China's sixth-generation fighter aircraft design based on nuclearpropulsion

[Timur]

http://china-arsenal.blogspot.com/2009/12/chinas-sixth-generation-fighter.html

[Ray O'Hara[_3_]]

"Timur" > wrote in message
...
> http://china-arsenal.blogspot.com/2009/12/chinas-sixth-generation-fighter.html


what will you post next. China's moonbase plans and its X-wing fighters?
get back to us when they build credible 3rd generation fighters.

[guy]

On 9 Dec, 19:57, "Ray O'Hara" > wrote:
> "Timur" > wrote in message
>
> ...
>
> >http://china-arsenal.blogspot.com/2009/12/chinas-sixth-generation-fig...
>
> what will you post next. China's moonbase plans and its X-wing fighters?
> get back to us when they build credible 3rd generation fighters.

Ray really! have you not heard about the Mach 3 dirigibles they are
building?

Guy

[Jack Linthicum]

On Dec 9, 3:06*pm, guy > wrote:
> On 9 Dec, 19:57, "Ray O'Hara" > wrote:
>
> > "Timur" > wrote in message
>
> ....
>
> > >http://china-arsenal.blogspot.com/2009/12/chinas-sixth-generation-fig....
>
> > what will you post next. China's moonbase plans and its X-wing fighters?
> > get back to us when they build credible 3rd generation fighters.
>
> Ray really! have you not heard about the Mach 3 dirigibles they are
> building?
>
> Guy

That's "Mock 3"

[nik Simpson]

On 12/9/2009 1:52 PM, Timur wrote:
> http://china-arsenal.blogspot.com/2009/12/chinas-sixth-generation-fighter.html

Apparently they use the same guy who does Chinese-English translation
for cheap electronics.

--
Nik Simpson

[Peter Skelton]

On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 12:06:48 -0800 (PST), guy
> wrote:

>On 9 Dec, 19:57, "Ray O'Hara" > wrote:
>> "Timur" > wrote in message
>>
>> ...
>>
>> >http://china-arsenal.blogspot.com/2009/12/chinas-sixth-generation-fig...
>>
>> what will you post next. China's moonbase plans and its X-wing fighters?
>> get back to us when they build credible 3rd generation fighters.
>
>Ray really! have you not heard about the Mach 3 dirigibles they are
>building?
>
Is that the one where they added cialis to the gas mix to improve
rigidity?


Peter Skelton

[Dan[_12_]]

Peter Skelton wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 12:06:48 -0800 (PST), guy
> > wrote:
>
>> On 9 Dec, 19:57, "Ray O'Hara" > wrote:
>>> "Timur" > wrote in message
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>>> http://china-arsenal.blogspot.com/2009/12/chinas-sixth-generation-fig...
>>> what will you post next. China's moonbase plans and its X-wing fighters?
>>> get back to us when they build credible 3rd generation fighters.
>> Ray really! have you not heard about the Mach 3 dirigibles they are
>> building?
>>
> Is that the one where they added cialis to the gas mix to improve
> rigidity?
>
>
> Peter Skelton

If it remains rigid for more than 4 hours it needs to be seen by a
physician.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

[Richard[_11_]]

On Dec 9, 7:08*pm, Dan > wrote:
> Peter Skelton wrote:
> > On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 12:06:48 -0800 (PST), guy
> > > wrote:
>
> >> On 9 Dec, 19:57, "Ray O'Hara" > wrote:
> >>> "Timur" > wrote in message
>
> ....
>
> >>>>http://china-arsenal.blogspot.com/2009/12/chinas-sixth-generation-fig....
> >>> what will you post next. China's moonbase plans and its X-wing fighters?
> >>> get back to us when they build credible 3rd generation fighters.
> >> Ray really! have you not heard about the Mach 3 dirigibles they are
> >> building?
>
> > Is that the one where they added cialis to the gas mix to improve
> > rigidity?
>
> > Peter Skelton
>
> * *If it remains rigid for more than 4 hours it needs to be seen by a
> physician.
>
> Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Puts a whole new angle on PRC.

The airship "Priapism".

