> >> >> > > out. I know, I've done it.
>>
>> >> >> > > Cheers
>>
>> >> >> > Good Christ almighty on a stick, and such a liar to boot. Do
>> >> >> > all Yids lie as a regular part of their incest mutated DNA
>> >> >> > code? - Brad Guth
>>
>> >> >> What a sad little man you are.
>>
>> >> >> Cheers
>>
>> >> > Are you silly folks suggesting that Muslims are the ones in
>> >> > charge of all the bad stuff associated with our MI5/CIA and of
>> >> > their NASA/Apollo cloak and dagger fiasco of our mutually
>> >> > perpetrated cold war(s)?
>>
>> >> Silly folks!
>>
>> >> Everyone know that the Juwes are the men that will not be blamed
>> >> for nothing.
>>
>> > Apparently there's no such thing as a bad Juwe.
>>
>> Do you even know what one is?
>
> Unlike yourself that obviously can't tell the difference between
> absolute infomercial crapolla and yet another infowar spewed cesspool
> of lies upon lies, whereas YES I can tell the difference between those
> few bad Jews and of all those other mostly good Jews that would not
> hurt a Muslim fly, though too bad for humanity and our environment
> that their Zion orchestrated religion is what forbids policing their
> own kind.

Sorry, but you've tripped yourself up badly there. A Juwe is not a jew,
you rabid freeek.

Bertie

BradGuth > wrote in
:

> On Dec 23, 3:51 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> BradGuth > wrote
>>
>> om:
>>
>> > Is that what Hitler's brown-nosed minions think is always the
>> > answer to everything that rocks your mainstream status quo boat?
>> > (drugs?)
>>
>> Obviously you don;t feel the need for drugs. I agree, you don't need
>> them. Not one little bit.
>>
>> > Why don't you just tell us why those NASA/Apollo EVA Kodak moments
>> > were not the least bit bluish?
>>
>> BB King wasn't available?
>>
>> Bertie
>
> No wonder we're headed for WWIII. Remember that it was folks exactly
> like your mindset that made it so entirely possible for the extent of
> what Hitler accomplished.


My Mindset?


Wasnb't aware that I had one.

Perhaps you had better outline me. for my own benefit, of course.


Bertie

BradGuth > wrote in
:

> On Dec 23, 3:39 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> "gatt" > wrote
>> :
>>
>>
>>
>> > "Kloudy via AviationKB.com" <u33403@uwe> wrote in message
>> >news:7d07b4aa19173@uwe...
>>
>> >> Nice try...you're an idiot.
>>
>> >> and not a very good troll.
>>
>> > He's not a troll, he's -dead serious- and since he used the word
>> > "Yid" and "MIB" I totally 100% believe him now. His work here is
>> > clearly done.
>>
>> I beg to differ. I think he's only just begun..
>>
>> Bertie
>
> Thank God there are far more good than bad Yids, as otherwise we'd be
> looking at WWIV by now. However, those pesky MI5/CIA as MIB spooks
> and moles are doing their level Skull and Bones best at punching up
> global inflation while getting us into WWIII.


Yeh, pesky MI5 CIA spooks.


Bad MI5 CIA spooks.

Naughty Mi5 CIA spooks.

>
> On the other hand, do you really think the mostly Semitic Third Reich
> is dead and gone?


Nope.


Bertie

On Dec 23, 11:02 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> > wrote :
>
>
> > On Dec 23, 3:39 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> "gatt" > wrote
> >> :
>
> >> > "Kloudy via AviationKB.com" <u33403@uwe> wrote in message
> >> >news:7d07b4aa19173@uwe...
>
> >> >> Nice try...you're an idiot.
>
> >> >> and not a very good troll.
>
> >> > He's not a troll, he's -dead serious- and since he used the word
> >> > "Yid" and "MIB" I totally 100% believe him now. His work here is
> >> > clearly done.
>
> >> I beg to differ. I think he's only just begun..
>
> >> Bertie
>
> > Thank God there are far more good than bad Yids, as otherwise we'd be
> > looking at WWIV by now. However, those pesky MI5/CIA as MIB spooks
> > and moles are doing their level Skull and Bones best at punching up
> > global inflation while getting us into WWIII.
>
> Yeh, pesky MI5 CIA spooks.
>
> Bad MI5 CIA spooks.
>
> Naughty Mi5 CIA spooks.
>
>
> > On the other hand, do you really think the mostly Semitic Third Reich
> > is dead and gone?
>
> Nope.
>
> Bertie

"Naughty Mi5 CIA spooks"

Are you playing word games? or can that reply of yours be interpreted
as your answer representing that you and I are on the same set of
tracks?

"Naughty" seems a wee bit soft for what they really are.

Besides the Pope and of his minions that didn't know squat about
physics or science, can you think of any other than Jewish faith-based
group as having assisted Hitler?
- Brad Guth

On Dec 23, 11:00 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> > wrote :
>
>
>
> > On Dec 23, 3:51 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> > wrote
> >>
> >> om:
>
> >> > Is that what Hitler's brown-nosed minions think is always the
> >> > answer to everything that rocks your mainstream status quo boat?
> >> > (drugs?)
>
> >> Obviously you don;t feel the need for drugs. I agree, you don't need
> >> them. Not one little bit.
>
> >> > Why don't you just tell us why those NASA/Apollo EVA Kodak moments
> >> > were not the least bit bluish?
>
> >> BB King wasn't available?
>
> >> Bertie
>
> > No wonder we're headed for WWIII. Remember that it was folks exactly
> > like your mindset that made it so entirely possible for the extent of
> > what Hitler accomplished.
>
> My Mindset?
>
> Wasnb't aware that I had one.
>
> Perhaps you had better outline me. for my own benefit, of course.
>
> Bertie

Can't outline a Usenet shadow.
- Brad Guth

On Dec 23, 10:59 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> > wrote :
>
> > On Dec 23, 6:03 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> > wrote
> >> innews:a55ae1d4-c198-4105-93dc-3ca4ae02f398
>
> @s8g2000prg.googlegroups.co
>
>
>
> >> m:
>
> >> > On Dec 23, 3:49 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> > wrote
> >> >> innews:d6e5c9ec-8a09-423d-9f60-b90113deb910
>
> >> @d4g2000prg.googlegroups.co
>
> >> >> m:
>
> >> >> > On Dec 21, 12:51 am, WingFlaps > wrote:
> >> >> >> On Dec 21, 6:01 > wrote:
>
> >> >> >> > On Dec 18, 5:58 pm, WingFlaps >
> >> >> >> > wrote:
>
> >> >> >> > > On Dec 19, 12:44 > wrote:
>
> >> >> >> > > > On Dec 18, 2:37 pm, "gatt" >
> >> >> >> > > > wrote:
>
> >> >> >> > > > > "BradGuth" > wrote in message
>
> >> >> >> > > > > news:453d3e93-7e2d-4e4f-b1ed-
>
> >> >> >> > > > > > Why was that NASA/Apollo moon ever once as having
> >> >> >> > > > > > been recorded by those unfiltered optics and upon
> >> >> >> > > > > > such gamma/X-ray sensitive film as depicting that
> >> >> >> > > > > > moon as not hardly the least bit physically dark or
> >> >> >> > > > > > much less of any bluish tint, or anything the least
> >> >> >> > > > > > bit like the blue/ purple saturated hue of what those
> >> >> >> > > > > > missions of Japan and China are recording?
>
> >> >> >> > > > > Another literary masterpiece.
>
> >> >> >> > > > > The authority on this subject is MXManiac. Why don't
> >> >> >> > > > > you two start a thread about it?
>
> >> >> >> > > > > > Are those Third Reich and apparently MI5 Jews in
> >> >> >> > > > > > charge of our mutually perpetrated cold-war, and of
> >> >> >> > > > > > pulling off that hocus-pocus space race, actually
> >> >> >> > > > > > still that deathly afraid of sharing the truth?
> >> >> >> > > > > > (apparently so)
>
> >> >> >> > > > > > Obviously the likes of "gatt" doesn't even get it.
>
> >> >> >> > > > > What, that the Third Reich and the Jews are hoaxing the
> >> >> >> > > > > space race?
>
> >> >> >> > > > > Of course I get it. You're a marginally-literate
> >> >> >> > > > > usenet whackjob. AKA "k00k"
>
> >> >> >> > > > > -c
>
> >> >> >> > > > See what I mean. (obviously not)
>
> >> >> >> > > > Can you tell us where the heck NASA and their teams of
> >> >> >> > > > Apollo folks were hiding Venus?
>
> >> >> >> > > > Can you explain as to why the NASA/Apollo moon wasn't
> >> >> >> > > > hardly ever physically dark or otherwise the least bit
> >> >> >> > > > blue within any of those unfiltered Kodak moments?
> >> >> >> > > > - Brad Guth
>
> >> >> >> > > No hiding needed, where should Venus be? A typical moon
> >> >> >> > > exposure wouldn't capture Venus as the moon surface is too
> >> >> >> > > bright and the film latitude too narrow. Second the hint
> >> >> >> > > of blue (and yellow and red) in the moon is so slight you
> >> >> >> > > need digital photography and image processing to pull it
> >> >> >> > > out. I know, I've done it.
>
> >> >> >> > > Cheers
>
> >> >> >> > Good Christ almighty on a stick, and such a liar to boot. Do
> >> >> >> > all Yids lie as a regular part of their incest mutated DNA
> >> >> >> > code? - Brad Guth
>
> >> >> >> What a sad little man you are.
>
> >> >> >> Cheers
>
> >> >> > Are you silly folks suggesting that Muslims are the ones in
> >> >> > charge of all the bad stuff associated with our MI5/CIA and of
> >> >> > their NASA/Apollo cloak and dagger fiasco of our mutually
> >> >> > perpetrated cold war(s)?
>
> >> >> Silly folks!
>
> >> >> Everyone know that the Juwes are the men that will not be blamed
> >> >> for nothing.
>
> >> > Apparently there's no such thing as a bad Juwe.
>
> >> Do you even know what one is?
>
> > Unlike yourself that obviously can't tell the difference between
> > absolute infomercial crapolla and yet another infowar spewed cesspool
> > of lies upon lies, whereas YES I can tell the difference between those
> > few bad Jews and of all those other mostly good Jews that would not
> > hurt a Muslim fly, though too bad for humanity and our environment
> > that their Zion orchestrated religion is what forbids policing their
> > own kind.
>
> Sorry, but you've tripped yourself up badly there. A Juwe is not a jew,
> you rabid freeek.
>
> Bertie

You like word games? (as do most spooks and moles)
- Brad Guth

On Dec 23, 10:58 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> > wrote :
>
> > On Dec 23, 5:54 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> > wrote
> >> innews:a9fd7526-c557-4250-a012-
>
>
>
>
>
> >> om:
>
> >> > On Dec 23, 5:19 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> > wrote
> >> >> innews:33a8e9fd-0512-4fd0-b04b-5aba94241ab9
>
> >> @a35g2000prf.googlegroups.c
>
> >> >> om:
>
> >> >> > On Dec 23, 3:37 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> >> > wrote
> >> >> >> innews:34d0f922-04ac-4d7c-8acf-
>
> >> >>
>
> >> >> >> om:
>
> >> >> >> > On Dec 23, 12:22 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> >> >> > wrote in
> >> >> >> >>news:8b969aa1-b7d9-4f71-b26b-
> >> >> >> >> :
>
> >> >> >> >> > On Dec 22, 4:02 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> >> >> >> > wrote in
> >> >> >> >> >>news:7a965ed2-3abb-4b38-a61e-
> >> >> >> >> >> :
>
> >> >> >> >> >> > On Dec 21, 2:40 pm, Gig601XLBuilder
> >> >> >> >> >> > > wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> >>BradGuthwrote:
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > FYI: the Moon is not actually BLUE, except to the
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > unfiltered eye.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> Well if I put the right filter on the camera my ****
> >> >> >> >> >> >> can be pink.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> > Are you saying that China and Japan had each put blue
> >> >> >> >> >> > bandpass filters on their color cameras?
> >> >> >> >> >> > -BradGuth-
>
> >> >> >> >> >> Why, do they **** pink?
>
> >> >> >> >> > Thanks for proving the obvious, that Yids of a feather
> >> >> >> >> > flock together.
>
> >> >> >> >> Does this mean I have to get circumcised?
>
> >> >> >> >> Bertie
>
> >> >> >> > If that's what it takes for the likes of yourself to tell us
> >> >> >> > why nothing of our NASA/Apollo ever managed to look the least
> >> >> >> > bit bluish (pretty damn neat Kodak film trick with such
> >> >> >> > unfiltered cameras), and as to why the albedo vibrance of
> >> >> >> > Venus was never once within sight from any EVA or orbital
> >> >> >> > FOV.
>
> >> >> >> Well, I don;t think circumcisn would help with that. Anything
> >> >> >> else jewish I can do to augment my comprehension of the
> >> >> >> universe and photography?
>
> >> >> >> > BTW, our moon's albedo on average is physically dark as an
> >> >> >> > open pit coal mine. Go figure upon which other nearly white
> >> >> >> > guano moon as having been xenon arc lamp spectrum
> >> >> >> > illuminated, that our rad-hard Apollo wizards landed upon,
> >> >> >> > instead of the reactive naked surface of iron, cobalt, sodium
> >> >> >> > and titanium of such a dry and dusty moon that's so
> >> >> >> > physically dark and as such unavoidably gamma and X-ray
> >> >> >> > anticathode nasty.
>
> >> >> >> I thought they landed on the Ementhal part.
>
> >> >> >> Bertie
>
> >> >> > On average the moon's rather dim albedo of 0.11 is much like
> >> >> > terrestrial coal at 0.1, which means that if some of that moon
> >> >> > is worth 0.33, whereas other sooty near black basalt portions of
> >> >> > less than 0.05 must also exist, as in fact they each do exist.
> >> >> > However, nothing of our moon is ever going to represent itself
> >> >> > as 0.75, especially at the incoming angle of that morning sun
> >> >> > unless you are looking nearly directly towards the sun and
> >> >> > without using a polarized lens element for cutting the solar
> >> >> > glare that's coming off that physically dark surface.
>
> >> >> Yeah, it was so obviously a fake that I sent back my Kenner junior
> >> >> astronaut set.
>
> >> >> > There was no lunar aluminum, salts or even metallic sodium
> >> >> > within those supposed soil samples. Go figure.
>
> >> >> It is a mystery!
>
> >> > Much the same as our mutually perpetrated cold-war(s) that wasted
> >> > all of those decades, traumatized and/or having exterminated
> >> > countless millions of mostly innocent lives and cosing us trillions
> >> > per decade in the process is still a mystery (much the same as
> >> > those Muslim WMD), isn't it.
>
> >> Yes, why would they need them when they have Donor Kebabs?
>
> >> It's all so obvious.
>
> >> Bertie
>
> > Have you gone and lost your little MI5/CIA clown car again?
>
> Nope, it's in the driveway.
>
> Bertie

That's what I'd thought, right along with your spare brown nose.
- Brad Guth

BradGuth > wrote in
:

> On Dec 23, 11:02 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> > wrote
>> innews:4c1e1b8e-5cbe-43b2-a542-b8d5624b2a39
@b40g2000prf.googlegroups.c
>> om:
>>
>>
>> > On Dec 23, 3:39 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> >> "gatt" > wrote
>> >> :
>>
>> >> > "Kloudy via AviationKB.com" <u33403@uwe> wrote in message
>> >> >news:7d07b4aa19173@uwe...
>>
>> >> >> Nice try...you're an idiot.
>>
>> >> >> and not a very good troll.
>>
>> >> > He's not a troll, he's -dead serious- and since he used the word
>> >> > "Yid" and "MIB" I totally 100% believe him now. His work here
>> >> > is clearly done.
>>
>> >> I beg to differ. I think he's only just begun..
>>
>> >> Bertie
>>
>> > Thank God there are far more good than bad Yids, as otherwise we'd
>> > be looking at WWIV by now. However, those pesky MI5/CIA as MIB
>> > spooks and moles are doing their level Skull and Bones best at
>> > punching up global inflation while getting us into WWIII.
>>
>> Yeh, pesky MI5 CIA spooks.
>>
>> Bad MI5 CIA spooks.
>>
>> Naughty Mi5 CIA spooks.
>>
>>
>> > On the other hand, do you really think the mostly Semitic Third
>> > Reich is dead and gone?
>>
>> Nope.
>>
>> Bertie
>
> "Naughty Mi5 CIA spooks"
>
> Are you playing word games?

Moi? Wood eye?


or can that reply of yours be interpreted
> as your answer representing that you and I are on the same set of
> tracks?
>
> "Naughty" seems a wee bit soft for what they really are.
>
> Besides the Pope and of his minions that didn't know squat about
> physics or science, can you think of any other than Jewish faith-based
> group as having assisted Hitler?

Yep.

Bertie

BradGuth > wrote in
:

> On Dec 23, 11:00 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> > wrote
>> innews:ecc7fd61-c790-40ce-8969-12f569eb3a92
@b40g2000prf.googlegroups.c
>> om:
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Dec 23, 3:51 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> > wrote
>> >> innews:0472d2d4-c32c-4335-bf9b-

>> >> s.c om:
>>
>> >> > Is that what Hitler's brown-nosed minions think is always the
>> >> > answer to everything that rocks your mainstream status quo boat?
>> >> > (drugs?)
>>
>> >> Obviously you don;t feel the need for drugs. I agree, you don't
>> >> need them. Not one little bit.
>>
>> >> > Why don't you just tell us why those NASA/Apollo EVA Kodak
>> >> > moments were not the least bit bluish?
>>
>> >> BB King wasn't available?
>>
>> >> Bertie
>>
>> > No wonder we're headed for WWIII. Remember that it was folks
>> > exactly like your mindset that made it so entirely possible for the
>> > extent of what Hitler accomplished.
>>
>> My Mindset?
>>
>> Wasnb't aware that I had one.
>>
>> Perhaps you had better outline me. for my own benefit, of course.
>>
>> Bertie
>
> Can't outline a Usenet shadow.

But you said I had a mindset.


