9/11 Truths

[Quaalude]

Notes from the Top Secret briefing early morning, Sept 11, 2001,
Livermore.

"People are so calm about this...it's shocking not only at the low-key
way it was announced, but at the comparative apparent lack of
reaction of many of my colleagues."


¡E The planes that hit the twin towers are remotely
controlled (over-riding the pilots, and with software
modifications that would permit tight turns that would normally
be impossible due to autopilot default limit settings). The remote
control was enacted from thousands of miles away via Bell's Theorem.

¡E The plane that hit the Pentagon will be a small, remotely piloted
Navy
jet. A full-sized Boeing 757 could not have been used because the
aerodynamic ground effects would have prevented it coming in so
low at full speed without it having to slow right down as if to
land.

¡E The well-publicized cellphone calls would be fabricated.

¡E Control over Flight 93, which either crashed or was shot
down over Pennsylvania, would be lost, and that that part of
the plan had gone wrong (there had been another targeted building).

¡E What had happened to the passengers and the plane of Flight 77
(the plane that supposedly hit the Pentagon), UNKNOWN.

¡E Osama bin Laden had nothing to do with any of it apart from the fact
that he was a USG asset.

[Orval Fairbairn]

In article >,
Quaalude > wrote:

> Notes from the Top Secret briefing early morning, Sept 11, 2001,
> Livermore.
>
> "People are so calm about this...it's shocking not only at the low-key
> way it was announced, but at the comparative apparent lack of
> reaction of many of my colleagues."
>
>
> ¡E The planes that hit the twin towers are remotely
> controlled (over-riding the pilots, and with software
> modifications that would permit tight turns that would normally
> be impossible due to autopilot default limit settings). The remote
> control was enacted from thousands of miles away via Bell's Theorem.
>
> ¡E The plane that hit the Pentagon will be a small, remotely piloted
> Navy
> jet. A full-sized Boeing 757 could not have been used because the
> aerodynamic ground effects would have prevented it coming in so
> low at full speed without it having to slow right down as if to
> land.
>
> ¡E The well-publicized cellphone calls would be fabricated.
>
> ¡E Control over Flight 93, which either crashed or was shot
> down over Pennsylvania, would be lost, and that that part of
> the plan had gone wrong (there had been another targeted building).
>
> ¡E What had happened to the passengers and the plane of Flight 77
> (the plane that supposedly hit the Pentagon), UNKNOWN.
>
> ¡E Osama bin Laden had nothing to do with any of it apart from the fact
> that he was a USG asset.




Yet more KOOK-A-DOODLE-DOO!

[emeleysantya]

buy propecia generic, order propecia dht.

buy propecia 5mg online (http://discountpropecia.grouply.com/message/5) - buy propecia online us.

order propecia with paypal, buy propecia generic.

[emeleysantya]

buy propecia merck, buy propecia europe.

order propecia pharmcom (http://discountpropecia.freeforums.org/where-to-buy-propecia-in-uk-t9.html) - order propecia by merck.

cheap propecia, can i get propecia on prescription.

[emeleysantya]

order propecia online in canada, buy propecia at boots.

order propecia 1mg (http://discountpropecia.freeforums.org/where-to-buy-propecia-in-uk-t9.html) - where to buy propecia in ireland.

where to buy propecia in australia, cheap propecia tablets.

[Quaalude]

On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 19:26:04 -0400, Quaalude wrote:

> Notes from the Top Secret briefing early morning, Sept 11, 2001,
> Livermore.
>
> "People are so calm about this...it's shocking not only at the low-key
> way it was announced, but at the comparative apparent lack of
> reaction of many of my colleagues."
>
> ¡E The planes that hit the twin towers are remotely
> controlled (over-riding the pilots, and with software
> modifications that would permit tight turns that would normally
> be impossible due to autopilot default limit settings). The remote
> control was enacted from thousands of miles away via Bell's Theorem.
>
> ¡E The plane that hit the Pentagon will be a small, remotely piloted
> Navy
> jet. A full-sized Boeing 757 could not have been used because the
> aerodynamic ground effects would have prevented it coming in so
> low at full speed without it having to slow right down as if to
> land.
>
> ¡E The well-publicized cellphone calls would be fabricated.
>
> ¡E Control over Flight 93, which either crashed or was shot
> down over Pennsylvania, would be lost, and that that part of
> the plan had gone wrong (there had been another targeted building).
>
> ¡E What had happened to the passengers and the plane of Flight 77
> (the plane that supposedly hit the Pentagon), UNKNOWN.
>
> ¡E Osama bin Laden had nothing to do with any of it apart from the fact
> that he was a USG asset.

