View Full Version : UK1 K9370 Fairey Battle 1942 WrightField.jpg
Joseph Testagrose
October 28th 11, 12:58 PM
Graham Harrison[_2_]
October 28th 11, 06:33 PM
"Joseph Testagrose" > wrote in message
...
That's not your average Battle. Contra rotating props?
Graham Sheldon
October 28th 11, 10:27 PM
And in USA markings?
"Graham Harrison" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Joseph Testagrose" > wrote in message
> ...
>
> That's not your average Battle. Contra rotating props?
Andrew Chaplin
October 28th 11, 10:50 PM
"Graham Sheldon" > wrote in
ond.com:
> "Graham Harrison" > wrote in
> message ...
>>
>> "Joseph Testagrose" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>
>> That's not your average Battle. Contra rotating props?
>
> And in USA markings?
From Wikipedia: "Battle K9370 was used to test the Fairey Monarch 2,000+ hp
(1,490+ kW) aero-engine with electrically-controlled three-blade contra-
rotating propellers in 1939. According to Jane's All the World's Aircraft
1946-47, the aircraft was shipped to the U.S.A. after 86 hours test time."
--
Andrew Chaplin
SIT MIHI GLADIUS SICUT SANCTO MARTINO
(If you're going to e-mail me, you'll have to get "yourfinger." out.)
Savageduck[_3_]
October 29th 11, 12:45 AM
On 2011-10-28 14:50:43 -0700, Andrew Chaplin
> said:
> "Graham Sheldon" > wrote in
> ond.com:
>
>> "Graham Harrison" > wrote in
>> message ...
>>>
>>> "Joseph Testagrose" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>
>>> That's not your average Battle. Contra rotating props?
>>
>> And in USA markings?
>
> From Wikipedia: "Battle K9370 was used to test the Fairey Monarch 2,000+ hp
> (1,490+ kW) aero-engine with electrically-controlled three-blade contra-
> rotating propellers in 1939. According to Jane's All the World's Aircraft
> 1946-47, the aircraft was shipped to the U.S.A. after 86 hours test time."
There also seem to be a strange set of unexplained exhaust headers
protruding low on the forward fuselage.
What were those hooked up to?
--
Regards,
Savageduck
John Szalay[_2_]
October 29th 11, 01:52 AM
Savageduck > wrote in
>>>>
>>>> That's not your average Battle. Contra rotating props?
>>>
>>> And in USA markings?
>>
>> From Wikipedia: "Battle K9370 was used to test the Fairey Monarch
>> 2,000+ hp (1,490+ kW) aero-engine with electrically-controlled
>> three-blade contra- rotating propellers in 1939. According to Jane's
>> All the World's Aircraft 1946-47, the aircraft was shipped to the
>> U.S.A. after 86 hours test time."
>
> There also seem to be a strange set of unexplained exhaust headers
> protruding low on the forward fuselage.
> What were those hooked up to?
>
Perhaps
Richard[_8_]
October 29th 11, 03:21 AM
On 10/28/2011 7:52 PM, John Szalay wrote:
> > wrote in
>>>>>
>>>>> That's not your average Battle. Contra rotating props?
>>>>
>>>> And in USA markings?
>>>
>>> From Wikipedia: "Battle K9370 was used to test the Fairey Monarch
>>> 2,000+ hp (1,490+ kW) aero-engine with electrically-controlled
>>> three-blade contra- rotating propellers in 1939. According to Jane's
>>> All the World's Aircraft 1946-47, the aircraft was shipped to the
>>> U.S.A. after 86 hours test time."
>>
>> There also seem to be a strange set of unexplained exhaust headers
>> protruding low on the forward fuselage.
>> What were those hooked up to?
>>
>
> Perhaps
>
>
With the turbo charger attached to the crank case, what's the
possibility this was a two-stroke engine?
Savageduck[_3_]
October 29th 11, 03:22 AM
On 2011-10-28 17:52:56 -0700, John Szalay <john.szalayATatt.net> said:
> Savageduck > wrote in
>>>>>
>>>>> That's not your average Battle. Contra rotating props?
>>>>
>>>> And in USA markings?
>>>
>>> From Wikipedia: "Battle K9370 was used to test the Fairey Monarch
>>> 2,000+ hp (1,490+ kW) aero-engine with electrically-controlled
>>> three-blade contra- rotating propellers in 1939. According to Jane's
>>> All the World's Aircraft 1946-47, the aircraft was shipped to the
>>> U.S.A. after 86 hours test time."
>>
>> There also seem to be a strange set of unexplained exhaust headers
>> protruding low on the forward fuselage.
>> What were those hooked up to?
>>
>
> Perhaps
>
>
> <image>
Thanks for that interesting bit of info. It seems that Fairy P-24
"Monarch", putting out 2000 HP, was experimental and only used on the
Battle as a test bed. Projected for use in the Tornado and the P-47,
and it never when into full production.
--
Regards,
Savageduck
Savageduck[_3_]
October 29th 11, 03:49 AM
On 2011-10-28 19:21:48 -0700, Richard > said:
> On 10/28/2011 7:52 PM, John Szalay wrote:
>> > wrote in
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's not your average Battle. Contra rotating props?
>>>>>
>>>>> And in USA markings?
>>>>
>>>> From Wikipedia: "Battle K9370 was used to test the Fairey Monarch
>>>> 2,000+ hp (1,490+ kW) aero-engine with electrically-controlled
>>>> three-blade contra- rotating propellers in 1939. According to Jane's
>>>> All the World's Aircraft 1946-47, the aircraft was shipped to the
>>>> U.S.A. after 86 hours test time."
>>>
>>> There also seem to be a strange set of unexplained exhaust headers
>>> protruding low on the forward fuselage.
>>> What were those hooked up to?
>>>
>>
>> Perhaps
>>
>>
>
> With the turbo charger attached to the crank case, what's the
> possibility this was a two-stroke engine?
With a turbo charger on each side it looks more like an "X-24"?
Probably one V-12 on top of an inverted V-12. No wonder the P-47 ended
up with the Twin-Wasp R-2800-59.
--
Regards,
Savageduck
vBulletin® v3.6.4, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.