PDA

View Full Version : Re: Rec.Aviation "Rogue's Gallery" of aircraft photos update


Shiver Me Timbers
May 2nd 04, 06:06 PM
> Jay Honeck > wrote:

> The major drawback to the newsgroups, however, is that they do not allow the
> transmission of photos.

Says who.....??????

alt.binaries.pictures.aviation

That newsgroup has been there for years and works like a hot damn.

> As a result, we all operate in a text-based, 2-dimensional world, never knowing
> what each other looks like, never being
> able to "show off" our favorite flying machines.

Says who.....??????

alt.binaries.pictures.aviation

That newsgroup has been there for years and works like a hot damn.

> Until now!

Hmmmmm..... Do I smell another commercial plug for alexisparkinn
comming up.

> Visit http://www.alexisparkinn.com/_JUST_A_LITTLE_SLICE_OF_SPAM_.htm

> For the month of April, we've got three new additions and updates:

And if those three people were that interested in sharing pictures of
their pride and joy with the aviation community then one would think
they would have both the intelligence and decency to share them by
posting their own pictures to..... alt.binaries.pictures.aviation

That newsgroup has been there for years and works like a hot damn.

After all Jay.... it's good enough for you to drop by every so often
and scrounge pictures from..... It was a Corsair picture you were
looking for the other day wasn't it.....????????

Scott Skylane
May 2nd 04, 06:20 PM
Shiver Me Timbers wrote:
/snip/

Hey, "Shiver",

You might want to check your bowl of Wheaties, I beleive someone has
****ed in it...

Happy Flying!
Scott Skylane

G. Burkhart
May 2nd 04, 06:53 PM
a.b.p.a is a good place to view pictures of planes for that day, but it
is a terrible place for finding a specific plane/person picture from these
rec.aviation groups. If someone asks me if I have some (old) pictures of my
plane online, I point them to Jay's site or the Ercoupe site and they can
view them. Jay's site is set up nicely that I can browse the pictures of the
people and planes at my leisure or look up specific people or planes from
these groups to get some (usually wrong ;-) impression of the posters.

When my plane gets out of annual, I will try to take some newer/better
pictures of my Ercoupe and submit them to Jay's site. It allows others in
these groups to get an idea of my flying.

I can't imagine trying to keep track of the various people and planes on
these rec groups by downloading their pictures from a.b.p.a. and trying to
catalog, sort and filter out the non rec. planes. Jay's site is a great
complement to these rec groups.

I recently took a picture of a Citabria (N91RA) at FRM (yes, the same
one that's on the April cover of AOPA), anyone interested in seeing it can
check it out on a.b.p.a. one of these days...

-Greg Burkhart
N93332

"Shiver Me Timbers" > wrote in message
...
> > Jay Honeck > wrote:
>
> > The major drawback to the newsgroups, however, is that they do not allow
the
> > transmission of photos.
>
> Says who.....??????
>
> alt.binaries.pictures.aviation

Jay Honeck
May 2nd 04, 11:43 PM
> And if those three people were that interested in sharing pictures of
> their pride and joy with the aviation community then one would think
> they would have both the intelligence and decency to share them by
> posting their own pictures to..... alt.binaries.pictures.aviation

*sigh*

I know you're a troll, but (for those who may be wondering) here are the two
reasons alt.binaries isn't workable for the "Rogue's Gallery":

1. Many ISPs don't carry the binary newsgroups. As a result, many people
simply don't get to see the cool pix that are posted there.
2. Most ISPs that DO carry the binary groups only archive them for a few
days. I am only able to "see" the pix for about four days before my ISP
deletes them.

To make "alt.binaries.pictures.aviation" a viable alternative, all 77
participants would have to re-post their pictures every four days.
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"

G. Burkhart
May 3rd 04, 12:12 AM
"Jay Honeck" > wrote in message
news:rQelc.19048$I%1.1355836@attbi_s51...
> *sigh*
>
> To make "alt.binaries.pictures.aviation" a viable alternative, all 77
> participants would have to re-post their pictures every four days.

4 days??? I'm using the same newsgroup server (mchsi) and am lucky to see
pictures on a.b.p.a. over 2 days old. I have missed quite a few 'Hangar
Queen' pictures because I don't check these newsgroups daily. ;-(

If the 77 people would upload all of their pictures every 4 days to
a.b.p.a., it would probably reduce the archive to a day or 2 at most.

I enjoy browsing through Jay's site. Just looking at the rec pictures, it is
hard to even tell that the main site is for his Inn.

Teacherjh
May 3rd 04, 02:14 AM
Another disadvantage of the binaries newsgroups vs a web site is bandwidth
utilization. Somebody posts a picture to the newsgroup, it gets distributed
(transmitted) all over the world. Two people download the picture, but it has
still been transmitted a gazillion times.

Upload to the web, it just sits there. Two people download the picture, it
gets sent twice. Maybe less, if the people are from the same (large) ISP,
which caches the site once the first person requested it.

Jose

--
(for Email, make the obvious changes in my address)

Rich S.
May 3rd 04, 04:51 AM
"G. Burkhart" > wrote in message
news:Xfflc.18416$Ik.1331997@attbi_s53...
> "Jay Honeck" > wrote in message
> news:rQelc.19048$I%1.1355836@attbi_s51...
>
> I enjoy browsing through Jay's site. Just looking at the rec pictures, it
is
> hard to even tell that the main site is for his Inn.

And he, unlike anonymous trolls, seems to be a polite, courteous person.

Rich S.

Peter Duniho
May 3rd 04, 06:54 AM
"Shiver Me Timbers" > wrote in message
...
> > The major drawback to the newsgroups, however, is that they do not allow
the
> > transmission of photos.
>
> Says who.....??????
>
> alt.binaries.pictures.aviation

A newsgroup is one of the worst ways to distribute binary images. Huge
amounts of data are sent to servers that never need them, and the
representation of the data is inherently inefficient. In addition, the data
do not remain indefinitely.

Finally, have you considered the possibility that those of us reading
rec.aviation.piloting (and other text newsgroups) do not care to visit the
binary newsgroups, trying to sift through all the other stuff there to find
a handful of messages, or that many of us use ISPs that simply don't even
carry the binary newsgroups?

> Hmmmmm..... Do I smell another commercial plug for alexisparkinn
> comming up.

Ahhh...your true motivation appears. It's not that you actually think
there's something technically wrong, you're just offended at the scent of
commercialism.

We had this thread awhile back already. Do us all a favor, go back and
savor the thread on Google Groups, and leave the rest of us who've already
experienced it alone.

Pete

Bob Moore
May 3rd 04, 12:54 PM
"Rich S." wrote

> And he, unlike anonymous trolls, seems to be a polite, courteous
> person.

Having met Jay at Sun-n-Fun, I'll second that motion.

Bob Moore

Google