[WaltBJ]

Nuclear propulsion in a fighter? It's either going to be the biggest
heaviest fighter ever built or the mechanics will be able to perform
one (1) launch and the pilot one (1) mssion. And it better be a short
one, too, or else the pilot'll be barfing his guts out before he gets
back on final. Radiation, you know . . .
Walt BJ

[Bill Kambic[_2_]]

On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 17:50:03 -0800 (PST), WaltBJ
> wrote:

>Nuclear propulsion in a fighter? It's either going to be the biggest
>heaviest fighter ever built or the mechanics will be able to perform
>one (1) launch and the pilot one (1) mssion. And it better be a short
>one, too, or else the pilot'll be barfing his guts out before he gets
>back on final. Radiation, you know . . .
>Walt BJ

I'm sure they've developed a new shielding material with the
performance of lead and the weight of balsa wood to incorporate into
this new generation of wundermachinen.

[Dennis[_6_]]

guy wrote:

>> >http://china-arsenal.blogspot.com/2009/12/chinas-sixth-generation-fig
>> >...
>>
>> what will you post next. China's moonbase plans and its X-wing
>> fighters? get back to us when they build credible 3rd generation
>> fighters.
>
> Ray really! have you not heard about the Mach 3 dirigibles they are
> building?

Well, I *have* heard of Alien Space Bats...

[Dan[_12_]]

Richard wrote:
> On Dec 9, 7:08 pm, Dan > wrote:
>> Peter Skelton wrote:
>>> On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 12:06:48 -0800 (PST), guy
>>> > wrote:
>>>> On 9 Dec, 19:57, "Ray O'Hara" > wrote:
>>>>> "Timur" > wrote in message
>>>>> ...
>>>>>> http://china-arsenal.blogspot.com/2009/12/chinas-sixth-generation-fig...
>>>>> what will you post next. China's moonbase plans and its X-wing fighters?
>>>>> get back to us when they build credible 3rd generation fighters.
>>>> Ray really! have you not heard about the Mach 3 dirigibles they are
>>>> building?
>>> Is that the one where they added cialis to the gas mix to improve
>>> rigidity?
>>> Peter Skelton
>> If it remains rigid for more than 4 hours it needs to be seen by a
>> physician.
>>
>> Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> Puts a whole new angle on PRC.
>
> The airship "Priapism".

It's the Trojan class of airship. Most noticeable is the ribbed
envelope.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

[Jeff Dougherty]

On Dec 9, 3:17*pm, Jack Linthicum > wrote:
> On Dec 9, 3:06*pm, guy > wrote:
>
> > On 9 Dec, 19:57, "Ray O'Hara" > wrote:
>
> > > "Timur" > wrote in message
>
> > ....
>
> > > >http://china-arsenal.blogspot.com/2009/12/chinas-sixth-generation-fig...
>
> > > what will you post next. China's moonbase plans and its X-wing fighters?
> > > get back to us when they build credible 3rd generation fighters.
>
> > Ray really! have you not heard about the Mach 3 dirigibles they are
> > building?
>
> > Guy
>
> That's "Mock 3"

I thought it was "Mach 5".

"Speed, if you don't use the nuclear drive Racer X and the Americans
are going to win this race!"

-JTD

[tankfixer]

In article >,
says...
>
> On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 17:50:03 -0800 (PST), WaltBJ
> > wrote:
>
> >Nuclear propulsion in a fighter? It's either going to be the biggest
> >heaviest fighter ever built or the mechanics will be able to perform
> >one (1) launch and the pilot one (1) mssion. And it better be a short
> >one, too, or else the pilot'll be barfing his guts out before he gets
> >back on final. Radiation, you know . . .
> >Walt BJ
>
> I'm sure they've developed a new shielding material with the
> performance of lead and the weight of balsa wood to incorporate into
> this new generation of wundermachinen.

When you have billions of people why worry about the pilot ?
Just stuff a new one in for each mission...

[guy]

On 10 Dec, 06:29, Jeff Dougherty > wrote:
> On Dec 9, 3:17*pm, Jack Linthicum > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Dec 9, 3:06*pm, guy > wrote:
>
> > > On 9 Dec, 19:57, "Ray O'Hara" > wrote:
>
> > > > "Timur" > wrote in message
>
> > > ...
>
> > > > >http://china-arsenal.blogspot.com/2009/12/chinas-sixth-generation-fig...
>
> > > > what will you post next. China's moonbase plans and its X-wing fighters?
> > > > get back to us when they build credible 3rd generation fighters.
>
> > > Ray really! have you not heard about the Mach 3 dirigibles they are
> > > building?
>
> > > Guy
>
> > That's "Mock 3"
>
> I thought it was "Mach 5".
>
> "Speed, if you don't use the nuclear drive Racer X and the Americans
> are going to win this race!"
>
> -JTD- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Bugger, there is a mark 2?

