View Full Version : Comm Antenna in Winglet
SoaringXCellence
November 21st 10, 11:46 PM
To all you communication experts,
I have a Schreder hp-15/18 I am rebuilding. I need to install a
communication radio antenna. Is it possible that an installation in
one of the winglets will provide reasonable radio communications. The
winglet is fiberglass and I can ground to the aluminum wing
structure. The winglet is about the same height as a standard comm
antenna.
I was thinking maybe a copper strip up the TE.
Opinions?
Mike
Bob Kuykendall
November 22nd 10, 12:41 AM
On Nov 21, 3:46*pm, SoaringXCellence > wrote:
> To all you communication experts,
>
> I have a Schreder hp-15/18 I am rebuilding. *I need to install a
> communication radio antenna...
I'm not a radio expert, but I have installed and tested four or five
antennas in an HP-18. The only one that has worked very well was an
external 1/4-wave whip installed over the aft fuselage. I tuned it to
an SWR of about 1.4:1, at 123.4, which was about as good as you could
expect.
The troubles with installing an antenna in the winglet are that there
is not a good ground plane for a 1/4-wave whip, and not enough
vertical height for a 1/2-wave dipole (two 1/4-wave whips opposed). I
suppose you could put a rubber ducky antenna out there, but there's no
point since you could have the same antenna in the cockpit and do away
with the 25 feet of cable.
Anyhow, the other antennas I tried were a commercial 1/2-wave dipole
strip antenna in various orientations in the fuselage (SWR above 2.5
in all cases), a 1/4-wave whip on the gear door (again, poor SWR and
poor demonstrated performance), a Sebald-type combo 1/4-wave whip and
Nicks tube (good SWR but pointless, since the ship has a Nicks tube
elsewhere), an internal 1/4-wave whip the original builder had
installed on the most forward metal bulkhead (poor SWR), and a rubber
ducky installed on the cockpit rail (reasonable SWR, poor overall
performance).
At one point I played with the idea of building an Aramid fiber
ruddervator and installing a Jim Weir style copper tape dipole inside
its trailing edge. I know that the performance directly forward would
be very poor, but the overall performance might have been decent. But
in the end I just stuck a whip antenna on it and got on with life.
Thanks, Bob K.
Andy[_1_]
November 22nd 10, 01:42 AM
On Nov 21, 4:46*pm, SoaringXCellence > wrote:
> To all you communication experts,
>
> I have a Schreder hp-15/18 I am rebuilding. *I need to install a
> communication radio antenna. *Is it possible that an installation in
> one of the winglets will provide reasonable radio communications. *The
> winglet is fiberglass and I can ground to the aluminum wing
> structure. *The winglet is about the same height as a standard comm
> antenna.
>
> I was thinking maybe a copper strip up the TE.
>
> Opinions?
>
> Mike
Against:
Requires about the longest possible cable run. Adds weight and cable
loss.
Requires 2 connector breaks if the winglet is removable either of
which will cause problem if forgotten during rig/derig (failure to
connect may cause failure of the transmitter)
Any connector may be vulnerable to water ingestion if water ballast is
used
For:
Can't think of anything
On a metal tail boom sailplane a 1/4 wave whip mounted on the fuselage
is probably the simplest and most effective solution.
Andy
SoaringXCellence
November 22nd 10, 02:56 AM
Thanks for all the replies, both here and through email. I'll go with
the tail-boom mounted one.
Mike
vBulletin® v3.6.4, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.