Re: 73 old planes that qualify for Light-sport

[[email protected]]

Mark > wrote:
> On Sep 12, 9:04Â*pm, wrote:
>> Mark > wrote:
>> > On Sep 12, 7:59Â*pm, wrote:
>> >> Mark > wrote:
>>
>> >> An unreadable mess.
>>
>> > Huh? Â*Must be your newsreader. Mine displays it as
>> > I copied it...one long clean column. Very neat.
>>
>> USENET is ASCII.
>
> Yes that is proper netiquette which I abide by.
>
>> What you posted is trash and I'm not about to try reading it with a HTML
>> news reader.
>
> Well I wouldn't call it trash. It's a list of 73 certificated planes
> that fit the LS category. My apologies if it came out html. I
> didn't alter my computer. I simply copied and pasted.

What you copied was non-printable ASCII characters which are dumped by
newsreaders that follow the RFC's but are used by HTML to do formatting.

> So anyway, there's your answer. YES, there are 73 old
> certificated planes that meet the LS category, and really I'm
> pretty sure that isn't all inclusive.
>
> That a LOT!

No, it is a tiny fraction of pre-LSA airplanes and several of the airplanes
on that list are fairly rare.

But since you've said you intend to buy a manufactured LSA and invalidate
the airworthiness certificate, it doesn't matter.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

[Mark]

On Sep 13, 5:44*pm, wrote:

> But since you've said you intend to buy a manufactured LSA...

The better bargain is to purchase an owner built LSA with
factory assist, which may have later received SLSA status.

> and invalidate
> the airworthiness certificate,

Did I say that? Damn kids, always using my computer.
I'll have a talk with them.
>
> --
> Jim Pennino