Guy

[guy]

On 10 Dec, 01:08, Dan > wrote:
> Peter Skelton wrote:
> > On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 12:06:48 -0800 (PST), guy
> > > wrote:
>
> >> On 9 Dec, 19:57, "Ray O'Hara" > wrote:
> >>> "Timur" > wrote in message
>
> ....
>
> >>>>http://china-arsenal.blogspot.com/2009/12/chinas-sixth-generation-fig....
> >>> what will you post next. China's moonbase plans and its X-wing fighters?
> >>> get back to us when they build credible 3rd generation fighters.
> >> Ray really! have you not heard about the Mach 3 dirigibles they are
> >> building?
>
> > Is that the one where they added cialis to the gas mix to improve
> > rigidity?
>
> > Peter Skelton
>
> * *If it remains rigid for more than 4 hours it needs to be seen by a
> physician.
>
> Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Even better than Viagra;-)

Guy

[Dan[_12_]]

guy wrote:
> On 10 Dec, 01:08, Dan > wrote:
>> Peter Skelton wrote:
>>> On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 12:06:48 -0800 (PST), guy
>>> > wrote:
>>>> On 9 Dec, 19:57, "Ray O'Hara" > wrote:
>>>>> "Timur" > wrote in message
>>>>> ...
>>>>>> http://china-arsenal.blogspot.com/2009/12/chinas-sixth-generation-fig...
>>>>> what will you post next. China's moonbase plans and its X-wing fighters?
>>>>> get back to us when they build credible 3rd generation fighters.
>>>> Ray really! have you not heard about the Mach 3 dirigibles they are
>>>> building?
>>> Is that the one where they added cialis to the gas mix to improve
>>> rigidity?
>>> Peter Skelton
>> If it remains rigid for more than 4 hours it needs to be seen by a
>> physician.
>>
>> Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> Even better than Viagra;-)
>
> Guy

Viagra would have to be used 30 minutes prior to launch. Cialis can
be taken daily so the Mach 3 dirigible can sit alert.

Of course such a fast airship would make it a tad difficult to swing
aboard with cutlass in hand.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

[Peter Skelton]

On Wed, 09 Dec 2009 19:08:22 -0600, Dan > wrote:

>Peter Skelton wrote:
>> On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 12:06:48 -0800 (PST), guy
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> On 9 Dec, 19:57, "Ray O'Hara" > wrote:
>>>> "Timur" > wrote in message
>>>>
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>>> http://china-arsenal.blogspot.com/2009/12/chinas-sixth-generation-fig...
>>>> what will you post next. China's moonbase plans and its X-wing fighters?
>>>> get back to us when they build credible 3rd generation fighters.
>>> Ray really! have you not heard about the Mach 3 dirigibles they are
>>> building?
>>>
>> Is that the one where they added cialis to the gas mix to improve
>> rigidity?
>>
>>
>> Peter Skelton
>
> If it remains rigid for more than 4 hours it needs to be seen by a
>physician.
>

That's the USN blimp which uses the obsolescent viagra
technology.


Peter Skelton

[Peter Skelton]

On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 22:30:46 -0800, tankfixer
> wrote:

>In article >,
says...
>>
>> On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 17:50:03 -0800 (PST), WaltBJ
>> > wrote:
>>
>> >Nuclear propulsion in a fighter? It's either going to be the biggest
>> >heaviest fighter ever built or the mechanics will be able to perform
>> >one (1) launch and the pilot one (1) mssion. And it better be a short
>> >one, too, or else the pilot'll be barfing his guts out before he gets
>> >back on final. Radiation, you know . . .
>> >Walt BJ
>>
>> I'm sure they've developed a new shielding material with the
>> performance of lead and the weight of balsa wood to incorporate into
>> this new generation of wundermachinen.
>
>When you have billions of people why worry about the pilot ?
>Just stuff a new one in for each mission...

I forsee certain difficulties with training.