Bertie

BradGuth > wrote in
:

> On Dec 23, 10:59 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> > wrote
>> innews:1ee85f70-314e-45da-8eef-fac332bdf251
@a35g2000prf.googlegroups.c
>> om:
>>
>> > On Dec 23, 6:03 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> > wrote
>> >> innews:a55ae1d4-c198-4105-93dc-3ca4ae02f398
>>
>> @s8g2000prg.googlegroups.co
>>
>>
>>
>> >> m:
>>
>> >> > On Dec 23, 3:49 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> >> > wrote
>> >> >> innews:d6e5c9ec-8a09-423d-9f60-b90113deb910
>>
>> >> @d4g2000prg.googlegroups.co
>>
>> >> >> m:
>>
>> >> >> > On Dec 21, 12:51 am, WingFlaps >
>> >> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> >> On Dec 21, 6:01 > wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> > On Dec 18, 5:58 pm, WingFlaps >
>> >> >> >> > wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> > > On Dec 19, 12:44 > wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> > > > On Dec 18, 2:37 pm, "gatt" >
>> >> >> >> > > > wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> > > > > "BradGuth" > wrote in message
>>
>> >> >> >> > > > > news:453d3e93-7e2d-4e4f-b1ed-
>>
>> >> >> >> > > > > > Why was that NASA/Apollo moon ever once as having
>> >> >> >> > > > > > been recorded by those unfiltered optics and upon
>> >> >> >> > > > > > such gamma/X-ray sensitive film as depicting that
>> >> >> >> > > > > > moon as not hardly the least bit physically dark
>> >> >> >> > > > > > or much less of any bluish tint, or anything the
>> >> >> >> > > > > > least bit like the blue/ purple saturated hue of
>> >> >> >> > > > > > what those missions of Japan and China are
>> >> >> >> > > > > > recording?
>>
>> >> >> >> > > > > Another literary masterpiece.
>>
>> >> >> >> > > > > The authority on this subject is MXManiac. Why
>> >> >> >> > > > > don't you two start a thread about it?
>>
>> >> >> >> > > > > > Are those Third Reich and apparently MI5 Jews in
>> >> >> >> > > > > > charge of our mutually perpetrated cold-war, and
>> >> >> >> > > > > > of pulling off that hocus-pocus space race,
>> >> >> >> > > > > > actually still that deathly afraid of sharing the
>> >> >> >> > > > > > truth? (apparently so)
>>
>> >> >> >> > > > > > Obviously the likes of "gatt" doesn't even get it.
>>
>> >> >> >> > > > > What, that the Third Reich and the Jews are hoaxing
>> >> >> >> > > > > the space race?
>>
>> >> >> >> > > > > Of course I get it. You're a marginally-literate
>> >> >> >> > > > > usenet whackjob. AKA "k00k"
>>
>> >> >> >> > > > > -c
>>
>> >> >> >> > > > See what I mean. (obviously not)
>>
>> >> >> >> > > > Can you tell us where the heck NASA and their teams of
>> >> >> >> > > > Apollo folks were hiding Venus?
>>
>> >> >> >> > > > Can you explain as to why the NASA/Apollo moon wasn't
>> >> >> >> > > > hardly ever physically dark or otherwise the least bit
>> >> >> >> > > > blue within any of those unfiltered Kodak moments?
>> >> >> >> > > > - Brad Guth
>>
>> >> >> >> > > No hiding needed, where should Venus be? A typical moon
>> >> >> >> > > exposure wouldn't capture Venus as the moon surface is
>> >> >> >> > > too bright and the film latitude too narrow. Second the
>> >> >> >> > > hint of blue (and yellow and red) in the moon is so
>> >> >> >> > > slight you need digital photography and image processing
>> >> >> >> > > to pull it out. I know, I've done it.
>>
>> >> >> >> > > Cheers
>>
>> >> >> >> > Good Christ almighty on a stick, and such a liar to boot.
>> >> >> >> > Do all Yids lie as a regular part of their incest mutated
>> >> >> >> > DNA code? - Brad Guth
>>
>> >> >> >> What a sad little man you are.
>>
>> >> >> >> Cheers
>>
>> >> >> > Are you silly folks suggesting that Muslims are the ones in
>> >> >> > charge of all the bad stuff associated with our MI5/CIA and
>> >> >> > of their NASA/Apollo cloak and dagger fiasco of our mutually
>> >> >> > perpetrated cold war(s)?
>>
>> >> >> Silly folks!
>>
>> >> >> Everyone know that the Juwes are the men that will not be
>> >> >> blamed for nothing.
>>
>> >> > Apparently there's no such thing as a bad Juwe.
>>
>> >> Do you even know what one is?
>>
>> > Unlike yourself that obviously can't tell the difference between
>> > absolute infomercial crapolla and yet another infowar spewed
>> > cesspool of lies upon lies, whereas YES I can tell the difference
>> > between those few bad Jews and of all those other mostly good Jews
>> > that would not hurt a Muslim fly, though too bad for humanity and
>> > our environment that their Zion orchestrated religion is what
>> > forbids policing their own kind.
>>
>> Sorry, but you've tripped yourself up badly there. A Juwe is not a
>> jew, you rabid freeek.
>>
>> Bertie
>
> You like word games? (as do most spooks and moles)

I know "Ghost" and have played scrabble a few times.

Hate crosswords though. Boring.


Bertie>

BradGuth > wrote in
:

> On Dec 23, 10:58 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> > wrote
>> innews:dc226352-b336-4ee3-bf96-a95ffbbc4339
@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.c
>> om:
>>
>> > On Dec 23, 5:54 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> > wrote
>> >> innews:a9fd7526-c557-4250-a012-
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >> om:
>>
>> >> > On Dec 23, 5:19 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> >> > wrote
>> >> >> innews:33a8e9fd-0512-4fd0-b04b-5aba94241ab9
>>
>> >> @a35g2000prf.googlegroups.c
>>
>> >> >> om:
>>
>> >> >> > On Dec 23, 3:37 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> >> >> > wrote
>> >> >> >> innews:34d0f922-04ac-4d7c-8acf-
>>
>> >> >>
>>
>> >> >> >> om:
>>
>> >> >> >> > On Dec 23, 12:22 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> >> >> >> > wrote in
>> >> >> >> >>news:8b969aa1-b7d9-4f71-b26b-
>> >> >> >> >> :
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > On Dec 22, 4:02 pm, Bertie the Bunyip >
>> >> >> >> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> > wrote in
>> >> >> >> >> >>news:7a965ed2-3abb-4b38-a61e-
>> >> >> >> >> >> :
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > On Dec 21, 2:40 pm, Gig601XLBuilder
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>BradGuthwrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > FYI: the Moon is not actually BLUE, except to
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > the unfiltered eye.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> Well if I put the right filter on the camera my
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> **** can be pink.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > Are you saying that China and Japan had each put
>> >> >> >> >> >> > blue bandpass filters on their color cameras?
>> >> >> >> >> >> > -BradGuth-
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> Why, do they **** pink?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > Thanks for proving the obvious, that Yids of a feather
>> >> >> >> >> > flock together.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> Does this mean I have to get circumcised?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> Bertie
>>
>> >> >> >> > If that's what it takes for the likes of yourself to tell
>> >> >> >> > us why nothing of our NASA/Apollo ever managed to look the
>> >> >> >> > least bit bluish (pretty damn neat Kodak film trick with
>> >> >> >> > such unfiltered cameras), and as to why the albedo
>> >> >> >> > vibrance of Venus was never once within sight from any EVA
>> >> >> >> > or orbital FOV.
>>
>> >> >> >> Well, I don;t think circumcisn would help with that.
>> >> >> >> Anything else jewish I can do to augment my comprehension of
>> >> >> >> the universe and photography?
>>
>> >> >> >> > BTW, our moon's albedo on average is physically dark as an
>> >> >> >> > open pit coal mine. Go figure upon which other nearly
>> >> >> >> > white guano moon as having been xenon arc lamp spectrum
>> >> >> >> > illuminated, that our rad-hard Apollo wizards landed upon,
>> >> >> >> > instead of the reactive naked surface of iron, cobalt,
>> >> >> >> > sodium and titanium of such a dry and dusty moon that's so
>> >> >> >> > physically dark and as such unavoidably gamma and X-ray
>> >> >> >> > anticathode nasty.
>>
>> >> >> >> I thought they landed on the Ementhal part.
>>
>> >> >> >> Bertie
>>
>> >> >> > On average the moon's rather dim albedo of 0.11 is much like
>> >> >> > terrestrial coal at 0.1, which means that if some of that
>> >> >> > moon is worth 0.33, whereas other sooty near black basalt
>> >> >> > portions of less than 0.05 must also exist, as in fact they
>> >> >> > each do exist. However, nothing of our moon is ever going to
>> >> >> > represent itself as 0.75, especially at the incoming angle of
>> >> >> > that morning sun unless you are looking nearly directly
>> >> >> > towards the sun and without using a polarized lens element
>> >> >> > for cutting the solar glare that's coming off that physically
>> >> >> > dark surface.
>>
>> >> >> Yeah, it was so obviously a fake that I sent back my Kenner
>> >> >> junior astronaut set.
>>
>> >> >> > There was no lunar aluminum, salts or even metallic sodium
>> >> >> > within those supposed soil samples. Go figure.
>>
>> >> >> It is a mystery!
>>
>> >> > Much the same as our mutually perpetrated cold-war(s) that
>> >> > wasted all of those decades, traumatized and/or having
>> >> > exterminated countless millions of mostly innocent lives and
>> >> > cosing us trillions per decade in the process is still a mystery
>> >> > (much the same as those Muslim WMD), isn't it.
>>
>> >> Yes, why would they need them when they have Donor Kebabs?
>>
>> >> It's all so obvious.
>>
>> >> Bertie
>>
>> > Have you gone and lost your little MI5/CIA clown car again?
>>
>> Nope, it's in the driveway.
>>
>> Bertie
>
> That's what I'd thought, right along with your spare brown nose.

And who am I suppsed to be bown nosing, then?

Just for my own orientation, mind you.


Bertie

On Dec 18, 6:56 pm, "Matt W. Barrow" >
wrote:
> "gatt" > wrote in message
>
> ...
>
>
>
> > "BradGuth" > wrote in message
> > news:89a54833-10fc-4d55-9a83-
>
> >> Can you tell us where the heck NASA and their teams ofApollofolks
> >> were hiding Venus?
>
> > Behind themoon?
>
> > Call me kookie, but, it's dark out. ....where the heck is NASA hiding
> > the sun?! EARTH IS AHOAX!
>
> I thought it was hidden in the contrails.

And the reason(s) as to why your 3D interactive orbital simulator
doesn't work is because ????
- Brad Guth

On Dec 23, 7:41 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> BradGuth > wrote :
>
> > On Dec 23, 10:58 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> > wrote
> >> innews:dc226352-b336-4ee3-bf96-a95ffbbc4339
>
> @e10g2000prf.googlegroups.c
>
>
>
> >> om:
>
> >> > On Dec 23, 5:54 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> > wrote
> >> >> innews:a9fd7526-c557-4250-a012-
>
> >>
>
> >> >> om:
>
> >> >> > On Dec 23, 5:19 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> >> > wrote
> >> >> >> innews:33a8e9fd-0512-4fd0-b04b-5aba94241ab9
>
> >> >> @a35g2000prf.googlegroups.c
>
> >> >> >> om:
>
> >> >> >> > On Dec 23, 3:37 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> >> >> > wrote
> >> >> >> >> innews:34d0f922-04ac-4d7c-8acf-
>
> >> >> >>
>
> >> >> >> >> om:
>
> >> >> >> >> > On Dec 23, 12:22 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> >> >> >> > wrote in
> >> >> >> >> >>news:8b969aa1-b7d9-4f71-b26b-
> >> >> >> >> >> :
>
> >> >> >> >> >> > On Dec 22, 4:02 pm, Bertie the Bunyip >
> >> >> >> >> >> > wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> > wrote in
> >> >> >> >> >> >>news:7a965ed2-3abb-4b38-a61e-
> >> >> >> >> >> >> :
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Dec 21, 2:40 pm, Gig601XLBuilder
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>BradGuthwrote:
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > FYI: theMoonis not actually BLUE, except to
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > the unfiltered eye.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Well if I put the right filter on the camera my
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> **** can be pink.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Are you saying that China and Japan had each put
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > blue bandpass filters on their color cameras?
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > -BradGuth-
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> Why, do they **** pink?
>
> >> >> >> >> >> > Thanks for proving the obvious, that Yids of a feather
> >> >> >> >> >> > flock together.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> Does this mean I have to get circumcised?
>
> >> >> >> >> >> Bertie
>
> >> >> >> >> > If that's what it takes for the likes of yourself to tell
> >> >> >> >> > us why nothing of our NASA/Apolloever managed to look the
> >> >> >> >> > least bit bluish (pretty damn neat Kodak film trick with
> >> >> >> >> > such unfiltered cameras), and as to why the albedo
> >> >> >> >> > vibrance of Venus was never once within sight from any EVA
> >> >> >> >> > or orbital FOV.
>
> >> >> >> >> Well, I don;t think circumcisn would help with that.
> >> >> >> >> Anything else jewish I can do to augment my comprehension of
> >> >> >> >> the universe and photography?
>
> >> >> >> >> > BTW, ourmoon'salbedo on average is physically dark as an
> >> >> >> >> > open pit coal mine. Go figure upon which other nearly
> >> >> >> >> > white guanomoonas having been xenon arc lamp spectrum
> >> >> >> >> > illuminated, that our rad-hardApollowizards landed upon,
> >> >> >> >> > instead of the reactive naked surface of iron, cobalt,
> >> >> >> >> > sodium and titanium of such a dry and dustymoonthat's so
> >> >> >> >> > physically dark and as such unavoidably gamma and X-ray
> >> >> >> >> > anticathode nasty.
>
> >> >> >> >> I thought they landed on the Ementhal part.
>
> >> >> >> >> Bertie
>
> >> >> >> > On average themoon'srather dim albedo of 0.11 is much like
> >> >> >> > terrestrial coal at 0.1, which means that if some of that
> >> >> >> >moonis worth 0.33, whereas other sooty near black basalt
> >> >> >> > portions of less than 0.05 must also exist, as in fact they
> >> >> >> > each do exist. However, nothing of ourmoonis ever going to
> >> >> >> > represent itself as 0.75, especially at the incoming angle of
> >> >> >> > that morning sun unless you are looking nearly directly
> >> >> >> > towards the sun and without using a polarized lens element
> >> >> >> > for cutting the solar glare that's coming off that physically
> >> >> >> > dark surface.
>
> >> >> >> Yeah, it was so obviously a fake that I sent back my Kenner
> >> >> >> junior astronaut set.
>
> >> >> >> > There was no lunar aluminum, salts or even metallic sodium
> >> >> >> > within those supposed soil samples. Go figure.
>
> >> >> >> It is a mystery!
>
> >> >> > Much the same as our mutually perpetrated cold-war(s) that
> >> >> > wasted all of those decades, traumatized and/or having
> >> >> > exterminated countless millions of mostly innocent lives and
> >> >> > cosing us trillions per decade in the process is still a mystery
> >> >> > (much the same as those Muslim WMD), isn't it.
>
> >> >> Yes, why would they need them when they have Donor Kebabs?
>
> >> >> It's all so obvious.
>
> >> >> Bertie
>
> >> > Have you gone and lost your little MI5/CIA clown car again?
>
> >> Nope, it's in the driveway.
>
> >> Bertie
>
> > That's what I'd thought, right along with your spare brown nose.
>
> And who am I suppsed to be bown nosing, then?
>
> Just for my own orientation, mind you.
>
> Bertie

Why are all the Usenet pretend atheists and their mainstream status
quo brown nose so deathly afraid of the truth?

