PDA

View Full Version : Re: My ID


Tom[_16_]
October 13th 11, 10:21 PM
On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 17:15:34 -0400, The Vor-DME wrote:

> Back to the normal identity (see how easy it is to change) I could
> very easily submit posts signed, "TOM" ; write the most preposterous
> things, then revert to my usual identity and furnish pithy responses.

Go right ahead.

> And what would I have accomplished in so doing? What possible
> satisfaction could I draw from such an inane prank? For me, it's not
> worth the 29 sec it takes to do such a thing, but it would appear
> this is not the case for everyone here.

Then STFU.

> Could it be that some contributors are having a very difficult time
> seeing ideas challenged by assclown arguments, and are ready to
> resort to just about anything? It be that this same /intelectual/
> weakness is what allowed them to be duped in the first place by
> these whacko theories, preying on the /intelectually/ frail?

Of course you mean "intellectual" and "intellectually". *rofl*

Of course.

> **Don't you realize I'm a bee? Bzzzzzzzzzzzz bzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz*

A bee. Got it.

*ROTFLMAO*

VOR DME
October 13th 11, 10:23 PM
On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 17:21:59 -0400, Tom wrote:

> On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 17:15:34 -0400, The Vor-DME wrote:
>
>> Back to the normal identity (see how easy it is to change) I could
>> very easily submit posts signed, "TOM" ; write the most preposterous
>> things, then revert to my usual identity and furnish pithy responses.
>
> Go right ahead.
>
>> And what would I have accomplished in so doing? What possible
>> satisfaction could I draw from such an inane prank? For me, it's not
>> worth the 29 sec it takes to do such a thing, but it would appear
>> this is not the case for everyone here.
>
> Then STFU.
>
>> Could it be that some contributors are having a very difficult time
>> seeing ideas challenged by assclown arguments, and are ready to
>> resort to just about anything? It be that this same /intelectual/
>> weakness is what allowed them to be duped in the first place by
>> these whacko theories, preying on the /intelectually/ frail?
>
> Of course you mean "intellectual" and "intellectually". *rofl*
>
> Of course.
>
>> **Don't you realize I'm a bee? Bzzzzzzzzzzzz bzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz*
>
> A bee. Got it.
>
> *ROTFLMAO*

Yes, a bee! What have you got against bees you intelectual beeless
cumquat!

*I buzz you. Bzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz HUGE BEE!!*

Tom[_16_]
October 13th 11, 10:24 PM
On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 17:23:02 -0400, VOR DME wrote:

> On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 17:21:59 -0400, Tom wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 17:15:34 -0400, The Vor-DME wrote:
>>
>>> Back to the normal identity (see how easy it is to change) I could
>>> very easily submit posts signed, "TOM" ; write the most preposterous
>>> things, then revert to my usual identity and furnish pithy responses.
>>
>> Go right ahead.
>>
>>> And what would I have accomplished in so doing? What possible
>>> satisfaction could I draw from such an inane prank? For me, it's not
>>> worth the 29 sec it takes to do such a thing, but it would appear
>>> this is not the case for everyone here.
>>
>> Then STFU.
>>
>>> Could it be that some contributors are having a very difficult time
>>> seeing ideas challenged by assclown arguments, and are ready to
>>> resort to just about anything? It be that this same /intelectual/
>>> weakness is what allowed them to be duped in the first place by
>>> these whacko theories, preying on the /intelectually/ frail?
>>
>> Of course you mean "intellectual" and "intellectually". *rofl*
>>
>> Of course.
>>
>>> **Don't you realize I'm a bee? Bzzzzzzzzzzzz bzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz*
>>
>> A bee. Got it.
>>
>> *ROTFLMAO*
>
> Yes, a bee! What have you got against bees you intelectual beeless
> cumquat!
>
> *I buzz you. Bzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz HUGE BEE!!*

A bee. Got it.

Whew, what an assclown.

Google