www.stealthskater.com/Documents/Deacon_01.pdf

[Dudley Henriques[_3_]]

On Sep 22, 7:26*pm, Quaalude > wrote:
> Notes from the Top Secret briefing early morning, Sept 11, 2001,
> Livermore.
>
> "People are so calm about this...it's shocking not only at the low-key
> way it was *announced, *but *at *the *comparative *apparent *lack *of
> reaction *of *many *of *my colleagues."
>
> E * The *planes *that *hit *the *twin *towers *are *remotely
> controlled *(over-riding *the pilots, *and *with *software
> modifications *that *would *permit *tight *turns *that *would normally
> be impossible due to autopilot default limit settings). The remote
> control was enacted from thousands of miles away via Bell's Theorem.
>
> E *The plane that hit the Pentagon will be a small, remotely piloted
> Navy
> jet. A full-sized Boeing 757 could not have been used because the
> aerodynamic ground effects would *have *prevented *it *coming *in *so
> low *at *full *speed without *it *having *to *slow right down as if to
> land.
>
> E *The well-publicized cellphone calls would be fabricated.
>
> E * Control *over *Flight *93, *which *either crashed *or *was *shot
> down *over *Pennsylvania, *would be lost, *and that *that *part *of
> the *plan *had *gone wrong (there had been another targeted building).
>
> E *What had happened to the passengers and the plane of Flight 77
> (the plane that supposedly hit the Pentagon), UNKNOWN.
>
> E *Osama bin Laden had nothing to do with any of it apart from the fact
> that he was a USG asset. *

Congratulations! Every time I think I've seen the extreme limits of
man's ignorance, someone comes along and redefines it for me.
Dudley Henriques

[Tom[_15_]]

On Tue, 4 Oct 2011 12:07:24 -0700 (PDT), Dudley Henriques wrote:

> Congratulations! Every time I think I've seen the extreme limits of
> man's ignorance, someone comes along and redefines it for me.
> Dudley Henriques

Huh?

Dudley Henriques redefines the limits of ignorance? Aren't you Dudley
Henriques?

[150flivver]

On Oct 4, 2:21*pm, Tom > wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Oct 2011 12:07:24 -0700 (PDT), Dudley Henriques wrote:
> > Congratulations! Every time I think I've seen the extreme limits of
> > man's ignorance, someone comes along and redefines it for me.
> > Dudley Henriques
>
> Huh?
>
> Dudley Henriques redefines the limits of ignorance? Aren't you Dudley
> Henriques?

Dudley, it's unfortunate that there are people stupid enough to
actually believe these claims. Otherwise it's pretty funny. I wonder
if these same people tune in to Saturday Night Live and see the first
skit and think they really are watching a Presidential news
conference?

[Orval Fairbairn]

In article >, Tom >
wrote:

> On Tue, 4 Oct 2011 12:07:24 -0700 (PDT), Dudley Henriques wrote:
>
> > Congratulations! Every time I think I've seen the extreme limits of
> > man's ignorance, someone comes along and redefines it for me.
> > Dudley Henriques
>
> Huh?
>
> Dudley Henriques redefines the limits of ignorance? Aren't you Dudley
> Henriques?

Tom, why don't you challenge Dudley to an aerial dogfight duel? If you
are so **** hot as you claim to be, you should be able to wax him in
minutes. If not, we are rid of another fool poseur.

[Dudley Henriques[_3_]]

On Oct 4, 3:21*pm, Tom > wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Oct 2011 12:07:24 -0700 (PDT), Dudley Henriques wrote:
> > Congratulations! Every time I think I've seen the extreme limits of
> > man's ignorance, someone comes along and redefines it for me.
> > Dudley Henriques
>
> Huh?
>
> Dudley Henriques redefines the limits of ignorance? Aren't you Dudley
>Henriques?

I see. Well, let's then address your position from my "ignorant"
perspective?

