Lets go have lunch with Dr. Phil

[-Mark-]

Hey Phil, do ya'll have a microwave, or I
could stop by Subway and get sandwiches.

Are you still in suite 250?
http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/private/snapshot.asp?privcapId=22548050

**** with all the BIG BUCKS you got, why
don't we just all meet up at Carrabba's Italian
Grill? I have a LOT of Italian friends. TONS
of Italian friends.

Jim Pennino the pinhead isn't one of them.

----
Mark IV
American Pilot

[Phil]

On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 06:31:34 -0800 (PST), -Mark- wrote:

> Hey Phil, do ya'll have a microwave, or I
> could stop by Subway and get sandwiches.
>
> Are you still in suite 250?
> http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/private/snapshot.asp?privcapId=22548050
>
> **** with all the BIG BUCKS you got, why
> don't we just all meet up at Carrabba's Italian
> Grill? I have a LOT of Italian friends. TONS
> of Italian friends.
>
> Jim Pennino the pinhead isn't one of them.
>
> ----
> Mark IV
> American Pilot

Mark,

Visitors unannounced and uninvited are shot on sight by IS. Give me a
call first.

Phil

[Linton Yarbrough]

On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 17:07:19 -0500, Justin Eriksen wrote:

> Be careful. Note what happens when you click on Ari's link.
> www.turiss.com

Not good, not good at all.

[vern]

On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:37:36 -0500, Linton Yarbrough wrote:

> On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 17:07:19 -0500, Justin Eriksen wrote:
>
>> Be careful. Note what happens when you click on Ari's link.
>> www.turiss.com
>
> Not good, not good at all.

How the hell do they get it to do that?
--
R.I.P to Dead Tull Morons
http://tr.im/1f74

[Ari Silverstein]

On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:41:22 -0500, vern wrote:

> On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:37:36 -0500, Linton Yarbrough wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 17:07:19 -0500, Justin Eriksen wrote:
>>
>>> Be careful. Note what happens when you click on Ari's link.
>>> www.turiss.com
>>
>> Not good, not good at all.
>
> How the hell do they get it to do that?

Wrong question. The correct question is /why/ does the link to /that/
particular site? Followed by how the hell would /they/ allow that?
--
http://fffff.at/tag/****google/

[Linton Yarbrough]

On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:45:23 -0500, Ari Silverstein wrote:
On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:45:23 -0500, Ari Silverstein wrote:> On Thu, 16
Dec 2010 19:41:22 -0500, vern wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:37:36 -0500, Linton Yarbrough wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 17:07:19 -0500, Justin Eriksen wrote:
>>>
>>>> Be careful. Note what happens when you click on Ari's link.
>>>> www.turiss.com
>>>
>>> Not good, not good at all.
>>
>> How the hell do they get it to do that?
>
> Wrong question. The correct question is /why/ does the link to /that/
> particular site? Followed by how the hell would /they/ allow that?

Google only allows very few to do that. Not good, not good at all.

[Anthony Atkielski[_2_]]

On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:46:57 -0500, Linton Yarbrough wrote:

> On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:45:23 -0500, Ari Silverstein wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:45:23 -0500, Ari Silverstein wrote:> On Thu, 16
> Dec 2010 19:41:22 -0500, vern wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:37:36 -0500, Linton Yarbrough wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 17:07:19 -0500, Justin Eriksen wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Be careful. Note what happens when you click on Ari's link.
>>>>> www.turiss.com
>>>>
>>>> Not good, not good at all.
>>>
>>> How the hell do they get it to do that?
>>
>> Wrong question. The correct question is /why/ does the link to /that/
>> particular site? Followed by how the hell would /they/ allow that?
>
> Google only allows very few to do that. Not good, not good at all.

The _only_ way Google allows this redirection is if they own the
company.

