Mark4[_2_]
November 16th 10, 06:49 PM
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 06:36:43 -0500, J.B. Wood wrote:
> On 11/16/2010 12:09 AM, thhissux wrote:
>> Has anyone ever heard of Tesla having designed two entirely different
>> systems of technology within one basic hardware design. That is the
>> one we use now with AC polyphase system and another "hidden" system of
>> application which uses the same hardware and terminology but is of a
>> "non-electrical" energy. The non-electrical component being present in
>> the electrical but in this other one specifically isolated and freed
>> from the movement of electrons. It's interesting because when I looked
>> at both I realized that the other would function just the same with
>> minor adjustments to all of our existing hardware. Could we have a
>> hidden potential technology just waiting to be used and applied to our
>> current electrical grid? While reading his paper "Experiments With
>> Alternate Currents Of High Potential And High Frequency" you could
>> just as easily think he was describing one type of technology when in
>> reality a concealed second meaning was being described as well in
>> which if one had the "key" would unveil a new realm of possibilities.
>
> Hello, and Nikola Tesla, while arguably one of the world's great
> inventors, is often associated with, for lack of a better term,
> fantastic/sci-fi devices. Tesla himself is partly to blame since he
> made claims for some of his more exotic devices (e.g. a handheld
> oscillator that could bring down a bridge) that were never demonstrated.
> Another problem is that biographies on Tesla (e.g. Margaret Cheney's
> book) aren't written by folks with sufficient technical knowledge IMO to
> separate the wheat from the chaff. Whether or not this is a deliberate
> attempt to sell more books I can't say. Kind of like the Syfy channel's
> "Ghost Hunters" show. Is it really science or more for pure
> entertainment? (The hosts are Roto-Rooter plumbers by day if that means
> anything.)
>
> As any EE like myself knows, Tesla's contributions to A.C. power
> generation, distribution and utilization are real, practical, and
> well-documented. A unit for magnetic flux density takes his name. His
> experiments in high-frequency A.C. also added to our knowledge of
> electrophysics. Can't we just let it go at that and let the man RIP?
> Sincerely,
Only an idiot would claim that. I for one have fully solved Tesla and
letting him RIP would NOT be what he wanted.
Here is my Ode To Tesla.
http://tinyurl.com/35fwrgr
Mark4
> On 11/16/2010 12:09 AM, thhissux wrote:
>> Has anyone ever heard of Tesla having designed two entirely different
>> systems of technology within one basic hardware design. That is the
>> one we use now with AC polyphase system and another "hidden" system of
>> application which uses the same hardware and terminology but is of a
>> "non-electrical" energy. The non-electrical component being present in
>> the electrical but in this other one specifically isolated and freed
>> from the movement of electrons. It's interesting because when I looked
>> at both I realized that the other would function just the same with
>> minor adjustments to all of our existing hardware. Could we have a
>> hidden potential technology just waiting to be used and applied to our
>> current electrical grid? While reading his paper "Experiments With
>> Alternate Currents Of High Potential And High Frequency" you could
>> just as easily think he was describing one type of technology when in
>> reality a concealed second meaning was being described as well in
>> which if one had the "key" would unveil a new realm of possibilities.
>
> Hello, and Nikola Tesla, while arguably one of the world's great
> inventors, is often associated with, for lack of a better term,
> fantastic/sci-fi devices. Tesla himself is partly to blame since he
> made claims for some of his more exotic devices (e.g. a handheld
> oscillator that could bring down a bridge) that were never demonstrated.
> Another problem is that biographies on Tesla (e.g. Margaret Cheney's
> book) aren't written by folks with sufficient technical knowledge IMO to
> separate the wheat from the chaff. Whether or not this is a deliberate
> attempt to sell more books I can't say. Kind of like the Syfy channel's
> "Ghost Hunters" show. Is it really science or more for pure
> entertainment? (The hosts are Roto-Rooter plumbers by day if that means
> anything.)
>
> As any EE like myself knows, Tesla's contributions to A.C. power
> generation, distribution and utilization are real, practical, and
> well-documented. A unit for magnetic flux density takes his name. His
> experiments in high-frequency A.C. also added to our knowledge of
> electrophysics. Can't we just let it go at that and let the man RIP?
> Sincerely,
Only an idiot would claim that. I for one have fully solved Tesla and
letting him RIP would NOT be what he wanted.
Here is my Ode To Tesla.
http://tinyurl.com/35fwrgr
Mark4