There were four aircraft involved in 9-11. According to families,
friends, airport employees, parking attendants, car rental agencies,
taxi drivers, employers, and several thousand other misc and assorted
witnesses who personally knew or were associated with the 246 people
who were on those 4 airplanes. Can you explain to me and to the other
"ignorant folks" reading this idiotic thread, just what happened to
all these people, and where they are now?
Did the government murder these people?
Where are the 4 aircraft supposedly involved in 9-11 now?

Dudley Henriques

[Tom[_15_]]

On Tue, 4 Oct 2011 12:48:05 -0700 (PDT), 150flivver wrote:

> On Oct 4, 2:21*pm, Tom > wrote:
>> On Tue, 4 Oct 2011 12:07:24 -0700 (PDT), Dudley Henriques wrote:
>>> Congratulations! Every time I think I've seen the extreme limits of
>>> man's ignorance, someone comes along and redefines it for me.
>>> Dudley Henriques
>>
>> Huh?
>>
>> Dudley Henriques redefines the limits of ignorance? Aren't you Dudley
>> Henriques?
>
> Dudley,

I'm not Dudley. Can't you reconcile a Usenet thread?

[Tom[_15_]]

On Tue, 04 Oct 2011 16:12:50 -0400, Orval Fairbairn wrote:

> In article >, Tom >
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 4 Oct 2011 12:07:24 -0700 (PDT), Dudley Henriques wrote:
>>
>>> Congratulations! Every time I think I've seen the extreme limits of
>>> man's ignorance, someone comes along and redefines it for me.
>>> Dudley Henriques
>>
>> Huh?
>>
>> Dudley Henriques redefines the limits of ignorance? Aren't you Dudley
>> Henriques?
>
> Tom, why don't you challenge Dudley to an aerial dogfight duel?

Go (not) build an LSA.

> If you are so **** hot

Never said that. You're lies are innumerable. Adios.

[Tom[_15_]]

On Tue, 4 Oct 2011 13:55:22 -0700 (PDT), Dudley Henriques wrote:

> On Oct 4, 3:21*pm, Tom > wrote:
>> On Tue, 4 Oct 2011 12:07:24 -0700 (PDT), Dudley Henriques wrote:
>>> Congratulations! Every time I think I've seen the extreme limits of
>>> man's ignorance, someone comes along and redefines it for me.
>>> Dudley Henriques
>>
>> Huh?
>>
>> Dudley Henriques redefines the limits of ignorance? Aren't you Dudley
>> Henriques?
>
> I see.

At your age, that's saying something.

> Well, let's then address your position from my "ignorant" perspective?

Go right ahead, I'm off for dinner.

[Dudley Henriques[_3_]]

On Oct 4, 5:15*pm, Tom > wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Oct 2011 13:55:22 -0700 (PDT), Dudley Henriques wrote:
> > On Oct 4, 3:21 pm, Tom > wrote:
> >> On Tue, 4 Oct 2011 12:07:24 -0700 (PDT), Dudley Henriques wrote:
> >>> Congratulations! Every time I think I've seen the extreme limits of
> >>> man's ignorance, someone comes along and redefines it for me.
> >>> Dudley Henriques
>
> >> Huh?
>
> >> Dudley Henriques redefines the limits of ignorance? Aren't you Dudley
> >> Henriques?
>
> > I see.
>
> At your age, that's saying something.
>
> > Well, let's then address your position from my "ignorant" perspective?
>
> Go right ahead, I'm off for dinner.

I thought so.
Try fish. I understand it's brain food.

[Tom[_15_]]

On Tue, 4 Oct 2011 13:55:22 -0700 (PDT), Dudley Henriques wrote:

> There were four aircraft involved in 9-11. According to families,
> friends, airport employees, parking attendants, car rental agencies,
> taxi drivers, employers, and several thousand other misc and assorted
> witnesses who personally knew or were associated with the 246 people
> who were on those 4 airplanes. Can you explain to me and to the other
> "ignorant folks" reading this idiotic thread, just what happened to
> all these people, and where they are now?

Why would I know or care?

> Did the government murder these people?

You tell me.

> Where are the 4 aircraft supposedly involved in 9-11 now?

OK, I give, where are they?