[Linton Yarbrough]

On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 01:12:19 +0000 (UTC), Anthony Atkielski wrote:

> On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:46:57 -0500, Linton Yarbrough wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:45:23 -0500, Ari Silverstein wrote:
>> On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:45:23 -0500, Ari Silverstein wrote:> On Thu, 16
>> Dec 2010 19:41:22 -0500, vern wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:37:36 -0500, Linton Yarbrough wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 17:07:19 -0500, Justin Eriksen wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Be careful. Note what happens when you click on Ari's link.
>>>>>> www.turiss.com
>>>>>
>>>>> Not good, not good at all.
>>>>
>>>> How the hell do they get it to do that?
>>>
>>> Wrong question. The correct question is /why/ does the link to /that/
>>> particular site? Followed by how the hell would /they/ allow that?
>>
>> Google only allows very few to do that. Not good, not good at all.
>
> The _only_ way Google allows this redirection is if they own the
> company.

If Google bought the company from Phil Mellinger then anyone posting
to newsgroups is completely exposed. Threats have been made. Threats
of bodily injury, identity theft and death. I repeat "Not good, not
good at all".

[Ari Silverstein]

On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 01:12:19 +0000 (UTC), Anthony Atkielski wrote:

> On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:46:57 -0500, Linton Yarbrough wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:45:23 -0500, Ari Silverstein wrote:
>> On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:45:23 -0500, Ari Silverstein wrote:> On Thu, 16
>> Dec 2010 19:41:22 -0500, vern wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:37:36 -0500, Linton Yarbrough wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 17:07:19 -0500, Justin Eriksen wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Be careful. Note what happens when you click on Ari's link.
>>>>>> www.turiss.com
>>>>>
>>>>> Not good, not good at all.
>>>>
>>>> How the hell do they get it to do that?
>>>
>>> Wrong question. The correct question is /why/ does the link to /that/
>>> particular site? Followed by how the hell would /they/ allow that?
>>
>> Google only allows very few to do that. Not good, not good at all.
>
> The _only_ way Google allows this redirection is if they own the
> company.

We have a winner.
--
´If you give me six lines written by the hand of the most honest of
men, I will find something in them which will hang him.¡ ~Cardinal
Richelieu

[Phil]

On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 20:19:19 -0500, Linton Yarbrough wrote:

> On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 01:12:19 +0000 (UTC), Anthony Atkielski wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:46:57 -0500, Linton Yarbrough wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:45:23 -0500, Ari Silverstein wrote:
>>> On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:45:23 -0500, Ari Silverstein wrote:> On Thu, 16
>>> Dec 2010 19:41:22 -0500, vern wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:37:36 -0500, Linton Yarbrough wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 17:07:19 -0500, Justin Eriksen wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Be careful. Note what happens when you click on Ari's link.
>>>>>>> www.turiss.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not good, not good at all.
>>>>>
>>>>> How the hell do they get it to do that?
>>>>
>>>> Wrong question. The correct question is /why/ does the link to /that/
>>>> particular site? Followed by how the hell would /they/ allow that?
>>>
>>> Google only allows very few to do that. Not good, not good at all.
>>
>> The _only_ way Google allows this redirection is if they own the
>> company.
>
> If Google bought the company from Phil Mellinger then anyone posting
> to newsgroups is completely exposed. Threats have been made. Threats
> of bodily injury, identity theft and death. I repeat "Not good, not
> good at all".

smile

[Anthony Atkielski[_2_]]

On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 20:19:19 -0500, Linton Yarbrough wrote:

> On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 01:12:19 +0000 (UTC), Anthony Atkielski wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:46:57 -0500, Linton Yarbrough wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:45:23 -0500, Ari Silverstein wrote:
>>> On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:45:23 -0500, Ari Silverstein wrote:> On Thu, 16
>>> Dec 2010 19:41:22 -0500, vern wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:37:36 -0500, Linton Yarbrough wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 17:07:19 -0500, Justin Eriksen wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Be careful. Note what happens when you click on Ari's link.
>>>>>>> www.turiss.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not good, not good at all.
>>>>>
>>>>> How the hell do they get it to do that?
>>>>
>>>> Wrong question. The correct question is /why/ does the link to /that/
>>>> particular site? Followed by how the hell would /they/ allow that?
>>>
>>> Google only allows very few to do that. Not good, not good at all.
>>
>> The _only_ way Google allows this redirection is if they own the
>> company.
>
> If Google bought the company from Phil Mellinger then anyone posting
> to newsgroups is completely exposed. Threats have been made. Threats
> of bodily injury, identity theft and death. I repeat "Not good, not
> good at all".