Is there a little something else you'd care to share and share alike,
or is that against your MIB policy that just so happens to react
exactly as though an Old Testament thumping Zionist would?
- Brad Guth

BradGuth > wrote in
:

> On Dec 23, 7:41 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> BradGuth > wrote
>> innews:8ffbd21b-3fe5-425f-8b17-88bf39ac4ba6
@d4g2000prg.googlegroups.co
>> m:
>>
>> > On Dec 23, 10:58 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> >> > wrote
>> >> innews:dc226352-b336-4ee3-bf96-a95ffbbc4339
>>
>> @e10g2000prf.googlegroups.c
>>
>>
>>
>> >> om:
>>
>> >> > On Dec 23, 5:54 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> >> > wrote
>> >> >> innews:a9fd7526-c557-4250-a012-
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >> >> om:
>>
>> >> >> > On Dec 23, 5:19 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> >> >> > wrote
>> >> >> >> innews:33a8e9fd-0512-4fd0-b04b-5aba94241ab9
>>
>> >> >> @a35g2000prf.googlegroups.c
>>
>> >> >> >> om:
>>
>> >> >> >> > On Dec 23, 3:37 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> >> >> >> > wrote
>> >> >> >> >> innews:34d0f922-04ac-4d7c-8acf-
>>
>> >> >> >>
>>
>> >> >> >> >> om:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > On Dec 23, 12:22 am, Bertie the Bunyip >
>> >> >> >> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> > wrote in
>> >> >> >> >> >>news:8b969aa1-b7d9-4f71-b26b-
>> >> >> >> >> >> :
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > On Dec 22, 4:02 pm, Bertie the Bunyip >
>> >> >> >> >> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> > wrote in
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>news:7a965ed2-3abb-4b38-a61e-
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> :
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Dec 21, 2:40 pm, Gig601XLBuilder
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>BradGuthwrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > FYI: theMoonis not actually BLUE, except to
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > the unfiltered eye.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Well if I put the right filter on the camera my
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> **** can be pink.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Are you saying that China and Japan had each put
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > blue bandpass filters on their color cameras?
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > -BradGuth-
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> Why, do they **** pink?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > Thanks for proving the obvious, that Yids of a
>> >> >> >> >> >> > feather flock together.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> Does this mean I have to get circumcised?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> Bertie
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > If that's what it takes for the likes of yourself to
>> >> >> >> >> > tell us why nothing of our NASA/Apolloever managed to
>> >> >> >> >> > look the least bit bluish (pretty damn neat Kodak film
>> >> >> >> >> > trick with such unfiltered cameras), and as to why the
>> >> >> >> >> > albedo vibrance of Venus was never once within sight
>> >> >> >> >> > from any EVA or orbital FOV.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> Well, I don;t think circumcisn would help with that.
>> >> >> >> >> Anything else jewish I can do to augment my comprehension
>> >> >> >> >> of the universe and photography?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > BTW, ourmoon'salbedo on average is physically dark as
>> >> >> >> >> > an open pit coal mine. Go figure upon which other
>> >> >> >> >> > nearly white guanomoonas having been xenon arc lamp
>> >> >> >> >> > spectrum illuminated, that our rad-hardApollowizards
>> >> >> >> >> > landed upon, instead of the reactive naked surface of
>> >> >> >> >> > iron, cobalt, sodium and titanium of such a dry and
>> >> >> >> >> > dustymoonthat's so physically dark and as such
>> >> >> >> >> > unavoidably gamma and X-ray anticathode nasty.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> I thought they landed on the Ementhal part.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> Bertie
>>
>> >> >> >> > On average themoon'srather dim albedo of 0.11 is much like
>> >> >> >> > terrestrial coal at 0.1, which means that if some of that
>> >> >> >> >moonis worth 0.33, whereas other sooty near black basalt
>> >> >> >> > portions of less than 0.05 must also exist, as in fact
>> >> >> >> > they each do exist. However, nothing of ourmoonis ever
>> >> >> >> > going to represent itself as 0.75, especially at the
>> >> >> >> > incoming angle of that morning sun unless you are looking
>> >> >> >> > nearly directly towards the sun and without using a
>> >> >> >> > polarized lens element for cutting the solar glare that's
>> >> >> >> > coming off that physically dark surface.
>>
>> >> >> >> Yeah, it was so obviously a fake that I sent back my Kenner
>> >> >> >> junior astronaut set.
>>
>> >> >> >> > There was no lunar aluminum, salts or even metallic sodium
>> >> >> >> > within those supposed soil samples. Go figure.
>>
>> >> >> >> It is a mystery!
>>
>> >> >> > Much the same as our mutually perpetrated cold-war(s) that
>> >> >> > wasted all of those decades, traumatized and/or having
>> >> >> > exterminated countless millions of mostly innocent lives and
>> >> >> > cosing us trillions per decade in the process is still a
>> >> >> > mystery (much the same as those Muslim WMD), isn't it.
>>
>> >> >> Yes, why would they need them when they have Donor Kebabs?
>>
>> >> >> It's all so obvious.
>>
>> >> >> Bertie
>>
>> >> > Have you gone and lost your little MI5/CIA clown car again?
>>
>> >> Nope, it's in the driveway.
>>
>> >> Bertie
>>
>> > That's what I'd thought, right along with your spare brown nose.
>>
>> And who am I suppsed to be bown nosing, then?
>>
>> Just for my own orientation, mind you.
>>
>> Bertie
>
> Why are all the Usenet pretend atheists and their mainstream status
> quo brown nose so deathly afraid of the truth?

The truth being?
>
> Is there a little something else you'd care to share and share alike,
> or is that against your MIB policy that just so happens to react
> exactly as though an Old Testament thumping Zionist would?


Or the Betty Crocker cookbook for that matter.


Bertie

On Dec 23, 7:39 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> BradGuth > wrote :
>
> > On Dec 23, 11:02 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> > wrote
> >> innews:4c1e1b8e-5cbe-43b2-a542-b8d5624b2a39
>
> @b40g2000prf.googlegroups.c
>
>
>
> >> om:
>
> >> > On Dec 23, 3:39 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> >> "gatt" > wrote
> >> >> :
>
> >> >> > "Kloudy via AviationKB.com" <u33403@uwe> wrote in message
> >> >> >news:7d07b4aa19173@uwe...
>
> >> >> >> Nice try...you're an idiot.
>
> >> >> >> and not a very good troll.
>
> >> >> > He's not a troll, he's -dead serious- and since he used the word
> >> >> > "Yid" and "MIB" I totally 100% believe him now. His work here
> >> >> > is clearly done.
>
> >> >> I beg to differ. I think he's only just begun..
>
> >> >> Bertie
>
> >> > Thank God there are far more good than bad Yids, as otherwise we'd
> >> > be looking at WWIV by now. However, those pesky MI5/CIA as MIB
> >> > spooks and moles are doing their level Skull and Bones best at
> >> > punching up global inflation while getting us into WWIII.
>
> >> Yeh, pesky MI5 CIA spooks.
>
> >> Bad MI5 CIA spooks.
>
> >> Naughty Mi5 CIA spooks.
>
> >> > On the other hand, do you really think the mostly Semitic Third
> >> > Reich is dead and gone?
>
> >> Nope.
>
> >> Bertie
>
> > "Naughty Mi5 CIA spooks"
>
> > Are you playing word games?
>
> Moi? Wood eye?
>
> or can that reply of yours be interpreted
>
> > as your answer representing that you and I are on the same set of
> > tracks?
>
> > "Naughty" seems a wee bit soft for what they really are.
>
> > Besides the Pope and of his minions that didn't know squat about
> > physics or science, can you think of any other than Jewish faith-based
> > group as having assisted Hitler?
>
> Yep.
>
> Bertie

Yep what? (unless you're one of them bad guys, why not tell all by
getting specific, and name those names)

- Brad Guth

BradGuth > wrote in
:

> On Dec 23, 7:39 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> BradGuth > wrote
>> innews:98b7bdd8-b4f9-40c9-86ee-

>> om:
>>
>> > On Dec 23, 11:02 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> >> > wrote
>> >> innews:4c1e1b8e-5cbe-43b2-a542-b8d5624b2a39
>>
>> @b40g2000prf.googlegroups.c
>>
>>
>>
>> >> om:
>>
>> >> > On Dec 23, 3:39 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> >> >> "gatt" > wrote
>> >> >> :
>>
>> >> >> > "Kloudy via AviationKB.com" <u33403@uwe> wrote in message
>> >> >> >news:7d07b4aa19173@uwe...
>>
>> >> >> >> Nice try...you're an idiot.
>>
>> >> >> >> and not a very good troll.
>>
>> >> >> > He's not a troll, he's -dead serious- and since he used the
>> >> >> > word "Yid" and "MIB" I totally 100% believe him now. His
>> >> >> > work here is clearly done.
>>
>> >> >> I beg to differ. I think he's only just begun..
>>
>> >> >> Bertie
>>
>> >> > Thank God there are far more good than bad Yids, as otherwise
>> >> > we'd be looking at WWIV by now. However, those pesky MI5/CIA as
>> >> > MIB spooks and moles are doing their level Skull and Bones best
>> >> > at punching up global inflation while getting us into WWIII.
>>
>> >> Yeh, pesky MI5 CIA spooks.
>>
>> >> Bad MI5 CIA spooks.
>>
>> >> Naughty Mi5 CIA spooks.
>>
>> >> > On the other hand, do you really think the mostly Semitic Third
>> >> > Reich is dead and gone?
>>
>> >> Nope.
>>
>> >> Bertie
>>
>> > "Naughty Mi5 CIA spooks"
>>
>> > Are you playing word games?
>>
>> Moi? Wood eye?
>>
>> or can that reply of yours be interpreted
>>
>> > as your answer representing that you and I are on the same set of
>> > tracks?
>>
>> > "Naughty" seems a wee bit soft for what they really are.
>>
>> > Besides the Pope and of his minions that didn't know squat about
>> > physics or science, can you think of any other than Jewish
>> > faith-based group as having assisted Hitler?
>>
>> Yep.
>>
>> Bertie
>
> Yep what? (unless you're one of them bad guys, why not tell all by
> getting specific, and name those names)


Yep

I know of another faith basd group that supported hitler.


Got a reading comprehension problem? I can type slower.


Bertie

On Dec 23, 7:40 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> BradGuth > wrote :
>
> > On Dec 23, 10:59 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> > wrote
> >> innews:1ee85f70-314e-45da-8eef-fac332bdf251
>
> @a35g2000prf.googlegroups.c
>
>
>
> >> om:
>
> >> > On Dec 23, 6:03 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> > wrote
> >> >> innews:a55ae1d4-c198-4105-93dc-3ca4ae02f398
>
> >> @s8g2000prg.googlegroups.co
>
> >> >> m:
>
> >> >> > On Dec 23, 3:49 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> >> > wrote
> >> >> >> innews:d6e5c9ec-8a09-423d-9f60-b90113deb910
>
> >> >> @d4g2000prg.googlegroups.co
>
> >> >> >> m:
>
> >> >> >> > On Dec 21, 12:51 am, WingFlaps >
> >> >> >> > wrote:
> >> >> >> >> On Dec 21, 6:01 > wrote:
>
> >> >> >> >> > On Dec 18, 5:58 pm, WingFlaps >
> >> >> >> >> > wrote:
>
> >> >> >> >> > > On Dec 19, 12:44 > wrote:
>
> >> >> >> >> > > > On Dec 18, 2:37 pm, "gatt" >
> >> >> >> >> > > > wrote:
>
> >> >> >> >> > > > > "BradGuth" > wrote in message
>
> >> >> >> >> > > > > news:453d3e93-7e2d-4e4f-b1ed-
>
> >> >> >> >> > > > > > Why was that NASA/Apollomoonever once as having
> >> >> >> >> > > > > > been recorded by those unfiltered optics and upon
> >> >> >> >> > > > > > such gamma/X-ray sensitive film as depicting that
> >> >> >> >> > > > > >moonas not hardly the least bit physically dark
> >> >> >> >> > > > > > or much less of any bluish tint, or anything the
> >> >> >> >> > > > > > least bit like the blue/ purple saturated hue of
> >> >> >> >> > > > > > what those missions of Japan and China are
> >> >> >> >> > > > > > recording?
>
> >> >> >> >> > > > > Another literary masterpiece.
>
> >> >> >> >> > > > > The authority on this subject is MXManiac. Why
> >> >> >> >> > > > > don't you two start a thread about it?
>
> >> >> >> >> > > > > > Are those Third Reich and apparently MI5 Jews in
> >> >> >> >> > > > > > charge of our mutually perpetrated cold-war, and
> >> >> >> >> > > > > > of pulling off that hocus-pocus space race,
> >> >> >> >> > > > > > actually still that deathly afraid of sharing the
> >> >> >> >> > > > > > truth? (apparently so)
>
> >> >> >> >> > > > > > Obviously the likes of "gatt" doesn't even get it.
>
> >> >> >> >> > > > > What, that the Third Reich and the Jews are hoaxing
> >> >> >> >> > > > > the space race?
>
> >> >> >> >> > > > > Of course I get it. You're a marginally-literate
> >> >> >> >> > > > > usenet whackjob. AKA "k00k"
>
> >> >> >> >> > > > > -c
>
> >> >> >> >> > > > See what I mean. (obviously not)
>
> >> >> >> >> > > > Can you tell us where the heck NASA and their teams of
> >> >> >> >> > > >Apollofolks were hiding Venus?
>
> >> >> >> >> > > > Can you explain as to why the NASA/Apollomoonwasn't
> >> >> >> >> > > > hardly ever physically dark or otherwise the least bit
> >> >> >> >> > > > blue within any of those unfiltered Kodak moments?
> >> >> >> >> > > > - Brad Guth
>
> >> >> >> >> > > No hiding needed, where should Venus be? A typicalmoon
> >> >> >> >> > > exposure wouldn't capture Venus as themoonsurface is
> >> >> >> >> > > too bright and the film latitude too narrow. Second the
> >> >> >> >> > > hint of blue (and yellow and red) in themoonis so
> >> >> >> >> > > slight you need digital photography and image processing
> >> >> >> >> > > to pull it out. I know, I've done it.
>
> >> >> >> >> > > Cheers
>
> >> >> >> >> > Good Christ almighty on a stick, and such a liar to boot.
> >> >> >> >> > Do all Yids lie as a regular part of their incest mutated
> >> >> >> >> > DNA code? - Brad Guth
>
> >> >> >> >> What a sad little man you are.
>
> >> >> >> >> Cheers
>
> >> >> >> > Are you silly folks suggesting that Muslims are the ones in
> >> >> >> > charge of all the bad stuff associated with our MI5/CIA and
> >> >> >> > of their NASA/Apollocloak and dagger fiasco of our mutually
> >> >> >> > perpetrated cold war(s)?
>
> >> >> >> Silly folks!
>
> >> >> >> Everyone know that the Juwes are the men that will not be
> >> >> >> blamed for nothing.
>
> >> >> > Apparently there's no such thing as a bad Juwe.
>
> >> >> Do you even know what one is?
>
> >> > Unlike yourself that obviously can't tell the difference between
> >> > absolute infomercial crapolla and yet another infowar spewed
> >> > cesspool of lies upon lies, whereas YES I can tell the difference
> >> > between those few bad Jews and of all those other mostly good Jews
> >> > that would not hurt a Muslim fly, though too bad for humanity and
> >> > our environment that their Zion orchestrated religion is what
> >> > forbids policing their own kind.
>
> >> Sorry, but you've tripped yourself up badly there. A Juwe is not a
> >> jew, you rabid freeek.
>
> >> Bertie
>
> > You like word games? (as do most spooks and moles)
>
> I know "Ghost" and have played scrabble a few times.
>
> Hate crosswords though. Boring.
>
> Bertie>

As I'd thought, once a spook/mole, always a spook/mole.

What's your MI5/CIA grade or rank?

How many of those government minions do you have?
- Brad Guth

On Dec 24, 7:45 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> BradGuth > wrote :
>
> > On Dec 23, 7:39 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> BradGuth > wrote
> >> innews:98b7bdd8-b4f9-40c9-86ee-
>
>
>
>
>
> >> om:
>
> >> > On Dec 23, 11:02 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> >> > wrote
> >> >> innews:4c1e1b8e-5cbe-43b2-a542-b8d5624b2a39
>
> >> @b40g2000prf.googlegroups.c
>
> >> >> om:
>
> >> >> > On Dec 23, 3:39 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> >> >> "gatt" > wrote
> >> >> >> :
>
> >> >> >> > "Kloudy via AviationKB.com" <u33403@uwe> wrote in message
> >> >> >> >news:7d07b4aa19173@uwe...
>
> >> >> >> >> Nice try...you're an idiot.
>
> >> >> >> >> and not a very good troll.
>
> >> >> >> > He's not a troll, he's -dead serious- and since he used the
> >> >> >> > word "Yid" and "MIB" I totally 100% believe him now. His
> >> >> >> > work here is clearly done.
>
> >> >> >> I beg to differ. I think he's only just begun..
>
> >> >> >> Bertie
>
> >> >> > Thank God there are far more good than bad Yids, as otherwise
> >> >> > we'd be looking at WWIV by now. However, those pesky MI5/CIA as
> >> >> > MIB spooks and moles are doing their level Skull and Bones best
> >> >> > at punching up global inflation while getting us into WWIII.
>
> >> >> Yeh, pesky MI5 CIA spooks.
>
> >> >> Bad MI5 CIA spooks.
>
> >> >> Naughty Mi5 CIA spooks.
>
> >> >> > On the other hand, do you really think the mostly Semitic Third
> >> >> > Reich is dead and gone?
>
> >> >> Nope.
>
> >> >> Bertie
>
> >> > "Naughty Mi5 CIA spooks"
>
> >> > Are you playing word games?
>
> >> Moi? Wood eye?
>
> >> or can that reply of yours be interpreted
>
> >> > as your answer representing that you and I are on the same set of
> >> > tracks?
>
> >> > "Naughty" seems a wee bit soft for what they really are.
>
> >> > Besides the Pope and of his minions that didn't know squat about
> >> > physics or science, can you think of any other than Jewish
> >> > faith-based group as having assisted Hitler?
>
> >> Yep.
>
> >> Bertie
>
> > Yep what? (unless you're one of them bad guys, why not tell all by
> > getting specific, and name those names)
>
> Yep
>
> I know of another faith basd group that supported hitler.
>
> Got a reading comprehension problem? I can type slower.
>
> Bertie

Obviously you can't type much at all, because you obviously can't seem
to type out that name of that other physics, science and banking smart
religion that was supposedly tight with Hitler.
- Brad Guth