Oh, I get it Octogenarian Obssesor, you think inside your grainy,
quickly eroding, Alzhemeir's influenced brain that *I* made statements
to these so called factoids of *yours*.

Sorry, Old Timedouter, I'll save you and the other liars here a long,
exhausting and useless Google Groups search.

Not once have I claimed anything of any sort.

Not once.

Thanks for playing though, now reinsert your teeth and get lost.

P.S. I ate Korean, Jap and German food for dinner In Memoriam to all of
your military service...to the Fords, Rockefellers, Duponts and all the
other elitists who made trillions while you stupidly fought a false flag
war for them. lol

[Tom[_15_]]

On Tue, 4 Oct 2011 14:46:16 -0700 (PDT), Dudley Henriques wrote:

> On Oct 4, 5:15*pm, Tom > wrote:
>> On Tue, 4 Oct 2011 13:55:22 -0700 (PDT), Dudley Henriques wrote:
>>> On Oct 4, 3:21 pm, Tom > wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 4 Oct 2011 12:07:24 -0700 (PDT), Dudley Henriques wrote:
>>>>> Congratulations! Every time I think I've seen the extreme limits of
>>>>> man's ignorance, someone comes along and redefines it for me.
>>>>> Dudley Henriques
>>
>>>> Huh?
>>
>>>> Dudley Henriques redefines the limits of ignorance? Aren't you Dudley
>>>> Henriques?
>>
>>> I see.
>>
>> At your age, that's saying something.
>>
>>> Well, let's then address your position from my "ignorant" perspective?
>>
>> Go right ahead, I'm off for dinner.
>
> I thought so.
> Try fish. I understand it's brain food.

Pass. Didn't work for you why should I waste my time?

[george152]

On 5/10/2011 10:48 a.m., Tom wrote:

> OK, I give, where are they?
>
> Oh, I get it Octogenarian Obssesor, you think inside your grainy,
> quickly eroding, Alzhemeir's influenced brain that *I* made statements
> to these so called factoids of *yours*.
>
> Sorry, Old Timedouter, I'll save you and the other liars here a long,
> exhausting and useless Google Groups search.
>
> Not once have I claimed anything of any sort.
>
> Not once.
>
> Thanks for playing though, now reinsert your teeth and get lost.
>
> P.S. I ate Korean, Jap and German food for dinner In Memoriam to all of
> your military service...to the Fords, Rockefellers, Duponts and all the
> other elitists who made trillions while you stupidly fought a false flag
> war for them. lol


Denial ain't just a river in Egypt for this one....

[Orval Fairbairn]

In article >, Tom >
wrote:

> On Tue, 4 Oct 2011 13:55:22 -0700 (PDT), Dudley Henriques wrote:
>
> > On Oct 4, 3:21*pm, Tom > wrote:
> >> On Tue, 4 Oct 2011 12:07:24 -0700 (PDT), Dudley Henriques wrote:
> >>> Congratulations! Every time I think I've seen the extreme limits of
> >>> man's ignorance, someone comes along and redefines it for me.
> >>> Dudley Henriques
> >>
> >> Huh?
> >>
> >> Dudley Henriques redefines the limits of ignorance? Aren't you Dudley
> >> Henriques?
> >
> > I see.
>
> At your age, that's saying something.
>
> > Well, let's then address your position from my "ignorant" perspective?
>
> Go right ahead, I'm off for dinner.
>

You are not just "off for dinner" -- you're off your rocker!

[Tom[_15_]]

On Tue, 4 Oct 2011 14:46:16 -0700 (PDT), Dudley Henriques wrote:

> I thought so.

Well Doodley Ole Boy, and I do mean *old*, RAP sheeple called you up and
in you came riding on your white horse. To what avail?

You didn't read the thread, you attempted to attach your misguided
bull**** to me and the end result? Your white horse crapped black dung
all over you.

Hint: When you quit Usenet, like you have a dozen times now lol, *QUIT*.
You're getting way too old to keep destroying what little reputation you
have left by drinking your own poison.

[Jim Logajan]

Dudley Henriques > wrote:
> Try fish. I understand it's brain food.

He certainly is fishing. ;-)

How's life with you these days, good sir?

