Isn't this spoofing thing outdated?

[The ealOR-DME]

Any post sent to rec.aviation.military or any group other than
rec.aviation.piloting, is not from me. I do not cross-post. I also do
not spoof others' posts. I write in clear, concise, English phrases,
with correct grammar and no mistakes, save the occasional typo. I do
not
attack people personally, resort to name-calling or ad-hominem insult.
I would sooner lose contact with everyone here (which would be a
shame,
as there are many serious contributors) than resort to such tactics.

Anything you read which does not fully meet the above criteria, now or
in the future, is simply not from me.I hope this makes the spoofers'
task more complicated, as they will have their work cut out for them
respecting all of the above, whilst playing their childish games...

Remember, I'm a Bee!

*Bzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz bzzzzzzzzzzzz BEE Huge Bee Bzzzzzzzzzzzz*

[The Real VOR-DME]

In article >, says...

>Remember, I'm a Bee!
>
>*Bzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz bzzzzzzzzzzzz BEE Huge Bee Bzzzzzzzzzzzz*


This spoofer missed the "R" in Real (the sender - honestly, spoofers, if
you can't even get the sender's name right, you're not even up to a
childish level. A child would have gotten that part). Also missed the
fact that a "bee" is not a proper noun, and thus is not captialized. But
most of all, he "continued" to cross-post to rec. aviation.military!
Even after I TOLD them how to recognize false posts... Good Lord, what
ignorance...

[VOR-DME[_4_]]

Back to the normal identity (see how easy it is to change) I could very
easily submit posts signed, "TOM" ; write the most preposterous things,
then revert to my usual identity and furnish pithy responses. And what
would I have accomplished in so doing? What possible satisfaction could I
draw from such an inane prank? For me, it's not worth the 29 sec it takes
to do such a thing, but it would appear this is not the case for everyone
here.

Could it be that some contributors are having a very difficult time seeing
their shaky ideas challenged by rational arguments, and are ready to
resort to just about anything? Could it be that this same intellectual
weakness is what allowed them to be duped in the first place by these
whacko theories, preying on the intelectually frail?

[Dan[_15_]]

On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 23:12:07 +0200, VOR-DME wrote:

> Back to the normal identity (see how easy it is to change) I could very
> easily submit posts signed, "TOM" ; write the most preposterous things,
> then revert to my usual identity and furnish pithy responses. And what
> would I have accomplished in so doing? What possible satisfaction could I
> draw from such an inane prank? For me, it's not worth the 29 sec it takes
> to do such a thing, but it would appear this is not the case for everyone
> here.
>
> Could it be that some contributors are having a very difficult time seeing
> their shaky ideas challenged by rational arguments, and are ready to
> resort to just about anything? Could it be that this same intellectual
> weakness is what allowed them to be duped in the first place by these
> whacko theories, preying on the intelectually frail?

He's scared of you, beeeing a bee and all.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

[VOR DME]

On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 17:25:32 -0400, Dan wrote:

> On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 23:12:07 +0200, VOR-DME wrote:
>
>> Back to the normal identity (see how easy it is to change) I could very
>> easily submit posts signed, "TOM" ; write the most preposterous things,
>> then revert to my usual identity and furnish pithy responses. And what
>> would I have accomplished in so doing? What possible satisfaction could I
>> draw from such an inane prank? For me, it's not worth the 29 sec it takes
>> to do such a thing, but it would appear this is not the case for everyone
>> here.
>>
>> Could it be that some contributors are having a very difficult time seeing
>> their shaky ideas challenged by rational arguments, and are ready to
>> resort to just about anything? Could it be that this same intellectual
>> weakness is what allowed them to be duped in the first place by these
>> whacko theories, preying on the intelectually frail?
>
> He's scared of you, beeeing a bee and all.
>
> Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

YeS! An intelectual bee I bee.

*HYOOGE BEE*

*Bzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz*

[Tom[_16_]]

On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 17:27:19 -0400, VOR DME wrote:

> On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 17:25:32 -0400, Dan wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 23:12:07 +0200, VOR-DME wrote:
>>
>>> Back to the normal identity (see how easy it is to change) I could very
>>> easily submit posts signed, "TOM" ; write the most preposterous things,
>>> then revert to my usual identity and furnish pithy responses. And what
>>> would I have accomplished in so doing? What possible satisfaction could I
>>> draw from such an inane prank? For me, it's not worth the 29 sec it takes
>>> to do such a thing, but it would appear this is not the case for everyone
>>> here.
>>>
>>> Could it be that some contributors are having a very difficult time seeing
>>> their shaky ideas challenged by rational arguments, and are ready to
>>> resort to just about anything? Could it be that this same intellectual
>>> weakness is what allowed them to be duped in the first place by these
>>> whacko theories, preying on the intelectually frail?
>>
>> He's scared of you, beeeing a bee and all.
>>
>> Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
>
> YeS! An intelectual bee I bee.
>
> *HYOOGE BEE*
>
> *Bzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz*

Scared of bees? Maybe. This "bee". Naw.