Log in

View Full Version : Re: Getting tired of The DigiWX posts


John Seaborn[_2_]
July 14th 10, 03:58 PM
Is it time to move RAS to a more solid footing?

Could there be a small "elected" group that acts as moderators
essentially tossing anything that is not soaring related of which
there are more and more posts appearing as the nuts and spammers get
more active in these un-moderated newsgroups. Is it time for the RAS
management group?

mike
July 14th 10, 04:27 PM
On Jul 14, 8:58*am, John Seaborn > wrote:
> Is it time to move RAS to a more solid footing?
>
> Could there be a small "elected" group that acts as moderators
> essentially tossing anything that is not soaring related of which
> there are more and more posts appearing as the nuts and spammers get
> more active in these un-moderated newsgroups. Is it time for the RAS
> management group?

I would be happy to see a move to a Google/Yahoo group and forget
about this newsgroups format which is being ruined with spam and the
insane.

Alex Potter
July 14th 10, 05:23 PM
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 08:27:28 -0700, mike wrote:

> I would be happy to see a move to a Google/Yahoo group and forget about
> this newsgroups format which is being ruined with spam and the insane.

Get a proper newsreader and use a kill-file. There are, relatively, very
few spam posts to this newsgroup. My kill-file has just one entry.

--
Alex

rjc
July 14th 10, 05:44 PM
On Jul 14, 10:23*am, Alex Potter > wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 08:27:28 -0700, mike wrote:
> > I would be happy to see a *move to a Google/Yahoo group and forget about
> > this newsgroups format which is being ruined with spam and the insane.
>
> Get a proper newsreader and use a kill-file. There are, relatively, very
> few spam posts to this newsgroup. My kill-file has just one entry.
>
> --
> Alex

Agreed. As ugly as the spam is, I'd much rather deal with it than be
forced to deal with a browser-based newsreader. (Never mind that this
is posted via google groups.)

-js

Alex Potter
July 14th 10, 05:51 PM
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 09:44:58 -0700, rjc wrote:
>
> Agreed. As ugly as the spam is, I'd much rather deal with it than be
> forced to deal with a browser-based newsreader. (Never mind that this
> is posted via google groups.)

Do google leave the spam in? My news provider must filter it out, if
there is much spam in /this/ group.

--
Alex

Google