[Dudley Henriques[_3_]]

On Oct 5, 3:47*pm, Jim Logajan > wrote:
> Dudley Henriques > wrote:
> > Try fish. I understand it's brain food.
>
> He certainly is fishing. ;-)
>
> How's life with you these days, good sir?

Hi Jim;

Hanging in for an old guy :-) It's been a bad year airshow wise and
unfortunately we've been very busy.
Health wise got a reprieve on my cancer after 2 solid months of
radiation.

I see Usenet hasn't changed much :-))))))))))

Best to you as always,
Dudley Henriques

[Mike Beede[_2_]]

Tom > wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Oct 2011 13:55:22 -0700 (PDT), Dudley Henriques wrote:
>
>> On Oct 4, 3:21 pm, Tom > wrote:
>>> On Tue, 4 Oct 2011 12:07:24 -0700 (PDT), Dudley Henriques wrote:
>>>> Congratulations! Every time I think I've seen the extreme limits of
>>>> man's ignorance, someone comes along and redefines it for me.
>>>> Dudley Henriques
>>>
>>> Huh?
>>>
>>> Dudley Henriques redefines the limits of ignorance? Aren't you Dudley
>>> Henriques?
>>
>> I see.
>
> At your age, that's saying something.
>
>> Well, let's then address your position from my "ignorant" perspective?
>
> Go right ahead, I'm off for dinner.

Hi Dudley. I've learned a couple things about USENET over
the years. The most important, and it applies to life in
general: never talk to loons. Whether they're conspiracy
theorists on the net or the smelly guy with a long beard
drinking out of a paper bag outside the subway station.
They have NOTHING BETTER TO DO than to babble
at you in an insulting fashion and they never stop.

In fact, that's one of the most reliable ways to tell who
isn't a loon--they get tired and quit eventually.

Regards,

Mike Beede

[Dudley Henriques[_3_]]

On Oct 8, 11:17*pm, Mike Beede > wrote:
> Tom > wrote:
> > On Tue, 4 Oct 2011 13:55:22 -0700 (PDT), Dudley Henriques wrote:
>
> >> On Oct 4, 3:21 pm, Tom > wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 4 Oct 2011 12:07:24 -0700 (PDT), Dudley Henriques wrote:
> >>>> Congratulations! Every time I think I've seen the extreme limits of
> >>>> man's ignorance, someone comes along and redefines it for me.
> >>>> Dudley Henriques
>
> >>> Huh?
>
> >>> Dudley Henriques redefines the limits of ignorance? Aren't you Dudley
> >>> Henriques?
>
> >> I see.
>
> > At your age, that's saying something.
>
> >> Well, let's then address your position from my "ignorant" perspective?
>
> > Go right ahead, I'm off for dinner.
>
> Hi Dudley. *I've learned a couple things about USENET over
> the years. *The most important, and it applies to life in
> general: never talk to loons. *Whether they're conspiracy
> theorists on the net or the smelly guy with a long beard
> drinking out of a paper bag outside the subway station.
> They have NOTHING BETTER TO DO than to babble
> at you in an insulting fashion and they never stop.
>
> In fact, that's one of the most reliable ways to tell who
> isn't a loon--they get tired and quit eventually.
>
> Regards,
>
> * *Mike Beede

Hi Mike;

I'm actually an old hand at Usenet. Been around now for going on 10
years or so. Went the full gamut from coming on initially thinking
about offering something useful, then going through the "enlightenment
stage" where I tried to deal with the idiots and morons that seem
drawn to the forums, then the "mad stage" where I took them on head to
head.
These days I don't come around much. When I do stop in I simply post
as the mood hits me and if I attract a loon or two I just let them
have their say and move on. Just "ain't worth the trouble any more".
Oh there are still the "good guys" hanging around Usenet, and we all
know each other pretty well after all these years. Mostly we have a
good laugh or two back channel at some of the more moronic answering
posts we attract.
Thanks for the post. Appreciate it.
Best to you,
DH

[Fred Sobotkin]

On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 20:46:20 -0700 (PDT), Dudley Henriques wrote:

