Re: Stan Myers secret design, lecture 1

[Ari Silverstein]

On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 17:39:59 -0800 (PST), Mark4 wrote:

> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YGp7hMUXjmI
>
> " If the device worked as specified, it would violate both the first
> and second laws of thermodynamics, allowing operation as a perpetual
> motion machine. Meyer's claims about his "Water Fuel Cell" and the car
> that it powered were found to be fraudulent by an Ohio court in 1996."
>
> -Wikipedia

*ROFL*

> Perpetual motion machine??
> Violating laws of thermodynamics??
>
> Really? Cause I thought he never claimed to "create" energy, but
> rather unlock that which already existed. And, who ever said
> anything about perpetual motion? This wasn't some magnet circus
> trick. I understood it to be an application of specific stepped up
> intermittent amperage.
>
> Anyone?
>
> ---
> Mark4

Sure, Mark(ie) aka Mark4. Btw, have you shown your newfound fish,
mark(ie) *TROLL*, your websites?

http://gayincarolina.jottit.com/my_main_squeeze

Mark's webstuff - www.geodon.com/images/homeBipolarAvatarHead.gif
http://static.open.salon.com/files/bipolar1255029439.jpg
My website http://www.hosanna1.com/ www.myspace.com/gayincarolina
www.gotitans.com/goForum/image.php?u=1948&dateline=1248991084

[Mark]

On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 12:21:44 -0500, Ari Silverstein wrote:

> On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 17:39:59 -0800 (PST), Mark4 wrote:
>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YGp7hMUXjmI
>>
>> " If the device worked as specified, it would violate both the first
>> and second laws of thermodynamics, allowing operation as a perpetual
>> motion machine. Meyer's claims about his "Water Fuel Cell" and the car
>> that it powered were found to be fraudulent by an Ohio court in 1996."
>>
>> -Wikipedia
>
> *ROFL*
>
>> Perpetual motion machine??
>> Violating laws of thermodynamics??
>>
>> Really? Cause I thought he never claimed to "create" energy, but
>> rather unlock that which already existed. And, who ever said
>> anything about perpetual motion? This wasn't some magnet circus
>> trick. I understood it to be an application of specific stepped up
>> intermittent amperage.
>>
>> Anyone?
>>
>> ---
>> Mark4
>
> Sure, Mark(ie) aka Mark4. Btw, have you shown your newfound fish,
> mark(ie) *TROLL*, your websites?
>
> http://gayincarolina.jottit.com/my_main_squeeze

Not my dick.

> Mark's webstuff - www.geodon.com/images/homeBipolarAvatarHead.gif
> http://static.open.salon.com/files/bipolar1255029439.jpg
> My website http://www.hosanna1.com/ www.myspace.com/gayincarolina
> www.gotitans.com/goForum/image.php?u=1948&dateline=1248991084

Well, while idiots *have* been around for a long
time, that wouldn't make me one, see, that doesn't
follow any school of logic, HOWEVER, upon
examination here, BY THE VERY VIRTUE of the
fact that you represent yourself here as an adult,
and you make idiotic non-deductive comments,
I therefore have established a point of logic that
it's very possible you made actually indeed be
an idiot, as evidenced by YOUR OWN WORDS.
--
https://twitter.com/CorruptNutsac

[Ari Silverstein]

On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 12:30:45 -0500, Mark4 wrote:

> On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 12:21:44 -0500, Ari Silverstein wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 17:39:59 -0800 (PST), Mark4 wrote:
>>
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YGp7hMUXjmI
>>>
>>> " If the device worked as specified, it would violate both the first
>>> and second laws of thermodynamics, allowing operation as a perpetual
>>> motion machine. Meyer's claims about his "Water Fuel Cell" and the car
>>> that it powered were found to be fraudulent by an Ohio court in 1996."
>>>
>>> -Wikipedia
>>
>> *ROFL*
>>
>>> Perpetual motion machine??
>>> Violating laws of thermodynamics??
>>>
>>> Really? Cause I thought he never claimed to "create" energy, but
>>> rather unlock that which already existed. And, who ever said
>>> anything about perpetual motion? This wasn't some magnet circus
>>> trick. I understood it to be an application of specific stepped up
>>> intermittent amperage.
>>>
>>> Anyone?
>>>
>>> ---
>>> Mark4
>>
>> Sure, Mark(ie) aka Mark4. Btw, have you shown your newfound fish,
>> mark(ie) *TROLL*, your websites?
>>
>> http://gayincarolina.jottit.com/my_main_squeeze
>
> Not my dick.

Ya' think? Then why post it to your website? Looking for young boys
again, Mark(ie)4?
--
´If you give me six lines written by the hand of the most honest of
men, I will find something in them which will hang him.¡ ~Cardinal
Richelieu

[Mark4[_2_]]

On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 12:32:52 -0500, Ari Silverstein wrote:

>>> Sure, Mark(ie) aka Mark4. Btw, have you shown your newfound fish,
>>> mark(ie) *TROLL*, your websites?
>>>
>>> http://gayincarolina.jottit.com/my_main_squeeze
>>
>> Not my dick.
>
> Ya' think? Then why post it to your website? Looking for young boys
> again, Mark(ie)4?

*GO TO HELL YOU BLOODSUCKING SHYLOCK*
--
https://twitter.com/CorruptNutsac
http://gayincarolina.jottit.com/my_main_squeeze

[MarkIV[_2_]]

On Fri, 26 Nov 2010 01:24:23 -0500, WaIIy wrote:

> Quit crossposting you ignorant ****s.

You first.


Assclown.

MarkIV