On Dec 24, 7:39 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> BradGuth > wrote :
>
> > On Dec 23, 7:41 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> BradGuth > wrote
> >> innews:8ffbd21b-3fe5-425f-8b17-88bf39ac4ba6
>
> @d4g2000prg.googlegroups.co
>
>
>
> >> m:
>
> >> > On Dec 23, 10:58 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> >> > wrote
> >> >> innews:dc226352-b336-4ee3-bf96-a95ffbbc4339
>
> >> @e10g2000prf.googlegroups.c
>
> >> >> om:
>
> >> >> > On Dec 23, 5:54 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> >> > wrote
> >> >> >> innews:a9fd7526-c557-4250-a012-
>
> >> >>
>
> >> >> >> om:
>
> >> >> >> > On Dec 23, 5:19 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> >> >> > wrote
> >> >> >> >> innews:33a8e9fd-0512-4fd0-b04b-5aba94241ab9
>
> >> >> >> @a35g2000prf.googlegroups.c
>
> >> >> >> >> om:
>
> >> >> >> >> > On Dec 23, 3:37 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> >> >> >> > wrote
> >> >> >> >> >> innews:34d0f922-04ac-4d7c-8acf-
>
> >> >> >> >>
>
> >> >> >> >> >> om:
>
> >> >> >> >> >> > On Dec 23, 12:22 am, Bertie the Bunyip >
> >> >> >> >> >> > wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> > wrote in
> >> >> >> >> >> >>news:8b969aa1-b7d9-4f71-b26b-
> >> >> >> >> >> >> :
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Dec 22, 4:02 pm, Bertie the Bunyip >
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > wrote in
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>news:7a965ed2-3abb-4b38-a61e-
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> :
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Dec 21, 2:40 pm, Gig601XLBuilder
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>BradGuthwrote:
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > FYI: theMoonis not actually BLUE, except to
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > the unfiltered eye.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Well if I put the right filter on the camera my
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> **** can be pink.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Are you saying that China and Japan had each put
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > blue bandpass filters on their color cameras?
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > -BradGuth-
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Why, do they **** pink?
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Thanks for proving the obvious, that Yids of a
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > feather flock together.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> Does this mean I have to get circumcised?
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> Bertie
>
> >> >> >> >> >> > If that's what it takes for the likes of yourself to
> >> >> >> >> >> > tell us why nothing of our NASA/Apolloever managed to
> >> >> >> >> >> > look the least bit bluish (pretty damn neat Kodak film
> >> >> >> >> >> > trick with such unfiltered cameras), and as to why the
> >> >> >> >> >> > albedo vibrance of Venus was never once within sight
> >> >> >> >> >> > from any EVA or orbital FOV.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> Well, I don;t think circumcisn would help with that.
> >> >> >> >> >> Anything else jewish I can do to augment my comprehension
> >> >> >> >> >> of the universe and photography?
>
> >> >> >> >> >> > BTW, ourmoon'salbedo on average is physically dark as
> >> >> >> >> >> > an open pit coal mine. Go figure upon which other
> >> >> >> >> >> > nearly white guanomoonas having been xenon arc lamp
> >> >> >> >> >> > spectrum illuminated, that our rad-hardApollowizards
> >> >> >> >> >> > landed upon, instead of the reactive naked surface of
> >> >> >> >> >> > iron, cobalt, sodium and titanium of such a dry and
> >> >> >> >> >> > dustymoonthat's so physically dark and as such
> >> >> >> >> >> > unavoidably gamma and X-ray anticathode nasty.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> I thought they landed on the Ementhal part.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> Bertie
>
> >> >> >> >> > On average themoon'srather dim albedo of 0.11 is much like
> >> >> >> >> > terrestrial coal at 0.1, which means that if some of that
> >> >> >> >> >moonis worth 0.33, whereas other sooty near black basalt
> >> >> >> >> > portions of less than 0.05 must also exist, as in fact
> >> >> >> >> > they each do exist. However, nothing of ourmoonis ever
> >> >> >> >> > going to represent itself as 0.75, especially at the
> >> >> >> >> > incoming angle of that morning sun unless you are looking
> >> >> >> >> > nearly directly towards the sun and without using a
> >> >> >> >> > polarized lens element for cutting the solar glare that's
> >> >> >> >> > coming off that physically dark surface.
>
> >> >> >> >> Yeah, it was so obviously a fake that I sent back my Kenner
> >> >> >> >> junior astronaut set.
>
> >> >> >> >> > There was no lunar aluminum, salts or even metallic sodium
> >> >> >> >> > within those supposed soil samples. Go figure.
>
> >> >> >> >> It is a mystery!
>
> >> >> >> > Much the same as our mutually perpetrated cold-war(s) that
> >> >> >> > wasted all of those decades, traumatized and/or having
> >> >> >> > exterminated countless millions of mostly innocent lives and
> >> >> >> > cosing us trillions per decade in the process is still a
> >> >> >> > mystery (much the same as those Muslim WMD), isn't it.
>
> >> >> >> Yes, why would they need them when they have Donor Kebabs?
>
> >> >> >> It's all so obvious.
>
> >> >> >> Bertie
>
> >> >> > Have you gone and lost your little MI5/CIA clown car again?
>
> >> >> Nope, it's in the driveway.
>
> >> >> Bertie
>
> >> > That's what I'd thought, right along with your spare brown nose.
>
> >> And who am I suppsed to be bown nosing, then?
>
> >> Just for my own orientation, mind you.
>
> >> Bertie
>
> > Why are all the Usenet pretend atheists and their mainstream status
> > quo brown nose so deathly afraid of the truth?
>
> The truth being?
>
>
>
> > Is there a little something else you'd care to share and share alike,
> > or is that against your MIB policy that just so happens to react
> > exactly as though an Old Testament thumping Zionist would?
>
> Or the Betty Crocker cookbook for that matter.
>
> Bertie

Spoken like a true spook/mole of a rusemaster that you are, or was
that just another infomercial fart.
- Brad Guth

BradGuth > wrote in
:




>
> Obviously you can't type much at all, because you obviously can't seem
> to type out that name of that other physics, science and banking smart
> religion that was supposedly tight with Hitler.

Sure I can, but I'm very surprised you don't already know it.

You're just taunting me that you don't, aren't you?


Bertie

BradGuth > wrote in
:

> On Dec 23, 7:40 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> BradGuth > wrote
>> innews:7ca0821f-0790-4373-b849-83d15ce15818
@a35g2000prf.googlegroups.c
>> om:
>>
>> > On Dec 23, 10:59 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> >> > wrote
>> >> innews:1ee85f70-314e-45da-8eef-fac332bdf251
>>
>> @a35g2000prf.googlegroups.c
>>
>>
>>
>> >> om:
>>
>> >> > On Dec 23, 6:03 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> >> > wrote
>> >> >> innews:a55ae1d4-c198-4105-93dc-3ca4ae02f398
>>
>> >> @s8g2000prg.googlegroups.co
>>
>> >> >> m:
>>
>> >> >> > On Dec 23, 3:49 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> >> >> > wrote
>> >> >> >> innews:d6e5c9ec-8a09-423d-9f60-b90113deb910
>>
>> >> >> @d4g2000prg.googlegroups.co
>>
>> >> >> >> m:
>>
>> >> >> >> > On Dec 21, 12:51 am, WingFlaps >
>> >> >> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> On Dec 21, 6:01 > wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > On Dec 18, 5:58 pm, WingFlaps
>> >> >> >> >> > > wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > On Dec 19, 12:44 >
>> >> >> >> >> > > wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > > On Dec 18, 2:37 pm, "gatt"
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > "BradGuth" > wrote in message
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > news:453d3e93-7e2d-4e4f-b1ed-
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > > Why was that NASA/Apollomoonever once as having
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > > been recorded by those unfiltered optics and
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > > upon such gamma/X-ray sensitive film as
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > > depicting that
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > >moonas not hardly the least bit physically dark
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > > or much less of any bluish tint, or anything
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > > the least bit like the blue/ purple saturated
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > > hue of what those missions of Japan and China
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > > are recording?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > Another literary masterpiece.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > The authority on this subject is MXManiac. Why
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > don't you two start a thread about it?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > > Are those Third Reich and apparently MI5 Jews
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > > in charge of our mutually perpetrated cold-war,
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > > and of pulling off that hocus-pocus space race,
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > > actually still that deathly afraid of sharing
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > > the truth? (apparently so)
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > > Obviously the likes of "gatt" doesn't even get
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > > it.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > What, that the Third Reich and the Jews are
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > hoaxing the space race?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > Of course I get it. You're a marginally-literate
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > usenet whackjob. AKA "k00k"
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > -c
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > > See what I mean. (obviously not)
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > > Can you tell us where the heck NASA and their teams
>> >> >> >> >> > > > of
>> >> >> >> >> > > >Apollofolks were hiding Venus?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > > Can you explain as to why the NASA/Apollomoonwasn't
>> >> >> >> >> > > > hardly ever physically dark or otherwise the least
>> >> >> >> >> > > > bit blue within any of those unfiltered Kodak
>> >> >> >> >> > > > moments? - Brad Guth
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > No hiding needed, where should Venus be? A
>> >> >> >> >> > > typicalmoon exposure wouldn't capture Venus as
>> >> >> >> >> > > themoonsurface is too bright and the film latitude
>> >> >> >> >> > > too narrow. Second the hint of blue (and yellow and
>> >> >> >> >> > > red) in themoonis so slight you need digital
>> >> >> >> >> > > photography and image processing to pull it out. I
>> >> >> >> >> > > know, I've done it.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > Cheers
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > Good Christ almighty on a stick, and such a liar to
>> >> >> >> >> > boot. Do all Yids lie as a regular part of their incest
>> >> >> >> >> > mutated DNA code? - Brad Guth
>>
>> >> >> >> >> What a sad little man you are.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> Cheers
>>
>> >> >> >> > Are you silly folks suggesting that Muslims are the ones
>> >> >> >> > in charge of all the bad stuff associated with our MI5/CIA
>> >> >> >> > and of their NASA/Apollocloak and dagger fiasco of our
>> >> >> >> > mutually perpetrated cold war(s)?
>>
>> >> >> >> Silly folks!
>>
>> >> >> >> Everyone know that the Juwes are the men that will not be
>> >> >> >> blamed for nothing.
>>
>> >> >> > Apparently there's no such thing as a bad Juwe.
>>
>> >> >> Do you even know what one is?
>>
>> >> > Unlike yourself that obviously can't tell the difference between
>> >> > absolute infomercial crapolla and yet another infowar spewed
>> >> > cesspool of lies upon lies, whereas YES I can tell the
>> >> > difference between those few bad Jews and of all those other
>> >> > mostly good Jews that would not hurt a Muslim fly, though too
>> >> > bad for humanity and our environment that their Zion
>> >> > orchestrated religion is what forbids policing their own kind.
>>
>> >> Sorry, but you've tripped yourself up badly there. A Juwe is not a
>> >> jew, you rabid freeek.
>>
>> >> Bertie
>>
>> > You like word games? (as do most spooks and moles)
>>
>> I know "Ghost" and have played scrabble a few times.
>>
>> Hate crosswords though. Boring.
>>
>> Bertie>
>
> As I'd thought, once a spook/mole, always a spook/mole.
>
> What's your MI5/CIA grade or rank?


Like I'd tell you.


>
> How many of those government minions do you have?

I don't think I can trust you with that info.

Bertie

BradGuth > wrote in
:

> On Dec 24, 7:39 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> BradGuth > wrote
>> innews:4cb57c48-eef4-4212-99ee-f7e895492773
@e25g2000prg.googlegroups.c
>> om:
>>
>> > On Dec 23, 7:41 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> >> BradGuth > wrote
>> >> innews:8ffbd21b-3fe5-425f-8b17-88bf39ac4ba6
>>
>> @d4g2000prg.googlegroups.co
>>
>>
>>
>> >> m:
>>
>> >> > On Dec 23, 10:58 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> >> >> > wrote
>> >> >> innews:dc226352-b336-4ee3-bf96-a95ffbbc4339
>>
>> >> @e10g2000prf.googlegroups.c
>>
>> >> >> om:
>>
>> >> >> > On Dec 23, 5:54 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> >> >> > wrote
>> >> >> >> innews:a9fd7526-c557-4250-a012-
>>
>> >> >>
>>
>> >> >> >> om:
>>
>> >> >> >> > On Dec 23, 5:19 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> >> >> >> > wrote
>> >> >> >> >> innews:33a8e9fd-0512-4fd0-b04b-5aba94241ab9
>>
>> >> >> >> @a35g2000prf.googlegroups.c
>>
>> >> >> >> >> om:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > On Dec 23, 3:37 am, Bertie the Bunyip >
>> >> >> >> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> > wrote
>> >> >> >> >> >> innews:34d0f922-04ac-4d7c-8acf-
>>
>> >> >> >> >>
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> om:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > On Dec 23, 12:22 am, Bertie the Bunyip >
>> >> >> >> >> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> > wrote in
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>news:8b969aa1-b7d9-4f71-b26b-
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> :
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Dec 22, 4:02 pm, Bertie the Bunyip >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > wrote in
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>news:7a965ed2-3abb-4b38-a61e-
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> :
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Dec 21, 2:40 pm, Gig601XLBuilder
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>BradGuthwrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > FYI: theMoonis not actually BLUE, except
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > to the unfiltered eye.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Well if I put the right filter on the camera
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> my **** can be pink.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Are you saying that China and Japan had each
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > put blue bandpass filters on their color
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > cameras? -BradGuth-
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Why, do they **** pink?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Thanks for proving the obvious, that Yids of a
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > feather flock together.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> Does this mean I have to get circumcised?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> Bertie
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > If that's what it takes for the likes of yourself to
>> >> >> >> >> >> > tell us why nothing of our NASA/Apolloever managed
>> >> >> >> >> >> > to look the least bit bluish (pretty damn neat Kodak
>> >> >> >> >> >> > film trick with such unfiltered cameras), and as to
>> >> >> >> >> >> > why the albedo vibrance of Venus was never once
>> >> >> >> >> >> > within sight from any EVA or orbital FOV.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> Well, I don;t think circumcisn would help with that.
>> >> >> >> >> >> Anything else jewish I can do to augment my
>> >> >> >> >> >> comprehension of the universe and photography?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > BTW, ourmoon'salbedo on average is physically dark
>> >> >> >> >> >> > as an open pit coal mine. Go figure upon which
>> >> >> >> >> >> > other nearly white guanomoonas having been xenon arc
>> >> >> >> >> >> > lamp spectrum illuminated, that our
>> >> >> >> >> >> > rad-hardApollowizards landed upon, instead of the
>> >> >> >> >> >> > reactive naked surface of iron, cobalt, sodium and
>> >> >> >> >> >> > titanium of such a dry and dustymoonthat's so
>> >> >> >> >> >> > physically dark and as such unavoidably gamma and
>> >> >> >> >> >> > X-ray anticathode nasty.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> I thought they landed on the Ementhal part.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> Bertie
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > On average themoon'srather dim albedo of 0.11 is much
>> >> >> >> >> > like terrestrial coal at 0.1, which means that if some
>> >> >> >> >> > of that
>> >> >> >> >> >moonis worth 0.33, whereas other sooty near black basalt
>> >> >> >> >> > portions of less than 0.05 must also exist, as in fact
>> >> >> >> >> > they each do exist. However, nothing of ourmoonis ever
>> >> >> >> >> > going to represent itself as 0.75, especially at the
>> >> >> >> >> > incoming angle of that morning sun unless you are
>> >> >> >> >> > looking nearly directly towards the sun and without
>> >> >> >> >> > using a polarized lens element for cutting the solar
>> >> >> >> >> > glare that's coming off that physically dark surface.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> Yeah, it was so obviously a fake that I sent back my
>> >> >> >> >> Kenner junior astronaut set.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > There was no lunar aluminum, salts or even metallic
>> >> >> >> >> > sodium within those supposed soil samples. Go figure.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> It is a mystery!
>>
>> >> >> >> > Much the same as our mutually perpetrated cold-war(s) that
>> >> >> >> > wasted all of those decades, traumatized and/or having
>> >> >> >> > exterminated countless millions of mostly innocent lives
>> >> >> >> > and cosing us trillions per decade in the process is still
>> >> >> >> > a mystery (much the same as those Muslim WMD), isn't it.
>>
>> >> >> >> Yes, why would they need them when they have Donor Kebabs?
>>
>> >> >> >> It's all so obvious.
>>
>> >> >> >> Bertie
>>
>> >> >> > Have you gone and lost your little MI5/CIA clown car again?
>>
>> >> >> Nope, it's in the driveway.
>>
>> >> >> Bertie
>>
>> >> > That's what I'd thought, right along with your spare brown nose.
>>
>> >> And who am I suppsed to be bown nosing, then?
>>
>> >> Just for my own orientation, mind you.
>>
>> >> Bertie
>>
>> > Why are all the Usenet pretend atheists and their mainstream status
>> > quo brown nose so deathly afraid of the truth?
>>
>> The truth being?
>>
>>
>>
>> > Is there a little something else you'd care to share and share
>> > alike, or is that against your MIB policy that just so happens to
>> > react exactly as though an Old Testament thumping Zionist would?
>>
>> Or the Betty Crocker cookbook for that matter.
>>
>> Bertie
>
> Spoken like a true spook/mole of a rusemaster that you are, or was
> that just another infomercial fart.


Not if you have th ekey. (big hint there)