> On Oct 8, 11:17*pm, Mike Beede > wrote:
>> Tom > wrote:
>>> On Tue, 4 Oct 2011 13:55:22 -0700 (PDT), Dudley Henriques wrote:
>>
>>>> On Oct 4, 3:21 pm, Tom > wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 4 Oct 2011 12:07:24 -0700 (PDT), Dudley Henriques wrote:
>>>>>> Congratulations! Every time I think I've seen the extreme limits of
>>>>>> man's ignorance, someone comes along and redefines it for me.
>>>>>> Dudley Henriques
>>
>>>>> Huh?
>>
>>>>> Dudley Henriques redefines the limits of ignorance? Aren't you Dudley
>>>>> Henriques?
>>
>>>> I see.
>>
>>> At your age, that's saying something.
>>
>>>> Well, let's then address your position from my "ignorant" perspective?
>>
>>> Go right ahead, I'm off for dinner.
>>
>> Hi Dudley. *I've learned a couple things about USENET over
>> the years. *The most important, and it applies to life in
>> general: never talk to loons. *Whether they're conspiracy
>> theorists on the net or the smelly guy with a long beard
>> drinking out of a paper bag outside the subway station.
>> They have NOTHING BETTER TO DO than to babble
>> at you in an insulting fashion and they never stop.
>>
>> In fact, that's one of the most reliable ways to tell who
>> isn't a loon--they get tired and quit eventually.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> * *Mike Beede
>
> Hi Mike;
>
> I'm actually an old hand at Usenet. Been around now for going on 10
> years or so, quit Usenet 25x. But as an old Geezer of no value to
> anyone I hang around to take the bows and accolades fukktards like
> you hand out to me. Now, bow and suck my cock.

Mike, don't do it. You laready have one dick in your mouth, don't be
greedy.

[Fred Sobotkin]

On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 20:46:20 -0700 (PDT), Dudley Henriques wrote:

> On Oct 8, 11:17*pm, Mike Beede > wrote:
>> Tom > wrote:
>>> On Tue, 4 Oct 2011 13:55:22 -0700 (PDT), Dudley Henriques wrote:
>>
>>>> On Oct 4, 3:21 pm, Tom > wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 4 Oct 2011 12:07:24 -0700 (PDT), Dudley Henriques wrote:
>>>>>> Congratulations! Every time I think I've seen the extreme limits of
>>>>>> man's ignorance, someone comes along and redefines it for me.
>>>>>> Dudley Henriques
>>
>>>>> Huh?
>>
>>>>> Dudley Henriques redefines the limits of ignorance? Aren't you Dudley
>>>>> Henriques?
>>
>>>> I see.
>>
>>> At your age, that's saying something.
>>
>>>> Well, let's then address your position from my "ignorant" perspective?
>>
>>> Go right ahead, I'm off for dinner.
>>
>> Hi Dudley. *I've learned a couple things about USENET over
>> the years. *The most important, and it applies to life in
>> general: never talk to loons. *Whether they're conspiracy
>> theorists on the net or the smelly guy with a long beard
>> drinking out of a paper bag outside the subway station.
>> They have NOTHING BETTER TO DO than to babble
>> at you in an insulting fashion and they never stop.
>>
>> In fact, that's one of the most reliable ways to tell who
>> isn't a loon--they get tired and quit eventually.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> * *Mike Beede
>
> Hi Mike;
>
> I'm actually an old hand at Usenet. Been around now for going on 10
> years or so, quit Usenet 25x. But as an old Geezer of no value to
> anyone I hang around to take the bows and accolades fukktards like
> you hand out to me. Now, bow and suck my cock.

Mike, don't do it. You laready have one dick in your mouth, don't be
greedy.

[Dudley Henriques[_3_]]

On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 01:57:27 -0400, Fred Sobotkin wrote:

>>> Hi Dudley. *I've learned a couple things about USENET over
>>> the years. *The most important, and it applies to life in
>>> general: never talk to loons. *Whether they're conspiracy
>>> theorists on the net or the smelly guy with a long beard
>>> drinking out of a paper bag outside the subway station.
>>> They have NOTHING BETTER TO DO than to babble
>>> at you in an insulting fashion and they never stop.
>>>
>>> In fact, that's one of the most reliable ways to tell who
>>> isn't a loon--they get tired and quit eventually.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> * *Mike Beede
>>
>> Hi Mike;
>>
>> I'm actually an old hand at Usenet. Been around now for going on 10
>> years or so, quit Usenet 25x. But as an old Geezer of no value to
>> anyone I hang around to take the bows and accolades fukktards like
>> you hand out to me. Now, bow and suck my cock.
>
> Mike, don't do it. You laready have one dick in your mouth, don't be
> greedy.