Peter Skelton

[Peter Skelton]

On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 01:58:53 -0600, Dan > wrote:

>guy wrote:
>> On 10 Dec, 01:08, Dan > wrote:
>>> Peter Skelton wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 12:06:48 -0800 (PST), guy
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>> On 9 Dec, 19:57, "Ray O'Hara" > wrote:
>>>>>> "Timur" > wrote in message
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>> http://china-arsenal.blogspot.com/2009/12/chinas-sixth-generation-fig...
>>>>>> what will you post next. China's moonbase plans and its X-wing fighters?
>>>>>> get back to us when they build credible 3rd generation fighters.
>>>>> Ray really! have you not heard about the Mach 3 dirigibles they are
>>>>> building?
>>>> Is that the one where they added cialis to the gas mix to improve
>>>> rigidity?
>>>> Peter Skelton
>>> If it remains rigid for more than 4 hours it needs to be seen by a
>>> physician.
>>>
>>> Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired- Hide quoted text -
>>>
>>> - Show quoted text -
>>
>> Even better than Viagra;-)
>>
>> Guy
>
> Viagra would have to be used 30 minutes prior to launch. Cialis can
>be taken daily so the Mach 3 dirigible can sit alert.
>
Don't you mean stand by?

> Of course such a fast airship would make it a tad difficult to swing
>aboard with cutlass in hand.
>
>Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
>
>Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Peter Skelton

[mkf]

On Dec 10, 7:27*am, Peter Skelton > wrote:
> On Wed, 09 Dec 2009 19:08:22 -0600, Dan > wrote:
> >Peter Skelton wrote:
> >> On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 12:06:48 -0800 (PST), guy
> >> > wrote:
>
> >>> On 9 Dec, 19:57, "Ray O'Hara" > wrote:
> >>>> "Timur" > wrote in message
>
> ...
>
> >>>>>http://china-arsenal.blogspot.com/2009/12/chinas-sixth-generation-fig...
> >>>> what will you post next. China's moonbase plans and its X-wing fighters?
> >>>> get back to us when they build credible 3rd generation fighters.
> >>> Ray really! have you not heard about the Mach 3 dirigibles they are
> >>> building?
>
> >> Is that the one where they added cialis to the gas mix to improve
> >> rigidity?
>
> >> Peter Skelton
>
> > * If it remains rigid for more than 4 hours it needs to be seen by a
> >physician.
>
> That's the USN blimp which uses the obsolescent viagra
> technology.
>
> Peter Skelton- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Cancelled after the government spent billions on "range-extension"
technology, then sent it back when the "desired results" were not
achieved.

[Bill Kambic[_2_]]

On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 07:28:34 -0500, Peter Skelton >
wrote:

>On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 22:30:46 -0800, tankfixer
> wrote:
>
>>In article >,
says...
>>>
>>> On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 17:50:03 -0800 (PST), WaltBJ
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>> >Nuclear propulsion in a fighter? It's either going to be the biggest
>>> >heaviest fighter ever built or the mechanics will be able to perform
>>> >one (1) launch and the pilot one (1) mssion. And it better be a short
>>> >one, too, or else the pilot'll be barfing his guts out before he gets
>>> >back on final. Radiation, you know . . .
>>> >Walt BJ
>>>
>>> I'm sure they've developed a new shielding material with the
>>> performance of lead and the weight of balsa wood to incorporate into
>>> this new generation of wundermachinen.
>>
>>When you have billions of people why worry about the pilot ?
>>Just stuff a new one in for each mission...
>
>I forsee certain difficulties with training.

Maybe they'll subcontract the training to the Alphonse Cadea Aviation
Academy..

[Timur]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_aircraft
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Nuclear_vehicle_propulsion
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Nuclear_propulsion

[tankfixer]

In article >,
says...
>
> On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 22:30:46 -0800, tankfixer
> > wrote:
>
> >In article >,
> says...
> >>
> >> On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 17:50:03 -0800 (PST), WaltBJ
> >> > wrote:
> >>
> >> >Nuclear propulsion in a fighter? It's either going to be the biggest
> >> >heaviest fighter ever built or the mechanics will be able to perform
> >> >one (1) launch and the pilot one (1) mssion. And it better be a short
> >> >one, too, or else the pilot'll be barfing his guts out before he gets
> >> >back on final. Radiation, you know . . .
> >> >Walt BJ
> >>
> >> I'm sure they've developed a new shielding material with the
> >> performance of lead and the weight of balsa wood to incorporate into
> >> this new generation of wundermachinen.
> >
> >When you have billions of people why worry about the pilot ?
> >Just stuff a new one in for each mission...
>
> I forsee certain difficulties with training.