Bertie

On Dec 24, 8:05 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> > wrote :
>
> > On Dec 24, 7:39 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> > wrote
> >> innews:4cb57c48-eef4-4212-99ee-f7e895492773
>
> @e25g2000prg.googlegroups.c
>
>
>
> >> om:
>
> >> > On Dec 23, 7:41 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> > wrote
> >> >> innews:8ffbd21b-3fe5-425f-8b17-88bf39ac4ba6
>
> >> @d4g2000prg.googlegroups.co
>
> >> >> m:
>
> >> >> > On Dec 23, 10:58 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> >> > wrote
> >> >> >> innews:dc226352-b336-4ee3-bf96-a95ffbbc4339
>
> >> >> @e10g2000prf.googlegroups.c
>
> >> >> >> om:
>
> >> >> >> > On Dec 23, 5:54 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> >> >> > wrote
> >> >> >> >> innews:a9fd7526-c557-4250-a012-
>
> >> >> >>
>
> >> >> >> >> om:
>
> >> >> >> >> > On Dec 23, 5:19 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> >> >> >> > wrote
> >> >> >> >> >> innews:33a8e9fd-0512-4fd0-b04b-5aba94241ab9
>
> >> >> >> >> @a35g2000prf.googlegroups.c
>
> >> >> >> >> >> om:
>
> >> >> >> >> >> > On Dec 23, 3:37 am, Bertie the Bunyip >
> >> >> >> >> >> > wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> > wrote
> >> >> >> >> >> >> innews:34d0f922-04ac-4d7c-8acf-
>
> >> >> >> >> >>
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> om:
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Dec 23, 12:22 am, Bertie the Bunyip >
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > wrote in
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>news:8b969aa1-b7d9-4f71-b26b-
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> :
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Dec 22, 4:02 pm, Bertie the Bunyip >
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > wrote in
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>news:7a965ed2-3abb-4b38-a61e-
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> :
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Dec 21, 2:40 pm, Gig601XLBuilder
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>BradGuthwrote:
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > FYI: theMoonis not actually BLUE, except
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > to the unfiltered eye.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Well if I put the right filter on the camera
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> my **** can be pink.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Are you saying that China and Japan had each
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > put blue bandpass filters on their color
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > cameras? -BradGuth-
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Why, do they **** pink?
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Thanks for proving the obvious, that Yids of a
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > feather flock together.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Does this mean I have to get circumcised?
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Bertie
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > If that's what it takes for the likes of yourself to
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > tell us why nothing of our NASA/Apolloever managed
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > to look the least bit bluish (pretty damn neat Kodak
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > film trick with such unfiltered cameras), and as to
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > why the albedo vibrance of Venus was never once
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > within sight from any EVA or orbital FOV.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> Well, I don;t think circumcisn would help with that.
> >> >> >> >> >> >> Anything else jewish I can do to augment my
> >> >> >> >> >> >> comprehension of the universe and photography?
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > BTW, ourmoon'salbedo on average is physically dark
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > as an open pit coal mine. Go figure upon which
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > other nearly white guanomoonas having been xenon arc
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > lamp spectrum illuminated, that our
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > rad-hardApollowizards landed upon, instead of the
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > reactive naked surface of iron, cobalt, sodium and
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > titanium of such a dry and dustymoonthat's so
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > physically dark and as such unavoidably gamma and
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > X-ray anticathode nasty.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> I thought they landed on the Ementhal part.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> Bertie
>
> >> >> >> >> >> > On average themoon'srather dim albedo of 0.11 is much
> >> >> >> >> >> > like terrestrial coal at 0.1, which means that if some
> >> >> >> >> >> > of that
> >> >> >> >> >> >moonis worth 0.33, whereas other sooty near black basalt
> >> >> >> >> >> > portions of less than 0.05 must also exist, as in fact
> >> >> >> >> >> > they each do exist. However, nothing of ourmoonis ever
> >> >> >> >> >> > going to represent itself as 0.75, especially at the
> >> >> >> >> >> > incoming angle of that morning sun unless you are
> >> >> >> >> >> > looking nearly directly towards the sun and without
> >> >> >> >> >> > using a polarized lens element for cutting the solar
> >> >> >> >> >> > glare that's coming off that physically dark surface.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> Yeah, it was so obviously a fake that I sent back my
> >> >> >> >> >> Kenner junior astronaut set.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> > There was no lunar aluminum, salts or even metallic
> >> >> >> >> >> > sodium within those supposed soil samples. Go figure.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> It is a mystery!
>
> >> >> >> >> > Much the same as our mutually perpetrated cold-war(s) that
> >> >> >> >> > wasted all of those decades, traumatized and/or having
> >> >> >> >> > exterminated countless millions of mostly innocent lives
> >> >> >> >> > and cosing us trillions per decade in the process is still
> >> >> >> >> > a mystery (much the same as those Muslim WMD), isn't it.
>
> >> >> >> >> Yes, why would they need them when they have Donor Kebabs?
>
> >> >> >> >> It's all so obvious.
>
> >> >> >> >> Bertie
>
> >> >> >> > Have you gone and lost your little MI5/CIA clown car again?
>
> >> >> >> Nope, it's in the driveway.
>
> >> >> >> Bertie
>
> >> >> > That's what I'd thought, right along with your spare brown nose.
>
> >> >> And who am I suppsed to be bown nosing, then?
>
> >> >> Just for my own orientation, mind you.
>
> >> >> Bertie
>
> >> > Why are all the Usenet pretend atheists and their mainstream status
> >> > quo brown nose so deathly afraid of the truth?
>
> >> The truth being?
>
> >> > Is there a little something else you'd care to share and share
> >> > alike, or is that against your MIB policy that just so happens to
> >> > react exactly as though an Old Testament thumping Zionist would?
>
> >> Or the Betty Crocker cookbook for that matter.
>
> >> Bertie
>
> > Spoken like a true spook/mole of a rusemaster that you are, or was
> > that just another infomercial fart.
>
> Not if you have th ekey. (big hint there)
>
> Bertie

Bigger hint; I don't play word games, at least not very well. Half
the dyslexic time I can't even type out what I'm thinking. For better
results, try reading through my stuff in reverse. Sorry about that.
- Brad Guth

On Dec 24, 8:04 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> > wrote :
>
> > On Dec 23, 7:40 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> > wrote
> >> innews:7ca0821f-0790-4373-b849-83d15ce15818
>
> @a35g2000prf.googlegroups.c
>
>
>
> >> om:
>
> >> > On Dec 23, 10:59 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> > wrote
> >> >> innews:1ee85f70-314e-45da-8eef-fac332bdf251
>
> >> @a35g2000prf.googlegroups.c
>
> >> >> om:
>
> >> >> > On Dec 23, 6:03 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> >> > wrote
> >> >> >> innews:a55ae1d4-c198-4105-93dc-3ca4ae02f398
>
> >> >> @s8g2000prg.googlegroups.co
>
> >> >> >> m:
>
> >> >> >> > On Dec 23, 3:49 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> >> >> > wrote
> >> >> >> >> innews:d6e5c9ec-8a09-423d-9f60-b90113deb910
>
> >> >> >> @d4g2000prg.googlegroups.co
>
> >> >> >> >> m:
>
> >> >> >> >> > On Dec 21, 12:51 am, WingFlaps >
> >> >> >> >> > wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> On Dec 21, 6:01 > wrote:
>
> >> >> >> >> >> > On Dec 18, 5:58 pm, WingFlaps
> >> >> >> >> >> > > wrote:
>
> >> >> >> >> >> > > On Dec 19, 12:44 >
> >> >> >> >> >> > > wrote:
>
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > On Dec 18, 2:37 pm, "gatt"
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > wrote:
>
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > "BradGuth" > wrote in message
>
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > news:453d3e93-7e2d-4e4f-b1ed-
>
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > Why was that NASA/Apollomoonever once as having
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > been recorded by those unfiltered optics and
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > upon such gamma/X-ray sensitive film as
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > depicting that
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > >moonas not hardly the least bit physically dark
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > or much less of any bluish tint, or anything
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > the least bit like the blue/ purple saturated
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > hue of what those missions of Japan and China
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > are recording?
>
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > Another literary masterpiece.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > The authority on this subject is MXManiac. Why
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > don't you two start a thread about it?
>
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > Are those Third Reich and apparently MI5 Jews
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > in charge of our mutually perpetrated cold-war,
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > and of pulling off that hocus-pocus space race,
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > actually still that deathly afraid of sharing
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > the truth? (apparently so)
>
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > Obviously the likes of "gatt" doesn't even get
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > it.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > What, that the Third Reich and the Jews are
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > hoaxing the space race?
>
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > Of course I get it. You're a marginally-literate
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > usenet whackjob. AKA "k00k"
>
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > -c
>
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > See what I mean. (obviously not)
>
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > Can you tell us where the heck NASA and their teams
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > of
> >> >> >> >> >> > > >Apollofolks were hiding Venus?
>
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > Can you explain as to why the NASA/Apollomoonwasn't
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > hardly ever physically dark or otherwise the least
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > bit blue within any of those unfiltered Kodak
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > moments? - Brad Guth
>
> >> >> >> >> >> > > No hiding needed, where should Venus be? A
> >> >> >> >> >> > > typicalmoon exposure wouldn't capture Venus as
> >> >> >> >> >> > > themoonsurface is too bright and the film latitude
> >> >> >> >> >> > > too narrow. Second the hint of blue (and yellow and
> >> >> >> >> >> > > red) in themoonis so slight you need digital
> >> >> >> >> >> > > photography and image processing to pull it out. I
> >> >> >> >> >> > > know, I've done it.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> > > Cheers
>
> >> >> >> >> >> > Good Christ almighty on a stick, and such a liar to
> >> >> >> >> >> > boot. Do all Yids lie as a regular part of their incest
> >> >> >> >> >> > mutated DNA code? - Brad Guth
>
> >> >> >> >> >> What a sad little man you are.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> Cheers
>
> >> >> >> >> > Are you silly folks suggesting that Muslims are the ones
> >> >> >> >> > in charge of all the bad stuff associated with our MI5/CIA
> >> >> >> >> > and of their NASA/Apollocloak and dagger fiasco of our
> >> >> >> >> > mutually perpetrated cold war(s)?
>
> >> >> >> >> Silly folks!
>
> >> >> >> >> Everyone know that the Juwes are the men that will not be
> >> >> >> >> blamed for nothing.
>
> >> >> >> > Apparently there's no such thing as a bad Juwe.
>
> >> >> >> Do you even know what one is?
>
> >> >> > Unlike yourself that obviously can't tell the difference between
> >> >> > absolute infomercial crapolla and yet another infowar spewed
> >> >> > cesspool of lies upon lies, whereas YES I can tell the
> >> >> > difference between those few bad Jews and of all those other
> >> >> > mostly good Jews that would not hurt a Muslim fly, though too
> >> >> > bad for humanity and our environment that their Zion
> >> >> > orchestrated religion is what forbids policing their own kind.
>
> >> >> Sorry, but you've tripped yourself up badly there. A Juwe is not a
> >> >> jew, you rabid freeek.
>
> >> >> Bertie
>
> >> > You like word games? (as do most spooks and moles)
>
> >> I know "Ghost" and have played scrabble a few times.
>
> >> Hate crosswords though. Boring.
>
> >> Bertie>
>
> > As I'd thought, once a spook/mole, always a spook/mole.
>
> > What's your MI5/CIA grade or rank?
>
> Like I'd tell you.
>
>
>
> > How many of those government minions do you have?
>
> I don't think I can trust you with that info.
>
> Bertie

Figures, doesn't it.

- Brad Guth

On Dec 24, 8:03 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> > wrote :
>
>
> > Obviously you can't type much at all, because you obviously can't seem
> > to type out that name of that other physics, science and banking smart
> > religion that was supposedly tight with Hitler.
>
> Sure I can, but I'm very surprised you don't already know it.
>
> You're just taunting me that you don't, aren't you?
>
> Bertie

Unlike yourself, I'm not all-knowing and I even make my fair share of
honest mistakes. Perhaps you MI5/CIA folks should try it out (it's
sometimes called remorse).

- Brad Guth

BradGuth > wrote in
:

> On Dec 24, 8:05 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> > wrote
>> innews:96802d4f-30b3-4fec-b4fe-91aa2f233fe5
@l6g2000prm.googlegroups.co
>> m:
>>
>> > On Dec 24, 7:39 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> > wrote
>> >> innews:4cb57c48-eef4-4212-99ee-f7e895492773
>>
>> @e25g2000prg.googlegroups.c
>>
>>
>>
>> >> om:
>>
>> >> > On Dec 23, 7:41 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> >> > wrote
>> >> >> innews:8ffbd21b-3fe5-425f-8b17-88bf39ac4ba6
>>
>> >> @d4g2000prg.googlegroups.co
>>
>> >> >> m:
>>
>> >> >> > On Dec 23, 10:58 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> >> >> > wrote
>> >> >> >> innews:dc226352-b336-4ee3-bf96-a95ffbbc4339
>>
>> >> >> @e10g2000prf.googlegroups.c
>>
>> >> >> >> om:
>>
>> >> >> >> > On Dec 23, 5:54 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> >> >> >> > wrote
>> >> >> >> >> innews:a9fd7526-c557-4250-a012-
>>
>> >> >> >>
>>
>> >> >> >> >> om:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > On Dec 23, 5:19 am, Bertie the Bunyip >
>> >> >> >> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> > wrote
>> >> >> >> >> >> innews:33a8e9fd-0512-4fd0-b04b-5aba94241ab9
>>
>> >> >> >> >> @a35g2000prf.googlegroups.c
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> om:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > On Dec 23, 3:37 am, Bertie the Bunyip >
>> >> >> >> >> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> > wrote
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> innews:34d0f922-04ac-4d7c-8acf-
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> om:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Dec 23, 12:22 am, Bertie the Bunyip
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > wrote in
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>news:8b969aa1-b7d9-4f71-b26b-
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> :
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Dec 22, 4:02 pm, Bertie the Bunyip
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > wrote in
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>news:7a965ed2-3abb-4b38-a61e-
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> :
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Dec 21, 2:40 pm, Gig601XLBuilder
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>BradGuthwrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > FYI: theMoonis not actually BLUE,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > except to the unfiltered eye.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Well if I put the right filter on the
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> camera my **** can be pink.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Are you saying that China and Japan had
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > each put blue bandpass filters on their
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > color cameras? -BradGuth-
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Why, do they **** pink?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Thanks for proving the obvious, that Yids of a
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > feather flock together.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Does this mean I have to get circumcised?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Bertie
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > If that's what it takes for the likes of yourself
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > to tell us why nothing of our NASA/Apolloever
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > managed to look the least bit bluish (pretty damn
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > neat Kodak film trick with such unfiltered
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > cameras), and as to why the albedo vibrance of
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Venus was never once within sight from any EVA or
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > orbital FOV.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> Well, I don;t think circumcisn would help with
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> that. Anything else jewish I can do to augment my
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> comprehension of the universe and photography?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > BTW, ourmoon'salbedo on average is physically
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > dark as an open pit coal mine. Go figure upon
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > which other nearly white guanomoonas having been
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > xenon arc lamp spectrum illuminated, that our
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > rad-hardApollowizards landed upon, instead of the
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > reactive naked surface of iron, cobalt, sodium
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > and titanium of such a dry and dustymoonthat's so
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > physically dark and as such unavoidably gamma and
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > X-ray anticathode nasty.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> I thought they landed on the Ementhal part.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> Bertie
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > On average themoon'srather dim albedo of 0.11 is
>> >> >> >> >> >> > much like terrestrial coal at 0.1, which means that
>> >> >> >> >> >> > if some of that
>> >> >> >> >> >> >moonis worth 0.33, whereas other sooty near black
>> >> >> >> >> >> >basalt
>> >> >> >> >> >> > portions of less than 0.05 must also exist, as in
>> >> >> >> >> >> > fact they each do exist. However, nothing of
>> >> >> >> >> >> > ourmoonis ever going to represent itself as 0.75,
>> >> >> >> >> >> > especially at the incoming angle of that morning sun
>> >> >> >> >> >> > unless you are looking nearly directly towards the
>> >> >> >> >> >> > sun and without using a polarized lens element for
>> >> >> >> >> >> > cutting the solar glare that's coming off that
>> >> >> >> >> >> > physically dark surface.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> Yeah, it was so obviously a fake that I sent back my
>> >> >> >> >> >> Kenner junior astronaut set.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > There was no lunar aluminum, salts or even metallic
>> >> >> >> >> >> > sodium within those supposed soil samples. Go
>> >> >> >> >> >> > figure.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> It is a mystery!
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > Much the same as our mutually perpetrated cold-war(s)
>> >> >> >> >> > that wasted all of those decades, traumatized and/or
>> >> >> >> >> > having exterminated countless millions of mostly
>> >> >> >> >> > innocent lives and cosing us trillions per decade in
>> >> >> >> >> > the process is still a mystery (much the same as those
>> >> >> >> >> > Muslim WMD), isn't it.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> Yes, why would they need them when they have Donor
>> >> >> >> >> Kebabs?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> It's all so obvious.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> Bertie
>>
>> >> >> >> > Have you gone and lost your little MI5/CIA clown car
>> >> >> >> > again?
>>
>> >> >> >> Nope, it's in the driveway.
>>
>> >> >> >> Bertie
>>
>> >> >> > That's what I'd thought, right along with your spare brown
>> >> >> > nose.
>>
>> >> >> And who am I suppsed to be bown nosing, then?
>>
>> >> >> Just for my own orientation, mind you.
>>
>> >> >> Bertie
>>
>> >> > Why are all the Usenet pretend atheists and their mainstream
>> >> > status quo brown nose so deathly afraid of the truth?
>>
>> >> The truth being?
>>
>> >> > Is there a little something else you'd care to share and share
>> >> > alike, or is that against your MIB policy that just so happens
>> >> > to react exactly as though an Old Testament thumping Zionist
>> >> > would?
>>
>> >> Or the Betty Crocker cookbook for that matter.
>>
>> >> Bertie
>>
>> > Spoken like a true spook/mole of a rusemaster that you are, or was
>> > that just another infomercial fart.
>>
>> Not if you have th ekey. (big hint there)
>>
>> Bertie
>
> Bigger hint; I don't play word games, at least not very well.

Obviously.


Bertie

BradGuth > wrote in
:

> On Dec 24, 8:04 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> > wrote
>> innews:3b12bb29-9d75-454a-911d-05e9f1e01c56
@x29g2000prg.googlegroups.c
>> om:
>>
>> > On Dec 23, 7:40 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> > wrote
>> >> innews:7ca0821f-0790-4373-b849-83d15ce15818
>>
>> @a35g2000prf.googlegroups.c
>>
>>
>>
>> >> om:
>>
>> >> > On Dec 23, 10:59 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> >> > wrote
>> >> >> innews:1ee85f70-314e-45da-8eef-fac332bdf251
>>
>> >> @a35g2000prf.googlegroups.c
>>
>> >> >> om:
>>
>> >> >> > On Dec 23, 6:03 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> >> >> > wrote
>> >> >> >> innews:a55ae1d4-c198-4105-93dc-3ca4ae02f398
>>
>> >> >> @s8g2000prg.googlegroups.co
>>
>> >> >> >> m:
>>
>> >> >> >> > On Dec 23, 3:49 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> >> >> >> > wrote
>> >> >> >> >> innews:d6e5c9ec-8a09-423d-9f60-b90113deb910
>>
>> >> >> >> @d4g2000prg.googlegroups.co
>>
>> >> >> >> >> m:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > On Dec 21, 12:51 am, WingFlaps
>> >> >> >> >> > > wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> On Dec 21, 6:01 > wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > On Dec 18, 5:58 pm, WingFlaps
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > On Dec 19, 12:44 >
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > > On Dec 18, 2:37 pm, "gatt"
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > "BradGuth" > wrote in
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > message
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > news:453d3e93-7e2d-4e4f-b1ed-
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > Why was that NASA/Apollomoonever once as
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > having been recorded by those unfiltered
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > optics and upon such gamma/X-ray sensitive
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > film as depicting that
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > >moonas not hardly the least bit physically
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > >dark
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > or much less of any bluish tint, or anything
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > the least bit like the blue/ purple
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > saturated hue of what those missions of
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > Japan and China
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > are recording?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > Another literary masterpiece.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > The authority on this subject is MXManiac.
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > Why don't you two start a thread about it?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > Are those Third Reich and apparently MI5
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > Jews in charge of our mutually perpetrated
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > cold-war, and of pulling off that
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > hocus-pocus space race,
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > actually still that deathly afraid of
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > sharing the truth? (apparently so)
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > Obviously the likes of "gatt" doesn't even
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > get it.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > What, that the Third Reich and the Jews are
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > hoaxing the space race?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > Of course I get it. You're a
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > marginally-literate
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > usenet whackjob. AKA "k00k"
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > -c
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > > See what I mean. (obviously not)
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > > Can you tell us where the heck NASA and their
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > > teams of
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > >Apollofolks were hiding Venus?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > > Can you explain as to why the
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > > NASA/Apollomoonwasn't hardly ever physically
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > > dark or otherwise the least
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > > bit blue within any of those unfiltered Kodak
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > > moments? - Brad Guth
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > No hiding needed, where should Venus be? A
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > typicalmoon exposure wouldn't capture Venus as
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > themoonsurface is too bright and the film latitude
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > too narrow. Second the hint of blue (and yellow
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > and red) in themoonis so slight you need digital
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > photography and image processing to pull it out. I
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > know, I've done it.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > Cheers
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > Good Christ almighty on a stick, and such a liar to
>> >> >> >> >> >> > boot. Do all Yids lie as a regular part of their
>> >> >> >> >> >> > incest mutated DNA code? - Brad Guth
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> What a sad little man you are.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> Cheers
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > Are you silly folks suggesting that Muslims are the
>> >> >> >> >> > ones in charge of all the bad stuff associated with our
>> >> >> >> >> > MI5/CIA and of their NASA/Apollocloak and dagger fiasco
>> >> >> >> >> > of our mutually perpetrated cold war(s)?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> Silly folks!
>>
>> >> >> >> >> Everyone know that the Juwes are the men that will not be
>> >> >> >> >> blamed for nothing.
>>
>> >> >> >> > Apparently there's no such thing as a bad Juwe.
>>
>> >> >> >> Do you even know what one is?
>>
>> >> >> > Unlike yourself that obviously can't tell the difference
>> >> >> > between absolute infomercial crapolla and yet another infowar
>> >> >> > spewed cesspool of lies upon lies, whereas YES I can tell the
>> >> >> > difference between those few bad Jews and of all those other
>> >> >> > mostly good Jews that would not hurt a Muslim fly, though too
>> >> >> > bad for humanity and our environment that their Zion
>> >> >> > orchestrated religion is what forbids policing their own
>> >> >> > kind.
>>
>> >> >> Sorry, but you've tripped yourself up badly there. A Juwe is
>> >> >> not a jew, you rabid freeek.
>>
>> >> >> Bertie
>>
>> >> > You like word games? (as do most spooks and moles)
>>
>> >> I know "Ghost" and have played scrabble a few times.
>>
>> >> Hate crosswords though. Boring.
>>
>> >> Bertie>
>>
>> > As I'd thought, once a spook/mole, always a spook/mole.
>>
>> > What's your MI5/CIA grade or rank?
>>
>> Like I'd tell you.
>>
>>
>>
>> > How many of those government minions do you have?
>>
>> I don't think I can trust you with that info.
>>
>> Bertie
>
> Figures, doesn't it.

