Re: Some good news to my old friends here at rec.aviation

[Robert Moore]

Mxsmanic wrote
> Does this mean that your hotel in Iowa is closing, or are you going to be
> operating two separate hotels, one in Iowa and one in Texas?

Well...let's see how many people jump in here to tell Mxsmanic that since
he doesn't own a motel, he is not qualified to ask this question. :)

Bob Moore

[george]

On Feb 23, 3:14*am, Robert Moore > wrote:
> Mxsmanic wrote
>
> > Does this mean that your hotel in Iowa is closing, or are you going to be
> > operating two separate hotels, one in Iowa and one in Texas?
>
> Well...let's see how many people jump in here to tell Mxsmanic that since
> he doesn't own a motel, he is not qualified to ask this question. *:)

:-) That comes after mixedup starts telling Jay how to do it...

[Morgans[_2_]]

"Robert Moore" > wrote

> Well...let's see how many people jump in here to tell Mxsmanic that since
> he doesn't own a motel, he is not qualified to ask this question. :)

My only comment would be on how he can miss analyzing a simple e-mail, so
completely. Nowhere was there an implication that they would be selling one
motel.

Not surprising, now that I think of it. What does he not mess up?
--
Jim in NC

[gpsman]

On Feb 22, 8:46*pm, "Morgans" > wrote:
> "Robert Moore" > wrote
>
> > Well...let's see how many people jump in here to tell Mxsmanic that since
> > he doesn't own a motel, he is not qualified to ask this question. *:)
>
> My only comment would be on how he can miss analyzing a simple e-mail, so
> completely.

You don't say.

> Nowhere was there an implication that they would be selling one
> motel.

Where, exactly, do you see that implied?

<q>On Feb 22, 5:26 am, Mxsmanic > wrote:
Does this mean that your hotel in Iowa is closing, or are you going to
be
operating two separate hotels, one in Iowa and one in Texas?</q>

I'm just as interested. Either way, somebody has some kickass
business sense of which I am in awe, especially in this economic/
lending climate.

> Not surprising, now that I think of it.

You sure that was thinking...?

I can see how he can get under the skin in his quest to have the
gnat's ass of everything there is to know about flying spoon-fed to
him, my issue is solely within the irony of your post.
-----

- gpsman

[Morgans[_2_]]

gpsman, try to keep up with who said what, when. Without going into
details, you are not even close.
--
Jim in NC

[XXXXX]

On Feb 22, 8:46*pm, "Morgans" > wrote:
> "Robert Moore" > wrote
>
> > Well...let's see how many people jump in here to tell Mxsmanic that since
> > he doesn't own a motel, he is not qualified to ask this question. *:)
>
> My only comment would be on how he can miss analyzing a simple e-mail, so
> completely. *Nowhere was there an implication that they would be selling one
> motel.
>
> Not surprising, now that I think of it. *What does he not mess up?
> --
> Jim in NC

someone earlier in this thread asked about the fate of his old motel
too. Aren't you going to harp on him too?

[Morgans[_2_]]

"XXXXX" > wrote

> someone earlier in this thread asked about the fate of his old motel
> too. Aren't you going to harp on him too?

Someone mistakenly said I asked about it, but if you follow it closely, it
was MXS ed up that asked if he was going to sell the Iowa one, even though
NOWHERE was that ever mentioned. So yes, mixed up MX got it wrong again,
and I will be glad to harp on him. Nobody else got it wrong; just him.
That isn't surprising, in the least.
--
Jim in NC

[gpsman]

On Feb 23, 5:44*pm, "Morgans" > wrote:
> "XXXXX" > wrote
>
> > someone earlier in this thread asked about the fate of his old motel
> > too. Aren't you going to harp on him too?
>
> Someone mistakenly said I asked about it, but if you follow it closely, it
> was MXS ed up that asked if he was going to sell the Iowa one, even though
> NOWHERE was that ever mentioned. *So yes, mixed up MX got it wrong again,
> and I will be glad to harp on him. *Nobody else got it wrong; just him.
> That isn't surprising, in the least.

I think I see the problem; you're retarded.
-----

- gpsman

[Gezellig]

On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 22:57:15 -0800 (PST), gpsman wrote:

> On Feb 23, 5:44*pm, "Morgans" > wrote:
>> "XXXXX" > wrote
>>
>>> someone earlier in this thread asked about the fate of his old motel
>>> too. Aren't you going to harp on him too?
>>
>> Someone mistakenly said I asked about it, but if you follow it closely, it
>> was MXS ed up that asked if he was going to sell the Iowa one, even though
>> NOWHERE was that ever mentioned. *So yes, mixed up MX got it wrong again,
>> and I will be glad to harp on him. *Nobody else got it wrong; just him.
>> That isn't surprising, in the least.
>
> I think I see the problem; you're retarded.
> -----
>
> - gpsman

Everyone who is in this or any thread who responds to MX is retarded.

Yes, that means basically the whole group on RAP, the ********.

[Morgans[_2_]]

"gpsman" > wrote

> I think I see the problem; you're retarded.

Who ****ed on your Wheaties this morning? I was simply stating fact. One
thing I will not stand (or sit) for is having someone else's words
attributed to me. This was the case, in this case.

