Ben Jackson
September 24th 03, 03:27 AM
In article <Jy6cb.418949$Oz4.210313@rwcrnsc54>,
Franklin Breeden > wrote:
>My uncle has drafted a letter for a
>buyer to sign releasing my uncle of all liability and requiring the
>buyer to agree to obtain training in gyros.
>
>As I see it, if a buyer signs the agreement it should be valid.
IANAL, but among the problems with this: You can't sign away anyone
*else's* right to sue. The pilot/owner is not likely to be the one to
sue -- it's the surviving family, which is not a party to the agreement.
Also, the agreement wouldn't cover negligence on the part of the builder.
--
Ben Jackson
>
http://www.ben.com/
Franklin Breeden > wrote:
>My uncle has drafted a letter for a
>buyer to sign releasing my uncle of all liability and requiring the
>buyer to agree to obtain training in gyros.
>
>As I see it, if a buyer signs the agreement it should be valid.
IANAL, but among the problems with this: You can't sign away anyone
*else's* right to sue. The pilot/owner is not likely to be the one to
sue -- it's the surviving family, which is not a party to the agreement.
Also, the agreement wouldn't cover negligence on the part of the builder.
--
Ben Jackson
>
http://www.ben.com/