That's what you are meant to believe, anyway.

Bertie>

BradGuth > wrote in
:

> On Dec 24, 8:03 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> > wrote
>>
>> om:
>>
>>
>> > Obviously you can't type much at all, because you obviously can't
>> > seem to type out that name of that other physics, science and
>> > banking smart religion that was supposedly tight with Hitler.
>>
>> Sure I can, but I'm very surprised you don't already know it.
>>
>> You're just taunting me that you don't, aren't you?
>>
>> Bertie
>
> Unlike yourself, I'm not all-knowing and I even make my fair share of
> honest mistakes. Perhaps you MI5/CIA folks should try it out (it's
> sometimes called remorse).
>


Are you sure that's what it's called?


Bertie

On Dec 23, 7:39 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> BradGuth > wrote :
>
> > On Dec 23, 11:00 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> > wrote
> >> innews:ecc7fd61-c790-40ce-8969-12f569eb3a92
>
> @b40g2000prf.googlegroups.c>> om:
>
> >> > On Dec 23, 3:51 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> > wrote
> >> >> innews:0472d2d4-c32c-4335-bf9b-
>
>
>
>
>
> >> >> s.c om:
>
> >> >> > Is that what Hitler's brown-nosed minions think is always the
> >> >> > answer to everything that rocks your mainstream status quo boat?
> >> >> > (drugs?)
>
> >> >> Obviously you don;t feel the need for drugs. I agree, you don't
> >> >> need them. Not one little bit.
>
> >> >> > Why don't you just tell us why those NASA/Apollo EVA Kodak
> >> >> > moments were not the least bit bluish?
>
> >> >> BB King wasn't available?
>
> >> >> Bertie
>
> >> > No wonder we're headed for WWIII. Remember that it was folks
> >> > exactly like your mindset that made it so entirely possible for the
> >> > extent of what Hitler accomplished.
>
> >> My Mindset?
>
> >> Wasnb't aware that I had one.
>
> >> Perhaps you had better outline me. for my own benefit, of course.
>
> >> Bertie
>
> > Can't outline a Usenet shadow.
>
> But you said I had a mindset.
>
> Bertie

There are good and bad mindsets. The likes of a Zionist puppeteered
Hitler and that of our resident LLPOF warlord(GW Bush) are each
examples of the Borg like bad kind of mindset.

How about your MI5/CIA-->MIB shadow mindset sharing as to why our NASA/
Apollo moon wasn't ever the least bit dark and blue. How hard or
insurmountable could that be?

- Brad Guth

Is this also why you silly brown-nosed folks can't share and share
alike, such as for sharing in the whole truth and nothing but the
truth, as to why our NASA/Apollo moon wasn't ever all that physically
dark and blue, especially to all of those unfiltered Kodak moments?

- Brad Guth


Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
> BradGuth > wrote in
> :
>
> > On Dec 24, 8:04 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> > wrote
> >> innews:3b12bb29-9d75-454a-911d-05e9f1e01c56
> @x29g2000prg.googlegroups.c
> >> om:
> >>
> >> > On Dec 23, 7:40 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> > wrote
> >> >> innews:7ca0821f-0790-4373-b849-83d15ce15818
> >>
> >> @a35g2000prf.googlegroups.c
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> >> om:
> >>
> >> >> > On Dec 23, 10:59 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> >> > wrote
> >> >> >> innews:1ee85f70-314e-45da-8eef-fac332bdf251
> >>
> >> >> @a35g2000prf.googlegroups.c
> >>
> >> >> >> om:
> >>
> >> >> >> > On Dec 23, 6:03 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> >> >> > wrote
> >> >> >> >> innews:a55ae1d4-c198-4105-93dc-3ca4ae02f398
> >>
> >> >> >> @s8g2000prg.googlegroups.co
> >>
> >> >> >> >> m:
> >>
> >> >> >> >> > On Dec 23, 3:49 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> >> >> >> > wrote
> >> >> >> >> >> innews:d6e5c9ec-8a09-423d-9f60-b90113deb910
> >>
> >> >> >> >> @d4g2000prg.googlegroups.co
> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> m:
> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> > On Dec 21, 12:51 am, WingFlaps
> >> >> >> >> >> > > wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Dec 21, 6:01 > wrote:
> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Dec 18, 5:58 pm, WingFlaps
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > wrote:
> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > On Dec 19, 12:44 >
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > wrote:
> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > On Dec 18, 2:37 pm, "gatt"
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > wrote:
> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > "BradGuth" > wrote in
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > message
> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > news:453d3e93-7e2d-4e4f-b1ed-
> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > Why was that NASA/Apollomoonever once as
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > having been recorded by those unfiltered
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > optics and upon such gamma/X-ray sensitive
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > film as depicting that
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > >moonas not hardly the least bit physically
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > >dark
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > or much less of any bluish tint, or anything
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > the least bit like the blue/ purple
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > saturated hue of what those missions of
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > Japan and China
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > are recording?
> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > Another literary masterpiece.
> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > The authority on this subject is MXManiac.
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > Why don't you two start a thread about it?
> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > Are those Third Reich and apparently MI5
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > Jews in charge of our mutually perpetrated
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > cold-war, and of pulling off that
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > hocus-pocus space race,
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > actually still that deathly afraid of
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > sharing the truth? (apparently so)
> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > Obviously the likes of "gatt" doesn't even
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > get it.
> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > What, that the Third Reich and the Jews are
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > hoaxing the space race?
> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > Of course I get it. You're a
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > marginally-literate
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > usenet whackjob. AKA "k00k"
> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > -c
> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > See what I mean. (obviously not)
> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > Can you tell us where the heck NASA and their
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > teams of
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >Apollofolks were hiding Venus?
> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > Can you explain as to why the
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > NASA/Apollomoonwasn't hardly ever physically
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > dark or otherwise the least
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > bit blue within any of those unfiltered Kodak
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > moments? - Brad Guth
> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > No hiding needed, where should Venus be? A
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > typicalmoon exposure wouldn't capture Venus as
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > themoonsurface is too bright and the film latitude
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > too narrow. Second the hint of blue (and yellow
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > and red) in themoonis so slight you need digital
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > photography and image processing to pull it out. I
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > know, I've done it.
> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > Cheers
> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Good Christ almighty on a stick, and such a liar to
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > boot. Do all Yids lie as a regular part of their
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > incest mutated DNA code? - Brad Guth
> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> What a sad little man you are.
> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> Cheers
> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> > Are you silly folks suggesting that Muslims are the
> >> >> >> >> >> > ones in charge of all the bad stuff associated with our
> >> >> >> >> >> > MI5/CIA and of their NASA/Apollocloak and dagger fiasco
> >> >> >> >> >> > of our mutually perpetrated cold war(s)?
> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> Silly folks!
> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> Everyone know that the Juwes are the men that will not be
> >> >> >> >> >> blamed for nothing.
> >>
> >> >> >> >> > Apparently there's no such thing as a bad Juwe.
> >>
> >> >> >> >> Do you even know what one is?
> >>
> >> >> >> > Unlike yourself that obviously can't tell the difference
> >> >> >> > between absolute infomercial crapolla and yet another infowar
> >> >> >> > spewed cesspool of lies upon lies, whereas YES I can tell the
> >> >> >> > difference between those few bad Jews and of all those other
> >> >> >> > mostly good Jews that would not hurt a Muslim fly, though too
> >> >> >> > bad for humanity and our environment that their Zion
> >> >> >> > orchestrated religion is what forbids policing their own
> >> >> >> > kind.
> >>
> >> >> >> Sorry, but you've tripped yourself up badly there. A Juwe is
> >> >> >> not a jew, you rabid freeek.
> >>
> >> >> >> Bertie
> >>
> >> >> > You like word games? (as do most spooks and moles)
> >>
> >> >> I know "Ghost" and have played scrabble a few times.
> >>
> >> >> Hate crosswords though. Boring.
> >>
> >> >> Bertie>
> >>
> >> > As I'd thought, once a spook/mole, always a spook/mole.
> >>
> >> > What's your MI5/CIA grade or rank?
> >>
> >> Like I'd tell you.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> > How many of those government minions do you have?
> >>
> >> I don't think I can trust you with that info.
> >>
> >> Bertie
> >
> > Figures, doesn't it.
>
> That's what you are meant to believe, anyway.
>
> Bertie>

On Dec 24, 11:41 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> BradGuth > wrote :
>
>
>
> > On Dec 24, 8:03 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> > wrote
> >>
> >> om:
>
> >> > Obviously you can't type much at all, because you obviously can't
> >> > seem to type out that name of that other physics, science and
> >> > banking smart religion that was supposedly tight with Hitler.
>
> >> Sure I can, but I'm very surprised you don't already know it.
>
> >> You're just taunting me that you don't, aren't you?
>
> >> Bertie
>
> > Unlike yourself, I'm not all-knowing and I even make my fair share of
> > honest mistakes. Perhaps you MI5/CIA folks should try it out (it's
> > sometimes called remorse).
>
> Are you sure that's what it's called?
>
> Bertie

Yes, I'm dead certain it's called remorse, of which you folks clearly
haven't any such stinking remorse about much of anything.

Obviously those Antichrist and most all those 'pretend atheists'
folks haven't any remorse whatsoever about their having put one of
their own kind on a stick for accomplishing that faith-based PR
stunt. Clearly you have no problems with such end-results justifying
the means and whatever the consequences.

- Brad Guth

BradGuth > wrote in
:

> On Dec 23, 7:39 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> BradGuth > wrote
>> innews:155f6ddf-880d-4ddf-8a4b-f2ed6d43a2f2
@d21g2000prf.googlegroups.c
>> om:
>>
>> > On Dec 23, 11:00 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> >> > wrote
>> >> innews:ecc7fd61-c790-40ce-8969-12f569eb3a92
>>
>> @b40g2000prf.googlegroups.c>> om:
>>
>> >> > On Dec 23, 3:51 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> >> > wrote
>> >> >> innews:0472d2d4-c32c-4335-bf9b-
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >> >> s.c om:
>>
>> >> >> > Is that what Hitler's brown-nosed minions think is always the
>> >> >> > answer to everything that rocks your mainstream status quo
>> >> >> > boat? (drugs?)
>>
>> >> >> Obviously you don;t feel the need for drugs. I agree, you don't
>> >> >> need them. Not one little bit.
>>
>> >> >> > Why don't you just tell us why those NASA/Apollo EVA Kodak
>> >> >> > moments were not the least bit bluish?
>>
>> >> >> BB King wasn't available?
>>
>> >> >> Bertie
>>
>> >> > No wonder we're headed for WWIII. Remember that it was folks
>> >> > exactly like your mindset that made it so entirely possible for
>> >> > the extent of what Hitler accomplished.
>>
>> >> My Mindset?
>>
>> >> Wasnb't aware that I had one.
>>
>> >> Perhaps you had better outline me. for my own benefit, of course.
>>
>> >> Bertie
>>
>> > Can't outline a Usenet shadow.
>>
>> But you said I had a mindset.
>>
>> Bertie
>
> There are good and bad mindsets. The likes of a Zionist puppeteered
> Hitler and that of our resident LLPOF warlord(GW Bush) are each
> examples of the Borg like bad kind of mindset.



MMm, I see.
We need good strong leaders. Where' Lorne Green when you need him?

>
> How about your MI5/CIA-->MIB shadow mindset sharing as to why our
> NASA/ Apollo moon wasn't ever the least bit dark and blue.



You're claimign tht the astronauts were beaten?

BradGuth > wrote in news:8e815ed4-80c6-4b6d-8e8c-
:

> Is this also why you silly brown-nosed folks can't share and share
> alike, such as for sharing in the whole truth and nothing but the
> truth, as to why our NASA/Apollo moon wasn't ever all that physically
> dark and blue, especially to all of those unfiltered Kodak moments?


I never use Kodak. Only Fuji. I find the color saturation more satisfying.
However, if I'm going for a pastel or Andy Wyeth egg tempera sort of feel I
do use Kodak. So, guilty as charged.


Bertie

BradGuth > wrote in
:

> On Dec 24, 11:41 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> BradGuth > wrote
>> innews:78439acf-424b-46e1-967f-

>> om:
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Dec 24, 8:03 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> >> > wrote
>> >> innews:c5d29baf-06cf-43b9-a03d-

>> >> s.c om:
>>
>> >> > Obviously you can't type much at all, because you obviously
>> >> > can't seem to type out that name of that other physics, science
>> >> > and banking smart religion that was supposedly tight with
>> >> > Hitler.
>>
>> >> Sure I can, but I'm very surprised you don't already know it.
>>
>> >> You're just taunting me that you don't, aren't you?
>>
>> >> Bertie
>>
>> > Unlike yourself, I'm not all-knowing and I even make my fair share
>> > of honest mistakes. Perhaps you MI5/CIA folks should try it out
>> > (it's sometimes called remorse).
>>
>> Are you sure that's what it's called?
>>
>> Bertie
>
> Yes, I'm dead certain it's called remorse, of which you folks clearly
> haven't any such stinking remorse about much of anything.


Well, I do wish I hadn't eaten that extra desert. That counts, right?

>
> Obviously those Antichrist and most all those 'pretend atheists'

So does a pretend atheist believe in god and says he doesn;t, or does he
say he does and secretly doesn't?


Bertie

On Dec 25, 3:21 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> > wrote :
>
> > On Dec 24, 11:41 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> > wrote
> >> innews:78439acf-424b-46e1-967f-
>
> >> om:
>
> >> > On Dec 24, 8:03 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> > wrote
> >> >> innews:c5d29baf-06cf-43b9-a03d-
>
>
>
>
>
> >> >> s.c om:
>
> >> >> > Obviously you can't type much at all, because you obviously
> >> >> > can't seem to type out that name of that other physics, science
> >> >> > and banking smart religion that was supposedly tight with
> >> >> > Hitler.
>
> >> >> Sure I can, but I'm very surprised you don't already know it.
>
> >> >> You're just taunting me that you don't, aren't you?
>
> >> >> Bertie
>
> >> > Unlike yourself, I'm not all-knowing and I even make my fair share
> >> > of honest mistakes. Perhaps you MI5/CIA folks should try it out
> >> > (it's sometimes called remorse).
>
> >> Are you sure that's what it's called?
>
> >> Bertie
>
> > Yes, I'm dead certain it's called remorse, of which you folks clearly
> > haven't any such stinking remorse about much of anything.
>
> Well, I do wish I hadn't eaten that extra desert. That counts, right?
>
>
>
> > Obviously those Antichrist and most all those 'pretend atheists'
>
> So does a pretend atheist believe in god and says he doesn;t, or does he
> say he does and secretly doesn't?

A pretend Atheist is very much a faith-based believer in some kind of
god, but that gets in the way of being a good Usenet rusemaster that
always needs to jump those various faith-based fences as often as they
like, as they topic/author stalk their ulterior motivated way within
Usenet.

Usually those Semitic pretend Atheist are rather easy to spot, as
their actions upon others is what typically goes along the exact very
same path or mindset as would any Old Testament thumping Zionist or
devout hard core Jew. Sometimes I can even spot those Mormon pretend
Atheists, because a true Atheist would tend to embrace the notions of
ETs and of whatever their intelligent design might have had to do with
the unusually complex forms of life as we know it.

Unfortunately, most honest folks of Usenet are deathly afraid of their
own shadow, and the other 99.9% are simply born-again liars unless
snookered and/or dumbfounded past the point of no return. Which group
do you fit into?
- Brad Guth

On Dec 25, 3:19 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> > wrote in news:8e815ed4-80c6-4b6d-8e8c-
> :
>
> > Is this also why you silly brown-nosed folks can't share and share
> > alike, such as for sharing in the whole truth and nothing but the
> > truth, as to why our NASA/Apollo moon wasn't ever all that physically
> > dark and blue, especially to all of those unfiltered Kodak moments?
>
> I never use Kodak. Only Fuji. I find the color saturation more satisfying.
> However, if I'm going for a pastel or Andy Wyeth egg tempera sort of feel I
> do use Kodak. So, guilty as charged.
>
> Bertie

In other words, that loaded MIB gun that's pointed at the back of your
empty head has gotten your undivided attention. Figures, doesn't it.