Sorry if the truth does not jive with your version of life.
--
Jim in NC

[gpsman]

On Feb 24, 5:26*pm, "Morgans" > wrote:
> "gpsman" > wrote
>
> > I think I see the problem; you're retarded.
>
> Who ****ed on your Wheaties this morning? *I was simply stating fact. *One
> thing I will not stand (or sit) for is having someone else's words
> attributed to me. *This was the case, in this case.
>
> Sorry if the truth does not jive with your version of life.

They sure look like your words.

Path: g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!proxad.net!
feeder1-2.proxad.net!feeder.erje.net!feeder.eternal-september.org!
eternal-september.org!aioe.org!not-for-mail
From: "Morgans" >
Newsgroups:
rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.owning,rec.avia tion.homebuilt
Subject: Re: Some good news to my old friends here at rec.aviation
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 22:46:52 -0300
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines: 15
Message-ID: >
References: >
> <nospam-88E84F.
>
>
>
67>
NNTP-Posting-Host: CedfUkRXFxJtMXcoUoWSwg.user.speranza.aioe.org
X-Complaints-To:
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5843
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal

"Robert Moore" > wrote:

My only comment would be on how he can miss analyzing a simple e-mail,
so
completely. Nowhere was there an implication that they would be
selling one
motel.

Not surprising, now that I think of it. What does he not mess up?
--
Jim in NC
-----

- gpsman

[cavelamb[_2_]]

gpsman wrote:

Who ****ed on your Wheaties this morning? I was simply stating fact. One
thing I will not stand (or sit) for is having someone else's words
attributed to me. This was the case, in this case.


- gpsman

[XXXXX]

On Feb 24, 1:57*am, gpsman > wrote:
> On Feb 23, 5:44*pm, "Morgans" > wrote:
>
> > "XXXXX" > wrote
>
> > > someone earlier in this thread asked about the fate of his old motel
> > > too. Aren't you going to harp on him too?
>
> > Someone mistakenly said I asked about it, but if you follow it closely, it
> > was MXS ed up that asked if he was going to sell the Iowa one, even though
> > NOWHERE was that ever mentioned. *So yes, mixed up MX got it wrong again,
> > and I will be glad to harp on him. *Nobody else got it wrong; just him.
> > That isn't surprising, in the least.
>
> I think I see the problem; you're retarded.
> *-----
>
> - gpsman

agreeing with this

[XXXXX]

On Feb 24, 9:19*am, Gezellig > wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 22:57:15 -0800 (PST), gpsman wrote:
> > On Feb 23, 5:44*pm, "Morgans" > wrote:
> >> "XXXXX" > wrote
>
> >>> someone earlier in this thread asked about the fate of his old motel
> >>> too. Aren't you going to harp on him too?
>
> >> Someone mistakenly said I asked about it, but if you follow it closely, it
> >> was MXS ed up that asked if he was going to sell the Iowa one, even though
> >> NOWHERE was that ever mentioned. *So yes, mixed up MX got it wrong again,
> >> and I will be glad to harp on him. *Nobody else got it wrong; just him.
> >> That isn't surprising, in the least.
>
> > I think I see the problem; you're retarded.
> > *-----
>
> > - gpsman
>
> Everyone who is in this or any thread who responds to MX is retarded.
>
> Yes, that means basically the whole group on RAP, the ********.

agreeing with this too

[Ricky]

On Feb 22, 7:46*pm, "Morgans" > wrote:

> My only comment would be on how he can miss analyzing a simple e-mail, so
> completely. *Nowhere was there an implication that they would be selling one
> motel.
>
> Not surprising, now that I think of it. *What does he not mess up?
> --
> Jim in NC

You know, neither was there an implication that he WASN'T selling his
other motel, so MX's question is perfectly valid. It seems you are the
one with the analytical handicap.

Ricky

[cavedweller]

On Feb 25, 11:07*am, Ricky > wrote:
> On Feb 22, 7:46*pm, "Morgans" > wrote:
>
> > My only comment would be on how he can miss analyzing a simple e-mail, so
> > completely. *Nowhere was there an implication that they would be selling one
> > motel.
>
> > Not surprising, now that I think of it. *What does he not mess up?
> > --
> > Jim in NC
>
> You know, neither was there an implication that he WASN'T selling his
> other motel, so MX's question is perfectly valid. It seems you are the
> one with the analytical handicap.
>
> Ricky

I don't have a dog in this fight this but from Jay's original post...
"and that our two aviation destination hotels will serve as a
beacon....". made it sound to me that the new one was in addition.

[george]

On Feb 26, 6:22*am, cavedweller > wrote:
> On Feb 25, 11:07*am, Ricky > wrote:
>
> > On Feb 22, 7:46*pm, "Morgans" > wrote:
>
> > > My only comment would be on how he can miss analyzing a simple e-mail, so
> > > completely. *Nowhere was there an implication that they would be selling one
> > > motel.
>
> > > Not surprising, now that I think of it. *What does he not mess up?
> > > --
> > > Jim in NC
>
> > You know, neither was there an implication that he WASN'T selling his
> > other motel, so MX's question is perfectly valid. It seems you are the
> > one with the analytical handicap.
>
> > Ricky
>
> I don't have a dog in this fight this but from Jay's original post...
> "and that our two aviation destination hotels will serve as a
> beacon....". * made it sound to me that the new one was in addition.

Then we'd be able to refer to Jay "we knew him when he had a one
hotel chain"

:-)