pilots refuse to fly with gun loons onboard

[AH#49]

Bogart wrote:

>
> Never heard of Jim Yanik. Was it posted to alt.nuke.the.usa? If not,
> I didn't see it.

Then THAT proves that you are indeed a mental midget, as all you do is
watch and post to that retarded, newsgroup!

[Dave Whitmarsh]

On Sat, 03 Jan 2004 00:37:12 GMT, AH#49 <"Asshole™#49"@ your.net>
wrote:

>Bogart wrote:
>
>>
>> Never heard of Jim Yanik. Was it posted to alt.nuke.the.usa? If not,
>> I didn't see it.
>
>Then THAT proves that you are indeed a mental midget, as all you do is
>watch and post to that retarded, newsgroup!

Yet more asylum inmates turning on each other. Sarah/Sable/Kensock
etc, your socks are coming undone, aren't they dear.

--
The Wit and Wisdom of Mort Davis:

On his inability to come to terms with technology:
"I have it ("Dave") killfiled. Yet it keeps responding to me."

On Empathy:
"Nick is ignoirant."
On his sexual habits:
"Box cutters could easily be concealed in shoes, up the rectum or vagina"

On American children rummaging through rubbish for food:
"True, ythey gewt the inbrads in Parliment to do it"

His neo-con solution for world peace:
"When Europe ****s itsself again, I suggest we drop nukes on it until no
human life remains."

Displaying that he's yet another lamer with a sticky
Caps Lock key who believes that anyone cares about the
contents of his killfile:
"Keep changing those fake idents, I have plenty more room in the old
killfile, ****TARD."

[pacplyer]

(Jim Austin) wrote in message >...
> nick wrote:
>
> > "Some flights to the US could be grounded after the airline pilots' union
> > called on its members not to fly with armed sky marshals on board."
> >
> > "Airline pilots should not take off with marshals on board, the British
> > Airline Pilots' Association (Balpa) has said."
> >
> > "Capt Granshaw defended pilots' right to take action and said: "Our advice
> > to pilots is that until adequate written and agreed assurances are received,
> > flight crew should not operate flights where sky marshals are carried."
>
> It's apparent that the pilots' union prefers that British planes be
> available to terrorists to crash into buildings and kill Americans,
> and that "nick" shares the same sentiments.
>

Jim,

You can only have one Captain on a ship. Ever heard of "Mutiny on the
Bounty?" You arm some idiot in the back, who has very limited
knowledge of aviation, and let him think he is charge, you have a
recipe for disaster. (in the past they've fallen asleep, left their
guns in the lavatory, shot other officers by accident, and gotten
drunk on duty. They have a boring job and they have to be accountable
to the PIC. The Brit pilot's union is correct. They don't want our
dysfunctional skymarshal program on board.

2nd Rant:
It's really amazing to me that this anti-gun society accepts shooting
down a hundred people with an air-to-air missile as necessary to
protect buildings, but at the same time is appalled at the suggestion
of the Captain being issued a side-arm to prevent this.

pacplyer - out

[Yardpilot]

"Nomen Nescio" ]> wrote in message
...



> A window hit would be troublesome, but not catastrophic. And again, a FMJ
would be
> more likely to punch a clean hole, but even if the window shatters,
everything is not going
> to suddenly get sucked out.

Agreed, mostly. That is generally a Hollywood myth.

>You're only looking at a 6 - 8 psi difference inside to out.

Sufficient under some circumstances to cause problems. I've been knocked
down by a 5 psi air pressure differential.

[Yardpilot]

"Morton Davis" > wrote in message
news:UgeJb.715753$HS4.5127546@attbi_s01...
>
> "Yardpilot" > wrote in message
> news:TX8Jb.38992$xX.133717@attbi_s02...
> >
> > " Bogart " > wrote in message
> > s.com...
> > > On Thu, 01 Jan 2004 18:04:33 GMT, "Scout"
> > > > wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >" Bogart " > wrote in message
> > > s.com...
> > > >> On Thu, 01 Jan 2004 15:08:13 GMT, "Scout"
> > > >> > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> >
> > > >> >"Bill Funk" > wrote in message
> > > >> ...
> > > >> >> On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 10:37:33 -0700, "Kevin McCue"
> > > >> >> > wrote:
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> > Wanna bet your life that they wouldn't miss? I wouldn't.
I'd
> > > >rather
> > > >> >deal
> > > >> >> >with the terrorist.
> > > >> >> > Since the Dept. of Homeland Insecurity seems to think that
> the
> > > >> >> >terrorist are likely trained ATP's how will the Air Marshal
stop
> > them
> > > >> >when
> > > >> >> >they are locked behind that now reinforced, bullet proof
cockpit
> > door?
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> The only way a terrorist could get behind that locked, bullet
> proof
> > > >> >> door is for someone to open it.
> > > >> >> The British pliots (or rather, their union) seem to think that
> > having
> > > >> >> the pilots open that door is a really good idea.
> > > >> >
> > > >> >Right, which is why it was managed to be opened by a couple of
> people
> > > >armed
> > > >> >with nothing more than a drink cart.
> > > >>
> > > >> How did they open a locked bullet proof door with a drink cart?
> > > >
> > > >They rammed the door with it.
> > >
> > > You're claiming a locked bulletproof door gave way to ramming from a
> > > drink cart?
> >
> > I don't see why it couldn't happen. A bullet proof vest won't sto0p an
> > icepick.
> >
> >
> http://johnrlott.tripod.com/op-eds/ArmedMarshalsWSJE.html
>
> " Reinforced cockpit doors are now in place, but because of engineering
> constraints few experts have much faith in their effectiveness. Last
> summer, on a bet to test the doors' strength, an overnight cleaning
> crew at Dulles Airport near Washington, D.C. rammed a drink cart into
> one of the new doors on a United Airlines plane. The door reportedly
> broke off its hinges. The doors for European airlines generally provide
> even less protection."

There has been a limited redesign by an airline or two because of that.
Four-point titanium locks, reinforcing bars, things like that. Evidently
there is no industry-wide standard. FYI, a "drink cart" is not an
insubstantial piece of material. One can weigh over 300 pounds.

[Morton Davis]

"pacplyer" > wrote in message
om...
> (Jim Austin) wrote in message
>...
> > nick wrote:
> >
> > > "Some flights to the US could be grounded after the airline pilots'
union
> > > called on its members not to fly with armed sky marshals on board."
> > >
> > > "Airline pilots should not take off with marshals on board, the
British
> > > Airline Pilots' Association (Balpa) has said."
> > >
> > > "Capt Granshaw defended pilots' right to take action and said: "Our
advice
> > > to pilots is that until adequate written and agreed assurances are
received,
> > > flight crew should not operate flights where sky marshals are
carried."
> >
> > It's apparent that the pilots' union prefers that British planes be
> > available to terrorists to crash into buildings and kill Americans,
> > and that "nick" shares the same sentiments.
> >
>
> Jim,
>
> You can only have one Captain on a ship.

**** YOU.

-*MORT*-

[Morton Davis]

"Yardpilot" > wrote in message
news:tipJb.727713$Tr4.1877967@attbi_s03...
>
> There has been a limited redesign by an airline or two because of that.
> Four-point titanium locks, reinforcing bars, things like that. Evidently
> there is no industry-wide standard. FYI, a "drink cart" is not an
> insubstantial piece of material. One can weigh over 300 pounds.
>
>
So can some passengers....