- Brad Guth

On Dec 25, 3:17 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> > wrote :
>
> > On Dec 23, 7:39 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> > wrote
> >> innews:155f6ddf-880d-4ddf-8a4b-f2ed6d43a2f2
>
> @d21g2000prf.googlegroups.c
>
>
>
> >> om:
>
> >> > On Dec 23, 11:00 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> > wrote
> >> >> innews:ecc7fd61-c790-40ce-8969-12f569eb3a92
>
> >> @b40g2000prf.googlegroups.c>> om:
>
> >> >> > On Dec 23, 3:51 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> >> > wrote
> >> >> >> innews:0472d2d4-c32c-4335-bf9b-
>
> >>
>
> >> >> >> s.c om:
>
> >> >> >> > Is that what Hitler's brown-nosed minions think is always the
> >> >> >> > answer to everything that rocks your mainstream status quo
> >> >> >> > boat? (drugs?)
>
> >> >> >> Obviously you don;t feel the need for drugs. I agree, you don't
> >> >> >> need them. Not one little bit.
>
> >> >> >> > Why don't you just tell us why those NASA/Apollo EVA Kodak
> >> >> >> > moments were not the least bit bluish?
>
> >> >> >> BB King wasn't available?
>
> >> >> >> Bertie
>
> >> >> > No wonder we're headed for WWIII. Remember that it was folks
> >> >> > exactly like your mindset that made it so entirely possible for
> >> >> > the extent of what Hitler accomplished.
>
> >> >> My Mindset?
>
> >> >> Wasnb't aware that I had one.
>
> >> >> Perhaps you had better outline me. for my own benefit, of course.
>
> >> >> Bertie
>
> >> > Can't outline a Usenet shadow.
>
> >> But you said I had a mindset.
>
> >> Bertie
>
> > There are good and bad mindsets. The likes of a Zionist puppeteered
> > Hitler and that of our resident LLPOF warlord(GW Bush) are each
> > examples of the Borg like bad kind of mindset.
>
> MMm, I see.
> We need good strong leaders. Where' Lorne Green when you need him?
>
>
> > How about your MI5/CIA-->MIB shadow mindset sharing as to why our
> > NASA/ Apollo moon wasn't ever the least bit dark and blue.
>
> You're claimign tht the astronauts were beaten?

Those NASA/Apollo folks were simply a whole lot smarter than given
credit, especially those Third Reich of the Semitic kind.

Even if having such a reliable fly-by-rocket lander (of which our
Apollo wizards did not have); would you have taken those moonsuit
naked EVA walks upon such a gamma saturated moon that's at least 8
fold worse off in secondary/recoil X-rays than any nasty Van Allen
belt?

- Brad Guth

BradGuth > wrote in
:

> On Dec 25, 3:21 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> > wrote

>>
>> > Obviously those Antichrist and most all those 'pretend atheists'
>>
>> So does a pretend atheist believe in god and says he doesn;t, or does
>> he say he does and secretly doesn't?
>
> A pretend Atheist is very much a faith-based believer in some kind of
> god, but that gets in the way of being a good Usenet rusemaster that
> always needs to jump those various faith-based fences as often as they
> like, as they topic/author stalk their ulterior motivated way within
> Usenet.
>
> Usually those Semitic pretend Atheist are rather easy to spot, as
> their actions upon others is what typically goes along the exact very
> same path or mindset as would any Old Testament thumping Zionist or
> devout hard core Jew. Sometimes I can even spot those Mormon pretend
> Atheists, because a true Atheist would tend to embrace the notions of
> ETs and of whatever their intelligent design might have had to do with
> the unusually complex forms of life as we know it.
>
> Unfortunately, most honest folks of Usenet are deathly afraid of their
> own shadow, and the other 99.9% are simply born-again liars unless
> snookered and/or dumbfounded past the point of no return. Which group
> do you fit into?


Dunno, I thought you had alreadty decided and were goingto save me the
trouble of deciding for myself.


Bertie
>

BradGuth > wrote in
:

> On Dec 25, 3:19 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> > wrote in news:8e815ed4-80c6-4b6d-8e8c-
>> :
>>
>> > Is this also why you silly brown-nosed folks can't share and share
>> > alike, such as for sharing in the whole truth and nothing but the
>> > truth, as to why our NASA/Apollo moon wasn't ever all that
>> > physically dark and blue, especially to all of those unfiltered
>> > Kodak moments?
>>
>> I never use Kodak. Only Fuji. I find the color saturation more
>> satisfying. However, if I'm going for a pastel or Andy Wyeth egg
>> tempera sort of feel I do use Kodak. So, guilty as charged.
>>
>> Bertie
>
> In other words, that loaded MIB gun that's pointed at the back of your
> empty head has gotten your undivided attention.

The only thing pointed at my head has been a glass of wine.

Bertie

BradGuth > wrote in
:



>
> Those NASA/Apollo folks were simply a whole lot smarter than given
> credit, especially those Third Reich of the Semitic kind.
>
> Even if having such a reliable fly-by-rocket lander (of which our
> Apollo wizards did not have); would you have taken those moonsuit
> naked EVA walks upon such a gamma saturated moon that's at least 8
> fold worse off in secondary/recoil X-rays than any nasty Van Allen
> belt?
>

You bet I would.


Bertie

On Dec 25, 5:06 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> > wrote :
>
> > Those NASA/Apollo folks were simply a whole lot smarter than given
> > credit, especially those Third Reich of the Semitic kind.
>
> > Even if having such a reliable fly-by-rocket lander (of which our
> > Apollo wizards did not have); would you have taken those moonsuit
> > naked EVA walks upon such a gamma saturated moon that's at least 8
> > fold worse off in secondary/recoil X-rays than any nasty Van Allen
> > belt?
>
> You bet I would.
>
> Bertie

And that's either because you had yourself an actual fly-by-rocket
lander (though of undocumented prototype R&D) as of 4 decades ago and
oddly not doable as of today, and/or is this naked moon walkabout
possible because of your superior rad-hard DNA?

Remember that you folks can't even tell us why the NASA/Apollo moon
wasn't the least bit physically dark or much less looking blue, not to
mention your not knowing of where or how the hell Venus was hiding.

- Brad Guth

On Dec 25, 5:05 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> > wrote :
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Dec 25, 3:19 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> > wrote in news:8e815ed4-80c6-4b6d-8e8c-
> >> :
>
> >> > Is this also why you silly brown-nosed folks can't share and share
> >> > alike, such as for sharing in the whole truth and nothing but the
> >> > truth, as to why our NASA/Apollo moon wasn't ever all that
> >> > physically dark and blue, especially to all of those unfiltered
> >> > Kodak moments?
>
> >> I never use Kodak. Only Fuji. I find the color saturation more
> >> satisfying. However, if I'm going for a pastel or Andy Wyeth egg
> >> tempera sort of feel I do use Kodak. So, guilty as charged.
>
> >> Bertie
>
> > In other words, that loaded MIB gun that's pointed at the back of your
> > empty head has gotten your undivided attention.
>
> The only thing pointed at my head has been a glass of wine.
>
> Bertie

In that case, if you should ever slip up, just keep checking that wine
for Po210. (standard MIB issue)

- Brad Guth

On Dec 25, 5:04 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> > wrote :
>
>
>
> > On Dec 25, 3:21 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> > wrote
>
> >> > Obviously those Antichrist and most all those 'pretend atheists'
>
> >> So does a pretend atheist believe in god and says he doesn;t, or does
> >> he say he does and secretly doesn't?
>
> > A pretend Atheist is very much a faith-based believer in some kind of
> > god, but that gets in the way of being a good Usenet rusemaster that
> > always needs to jump those various faith-based fences as often as they
> > like, as they topic/author stalk their ulterior motivated way within
> > Usenet.
>
> > Usually those Semitic pretend Atheist are rather easy to spot, as
> > their actions upon others is what typically goes along the exact very
> > same path or mindset as would any Old Testament thumping Zionist or
> > devout hard core Jew. Sometimes I can even spot those Mormon pretend
> > Atheists, because a true Atheist would tend to embrace the notions of
> > ETs and of whatever their intelligent design might have had to do with
> > the unusually complex forms of life as we know it.
>
> > Unfortunately, most honest folks of Usenet are deathly afraid of their
> > own shadow, and the other 99.9% are simply born-again liars unless
> > snookered and/or dumbfounded past the point of no return. Which group
> > do you fit into?
>
> Dunno, I thought you had alreadty decided and were goingto save me the
> trouble of deciding for myself.
>
> Bertie

That's my MI5/CIA spook, doing the usual buck passing, or isn't it a
little more like a hot potato pass. To think, without your silly
mindset kind of status quo or bust, the likes of Hitler would not have
gotten 10% as far as they did, and of course the same can be said of
our resident LLPOF warlord(GW Bush).

- Brad Guth

BradGuth > wrote in
:

> On Dec 25, 5:06 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> > wrote
>>
>> om:
>>
>> > Those NASA/Apollo folks were simply a whole lot smarter than given
>> > credit, especially those Third Reich of the Semitic kind.
>>
>> > Even if having such a reliable fly-by-rocket lander (of which our
>> > Apollo wizards did not have); would you have taken those moonsuit
>> > naked EVA walks upon such a gamma saturated moon that's at least 8
>> > fold worse off in secondary/recoil X-rays than any nasty Van Allen
>> > belt?
>>
>> You bet I would.
>>
>> Bertie
>
> And that's either because you had yourself an actual fly-by-rocket
> lander (though of undocumented prototype R&D) as of 4 decades ago and
> oddly not doable as of today, and/or is this naked moon walkabout
> possible because of your superior rad-hard DNA?
>
> Remember that you folks can't even tell us why the NASA/Apollo moon
> wasn't the least bit physically dark or much less looking blue, not to
> mention your not knowing of where or how the hell Venus was hiding.
>

I could but since you're a k00k you wouldn't listen anyway.

Bertie

BradGuth > wrote in
:

> On Dec 25, 5:05 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> > wrote
>> innews:d0b2366f-3592-4e9a-9799-

>> om:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Dec 25, 3:19 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> > wrote in news:8e815ed4-80c6-4b6d-8e8c-
>> >> :
>>
>> >> > Is this also why you silly brown-nosed folks can't share and
>> >> > share alike, such as for sharing in the whole truth and nothing
>> >> > but the truth, as to why our NASA/Apollo moon wasn't ever all
>> >> > that physically dark and blue, especially to all of those
>> >> > unfiltered Kodak moments?
>>
>> >> I never use Kodak. Only Fuji. I find the color saturation more
>> >> satisfying. However, if I'm going for a pastel or Andy Wyeth egg
>> >> tempera sort of feel I do use Kodak. So, guilty as charged.
>>
>> >> Bertie
>>
>> > In other words, that loaded MIB gun that's pointed at the back of
>> > your empty head has gotten your undivided attention.
>>
>> The only thing pointed at my head has been a glass of wine.
>>
>> Bertie
>
> In that case, if you should ever slip up, just keep checking that wine
> for Po210. (standard MIB issue)

Po 210? Was that a Cessna vuilt under licence in Warsaw?

Bertie

BradGuth > wrote in
:

> On Dec 25, 5:04 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> > wrote
>> innews:d9231cb8-3876-4199-8723-

>> om:
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Dec 25, 3:21 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> > wrote
>>
>> >> > Obviously those Antichrist and most all those 'pretend atheists'
>>
>> >> So does a pretend atheist believe in god and says he doesn;t, or
>> >> does he say he does and secretly doesn't?
>>
>> > A pretend Atheist is very much a faith-based believer in some kind
>> > of
>> > god, but that gets in the way of being a good Usenet rusemaster
>> > that always needs to jump those various faith-based fences as often
>> > as they like, as they topic/author stalk their ulterior motivated
>> > way within Usenet.
>>
>> > Usually those Semitic pretend Atheist are rather easy to spot, as
>> > their actions upon others is what typically goes along the exact
>> > very same path or mindset as would any Old Testament thumping
>> > Zionist or devout hard core Jew. Sometimes I can even spot those
>> > Mormon pretend Atheists, because a true Atheist would tend to
>> > embrace the notions of ETs and of whatever their intelligent design
>> > might have had to do with the unusually complex forms of life as we
>> > know it.
>>
>> > Unfortunately, most honest folks of Usenet are deathly afraid of
>> > their own shadow, and the other 99.9% are simply born-again liars
>> > unless snookered and/or dumbfounded past the point of no return.
>> > Which group do you fit into?
>>
>> Dunno, I thought you had alreadty decided and were goingto save me
>> the trouble of deciding for myself.
>>
>> Bertie
>
> That's my MI5/CIA spook, doing the usual buck passing, or isn't it a
> little more like a hot potato pass.

No, just saving myself loads of work by allowing you, with yur
tremendous insight, to tell me how it all works.

Bertie

On Dec 26, 2:08 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> > wrote :
>
> > On Dec 25, 5:04 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> > wrote
> >> innews:d9231cb8-3876-4199-8723-
>
>
>
>
>
> >> om:
>
> >> > On Dec 25, 3:21 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> > wrote
>
> >> >> > Obviously those Antichrist and most all those 'pretend atheists'
>
> >> >> So does a pretend atheist believe in god and says he doesn;t, or
> >> >> does he say he does and secretly doesn't?
>
> >> > A pretend Atheist is very much a faith-based believer in some kind
> >> > of
> >> > god, but that gets in the way of being a good Usenet rusemaster
> >> > that always needs to jump those various faith-based fences as often
> >> > as they like, as they topic/author stalk their ulterior motivated
> >> > way within Usenet.
>
> >> > Usually those Semitic pretend Atheist are rather easy to spot, as
> >> > their actions upon others is what typically goes along the exact
> >> > very same path or mindset as would any Old Testament thumping
> >> > Zionist or devout hard core Jew. Sometimes I can even spot those
> >> > Mormon pretend Atheists, because a true Atheist would tend to
> >> > embrace the notions of ETs and of whatever their intelligent design
> >> > might have had to do with the unusually complex forms of life as we
> >> > know it.
>
> >> > Unfortunately, most honest folks of Usenet are deathly afraid of
> >> > their own shadow, and the other 99.9% are simply born-again liars
> >> > unless snookered and/or dumbfounded past the point of no return.
> >> > Which group do you fit into?
>
> >> Dunno, I thought you had alreadty decided and were goingto save me
> >> the trouble of deciding for myself.
>
> >> Bertie
>
> > That's my MI5/CIA spook, doing the usual buck passing, or isn't it a
> > little more like a hot potato pass.
>
> No, just saving myself loads of work by allowing you, with yur
> tremendous insight, to tell me how it all works.
>
> Bertie

Unlike yourself, I'm not the least bit all-knowing, except I usually
know when I'm being snookered along.

Our blue moon as having been recently color CCD imaged with quality
bandpass coated optics is in fact looking rather bluish, pretty much
as it should appear to those insufficiently filtered cameras.

BTW, our moon's albedo on average of 0.11 is nearly as physically dark
as an open pit coal mine. Go figure upon which other nearly white
guano moon as having been xenon arc lamp spectrum illuminated that our
rad-hard Apollo wizards landed upon, instead of the unavoidably
reactive naked surface of iron, cobalt, sodium and titanium worth of
such a dry and extremely dusty moon that's so physically dark and as
such representing that unavoidably gamma and X-ray anticathode nasty
environment in addition to its naked basalt surface as being so
unavoidably electrostatic charged.

- Brad Guth

On Dec 26, 2:06 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> > wrote :
>
>
>
> > On Dec 25, 5:06 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> > wrote
> >>
> >> om:
>
> >> > Those NASA/Apollo folks were simply a whole lot smarter than given
> >> > credit, especially those Third Reich of the Semitic kind.
>
> >> > Even if having such a reliable fly-by-rocket lander (of which our
> >> > Apollo wizards did not have); would you have taken those moonsuit
> >> > naked EVA walks upon such a gamma saturated moon that's at least 8
> >> > fold worse off in secondary/recoil X-rays than any nasty Van Allen
> >> > belt?
>
> >> You bet I would.
>
> >> Bertie
>
> > And that's either because you had yourself an actual fly-by-rocket
> > lander (though of undocumented prototype R&D) as of 4 decades ago and
> > oddly not doable as of today, and/or is this naked moon walkabout
> > possible because of your superior rad-hard DNA?
>
> > Remember that you folks can't even tell us why the NASA/Apollo moon
> > wasn't the least bit physically dark or much less looking blue, not to
> > mention your not knowing of where or how the hell Venus was hiding.
>
> I could but since you're a k00k you wouldn't listen anyway.
>
> Bertie

In other words, you claim to know the truth but have elected as to not
share and share alike. Figures, doesn't it.

As having said this before; Our blue moon as having been recently
color CCD imaged with quality bandpass coated optics is in fact
looking rather bluish, pretty much as it should appear to those
insufficiently filtered cameras.

BTW, our moon's albedo on average of 0.11 is nearly as physically dark
as an open pit coal mine. Go figure upon which other nearly white
guano moon as having been xenon arc lamp spectrum illuminated that our
rad-hard Apollo wizards landed upon, instead of the unavoidably
reactive naked surface of iron, cobalt, sodium and titanium worth of
such a dry and extremely dusty moon that's so physically dark and as
such representing that unavoidably gamma and X-ray anticathode nasty
environment in addition to its naked basalt surface as being so
unavoidably electrostatic charged.