Turiss was Computer Forensic Group Inc and was acquired by
LanpherWilson Corp renamed Turiss, a digital investigations and
information protection firm with target markets in the corporate,
legal and government arenas. LWC is a subsidiary of Google, Inc.

[none]

Phil wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 20:19:19 -0500, Linton Yarbrough wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 01:12:19 +0000 (UTC), Anthony Atkielski wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:46:57 -0500, Linton Yarbrough wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:45:23 -0500, Ari Silverstein wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:45:23 -0500, Ari Silverstein wrote:> On Thu, 16
>>>> Dec 2010 19:41:22 -0500, vern wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:37:36 -0500, Linton Yarbrough wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 17:07:19 -0500, Justin Eriksen wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Be careful. Note what happens when you click on Ari's link.
>>>>>>>> www.turiss.com
>>>>>>> Not good, not good at all.
>>>>>> How the hell do they get it to do that?
>>>>> Wrong question. The correct question is /why/ does the link to /that/
>>>>> particular site? Followed by how the hell would /they/ allow that?
>>>> Google only allows very few to do that. Not good, not good at all.
>>> The _only_ way Google allows this redirection is if they own the
>>> company.
>> If Google bought the company from Phil Mellinger then anyone posting
>> to newsgroups is completely exposed. Threats have been made. Threats
>> of bodily injury, identity theft and death. I repeat "Not good, not
>> good at all".
>


> smile

Silence, thou rough beast!

Bob

[none]

none wrote:
> Phil wrote:
>> On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 20:19:19 -0500, Linton Yarbrough wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 01:12:19 +0000 (UTC), Anthony Atkielski wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:46:57 -0500, Linton Yarbrough wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:45:23 -0500, Ari Silverstein wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:45:23 -0500, Ari Silverstein wrote:> On Thu, 16
>>>>> Dec 2010 19:41:22 -0500, vern wrote:
>>>>>>> On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:37:36 -0500, Linton Yarbrough wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 17:07:19 -0500, Justin Eriksen wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Be careful. Note what happens when you click on Ari's link.
>>>>>>>>> www.turiss.com
>>>>>>>> Not good, not good at all.
>>>>>>> How the hell do they get it to do that?
>>>>>> Wrong question. The correct question is /why/ does the link to /that/
>>>>>> particular site? Followed by how the hell would /they/ allow that?
>>>>> Google only allows very few to do that. Not good, not good at all.
>>>> The _only_ way Google allows this redirection is if they own the
>>>> company.
>>> If Google bought the company from Phil Mellinger then anyone posting
>>> to newsgroups is completely exposed. Threats have been made. Threats
>>> of bodily injury, identity theft and death. I repeat "Not good, not
>>> good at all".
>>
>
>
>> smile
>
> Silence, thou rough beast!
>
> Bob

whoops...

Sorry, Phil. I thought I was "in" alt.slack


Bob

[none]

Ari Silverstein wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 01:12:19 +0000 (UTC), Anthony Atkielski wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:46:57 -0500, Linton Yarbrough wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:45:23 -0500, Ari Silverstein wrote:
>>> On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:45:23 -0500, Ari Silverstein wrote:> On Thu, 16
>>> Dec 2010 19:41:22 -0500, vern wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:37:36 -0500, Linton Yarbrough wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 17:07:19 -0500, Justin Eriksen wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Be careful. Note what happens when you click on Ari's link.
>>>>>>> www.turiss.com
>>>>>> Not good, not good at all.
>>>>> How the hell do they get it to do that?
>>>> Wrong question. The correct question is /why/ does the link to /that/
>>>> particular site? Followed by how the hell would /they/ allow that?
>>> Google only allows very few to do that. Not good, not good at all.
>> The _only_ way Google allows this redirection is if they own the
>> company.
>
> We have a winner.

Where do I go to cash in?

Bon Bob

LOng live America!

Long live Israel!

Long live Great Britain!