-*MORT*-

[Dave Whitmarsh]

On Sat, 03 Jan 2004 04:35:25 GMT, "Morton Davis"
> wrote:

>
>"pacplyer" > wrote in message
om...
>> (Jim Austin) wrote in message
>...
>> > nick wrote:
>> >
>> > > "Some flights to the US could be grounded after the airline pilots'
>union
>> > > called on its members not to fly with armed sky marshals on board."
>> > >
>> > > "Airline pilots should not take off with marshals on board, the
>British
>> > > Airline Pilots' Association (Balpa) has said."
>> > >
>> > > "Capt Granshaw defended pilots' right to take action and said: "Our
>advice
>> > > to pilots is that until adequate written and agreed assurances are
>received,
>> > > flight crew should not operate flights where sky marshals are
>carried."
>> >
>> > It's apparent that the pilots' union prefers that British planes be
>> > available to terrorists to crash into buildings and kill Americans,
>> > and that "nick" shares the same sentiments.
>> >
>>
>> Jim,
>>
>> You can only have one Captain on a ship.
>
>**** YOU.
>
>-*MORT*-
>

Thanks for your important and interesting contribution to the debate,
Mort.

--
The Wit and Wisdom of Mort Davis:

On his inability to come to terms with technology:
"I have it ("Dave") killfiled. Yet it keeps responding to me."

On Empathy:
"Nick is ignoirant."
On his sexual habits:
"Box cutters could easily be concealed in shoes, up the rectum or vagina"

On American children rummaging through rubbish for food:
"True, ythey gewt the inbrads in Parliment to do it"

His neo-con solution for world peace:
"When Europe ****s itsself again, I suggest we drop nukes on it until no
human life remains."

Displaying that he's yet another lamer with a sticky
Caps Lock key who believes that anyone cares about the
contents of his killfile:
"Keep changing those fake idents, I have plenty more room in the old
killfile, ****TARD."

[LIBassbug]

Gregory Procter wrote:

>
> LIBassbug wrote:
>
>
>>Gregory Procter wrote:
>>
>>
>>>LIBassbug wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Gregory Procter wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>LIBassbug wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Gregory Procter wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>LIBassbug wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Eddy_Down wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Morton Davis wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Box cutters could easily be concealed in shoes, up the rectum or vagina ,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>It's like Mort came from a completely different planet, isn't it?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On our planet rectums and vaginas have small openings.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>You have (5) very small fingers?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Is that a proposition?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>No, it's a repeat of your pronouncement.
>>>>
>>>>Is that when you told me you self fist?
>>>
>>>
>>>No, when you told me you have a five finger arsehole.
>>
>>Why do you care so much about how many fingers I can fit in my asshole?
>
>
> You keep bringing the subject up - I'm waiting for some punch line.

There's always a line at my punch bowl. (my guest trust I didn't dip my
fingers in it).

--
Chris.
http://****france.com/

New Zealand tubbies.
http://www.geocities.com/libassbug/nztubbies.jpg

Vengeance is a hamburger that is eaten cold, writes Georges Dupuy in
Liberation.

No wonder the French military is a band of sissies, look at where they
get their stock from. (800k mpeg file.)
http://www.geocities.com/libassbug/frenchfighters.mpeg

funny mp3
http://www.geocities.com/libassbug/horserace.mp3

The new Three Stooge's
http://www.geocities.com/libassbug/happyfamily.jpg

Two clowns.
http://www.geocities.com/libassbug/groggyclown.jpg
http://www.geocities.com/libassbug/nickclown.jpg

[Little John]

On Fri, 2 Jan 2004 10:00:03 +0100 (CET), in a fit of unbridled digital
verbosity, once again proving the problem is located between the seat and the
keyboard, Nomen Nescio ]> two-fingered
to all:

|>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
|>
|>From: Little John >
|>
|>>>While I like the Glasers and my wife swears by them for her .38 snubby, the
US
|>>>Sky Marshalls are not using them in airliners. They are now using the .357
Sig round in
|>>>FMJ.
|>>
|>>That's not what my sources say. Where'd you hear this?
|>
|>- From a discussion on this very subject that I had with a friend in the FBI.
I've known
|>him for over 25 years and went to College with him. So I tend to think the
info is
|>credible. None of this is "classified" info. either, or he wouldn't have told
me.
|>
|>>>The reason that I've heard is that it's very effective for shooting through
a hostage and
|>>>still having enough energy to drop a terrorist. It makes sense, but I
wouldn't want to be the
|>>>hostage.
|>>
|>>If that's the "reasoning", it will also go through on a clean shot and damage
|>>the airliner or an innocent passenger, something that is entirely contrary to
|>>the mission.
|>
|>As in everything with the gvt., there's the "official" mission and then there
is the "real"
|>mission.

Flashbacks to military days.

|>The mission, first and foremost is to keep the terrorist from gaining control
of the plane.
|>To this end, sacrificing a hostage, or a couple of passengers is acceptable.
Not
|>desirable, but acceptable.
|> They are trained in careful shot placement, however.

As everyone should be. Why use $7 worth of ammo when you can do the job with 70
cents worth? :-)

But, if they're trained that way, they won't need to shoot through a passenger.
There's always a target.

|> My understanding is that they are being outfitted with Sig Sauer P226's in
the .357 sig
|>caliber w/12 rd. mag. And not real happy about it 'cause it's not real
comfortable to
|>carry on an airline. They're pushing for the Sig Sauer P239 w/7 rd. mag, also
in .357 sig.
|>It's smaller and more comfortable to carry.

The Sigs are nice, but I still prefer the Berettas.

|> The rationale behind the FMJ round, besides penetration, is that tests have
shown that
|>if it hits a wire or hydraulic line, it's more likely to deflect or dent it
where a hollow point
|>is more likely to cause a fracture, as is a pre-frag. like the Glaser.

The manufacturer might disagree with that. It was one of the design parameters,
and one of the tests performed before the Glasers were approved way back when.

|> As far as puncturing the skin, it's just a small hole. The explosive
decompression that
|>you see in the movies is a myth.

I'm aware of that. Anyone that's ever seen a shot up military plane knows
damned good and well that "explosive" decompression is a myth.

A hole in the skin wouldn't even result in a noticable
|>pressure drop.
|> A window hit would be troublesome, but not catastrophic. And again, a FMJ
would be
|>more likely to punch a clean hole, but even if the window shatters, everything
is not going
|>to suddenly get sucked out. You're only looking at a 6 - 8 psi difference
inside to out.

I stated in another post that the pressure difference wouldn't even give a
passenger a good hickey if they stuck their neck to the hole.

|> If you think about it, it does make sense. Especially is you absolutly must
stop someone
|>from detonating a bomb, NOW!!!!
|> But I'm not involved with the Sky Marshall program, so I cannot personally
assure you
|>that this info. is accurate. But I tend to believe it.

Ok. My info came from various sources, including a couple of airline captains
that are buddies. They might be using both.


jammin1-at-jammin1-dot-com

jammin1's Resources
www.jammin1.com

[Dave Whitmarsh]

On Sat, 03 Jan 2004 01:03:57 -0700, Little John
> wrote:

>Flashbacks to military days.

Cleaning those latrines took its toll on you, didn't it boy.

--
The Wit and Wisdom of Mort Davis:

On his inability to come to terms with technology:
"I have it ("Dave") killfiled. Yet it keeps responding to me."

On Empathy:
"Nick is ignoirant."
On his sexual habits:
"Box cutters could easily be concealed in shoes, up the rectum or vagina"

On American children rummaging through rubbish for food:
"True, ythey gewt the inbrads in Parliment to do it"

His neo-con solution for world peace:
"When Europe ****s itsself again, I suggest we drop nukes on it until no
human life remains."

Displaying that he's yet another lamer with a sticky
Caps Lock key who believes that anyone cares about the
contents of his killfile:
"Keep changing those fake idents, I have plenty more room in the old
killfile, ****TARD."