Hi Mike;

Hanging in for an old guy :-) It's been a bad year airshow wise and
unfortunately we've been very busy. I need a smoke!
Health wise got a reprieve on my cancer after 2 solid months of
radiation. No bigee. I need another smoke!

I see Usenet hasn't changed much :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))

Best to you as always,
Dudley Henriques
Your Master

[Dudley Henriques[_3_]]

On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 01:57:27 -0400, Fred Sobotkin wrote:

>>> Hi Dudley. *I've learned a couple things about USENET over
>>> the years. *The most important, and it applies to life in
>>> general: never talk to loons. *Whether they're conspiracy
>>> theorists on the net or the smelly guy with a long beard
>>> drinking out of a paper bag outside the subway station.
>>> They have NOTHING BETTER TO DO than to babble
>>> at you in an insulting fashion and they never stop.
>>>
>>> In fact, that's one of the most reliable ways to tell who
>>> isn't a loon--they get tired and quit eventually.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> * *Mike Beede
>>
>> Hi Mike;
>>
>> I'm actually an old hand at Usenet. Been around now for going on 10
>> years or so, quit Usenet 25x. But as an old Geezer of no value to
>> anyone I hang around to take the bows and accolades fukktards like
>> you hand out to me. Now, bow and suck my cock.
>
> Mike, don't do it. You laready have one dick in your mouth, don't be
> greedy.

Hi Mike;

Hanging in for an old guy :-) It's been a bad year airshow wise and
unfortunately we've been very busy. I need a smoke!
Health wise got a reprieve on my cancer after 2 solid months of
radiation. No bigee. I need another smoke!

I see Usenet hasn't changed much :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))

Best to you as always,
Dudley Henriques
Your Master

[Dudley Henriques[_3_]]

On Oct 10, 3:27*pm, Dudley Henriques >
wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 01:57:27 -0400, Fred Sobotkin wrote:
> >>> Hi Dudley. I've learned a couple things about USENET over
> >>> the years. The most important, and it applies to life in
> >>> general: never talk to loons. Whether they're conspiracy
> >>> theorists on the net or the smelly guy with a long beard
> >>> drinking out of a paper bag outside the subway station.
> >>> They have NOTHING BETTER TO DO than to babble
> >>> at you in an insulting fashion and they never stop.
>
> >>> In fact, that's one of the most reliable ways to tell who
> >>> isn't a loon--they get tired and quit eventually.
>
> >>> Regards,
>
> >>> Mike Beede
>
> >> Hi Mike;
>
> >> I'm actually an old hand at Usenet. Been around now for going on 10
> >> years or so, quit Usenet 25x. But as an old Geezer of no value to
> >> anyone I hang around to take the bows and accolades fukktards like
> >> you hand out to me. Now, bow and suck my cock.
>
> > Mike, don't do it. You laready have one dick in your mouth, don't be
> > greedy.
>
> Hi Mike;
>
> Hanging in for an old guy :-) *It's been a bad year airshow wise and
> unfortunately we've been very busy. I need a smoke!
> Health wise got a reprieve on my cancer after 2 solid months of
> radiation. No bigee. I need another smoke!
>
> I see Usenet hasn't changed much :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))
>
> Best to you as always,
> Dudley Henriques
> Your Master

Just a few notes on this altered message before I put Usenet to bed
again. Should have known better than to stop by this time. :-))
Anyway, those of you who know me will know this message has been
altered. Those of you who believe otherwise don't know me and that's
no biggie.
Anyway, if I'm ever posting here and there is a question as to whether
or not I wrote something or whether one of the idiots now posting here
have altered it, simply check any of my many messages posted to Usenet
for the last year and note that I use a Mac with a specific IP
address.
Anything else has not been posted by me.
In this case someone has hijacked a message I posted and added text I
did not write. Don't know or care how this was done but I don't need
any more of it so I'm leaving the idiot who did it here while I move
on to forums a bit more productive.
Many thanks
Dudley Henriques
Thanks