- Brad Guth

On Dec 26, 2:07 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> > wrote :
>
> > On Dec 25, 5:05 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> > wrote
> >> innews:d0b2366f-3592-4e9a-9799-
>
>
>
>
>
> >> om:
>
> >> > On Dec 25, 3:19 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> > wrote in news:8e815ed4-80c6-4b6d-8e8c-
> >> >> :
>
> >> >> > Is this also why you silly brown-nosed folks can't share and
> >> >> > share alike, such as for sharing in the whole truth and nothing
> >> >> > but the truth, as to why our NASA/Apollo moon wasn't ever all
> >> >> > that physically dark and blue, especially to all of those
> >> >> > unfiltered Kodak moments?
>
> >> >> I never use Kodak. Only Fuji. I find the color saturation more
> >> >> satisfying. However, if I'm going for a pastel or Andy Wyeth egg
> >> >> tempera sort of feel I do use Kodak. So, guilty as charged.
>
> >> >> Bertie
>
> >> > In other words, that loaded MIB gun that's pointed at the back of
> >> > your empty head has gotten your undivided attention.
>
> >> The only thing pointed at my head has been a glass of wine.
>
> >> Bertie
>
> > In that case, if you should ever slip up, just keep checking that wine
> > for Po210. (standard MIB issue)
>
> Po 210? Was that a Cessna vuilt under licence in Warsaw?
>
> Bertie

Gee whiz, you certainly got that one correct. Your pathetic life gets
summarily terminated while riding within a Cessna 210. Go figure, why
the hell not.

- Brad Guth

Perhaps the best "what-if" and/or future revisions of of
science.space.history from the perspective of everything from Japan
and China that's getting such new and improved science data about our
unusually surface massive and nearby moon that's looking as though so
unusually blue, as such is having to be mainstream taboo/nondisclosure
rated and/or moderated to death for all it's worth, all because it's
getting too freaking honest and clearly not sufficiently Semitic
enough in order to suit those in charge of our private parts.

As having said this so often before; Our blue moon as having been
recently color CCD imaged with quality bandpass coated optics is in
fact looking rather secondary/recoil photon bluish, pretty much
exactly as it should appear to those insufficiently filtered cameras.
Of course those of our NASA/Apollo EVA cameras had no such narrow
bandpass coatings whatsoever, much less of having any color hue
saturation cutoff worth of optical element, but yet they did have all
of that nifty Kodak film that was apparently made rad-hard and
otherwise naturally more spectrum sensitive than the human eye, along
with having more than a sufficient worth of dynamic range(DR) in order
to have easily recorded Venus.

BTW, our moon's albedo on average of 0.11 is nearly as physically dark
as an open pit coal mine. Go figure upon which other nearly white
guano island sort of moon as having been xenon arc lamp spectrum
illuminated that our rad-hard Apollo wizards landed upon, instead of
the physically dark and unavoidably reactive basalt naked surface of
such iron, cobalt, sodium and titanium worth of our crystal dry and
extremely dusty moon that's upon average physically darker than
basalt, and as such representing that unavoidably gamma and X-ray
anticathode nasty environment in addition to all of its naked basalt
and dusty surface as being so unavoidably electrostatic charged.

BTW No.2, those raw 10 meter per pixel images via JAXA are going to
extrapolate out to offering as good as one fuzzy meter per pixel of
resampled enlargements, but otherwise of perfectly worthy images
depicting most anything of any significant size that's any part of our
NASA/Apollo stuff.

I honestly expect to eventually see those NASA/Apollo remainders as
dust covered forms of something artificial within each of their
artificial impact craters, or at best of their one-way hard landing
site, whereas only the most robust of rad-hard robotics could have
survived for any length of time.

Otherwise we're forever stuck within the cloak and dagger loops of one
of those pesky "don't ask, don't tell" situations.

- Brad Guth

BradGuth > wrote:
> BTW, our moon's albedo on average of 0.11 is nearly as physically dark
> as an open pit coal mine.

So what? The albedo of a green golf course is 0.13. The albedo of a
conifer forest is only about 0.083.

You need to get out more. Go to a basalt flow on Earth - there are
plenty. Or get outside and look up at the full moon some night. You're
hanging your hat on the most feeblest of all threads.

Speaking of coal mines, compare these photos:
http://www.geokem.com/images/scans/Indonesian_coal_mine.jpg
http://www.geokem.com/images/scans/Nikolai-Geologist.jpg

with this one:
http://astrogeology.usgs.gov/Projects/BrowseTheGeologicSolarSystem/Jpg/MoonBack.jpg

So what did you think of the piloting of Neil Armstrong? (Trying to
make this topical! ;-))

On Dec 26, 1:53 pm, Jim Logajan > wrote:
> > wrote:
> > BTW, our moon's albedo on average of 0.11 is nearly as physically dark
> > as an open pit coal mine.
>
> So what? The albedo of a green golf course is 0.13. The albedo of a
> conifer forest is only about 0.083.
>
> You need to get out more. Go to a basalt flow on Earth - there are
> plenty. Or get outside and look up at the full moon some night. You're
> hanging your hat on the most feeblest of all threads.
>
> Speaking of coal mines, compare these photos: http://www.geokem.com/images/scans/Indonesian_coal_mine.jpg http://www.geokem.com/images/scans/Nikolai-Geologist.jpg
>
> with this one: http://astrogeology.usgs.gov/Projects/BrowseTheGeologicSolarSystem/Jp...

Those are certainly a couple of terrific coal mine pictures, with the
floor or deck of that first one at roughly 0.1 or less, and the
overcast albedo worth of the second at 0.12 or slightly better, and of
the third one being of a certain guano island as having that nifty
array of xenon arc lamps that's illuminating their foreground as
though this local source of artificial illumination is situated
nearby, with those nearly soft white and either extremely eroded and/
or dusty hills in the background.

BTW; Can I use all three of those images in a court of law?

And so all of that is why the NASA/Apollo moon wasn't ever the least
bit dark or much less blue, and probably the same reason as to why
Venus was always so darn invisible. Now we all know the Jim Logajan
truth, and thanks ever so much.

>
> So what did you think of the piloting of Neil Armstrong? (Trying to
> make this topical! ;-))

That's easy: especially when there's no such fly-by-rocket lander to
start with.

- Brad Guth

Bertie,

This is like watching an idiot being kept busy by a card that says
"How do you keep an idiot busy? See other side." printed on both
sides! LOL

Brad,

"See other side"

BradGuth > wrote in
:

> On Dec 26, 2:08 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> > wrote
>> innews:d0c3eab4-7172-4870-96fb-

>> m:
>>
>> > On Dec 25, 5:04 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> > wrote
>> >> innews:d9231cb8-3876-4199-8723-
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >> om:
>>
>> >> > On Dec 25, 3:21 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> >> > wrote
>>
>> >> >> > Obviously those Antichrist and most all those 'pretend
>> >> >> > atheists'
>>
>> >> >> So does a pretend atheist believe in god and says he doesn;t,
>> >> >> or does he say he does and secretly doesn't?
>>
>> >> > A pretend Atheist is very much a faith-based believer in some
>> >> > kind of
>> >> > god, but that gets in the way of being a good Usenet rusemaster
>> >> > that always needs to jump those various faith-based fences as
>> >> > often as they like, as they topic/author stalk their ulterior
>> >> > motivated way within Usenet.
>>
>> >> > Usually those Semitic pretend Atheist are rather easy to spot,
>> >> > as their actions upon others is what typically goes along the
>> >> > exact very same path or mindset as would any Old Testament
>> >> > thumping Zionist or devout hard core Jew. Sometimes I can even
>> >> > spot those Mormon pretend Atheists, because a true Atheist would
>> >> > tend to embrace the notions of ETs and of whatever their
>> >> > intelligent design might have had to do with the unusually
>> >> > complex forms of life as we know it.
>>
>> >> > Unfortunately, most honest folks of Usenet are deathly afraid of
>> >> > their own shadow, and the other 99.9% are simply born-again
>> >> > liars unless snookered and/or dumbfounded past the point of no
>> >> > return. Which group do you fit into?
>>
>> >> Dunno, I thought you had alreadty decided and were goingto save me
>> >> the trouble of deciding for myself.
>>
>> >> Bertie
>>
>> > That's my MI5/CIA spook, doing the usual buck passing, or isn't it
>> > a little more like a hot potato pass.
>>
>> No, just saving myself loads of work by allowing you, with yur
>> tremendous insight, to tell me how it all works.
>>
>> Bertie
>
> Unlike yourself, I'm not the least bit all-knowing, except I usually
> know when I'm being snookered along.
>
> Our blue moon as having been recently color CCD imaged with quality
> bandpass coated optics is in fact looking rather bluish, pretty much
> as it should appear to those insufficiently filtered cameras.
>
> BTW, our moon's albedo on average of 0.11 is nearly as physically dark
> as an open pit coal mine. Go figure upon which other nearly white
> guano moon as having been xenon arc lamp spectrum illuminated that our
> rad-hard Apollo wizards landed upon, instead of the unavoidably
> reactive naked surface of iron, cobalt, sodium and titanium worth of
> such a dry and extremely dusty moon that's so physically dark and as
> such representing that unavoidably gamma and X-ray anticathode nasty
> environment in addition to its naked basalt surface as being so
> unavoidably electrostatic charged.
>
>


mmmm hmm.

Bertie

BradGuth > wrote in
:

> On Dec 26, 2:06 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> > wrote
>> innews:b7785863-0c6f-47aa-a988-

>> om:
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Dec 25, 5:06 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> > wrote
>> >> innews:3b0561a5-3f5d-4d62-b111-870da88f0234
@i29g2000prf.googlegroup
>> >> s.c om:
>>
>> >> > Those NASA/Apollo folks were simply a whole lot smarter than
>> >> > given credit, especially those Third Reich of the Semitic kind.
>>
>> >> > Even if having such a reliable fly-by-rocket lander (of which
>> >> > our Apollo wizards did not have); would you have taken those
>> >> > moonsuit naked EVA walks upon such a gamma saturated moon that's
>> >> > at least 8 fold worse off in secondary/recoil X-rays than any
>> >> > nasty Van Allen belt?
>>
>> >> You bet I would.
>>
>> >> Bertie
>>
>> > And that's either because you had yourself an actual fly-by-rocket
>> > lander (though of undocumented prototype R&D) as of 4 decades ago
>> > and oddly not doable as of today, and/or is this naked moon
>> > walkabout possible because of your superior rad-hard DNA?
>>
>> > Remember that you folks can't even tell us why the NASA/Apollo moon
>> > wasn't the least bit physically dark or much less looking blue, not
>> > to mention your not knowing of where or how the hell Venus was
>> > hiding.
>>
>> I could but since you're a k00k you wouldn't listen anyway.
>>
>> Bertie
>
> In other words, you claim to know the truth but have elected as to not
> share and share alike. Figures, doesn't it.

Yes, I've dedicated my life to keeping you in the dark.

I'm obviously a tremendous success in this regard.


Bertie>

BradGuth > wrote in
:

> On Dec 26, 2:07 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> > wrote
>> innews:22182b62-522e-4d49-9840-b033ba040697
@e25g2000prg.googlegroups.c
>> om:
>>
>> > On Dec 25, 5:05 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> > wrote
>> >> innews:d0b2366f-3592-4e9a-9799-
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >> om:
>>
>> >> > On Dec 25, 3:19 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
>> >> > wrote in
>> >> >>news:8e815ed4-80c6-4b6d-8e8c-
>> >> >> :
>>
>> >> >> > Is this also why you silly brown-nosed folks can't share and
>> >> >> > share alike, such as for sharing in the whole truth and
>> >> >> > nothing but the truth, as to why our NASA/Apollo moon wasn't
>> >> >> > ever all that physically dark and blue, especially to all of
>> >> >> > those unfiltered Kodak moments?
>>
>> >> >> I never use Kodak. Only Fuji. I find the color saturation more
>> >> >> satisfying. However, if I'm going for a pastel or Andy Wyeth
>> >> >> egg tempera sort of feel I do use Kodak. So, guilty as charged.
>>
>> >> >> Bertie
>>
>> >> > In other words, that loaded MIB gun that's pointed at the back
>> >> > of your empty head has gotten your undivided attention.
>>
>> >> The only thing pointed at my head has been a glass of wine.
>>
>> >> Bertie
>>
>> > In that case, if you should ever slip up, just keep checking that
>> > wine for Po210. (standard MIB issue)
>>
>> Po 210? Was that a Cessna vuilt under licence in Warsaw?
>>
>> Bertie
>
> Gee whiz, you certainly got that one correct. Your pathetic life gets
> summarily terminated while riding within a Cessna 210. Go figure, why
> the hell not.

Whoosh!

Well, everythign goes whoosh in your head, doesn't it?

Bertie

wrote in news:09e7597d-32e1-48a4-b6b4-0c49a6b24c17
@s8g2000prg.googlegroups.com:

>
> Bertie,
>
> This is like watching an idiot being kept busy by a card that says
> "How do you keep an idiot busy? See other side." printed on both
> sides! LOL
>

Yeah, he's not the most challenging idiot I've played with. There were
plenty of conspirawhackoes in alt.disasters.aviation if you like this sort
of thing. They get kind of boring after a short time for me. Other k00k
hunters just love 'em to bits though!

Bertie

BradGuth > wrote in
:

> On Dec 26, 1:53 pm, Jim Logajan > wrote:
>> > wrote:
>> > BTW, our moon's albedo on average of 0.11 is nearly as physically
>> > dark as an open pit coal mine.
>>
>> So what? The albedo of a green golf course is 0.13. The albedo of a
>> conifer forest is only about 0.083.
>>
>> You need to get out more. Go to a basalt flow on Earth - there are
>> plenty. Or get outside and look up at the full moon some night.
>> You're hanging your hat on the most feeblest of all threads.
>>
>> Speaking of coal mines, compare these photos:
>> http://www.geokem.com/images/scans/Indonesian_coal_mine.jpg
>> http://www.geokem.com/images/scans/Nikolai-Geologist.jpg
>>
>> with this one:
>>
http://astrogeology.usgs.gov/Projects/BrowseTheGeologicSolarSystem/Jp.
>> ..
>
> Those are certainly a couple of terrific coal mine pictures, with the
> floor or deck of that first one at roughly 0.1 or less, and the
> overcast albedo worth of the second at 0.12 or slightly better, and of
> the third one being of a certain guano island as having that nifty
> array of xenon arc lamps that's illuminating their foreground as
> though this local source of artificial illumination is situated
> nearby, with those nearly soft white and either extremely eroded and/
> or dusty hills in the background.
>
> BTW; Can I use all three of those images in a court of law?


You're going to sue NASA?


Bertie>

On Dec 27, 6:02 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> Brad > wrote :
>
>
> > On Dec 26, 1:53 pm, Jim Logajan > wrote:
> >>Brad > wrote:
> >> > BTW, our moon's albedo on average of 0.11 is nearly as physically
> >> > dark as an open pit coal mine.
>
> >> So what? The albedo of a green golf course is 0.13. The albedo of a
> >> conifer forest is only about 0.083.
>
> >> You need to get out more. Go to a basalt flow on Earth - there are
> >> plenty. Or get outside and look up at the full moon some night.
> >> You're hanging your hat on the most feeblest of all threads.
>
> >> Speaking of coal mines, compare these photos:
> >>http://www.geokem.com/images/scans/Indonesian_coal_mine.jpg
> >>http://www.geokem.com/images/scans/Nikolai-Geologist.jpg
>
> >> with this one:
>
> http://astrogeology.usgs.gov/Projects/BrowseTheGeologicSolarSystem/Jp.
>
> >> ..
>
> > Those are certainly a couple of terrific coal mine pictures, with the
> > floor or deck of that first one at roughly 0.1 or less, and the
> > overcast albedo worth of the second at 0.12 or slightly better, and of
> > the third one being of a certain guano island as having that nifty
> > array of xenon arc lamps that's illuminating their foreground as
> > though this local source of artificial illumination is situated
> > nearby, with those nearly soft white and either extremely eroded and/
> > or dusty hills in the background.
>
> > BTW; Can I use all three of those images in a court of law?
>
> You're going to sue NASA?
>
> Bertie>

Why the hell not?

Since we've been snookered (some of us to death) by our own kind, at
least I want my portion of the loot returned, along with a few billion
in compensation for emotional damages.

Of course this will likely become a class action lawsuit, thus 99.9%
of Usenet and all of their fellow uplink.space.com minions will have
to get pulled into the soup.

- Brad Guth

On Dec 27, 5:36 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> > wrote :
>
> > On Dec 26, 2:07 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> > wrote
> >> innews:22182b62-522e-4d49-9840-b033ba040697
>
> @e25g2000prg.googlegroups.c
>
>
>
> >> om:
>
> >> > On Dec 25, 5:05 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> > wrote
> >> >> innews:d0b2366f-3592-4e9a-9799-
>
> >>
>
> >> >> om:
>
> >> >> > On Dec 25, 3:19 pm, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
> >> >> > wrote in
> >> >> >>news:8e815ed4-80c6-4b6d-8e8c-
> >> >> >> :
>
> >> >> >> > Is this also why you silly brown-nosed folks can't share and
> >> >> >> > share alike, such as for sharing in the whole truth and
> >> >> >> > nothing but the truth, as to why our NASA/Apollo moon wasn't
> >> >> >> > ever all that physically dark and blue, especially to all of
> >> >> >> > those unfiltered Kodak moments?
>
> >> >> >> I never use Kodak. Only Fuji. I find the color saturation more
> >> >> >> satisfying. However, if I'm going for a pastel or Andy Wyeth
> >> >> >> egg tempera sort of feel I do use Kodak. So, guilty as charged.
>
> >> >> >> Bertie
>
> >> >> > In other words, that loaded MIB gun that's pointed at the back
> >> >> > of your empty head has gotten your undivided attention.
>
> >> >> The only thing pointed at my head has been a glass of wine.
>
> >> >> Bertie
>
> >> > In that case, if you should ever slip up, just keep checking that
> >> > wine for Po210. (standard MIB issue)
>
> >> Po 210? Was that a Cessna vuilt under licence in Warsaw?
>
> >> Bertie
>
> > Gee whiz, you certainly got that one correct. Your pathetic life gets
> > summarily terminated while riding within a Cessna 210. Go figure, why
> > the hell not.
>
> Whoosh!
>
> Well, everythign goes whoosh in your head, doesn't it?
>
> Bertie

Again; is that the best physics and replicated science as to why our
NASA/Apollo moon wasn't ever the least bit blue, and as to why Venus
was never anywhere in sight?

As you say "everythign goes whoosh" doesn't it. BTW, you are a bit
dyslexic too, I see.

- Brad Guth