[Yardpilot]

"Morton Davis" > wrote in message
news:tFrJb.46053$xX.206430@attbi_s02...
>
> "Yardpilot" > wrote in message
> news:tipJb.727713$Tr4.1877967@attbi_s03...
> >
> > There has been a limited redesign by an airline or two because of that.
> > Four-point titanium locks, reinforcing bars, things like that. Evidently
> > there is no industry-wide standard. FYI, a "drink cart" is not an
> > insubstantial piece of material. One can weigh over 300 pounds.
> >
> >
> So can some passengers....

Be nice <G>. Lee doesn't fly that often.

[Scout]

" Bogart " > wrote in message
s.com...
> On Fri, 02 Jan 2004 23:09:14 GMT, "Scout"
> > wrote:
>
> >
> >" Bogart " > wrote in message
> s.com...
> >> On Fri, 02 Jan 2004 11:12:43 GMT, "Scout"
> >> > wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >" Bogart " > wrote in message
> >> s.com...
> >>
> >> >> You're claiming a locked bulletproof door gave way to ramming from a
> >> >> drink cart? Cite please.
> >> >
> >> >Already provided.
> >>
> >> Finally, by Mort.
> >
> >No actually the message I refer to is by Jim Yanik. Which was posted
almost
> >24 hours before your reply. However, perhaps you hadn't gotten to that
> >message yet. I do note that you have chosen not to respond to his message
to
> >date.
>
> Never heard of Jim Yanik. Was it posted to alt.nuke.the.usa? If not,
> I didn't see it. Mort took care of Jim's oversight.

Well, that sort of settles the issue whether you are a troll or not.

<plonk>

[Dave]

"Yardpilot" > wrote in message
news:tipJb.727713$Tr4.1877967@attbi_s03...
>
> "Morton Davis" > wrote in message
> news:UgeJb.715753$HS4.5127546@attbi_s01...
> >
> > "Yardpilot" > wrote in message
> > news:TX8Jb.38992$xX.133717@attbi_s02...
> > >
> > > " Bogart " > wrote in message
> > > s.com...
> > > > On Thu, 01 Jan 2004 18:04:33 GMT, "Scout"
> > > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >" Bogart " > wrote in message
> > > > s.com...
> > > > >> On Thu, 01 Jan 2004 15:08:13 GMT, "Scout"
> > > > >> > wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >"Bill Funk" > wrote in message
> > > > >> ...
> > > > >> >> On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 10:37:33 -0700, "Kevin McCue"
> > > > >> >> > wrote:
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >> > Wanna bet your life that they wouldn't miss? I wouldn't.
> I'd
> > > > >rather
> > > > >> >deal
> > > > >> >> >with the terrorist.
> > > > >> >> > Since the Dept. of Homeland Insecurity seems to think
that
> > the
> > > > >> >> >terrorist are likely trained ATP's how will the Air Marshal
> stop
> > > them
> > > > >> >when
> > > > >> >> >they are locked behind that now reinforced, bullet proof
> cockpit
> > > door?
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >> The only way a terrorist could get behind that locked, bullet
> > proof
> > > > >> >> door is for someone to open it.
> > > > >> >> The British pliots (or rather, their union) seem to think that
> > > having
> > > > >> >> the pilots open that door is a really good idea.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >Right, which is why it was managed to be opened by a couple of
> > people
> > > > >armed
> > > > >> >with nothing more than a drink cart.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> How did they open a locked bullet proof door with a drink cart?
> > > > >
> > > > >They rammed the door with it.
> > > >
> > > > You're claiming a locked bulletproof door gave way to ramming from a
> > > > drink cart?
> > >
> > > I don't see why it couldn't happen. A bullet proof vest won't sto0p an
> > > icepick.
> > >
> > >
> > http://johnrlott.tripod.com/op-eds/ArmedMarshalsWSJE.html
> >
> > " Reinforced cockpit doors are now in place, but because of engineering
> > constraints few experts have much faith in their effectiveness. Last
> > summer, on a bet to test the doors' strength, an overnight cleaning
> > crew at Dulles Airport near Washington, D.C. rammed a drink cart into
> > one of the new doors on a United Airlines plane. The door reportedly
> > broke off its hinges. The doors for European airlines generally provide
> > even less protection."
>
> There has been a limited redesign by an airline or two because of that.
> Four-point titanium locks, reinforcing bars, things like that. Evidently
> there is no industry-wide standard. FYI, a "drink cart" is not an
> insubstantial piece of material. One can weigh over 300 pounds.


Get rid of the drinks cart - at least it would stop TSA bosses getting
drunk.

[Dave]

"pacplyer" > wrote in message
om...
> (Jim Austin) wrote in message
>...
> > nick wrote:
> >
> > > "Some flights to the US could be grounded after the airline pilots'
union
> > > called on its members not to fly with armed sky marshals on board."
> > >
> > > "Airline pilots should not take off with marshals on board, the
British
> > > Airline Pilots' Association (Balpa) has said."
> > >
> > > "Capt Granshaw defended pilots' right to take action and said: "Our
advice
> > > to pilots is that until adequate written and agreed assurances are
received,
> > > flight crew should not operate flights where sky marshals are
carried."
> >
> > It's apparent that the pilots' union prefers that British planes be
> > available to terrorists to crash into buildings and kill Americans,
> > and that "nick" shares the same sentiments.
> >
>
> Jim,
>
> You can only have one Captain on a ship. Ever heard of "Mutiny on the
> Bounty?" You arm some idiot in the back, who has very limited
> knowledge of aviation, and let him think he is charge, you have a
> recipe for disaster. (in the past they've fallen asleep, left their
> guns in the lavatory, shot other officers by accident, and gotten
> drunk on duty. They have a boring job and they have to be accountable
> to the PIC. The Brit pilot's union is correct. They don't want our
> dysfunctional skymarshal program on board.
>
> 2nd Rant:
> It's really amazing to me that this anti-gun society accepts shooting
> down a hundred people with an air-to-air missile as necessary to
> protect buildings, but at the same time is appalled at the suggestion
> of the Captain being issued a side-arm to prevent this.

The issue is one of where the decision making comes from. The decision to
shoot down a plane is made at the highest political level. They have to
accountable for it and we do have sanctions if we want to apply them.

Some loon on board a plane with a gun may succeed in defending the plane but
he may not. even though I hate politicians I would rather them make the
decision that the loon who thinks he is the Lone Ranger. I think one reason
for the politicians wanting to put the sky marshals on board is to have
someone to blame when a plane comes down.

either the sky marshal failed so we have to shoot it down or
they sky marshal must have cause the plane to come down by his actions in
frustrating the terrorists.

The result is the same 200 plus people dead but the politicians are clean.

[Webzpider]

"Morton Davis" > wrote in message news:8mfJb.41496$xX.137242@attbi_s02...
>
> "LIBassbug" > wrote in message
> . net...
> >
> >
> > nick wrote:
> >
> > > "LIBassbug" > wrote in message
> > >
> > >
> > >>>>>>Box cutters could easily be concealed in shoes, up the rectum or
> > >
> > > vagina
> > >
> > >>>,
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>>>It's like Mort came from a completely different planet, isn't it?
> > >>>>
> > >>>>On our planet rectums and vaginas have small openings.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>Not after Mort's stuffed them full of razor blades...
> > >>
> > >>Florida.
> > >
> > >
> > > From VA downwards people get weirder.
> >
> > I was going to move to Vagina but the houses were ugly.
> >
>
>
> Nick, is ignoirant. But then, he's a Brit, so that's redundant. Drug
> smugglers have been using body cavities to smuggle drugs for decades. Not
> far-fetched for a determined terroist to put a closed box cutter up her
> vagina.
>
> -*MORT*-
>

Your mother could easily put up a grenade launcher across hers.

