part number

[Philippe[_4_]]

Hello,

who knows the Cessna 150 propeller extension part number
(SAE1 patern, length around 2", engine O200)

thanks
--
une télé qui s'éteint et c'est un cerveau qui s'éveille
Philippe Vessaire Ò¿Ó¬

[Stealth Pilot[_3_]]

On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 09:50:48 +0100, Philippe >
wrote:

>Hello,
>
> who knows the Cessna 150 propeller extension part number
> (SAE1 patern, length around 2", engine O200)
>
>thanks

in the Cessna 100 series service manual there is no mention of an
extension.

the only ones I've seen are custom machined for homebuilts.

Stealth Pilot

[Peter Dohm]

"Stealth Pilot" > wrote in message
...
> On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 09:50:48 +0100, Philippe >
> wrote:
>
>>Hello,
>>
>> who knows the Cessna 150 propeller extension part number
>> (SAE1 patern, length around 2", engine O200)
>>
>>thanks
>
> in the Cessna 100 series service manual there is no mention of an
> extension.
>
> the only ones I've seen are custom machined for homebuilts.
>
> Stealth Pilot

There is, in fact, an extension on the 150M, and possibly the 150L and later
150F models; but I have never seen the manuals for those. I don't recall
whether ther extension was 2 inches or 3 inches. I believe that the
extension was concurrent with the change to the Clark-Y propeller and a
revised nosebowl/cowl.

Peter

[John[_9_]]

On Nov 5, 3:50*am, Philippe > wrote:
> Hello,
>
> * who knows the Cessna 150 propeller extension part number
> * * *(SAE1 patern, length around 2", engine O200)
>
> thanks
> --
> une télé qui s'éteint et c'est un cerveau qui s'éveille
> * * Philippe Vessaire *Ò¿Ó¬

You might have to look more to the propeller manual to find that
number since it was installed on the propeller and made by the prop
manufacturer.

[Stealth Pilot[_3_]]

On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 15:49:16 -0500, "Peter Dohm"
> wrote:

>"Stealth Pilot" > wrote in message
...
>> On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 09:50:48 +0100, Philippe >
>> wrote:
>>
>>>Hello,
>>>
>>> who knows the Cessna 150 propeller extension part number
>>> (SAE1 patern, length around 2", engine O200)
>>>
>>>thanks
>>
>> in the Cessna 100 series service manual there is no mention of an
>> extension.
>>
>> the only ones I've seen are custom machined for homebuilts.
>>
>> Stealth Pilot
>
>There is, in fact, an extension on the 150M, and possibly the 150L and later
>150F models; but I have never seen the manuals for those. I don't recall
>whether ther extension was 2 inches or 3 inches. I believe that the
>extension was concurrent with the change to the Clark-Y propeller and a
>revised nosebowl/cowl.
>
>Peter
>
ok that would post date the manual I have.

[Brian Whatcott]

Stealth Pilot wrote:

>> There is, in fact, an extension on the 150M, and possibly the 150L and later
>> 150F models; but I have never seen the manuals for those. I don't recall
>> whether ther extension was 2 inches or 3 inches. I believe that the
>> extension was concurrent with the change to the Clark-Y propeller and a
>> revised nosebowl/cowl.
>>
>> Peter
>>
> ok that would post date the manual I have.

No extension on 63-69 models in the '70 parts catalog.

Brian W

[Peter Dohm]

"brian whatcott" > wrote in message
...
> Stealth Pilot wrote:
>
>>> There is, in fact, an extension on the 150M, and possibly the 150L and
>>> later 150F models; but I have never seen the manuals for those. I don't
>>> recall whether ther extension was 2 inches or 3 inches. I believe that
>>> the extension was concurrent with the change to the Clark-Y propeller
>>> and a revised nosebowl/cowl.
>>>
>>> Peter
>>>
>> ok that would post date the manual I have.
>
> No extension on 63-69 models in the '70 parts catalog.
>
> Brian W

That's true.

It was on the 1977 model (150M) and may have been on the 150L which was
build in 1976 and possibly 1975--I don't have the information currently
available.

The prop extesion was part of a long series of improvements that gradually
brought the stated cruise speed back up to what is had been on the earliest
models--despite the wider cabin and "notch back" rear window. I have
trouble thinking of the 152 and later 150 and wide bodies; but this really
is what they were!

Peter