Guy Alcala
February 12th 04, 10:54 PM
Ed Rasimus wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 21:16:48 -0000, "Jim Doyle"
> > wrote:
>
> >Hello all,
> >
> >Just a quick question - do any aircraft have slats installed on the leading
> >edge of the horizontal tailplane?
> >
> >Rather like slats would be used on the main wing section but - instead of
> >providing helpful lift - they're just to counter a very large pitching
> >moment on approach when wing-mounted high lift devices are deployed.
> >
>
> Can't comment on slats, which implys to me moveable. But, the F-4E at
> slots on the horizontal tailplane--fixed sections about two inches
> extended from the leading edge of the tailplane sections and running
> the entire length.
>
> The slotted slab was one of the mods necessary to compensate for the
> longer nose and forward weight addition of the gun. A #7 fuel cell was
> added in the tail cone to increase extreme aft weight and the fixed
> slots were added to the tail plane to provide increased aerodynamic
> downforce to counter the nose gun.
Ed, I tend to doubt the extra forward weight was responsible for the fixed
inverted slot (not slat) on the tail, as the navy's F-4J, with the short nose
and No.7 tank, also had it from the beginning, indeed before the F-4E entered
service. The F-4J also removed the inboard section of the LEFs and had drooped
ailerons, so that may have had something to do with it, but I'm cross-posting
this to r.a.m.n. to see if anyone over there knows why.
Guy
> On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 21:16:48 -0000, "Jim Doyle"
> > wrote:
>
> >Hello all,
> >
> >Just a quick question - do any aircraft have slats installed on the leading
> >edge of the horizontal tailplane?
> >
> >Rather like slats would be used on the main wing section but - instead of
> >providing helpful lift - they're just to counter a very large pitching
> >moment on approach when wing-mounted high lift devices are deployed.
> >
>
> Can't comment on slats, which implys to me moveable. But, the F-4E at
> slots on the horizontal tailplane--fixed sections about two inches
> extended from the leading edge of the tailplane sections and running
> the entire length.
>
> The slotted slab was one of the mods necessary to compensate for the
> longer nose and forward weight addition of the gun. A #7 fuel cell was
> added in the tail cone to increase extreme aft weight and the fixed
> slots were added to the tail plane to provide increased aerodynamic
> downforce to counter the nose gun.
Ed, I tend to doubt the extra forward weight was responsible for the fixed
inverted slot (not slat) on the tail, as the navy's F-4J, with the short nose
and No.7 tank, also had it from the beginning, indeed before the F-4E entered
service. The F-4J also removed the inboard section of the LEFs and had drooped
ailerons, so that may have had something to do with it, but I'm cross-posting
this to r.a.m.n. to see if anyone over there knows why.
Guy