Webzpider

" I found alligator a bit chewy, but not bad."
-*MORT*-

[LIBassbug]

photographer wrote:

> "LIBassbug" > wrote in message
> . net...
>
>>
>>nick wrote:
>>
>>
>>>"LIBassbug" > wrote in message
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>>>Box cutters could easily be concealed in shoes, up the rectum or
>>>
>>>vagina
>>>
>>>
>>>>>,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>It's like Mort came from a completely different planet, isn't it?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>On our planet rectums and vaginas have small openings.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Not after Mort's stuffed them full of razor blades...
>>>>
>>>>Florida.
>>>
>>>
>>>From VA downwards people get weirder.
>>
>>I was going to move to Vagina but the houses were ugly.
>>
>
>
> And the houses don't have enough wombs;-)

If it was up to me there would be a womb in every room.

My house would be sort of a womb tomb.


--
Chris.
http://****france.com/

New Zealand tubbies.
http://www.geocities.com/libassbug/nztubbies.jpg

Vengeance is a hamburger that is eaten cold, writes Georges Dupuy in
Liberation.

No wonder the French military is a band of sissies, look at where they
get their stock from. (800k mpeg file.)
http://www.geocities.com/libassbug/frenchfighters.mpeg

funny mp3
http://www.geocities.com/libassbug/horserace.mp3

The new Three Stooge's
http://www.geocities.com/libassbug/happyfamily.jpg

Two clowns.
http://www.geocities.com/libassbug/groggyclown.jpg
http://www.geocities.com/libassbug/nickclown.jpg

[Michael Power]

"Eddy_Down" > wrote in message
s.com...
>
>
> Bill Smith wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 21:51:13 GMT, Dave Whitmarsh
> > > wrote:
> >
> >
> >>On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 13:01:03 -0800, Bill Smith
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 18:50:49 -0000, "nick"
> > wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>"Some flights to the US could be grounded after the airline pilots'
union
> >>>>called on its members not to fly with armed sky marshals on board."
> >>>>
> >>>>"Airline pilots should not take off with marshals on board, the
British
> >>>>Airline Pilots' Association (Balpa) has said."
> >>>>
> >>>>"Capt Granshaw defended pilots' right to take action and said: "Our
advice
> >>>>to pilots is that until adequate written and agreed assurances are
received,
> >>>>flight crew should not operate flights where sky marshals are
carried."
> >>>>
> >>>>http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/3357309.stm
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>LOL!. They want ONLY terrorists armed! This is, all at once, hilarious
> >>>and tragically stupid.
> >>> Bill Smith
> >>
> >>Your inability to comprehend basic English is a huge concern, Bill old
> >>chap.
> >
> >
> > "Written assurances". Of what? They want to be told that trained
> > personnel are going to be used rather than just passing guns out to
> > the passengers? They want to be told that if they lose control of
> > their aircraft it will be shot down and there might just be a few
> > remedies to try before then?
> >
>
> It's called X-ray machines at the airport check-in terminals, doofus.
>
We have them. Unfortunately, they're manned by low-level personnel, the
scrapings of American society and refugees from the former British and
Spanish Empire's colonies. The FBI and other agencies have proven it's
ridiculously easy to get weapons past them. Two times I've run into
difficulties with flying on a civilian airline were because of stupid, badly
trained, foreign-born flunkies (possibly not even American citizens) who
could barely speak English, and the third was with an American who probably
was in a prison work program.

[Bogart]

On Sat, 03 Jan 2004 10:45:47 GMT, "Scout"
> wrote:

>
>" Bogart " > wrote in message
s.com...
>> On Fri, 02 Jan 2004 23:09:14 GMT, "Scout"
>> > wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >" Bogart " > wrote in message
>> s.com...
>> >> On Fri, 02 Jan 2004 11:12:43 GMT, "Scout"
>> >> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >" Bogart " > wrote in message
>> >> s.com...
>> >>
>> >> >> You're claiming a locked bulletproof door gave way to ramming from a
>> >> >> drink cart? Cite please.
>> >> >
>> >> >Already provided.
>> >>
>> >> Finally, by Mort.
>> >
>> >No actually the message I refer to is by Jim Yanik. Which was posted
>almost
>> >24 hours before your reply. However, perhaps you hadn't gotten to that
>> >message yet. I do note that you have chosen not to respond to his message
>to
>> >date.
>>
>> Never heard of Jim Yanik. Was it posted to alt.nuke.the.usa? If not,
>> I didn't see it. Mort took care of Jim's oversight.
>
>Well, that sort of settles the issue whether you are a troll or not.
>
><plonk>

Fair enough, long ago I pegged you for an argumentative moron.

[nick]

"Dave Whitmarsh" > wrote in message

> Snout has already spanked your Bogart sock, Sable, is your Kensock
> feeling a little masochistic as well? Snout has always been lame, but
> you, Sarah dear, are even lamer.

It's a sign of Sables desperation that she uses one of her socks to back up
another of her socks.

[Scout]

"Dave" > wrote in message
...
>
> "pacplyer" > wrote in message
> om...
> > (Jim Austin) wrote in message
> >...
> > > nick wrote:
> > >
> > > > "Some flights to the US could be grounded after the airline pilots'
> union
> > > > called on its members not to fly with armed sky marshals on board."
> > > >
> > > > "Airline pilots should not take off with marshals on board, the
> British
> > > > Airline Pilots' Association (Balpa) has said."
> > > >
> > > > "Capt Granshaw defended pilots' right to take action and said: "Our
> advice
> > > > to pilots is that until adequate written and agreed assurances are
> received,
> > > > flight crew should not operate flights where sky marshals are
> carried."
> > >
> > > It's apparent that the pilots' union prefers that British planes be
> > > available to terrorists to crash into buildings and kill Americans,
> > > and that "nick" shares the same sentiments.
> > >
> >
> > Jim,
> >
> > You can only have one Captain on a ship. Ever heard of "Mutiny on the
> > Bounty?" You arm some idiot in the back, who has very limited
> > knowledge of aviation, and let him think he is charge, you have a
> > recipe for disaster. (in the past they've fallen asleep, left their
> > guns in the lavatory, shot other officers by accident, and gotten
> > drunk on duty. They have a boring job and they have to be accountable
> > to the PIC. The Brit pilot's union is correct. They don't want our
> > dysfunctional skymarshal program on board.
> >
> > 2nd Rant:
> > It's really amazing to me that this anti-gun society accepts shooting
> > down a hundred people with an air-to-air missile as necessary to
> > protect buildings, but at the same time is appalled at the suggestion
> > of the Captain being issued a side-arm to prevent this.
>
> The issue is one of where the decision making comes from. The decision to
> shoot down a plane is made at the highest political level. They have to
> accountable for it and we do have sanctions if we want to apply them.
>
> Some loon on board a plane with a gun may succeed in defending the plane
but
> he may not. even though I hate politicians I would rather them make the
> decision that the loon who thinks he is the Lone Ranger. I think one
reason
> for the politicians wanting to put the sky marshals on board is to have
> someone to blame when a plane comes down.

Well, let's see. When given a chance between shooting the plane down and
killing everyone and risking the chance that they might not have to resort
to this.....you chose killing everyone.

Free hint. If the terrorists are in control of any plane near high
population it WILL be shot down. Now consider, where do you find airports?
Right. Near population centers.

It isn't a choice of whether they will decide to shoot the plane down or
not, but rather if the terrorists gain control making that decision
necessary.

As such, ANYTHING that will keep them from taking over is a benefit.

[Scout]

"Dave Whitmarsh" > wrote in message
s.com...
> On Sat, 03 Jan 2004 10:45:47 GMT, "Scout"
> > wrote:
>
> >
> >" Bogart " > wrote in message
> s.com...
> >> On Fri, 02 Jan 2004 23:09:14 GMT, "Scout"
> >> > wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >" Bogart " > wrote in message
> >> s.com...
> >> >> On Fri, 02 Jan 2004 11:12:43 GMT, "Scout"
> >> >> > wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >" Bogart " > wrote in message
> >> >> s.com...
> >> >>
> >> >> >> You're claiming a locked bulletproof door gave way to ramming
from a
> >> >> >> drink cart? Cite please.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Already provided.
> >> >>
> >> >> Finally, by Mort.
> >> >
> >> >No actually the message I refer to is by Jim Yanik. Which was posted
> >almost
> >> >24 hours before your reply. However, perhaps you hadn't gotten to that
> >> >message yet. I do note that you have chosen not to respond to his
message
> >to
> >> >date.
> >>
> >> Never heard of Jim Yanik. Was it posted to alt.nuke.the.usa? If not,
> >> I didn't see it. Mort took care of Jim's oversight.
> >
> >Well, that sort of settles the issue whether you are a troll or not.
> >
> ><plonk>
> >
>
> She's not a troll she's a sock. Do try to keep up.

Sock....troll.....still a waste of time, bandwidth, electricity, food, and
oxygen.

[Dave Whitmarsh]

On Sat, 3 Jan 2004 18:42:02 -0000, "nick"
> wrote:

>
>"Dave Whitmarsh" > wrote in message
>
>> Snout has already spanked your Bogart sock, Sable, is your Kensock
>> feeling a little masochistic as well? Snout has always been lame, but
>> you, Sarah dear, are even lamer.
>
>It's a sign of Sables desperation that she uses one of her socks to back up
>another of her socks.
>

her paranoia is becoming more and more bizarre with each post. It's
still gratifying that two or three simple words in a response to her
can send her off on a frenzy. I'm still, of course, not reading her
ramblings, just entering stock responses as a reply - she goes
"nucular", as the chimp that is her leader might say.

--
The Wit and Wisdom of Mort Davis:

On his inability to come to terms with technology:
"I have it ("Dave") killfiled. Yet it keeps responding to me."

On Empathy:
"Nick is ignoirant."
On his sexual habits:
"Box cutters could easily be concealed in shoes, up the rectum or vagina"

On American children rummaging through rubbish for food:
"True, ythey gewt the inbrads in Parliment to do it"

His neo-con solution for world peace:
"When Europe ****s itsself again, I suggest we drop nukes on it until no
human life remains."

Displaying that he's yet another lamer with a sticky
Caps Lock key who believes that anyone cares about the
contents of his killfile:
"Keep changing those fake idents, I have plenty more room in the old
killfile, ****TARD."

[Mike Helm]

On 2 Jan 2004 17:08:39 -0800, (pacplyer)

(Jim Austin) wrote in message >...
>> nick wrote:
>>
>> > "Some flights to the US could be grounded after the airline pilots' union
>> > called on its members not to fly with armed sky marshals on board."
>> >
>> > "Airline pilots should not take off with marshals on board, the British
>> > Airline Pilots' Association (Balpa) has said."
>> >
>> > "Capt Granshaw defended pilots' right to take action and said: "Our advice
>> > to pilots is that until adequate written and agreed assurances are received,
>> > flight crew should not operate flights where sky marshals are carried."
>>
>> It's apparent that the pilots' union prefers that British planes be
>> available to terrorists to crash into buildings and kill Americans,
>> and that "nick" shares the same sentiments.
>>
>
>Jim,
>
>You can only have one Captain on a ship.

But doesn't the Captain need a crew that will defend him?

> Ever heard of "Mutiny on the
>Bounty?"

It's unlikely the air marshall is going to tell the pilot how or where
to fly the plane if there is not an emergency situation.

I haven't heard of this happening on any El Al flights.


> You arm some idiot in the back, who has very limited
>knowledge of aviation, and let him think he is charge, you have a
>recipe for disaster. (in the past they've fallen asleep, left their
>guns in the lavatory, shot other officers by accident, and gotten
>drunk on duty.

I've heard of pilots being drunk on duty, but never any of those applied
to air marshalls.

Do you have a cite?

> They have a boring job and they have to be accountable
>to the PIC. The Brit pilot's union is correct. They don't want our
>dysfunctional skymarshal program on board.
>
>2nd Rant:
>It's really amazing to me that this anti-gun society accepts shooting
>down a hundred people with an air-to-air missile as necessary to
>protect buildings, but at the same time is appalled at the suggestion
>of the Captain being issued a side-arm to prevent this.
>
>pacplyer - out

[Morton Davis]

"Mike Helm" > wrote in message
...
> On 2 Jan 2004 17:08:39 -0800, (pacplyer)
>
> > You arm some idiot in the back, who has very limited
> >knowledge of aviation, and let him think he is charge, you have a
> >recipe for disaster. (in the past they've fallen asleep, left their
> >guns in the lavatory, shot other officers by accident, and gotten
> >drunk on duty.
>
> I've heard of pilots being drunk on duty, but never any of those applied
> to air marshalls.
>
> Do you have a cite?
>

I'm particularly interested in a CITE for air marshals leaving their guns in
lavatories and shooting other air marshalls by accident.

-*MORT*-

[nobody]

In article >,
"nick" > wrote:

> "Some flights to the US could be grounded after the airline pilots' union
> called on its members not to fly with armed sky marshals on board."
>
> "Airline pilots should not take off with marshals on board, the British
> Airline Pilots' Association (Balpa) has said."
>
> "Capt Granshaw defended pilots' right to take action and said: "Our advice
> to pilots is that until adequate written and agreed assurances are received,
> flight crew should not operate flights where sky marshals are carried."
>
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/3357309.stm


What do you expect, the Brits are cowards, look at how they handed over
the Sudentenland to Hitler. Nothing has changed, they've learned
nothing.

[Eddy_Down]

Bill Smith wrote:
> On Thu, 01 Jan 2004 10:38:54 GMT, Eddy_Down
> > wrote:
>
>
>>
>>Bill Smith wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 21:51:13 GMT, Dave Whitmarsh
> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 13:01:03 -0800, Bill Smith
> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 18:50:49 -0000, "nick"
> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>"Some flights to the US could be grounded after the airline pilots' union
>>>>>>called on its members not to fly with armed sky marshals on board."
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"Airline pilots should not take off with marshals on board, the British
>>>>>>Airline Pilots' Association (Balpa) has said."
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"Capt Granshaw defended pilots' right to take action and said: "Our advice
>>>>>>to pilots is that until adequate written and agreed assurances are received,
>>>>>>flight crew should not operate flights where sky marshals are carried."
>>>>>>
>>>>>>http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/3357309.stm
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>LOL!. They want ONLY terrorists armed! This is, all at once, hilarious
>>>>>and tragically stupid.
>>>>> Bill Smith
>>>>
>>>>Your inability to comprehend basic English is a huge concern, Bill old
>>>>chap.
>>>
>>>
>>>"Written assurances". Of what? They want to be told that trained
>>>personnel are going to be used rather than just passing guns out to
>>>the passengers? They want to be told that if they lose control of
>>>their aircraft it will be shot down and there might just be a few
>>>remedies to try before then?
>>>
>>
>>It's called X-ray machines at the airport check-in terminals, doofus.
>>
>
>
> Sure, all they have to do now is get enough of them and then actually
> use them. All that deals with is weapons brought on by passengers, not
> those stashed by aircraft "service" workers.
>

True... but an airline's first priority (or indeed anyone in public
transport) is safety. If schools go out of hteir way in the USA to
install metal detectors to stop firearms getting in then airports must
be able to do as well.


> Bill Smith
>

[Teek]

" Bogart " > wrote in message >...
> On 1 Jan 2004 20:44:46 -0800, (Teek) wrote:
>
> >" Bogart " > wrote in message >...
>
> >> Let me guess, you're rap's resident nutcase? I didn't say SM's feel
> >> they are more likely to be seen as a " threat than as an aid. ".
> >> I'm telling you how they feel. It's from personal experience and
> >> personal contact. Not every one is an amateur detective.
> >
> >So what are you saying, then? That they feel like they are not needed
> >and feel like they aren't doing much good?
>
> SM's I've talked with have expressed some genuine concerns about being
> jumped by passengers in certain situations. That is all. They will
> do their jobs and will do a good job, regardless of the fact _I_ don't
> think they are necessary on domestic US flights.
>
Fair enough. No one can predict or imagine all possible situations
and scenarios, and I'm confident the air marshals can think of a few
that I can't. Many factors come in to play in the use of air
marshals; political, strategic, tactical, etc. Your sky marshals seem
to be concerned with the tactical aspect of *certain* situations that
either they don't want to tell you about, or you don't want to blab it
all over the internet. No matter. They are well-trained and come
from a diverse cross-section of society, with differing opinions and
beliefs. That comes with any organization or group that doesn't
discriminate based on race, color, creed, sex, religion, or political
beliefs. This is as it should be. It also means I can't rule out the
marshals you've talked to are in the minority in their concerns, or if
it is fairly common.

Though I don't know a lot of the details of their training, it lasts
for about three months and their firearms course is rather
challenging. I don't think they sit around very much playing cards
and drinking beer during this time. The concerns should be addressed
in training. And since I haven't been through it, I can't say for
sure what the curriculum is.

I think they are necessary on domestic flights, and on certain
overseas flights coming into the U.S. Perhaps they don't need to be
on every flight, but they need to be on enough of them to possibly
prevent another hijacking.

Teek

[Morton Davis]

"Teek" > wrote in message
m...
> " Bogart " > wrote in message
>...
> > On 1 Jan 2004 20:44:46 -0800, (Teek) wrote:
> >
> > >" Bogart " > wrote in message
>...
> >
> > >> Let me guess, you're rap's resident nutcase? I didn't say SM's feel
> > >> they are more likely to be seen as a " threat than as an aid. ".
> > >> I'm telling you how they feel. It's from personal experience and
> > >> personal contact. Not every one is an amateur detective.
> > >
> > >So what are you saying, then? That they feel like they are not needed
> > >and feel like they aren't doing much good?
> >
> > SM's I've talked with have expressed some genuine concerns about being
> > jumped by passengers in certain situations. That is all. They will
> > do their jobs and will do a good job, regardless of the fact _I_ don't
> > think they are necessary on domestic US flights.
> >
> Fair enough. No one can predict or imagine all possible situations
> and scenarios, and I'm confident the air marshals can think of a few
> that I can't. Many factors come in to play in the use of air
> marshals; political, strategic, tactical, etc. Your sky marshals seem
> to be concerned with the tactical aspect of *certain* situations that
> either they don't want to tell you about, or you don't want to blab it
> all over the internet. No matter. They are well-trained and come
> from a diverse cross-section of society, with differing opinions and
> beliefs. That comes with any organization or group that doesn't
> discriminate based on race, color, creed, sex, religion, or political
> beliefs. This is as it should be. It also means I can't rule out the
> marshals you've talked to are in the minority in their concerns, or if
> it is fairly common.
>
> Though I don't know a lot of the details of their training, it lasts
> for about three months and their firearms course is rather
> challenging. I don't think they sit around very much playing cards
> and drinking beer during this time. The concerns should be addressed
> in training. And since I haven't been through it, I can't say for
> sure what the curriculum is.
>
> I think they are necessary on domestic flights, and on certain
> overseas flights coming into the U.S. Perhaps they don't need to be
> on every flight, but they need to be on enough of them to possibly
> prevent another hijacking.
>
>
They train for the eventualities brought up.

-*MORT*-

[Gregory Procter]

LIBassbug wrote:

> Gregory Procter wrote:
>
> >
> > LIBassbug wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Gregory Procter wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>LIBassbug wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Gregory Procter wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>LIBassbug wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>Gregory Procter wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>LIBassbug wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>Eddy_Down wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>Morton Davis wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>Box cutters could easily be concealed in shoes, up the rectum or vagina ,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>It's like Mort came from a completely different planet, isn't it?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>On our planet rectums and vaginas have small openings.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>You have (5) very small fingers?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>Is that a proposition?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>No, it's a repeat of your pronouncement.
> >>>>
> >>>>Is that when you told me you self fist?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>No, when you told me you have a five finger arsehole.
> >>
> >>Why do you care so much about how many fingers I can fit in my asshole?
> >
> >
> > You keep bringing the subject up - I'm waiting for some punch line.
>
> There's always a line at my punch bowl. (my guest trust I didn't dip my
> fingers in it).

You only have stupid friends?

[LIBassbug]

Gregory Procter wrote:

>
> LIBassbug wrote:
>
>
>>Gregory Procter wrote:
>>
>>
>>>LIBassbug wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Gregory Procter wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>LIBassbug wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Gregory Procter wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>LIBassbug wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Gregory Procter wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>LIBassbug wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Eddy_Down wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Morton Davis wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Box cutters could easily be concealed in shoes, up the rectum or vagina ,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>It's like Mort came from a completely different planet, isn't it?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>On our planet rectums and vaginas have small openings.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>You have (5) very small fingers?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Is that a proposition?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>No, it's a repeat of your pronouncement.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Is that when you told me you self fist?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>No, when you told me you have a five finger arsehole.
>>>>
>>>>Why do you care so much about how many fingers I can fit in my asshole?
>>>
>>>
>>>You keep bringing the subject up - I'm waiting for some punch line.
>>
>>There's always a line at my punch bowl. (my guest trust I didn't dip my
>>fingers in it).
>
>
> You only have stupid friends?

They don't ask for money.

--
Chris.
http://****france.com/

New Zealand tubbies.
http://www.geocities.com/libassbug/nztubbies.jpg

The Three Usenet Stooge's
http://www.geocities.com/libassbug/happyfamily.jpg


BWAHAHAHAHA...

Brits teach the Chinese English via television.

(At 6.30pm entire villages would gather round their one and only black
and white television set. Together they would chorus useful phrases such
as "Would you like a gin and tonic?")

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/from_our_own_correspondent/3363077.stm

[Gregory Procter]

LIBassbug wrote:

> Gregory Procter wrote:
>
> >
> > LIBassbug wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Gregory Procter wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>LIBassbug wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Gregory Procter wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>LIBassbug wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>Gregory Procter wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>LIBassbug wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>Gregory Procter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>LIBassbug wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>Eddy_Down wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>Morton Davis wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>Box cutters could easily be concealed in shoes, up the rectum or vagina ,
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>It's like Mort came from a completely different planet, isn't it?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>On our planet rectums and vaginas have small openings.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>You have (5) very small fingers?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>Is that a proposition?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>No, it's a repeat of your pronouncement.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>Is that when you told me you self fist?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>No, when you told me you have a five finger arsehole.
> >>>>
> >>>>Why do you care so much about how many fingers I can fit in my asshole?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>You keep bringing the subject up - I'm waiting for some punch line.
> >>
> >>There's always a line at my punch bowl. (my guest trust I didn't dip my
> >>fingers in it).
> >
> >
> > You only have stupid friends?
>
> They don't ask for money.

They've been let down before?

[LIBassbug]

Gregory Procter wrote:

>
> LIBassbug wrote:
>
>
>>Gregory Procter wrote:
>>
>>
>>>LIBassbug wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Gregory Procter wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>LIBassbug wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Gregory Procter wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>LIBassbug wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Gregory Procter wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>LIBassbug wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Gregory Procter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>LIBassbug wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Eddy_Down wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Morton Davis wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Box cutters could easily be concealed in shoes, up the rectum or vagina ,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>It's like Mort came from a completely different planet, isn't it?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>On our planet rectums and vaginas have small openings.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>You have (5) very small fingers?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Is that a proposition?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>No, it's a repeat of your pronouncement.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Is that when you told me you self fist?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>No, when you told me you have a five finger arsehole.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Why do you care so much about how many fingers I can fit in my asshole?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>You keep bringing the subject up - I'm waiting for some punch line.
>>>>
>>>>There's always a line at my punch bowl. (my guest trust I didn't dip my
>>>>fingers in it).
>>>
>>>
>>>You only have stupid friends?
>>
>>They don't ask for money.
>
>
> They've been let down before?

Only the smart ones.

--
Chris.
http://****france.com/

New Zealand tubbies.
http://www.geocities.com/libassbug/nztubbies.jpg

The Three Usenet Stooge's
http://www.geocities.com/libassbug/happyfamily.jpg


BWAHAHAHAHA...

Brits teach the Chinese English via television.

(At 6.30pm entire villages would gather round their one and only black
and white television set. Together they would chorus useful phrases such
as "Would you like a gin and tonic?")

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/from_our_own_correspondent/3363077.stm

[Gregory Procter]

LIBassbug wrote:

> Gregory Procter wrote:
>
> >
> > LIBassbug wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Gregory Procter wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>LIBassbug wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Gregory Procter wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>LIBassbug wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>Gregory Procter wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>LIBassbug wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>Gregory Procter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>LIBassbug wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>Gregory Procter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>LIBassbug wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>Eddy_Down wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>Morton Davis wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Box cutters could easily be concealed in shoes, up the rectum or vagina ,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>It's like Mort came from a completely different planet, isn't it?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>On our planet rectums and vaginas have small openings.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>You have (5) very small fingers?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>Is that a proposition?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>No, it's a repeat of your pronouncement.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>Is that when you told me you self fist?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>No, when you told me you have a five finger arsehole.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>Why do you care so much about how many fingers I can fit in my asshole?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>You keep bringing the subject up - I'm waiting for some punch line.
> >>>>
> >>>>There's always a line at my punch bowl. (my guest trust I didn't dip my
> >>>>fingers in it).
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>You only have stupid friends?
> >>
> >>They don't ask for money.
> >
> >
> > They've been let down before?
>
> Only the smart ones.

Are you Irish?

[Yardpilot]

"Teek" > wrote in message
m...
> " Bogart " > wrote in message
>...
> > On 1 Jan 2004 20:44:46 -0800, (Teek) wrote:
> >
> > >" Bogart " > wrote in message
>...
> >
> > >> Let me guess, you're rap's resident nutcase? I didn't say SM's feel
> > >> they are more likely to be seen as a " threat than as an aid. ".
> > >> I'm telling you how they feel. It's from personal experience and
> > >> personal contact. Not every one is an amateur detective.
> > >
> > >So what are you saying, then? That they feel like they are not needed
> > >and feel like they aren't doing much good?
> >
> > SM's I've talked with have expressed some genuine concerns about being
> > jumped by passengers in certain situations. That is all. They will
> > do their jobs and will do a good job, regardless of the fact _I_ don't
> > think they are necessary on domestic US flights.
> >
> Fair enough. No one can predict or imagine all possible situations
> and scenarios, and I'm confident the air marshals can think of a few
> that I can't. Many factors come in to play in the use of air
> marshals; political, strategic, tactical, etc. Your sky marshals seem
> to be concerned with the tactical aspect of *certain* situations that
> either they don't want to tell you about, or you don't want to blab it
> all over the internet. No matter. They are well-trained and come
> from a diverse cross-section of society, with differing opinions and
> beliefs.

Really? More likely they are carefully selected to fit a particular type.

[LIBassbug]

Gregory Procter wrote:

>
> LIBassbug wrote:
>
>
>>Gregory Procter wrote:
>>
>>
>>>LIBassbug wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Gregory Procter wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>LIBassbug wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Gregory Procter wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>LIBassbug wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Gregory Procter wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>LIBassbug wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Gregory Procter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>LIBassbug wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Gregory Procter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>LIBassbug wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Eddy_Down wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Morton Davis wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Box cutters could easily be concealed in shoes, up the rectum or vagina ,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>It's like Mort came from a completely different planet, isn't it?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On our planet rectums and vaginas have small openings.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>You have (5) very small fingers?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Is that a proposition?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>No, it's a repeat of your pronouncement.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Is that when you told me you self fist?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>No, when you told me you have a five finger arsehole.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Why do you care so much about how many fingers I can fit in my asshole?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>You keep bringing the subject up - I'm waiting for some punch line.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>There's always a line at my punch bowl. (my guest trust I didn't dip my
>>>>>>fingers in it).
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>You only have stupid friends?
>>>>
>>>>They don't ask for money.
>>>
>>>
>>>They've been let down before?
>>
>>Only the smart ones.
>
>
> Are you Irish?

No, Greg, I said the smart ones!

--
Chris.
http://****france.com/

New Zealand tubbies.
http://www.geocities.com/libassbug/nztubbies.jpg

The Three Usenet Stooge's
http://www.geocities.com/libassbug/happyfamily.jpg


BWAHAHAHAHA...

Brits teach the Chinese English via television.

(At 6.30pm entire villages would gather round their one and only black
and white television set. Together they would chorus useful phrases such
as "Would you like a gin and tonic?")

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/from_our_own_correspondent/3363077.stm

[Gregory Procter]

LIBassbug wrote:

> Gregory Procter wrote:
>
> >
> > LIBassbug wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Gregory Procter wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>LIBassbug wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Gregory Procter wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>LIBassbug wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>Gregory Procter wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>LIBassbug wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>Gregory Procter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>LIBassbug wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>Gregory Procter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>LIBassbug wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>Gregory Procter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>LIBassbug wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Eddy_Down wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Morton Davis wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Box cutters could easily be concealed in shoes, up the rectum or vagina ,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>It's like Mort came from a completely different planet, isn't it?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>On our planet rectums and vaginas have small openings.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>You have (5) very small fingers?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>Is that a proposition?
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>No, it's a repeat of your pronouncement.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>Is that when you told me you self fist?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>No, when you told me you have a five finger arsehole.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>Why do you care so much about how many fingers I can fit in my asshole?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>You keep bringing the subject up - I'm waiting for some punch line.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>There's always a line at my punch bowl. (my guest trust I didn't dip my
> >>>>>>fingers in it).
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>You only have stupid friends?
> >>>>
> >>>>They don't ask for money.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>They've been let down before?
> >>
> >>Only the smart ones.
> >
> >
> > Are you Irish?
>
> No, Greg, I said the smart ones!

That's why I asked!

>
>
> --
> Chris.
> http://****france.com/
>
> New Zealand tubbies.
> http://www.geocities.com/libassbug/nztubbies.jpg
>
> The Three Usenet Stooge's
> http://www.geocities.com/libassbug/happyfamily.jpg
>
> BWAHAHAHAHA...
>
> Brits teach the Chinese English via television.
>
> (At 6.30pm entire villages would gather round their one and only black
> and white television set. Together they would chorus useful phrases such
> as "Would you like a gin and tonic?")
>
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/from_our_own_correspondent/3363077.stm

[LIBassbug]

Gregory Procter wrote:

>
> LIBassbug wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Box cutters could easily be concealed in shoes, up the rectum or vagina ,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>It's like Mort came from a completely different planet, isn't it?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On our planet rectums and vaginas have small openings.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>You have (5) very small fingers?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Is that a proposition?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>No, it's a repeat of your pronouncement.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Is that when you told me you self fist?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>No, when you told me you have a five finger arsehole.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Why do you care so much about how many fingers I can fit in my asshole?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>You keep bringing the subject up - I'm waiting for some punch line.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>There's always a line at my punch bowl. (my guest trust I didn't dip my
>>>>>>>>fingers in it).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>You only have stupid friends?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>They don't ask for money.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>They've been let down before?
>>>>
>>>>Only the smart ones.
>>>
>>>
>>>Are you Irish?
>>
>>No, Greg, I said the smart ones!
>
>
> That's why I asked!

Obviously you're not Irish. =8~)

--
Chris.
http://****france.com/

New Zealand tubbies.
http://www.geocities.com/libassbug/nztubbies.jpg

The Three Usenet Stooge's
http://www.geocities.com/libassbug/happyfamily.jpg


BWAHAHAHAHA...

Brits teach the Chinese English via television.

(At 6.30pm entire villages would gather round their one and only black
and white television set. Together they would chorus useful phrases such
as "Would you like a gin and tonic?")

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/from_our_own_correspondent/3363077.stm

[Rob Perkins]

On Tue, 06 Jan 2004 11:52:19 +1300, Gregory Procter
> wrote:

>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Let's trim some quotes out, people!

Rob

[Gregory Procter]

LIBassbug wrote:

> Gregory Procter wrote:
>
> >
> > LIBassbug wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Box cutters could easily be concealed in shoes, up the rectum or vagina ,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>It's like Mort came from a completely different planet, isn't it?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On our planet rectums and vaginas have small openings.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>You have (5) very small fingers?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Is that a proposition?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>No, it's a repeat of your pronouncement.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>Is that when you told me you self fist?
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>No, when you told me you have a five finger arsehole.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>Why do you care so much about how many fingers I can fit in my asshole?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>You keep bringing the subject up - I'm waiting for some punch line.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>There's always a line at my punch bowl. (my guest trust I didn't dip my
> >>>>>>>>fingers in it).
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>You only have stupid friends?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>They don't ask for money.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>They've been let down before?
> >>>>
> >>>>Only the smart ones.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Are you Irish?
> >>
> >>No, Greg, I said the smart ones!
> >
> >
> > That's why I asked!
>
> Obviously you're not Irish. =8~)

I believe I have no Irish ancestry within a considerably number of generations.

[LIBassbug]

Rob Perkins wrote:

> On Tue, 06 Jan 2004 11:52:19 +1300, Gregory Procter
> > wrote:
>
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
> Let's trim some quotes out, people!
>
> Rob

Lets all suck on my junk.

--
Chris.
http://****france.com/

New Zealand tubbies.
http://www.geocities.com/libassbug/nztubbies.jpg

The Three Usenet Stooge's
http://www.geocities.com/libassbug/happyfamily.jpg


BWAHAHAHAHA...

Brits teach the Chinese English via television.

(At 6.30pm entire villages would gather round their one and only black
and white television set. Together they would chorus useful phrases such
as "Would you like a gin and tonic?")

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/from_our_own_correspondent/3363077.stm

[Steven P. McNicoll]

" Bogart " > wrote in message
s.com...
>
> Sitting in first class just makes it easier for the hijackers. They'll
> slaughter all the first class passengers first.
>

Wouldn't first class passengers object to being slaughtered?


>
> You're forgetting the mindset of before 9/11. Without the knowledge
> of the fate of the other hijacked planes, the 4 hijackers had total
> control of that plane with box cutters. One hijacker said he had a
> bomb strapped to himself. Does the SM take the chance and shoot? I
> don't know.
>

The hijacker must be prevented from gaining control of the aircraft at all
costs. He shoots.

[Steven P. McNicoll]

"pacplyer" > wrote in message
om...
>
> You can only have one Captain on a ship. Ever heard of "Mutiny on the
> Bounty?" You arm some idiot in the back, who has very limited
> knowledge of aviation, and let him think he is charge, you have a
> recipe for disaster. (in the past they've fallen asleep, left their
> guns in the lavatory, shot other officers by accident, and gotten
> drunk on duty. They have a boring job and they have to be accountable
> to the PIC.
>

So don't let the sky marshal think he's in charge of the flight.


>
> The Brit pilot's union is correct. They don't want our
> dysfunctional skymarshal program on board.
>

Foriegn carriers that do not wish to comply with US security measures are
free to discontinue service to the US.

[Steven P. McNicoll]

"Dave" > wrote in message
...
>
> Some loon on board a plane with a gun may succeed in defending the plane
but
> he may not.
>

And if the "loon", aka sky marshal, fails in defending the plane they are no
worse off than they would be if the "loon" had never been aboard.


>
> either the sky marshal failed so we have to shoot it down or
> they sky marshal must have cause the plane to come down by his actions in
> frustrating the terrorists.
>
> The result is the same 200 plus people dead but the politicians are clean.
>

Or the sky marshal succeeds in defending the airplane and 200 people that
otherwise would have been killed are still alive.

[G.R. Patterson III]

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote:
>
> "pacplyer" > wrote in message
> om...
> >
> > The Brit pilot's union is correct. They don't want our
> > dysfunctional skymarshal program on board.
> >
>
> Foriegn carriers that do not wish to comply with US security measures are
> free to discontinue service to the US.

And if it's just a problem with the union, I'm sure we can find plenty of American
pilots to man those planes.

George Patterson
Great discoveries are not announced with "Eureka!". What's usually said is
"Hummmmm... That's interesting...."

[LIBassbug]

Bogart wrote:

> On Wed, 07 Jan 2004 11:21:07 GMT, LIBassbug >
> wrote:
>
>
>>
>>Rob Perkins wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Tue, 06 Jan 2004 11:52:19 +1300, Gregory Procter
> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>Let's trim some quotes out, people!
>>>
>>>Rob
>>
>>Lets all suck on my junk.
>
>
> Jude Girl just fainted. :)

That's because Nick farted while Eddy was bobbing.

--
Chris.
http://****france.com/

New Zealand tubbies.
http://www.geocities.com/libassbug/nztubbies.jpg

The Three Usenet Stooge's
http://www.geocities.com/libassbug/happyfamily.jpg


BWAHAHAHAHA...

Brits teach the Chinese English via television.

(At 6.30pm entire villages would gather round their one and only black
and white television set. Together they would chorus useful phrases such
as "Would you like a gin and tonic?")

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/from_our_own_correspondent/3363077.stm

[Bogart]

On Fri, 09 Jan 2004 11:20:42 GMT, LIBassbug >
wrote:

>
>
>Bogart wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 07 Jan 2004 11:21:07 GMT, LIBassbug >
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>>Rob Perkins wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>On Tue, 06 Jan 2004 11:52:19 +1300, Gregory Procter
> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>Let's trim some quotes out, people!
>>>>
>>>>Rob
>>>
>>>Lets all suck on my junk.
>>
>>
>> Jude Girl just fainted. :)
>
>That's because Nick farted while Eddy was bobbing.

Cheese Wiz twinkie farts. Hahaha. :)