Training ?
After the flying exhibition when they crashed the USN P3 are we sure
that China trains her pilots now ?

[frank]

On Dec 10, 11:33*am, Jeff Dougherty >
wrote:
> On Dec 10, 2:22*am, guy > wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 10 Dec, 06:29, Jeff Dougherty > wrote:
>
> > > On Dec 9, 3:17*pm, Jack Linthicum > wrote:
>
> > > > On Dec 9, 3:06*pm, guy > wrote:
>
> > > > > On 9 Dec, 19:57, "Ray O'Hara" > wrote:
>
> > > > > > "Timur" > wrote in message
>
> > > > > ...
>
> > > > > > >http://china-arsenal.blogspot.com/2009/12/chinas-sixth-generation-fig...
>
> > > > > > what will you post next. China's moonbase plans and its X-wing fighters?
> > > > > > get back to us when they build credible 3rd generation fighters..
>
> > > > > Ray really! have you not heard about the Mach 3 dirigibles they are
> > > > > building?
>
> > > > > Guy
>
> > > > That's "Mock 3"
>
> > > I thought it was "Mach 5".
>
> > > "Speed, if you don't use the nuclear drive Racer X and the Americans
> > > are going to win this race!"
>
> > > -JTD- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > Bugger, there is a mark 2?
>
> > Guy
>
> Yeah, and this one was drawn in Photoshop. *Imperialists beware!
>
> -JTD

ARRGH, and to keep it topical was probably pirated....

[guy]

On 10 Dec, 05:30, Dan > wrote:
> Richard wrote:
> > On Dec 9, 7:08 pm, Dan > wrote:
> >> Peter Skelton wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 12:06:48 -0800 (PST), guy
> >>> > wrote:
> >>>> On 9 Dec, 19:57, "Ray O'Hara" > wrote:
> >>>>> "Timur" > wrote in message
> ...
> >>>>>>http://china-arsenal.blogspot.com/2009/12/chinas-sixth-generation-fig...
> >>>>> what will you post next. China's moonbase plans and its X-wing fighters?
> >>>>> get back to us when they build credible 3rd generation fighters.
> >>>> Ray really! have you not heard about the Mach 3 dirigibles they are
> >>>> building?
> >>> Is that the one where they added cialis to the gas mix to improve
> >>> rigidity?
> >>> Peter Skelton
> >> * *If it remains rigid for more than 4 hours it needs to be seen by a
> >> physician.
>
> >> Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> > Puts a whole new angle on PRC.
>
> > The airship "Priapism".
>
> * * It's the Trojan class of airship. Most noticeable is the ribbed
> envelope.
>
> Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Any idea what the hanger it goes in fro emtying the envelope looks
like?

Guy

[Dan[_12_]]

guy wrote:
> On 10 Dec, 05:30, Dan > wrote:
>> Richard wrote:
>>> On Dec 9, 7:08 pm, Dan > wrote:
>>>> Peter Skelton wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 12:06:48 -0800 (PST), guy
>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>> On 9 Dec, 19:57, "Ray O'Hara" > wrote:
>>>>>>> "Timur" > wrote in message
>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>> http://china-arsenal.blogspot.com/2009/12/chinas-sixth-generation-fig...
>>>>>>> what will you post next. China's moonbase plans and its X-wing fighters?
>>>>>>> get back to us when they build credible 3rd generation fighters.
>>>>>> Ray really! have you not heard about the Mach 3 dirigibles they are
>>>>>> building?
>>>>> Is that the one where they added cialis to the gas mix to improve
>>>>> rigidity?
>>>>> Peter Skelton
>>>> If it remains rigid for more than 4 hours it needs to be seen by a
>>>> physician.
>>>> Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired- Hide quoted text -
>>>> - Show quoted text -
>>> Puts a whole new angle on PRC.
>>> The airship "Priapism".
>> It's the Trojan class of airship. Most noticeable is the ribbed
>> envelope.
>>
>> Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> Any idea what the hanger it goes in fro emtying the envelope looks
> like?
>
> Guy

Fire your typist.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired