Testing...no posts after 2/20/04...

[David Gunter]

I am not seeing any new posts to this group, hence this test.

-david
--
Replace spam with david if you wish to send email to my directly.

[Tom Sixkiller]

"David Gunter" > wrote in message
...
> I am not seeing any new posts to this group, hence this test.
>
> -david

Sounds like your ISP's newsserver took a vacation.

[Bob Noel]

In article >, "Tom Sixkiller"
> wrote:

> "David Gunter" > wrote in message
> ...
> > I am not seeing any new posts to this group, hence this test.
> >
> > -david
>
> Sounds like your ISP's newsserver took a vacation.

or got switched to a different machine with different
article numbers.

--
Bob Noel

[Casey Wilson]

> > "David Gunter" > wrote in message
> > ...
> > > I am not seeing any new posts to this group, hence this test.
> > >
> > > -david

This sort of reminds me of calling the roll with: "Anybody that's not
here, answer up!"

[dave]

I had the same problem. I could see new posts to this group from google
but not from my news reader. It wouldn't download new headers. I
unsubscribed and then subscribed. Problem solved.
Dave
68 7ECA

David Gunter wrote:

> I am not seeing any new posts to this group, hence this test.
>
> -david

[G.R. Patterson III]

dave wrote:
>
> I had the same problem. I could see new posts to this group from google
> but not from my news reader. It wouldn't download new headers. I
> unsubscribed and then subscribed. Problem solved.

Perhaps you should email this info to David?

George Patterson
Battle, n; A method of untying with the teeth a political knot that would
not yield to the tongue.

[dave]

good point-just sent it.
Dave
G.R. Patterson III wrote:
>
> dave wrote:
>
>>I had the same problem. I could see new posts to this group from google
>> but not from my news reader. It wouldn't download new headers. I
>>unsubscribed and then subscribed. Problem solved.
>
>
> Perhaps you should email this info to David?
>
> George Patterson
> Battle, n; A method of untying with the teeth a political knot that would
> not yield to the tongue.