Re: Wilga as a towplane

[[email protected]]

Em terça-feira, 9 de julho de 2002 21h23min16s UTC+1, Bruce escreveu:
> Does anyone have any experience using a Wilga as a towplane?

Yes, most if not all airclubs in Eastern Europe use Wilga as a towplane. The aircraft was specially built for this purpose. The rear window and the flying atitude of the aircraft allows excellent visibility for the glider behind.

It was built to be a STOL (short take off and landing) aircraft, and the wings are having slats for this purpose. It is able to tow your glider from a 200 yeards field. With good headwind, the aicraft can take off within 100 feet run only!
It is not very well suited for air tours, because it has a glide ratio of only 1/4. Its main strengths are climb and landing as fast as possible, in other words, putting as much gliders as possible in the air.

When the engine is cut off, you can put the aircraft nose dive and bring it to the ground within 2-3 minutes from an altitude of 2000 feet, without being being worried about exceeding the maximum speed. Shorter time = less fuel spent.

When towing, its fuel consumption is of approx. of 60 liter per hour. Probably the best towing aircraft in the world.

[Dan Marotta]

Doesn't the Wilga have shutters in front of the engine which you can close
to prevent shock cooling during a rapid descent?


> wrote in message
...
Em terça-feira, 9 de julho de 2002 21h23min16s UTC+1, Bruce escreveu:
> Does anyone have any experience using a Wilga as a towplane?

Yes, most if not all airclubs in Eastern Europe use Wilga as a towplane. The
aircraft was specially built for this purpose. The rear window and the
flying atitude of the aircraft allows excellent visibility for the glider
behind.

It was built to be a STOL (short take off and landing) aircraft, and the
wings are having slats for this purpose. It is able to tow your glider from
a 200 yeards field. With good headwind, the aicraft can take off within 100
feet run only!
It is not very well suited for air tours, because it has a glide ratio of
only 1/4. Its main strengths are climb and landing as fast as possible, in
other words, putting as much gliders as possible in the air.

When the engine is cut off, you can put the aircraft nose dive and bring it
to the ground within 2-3 minutes from an altitude of 2000 feet, without
being being worried about exceeding the maximum speed. Shorter time = less
fuel spent.

When towing, its fuel consumption is of approx. of 60 liter per hour.
Probably the best towing aircraft in the world.

[Martin Gregorie[_5_]]

On Sun, 23 Feb 2014 09:40:39 -0700, Dan Marotta wrote:

> Doesn't the Wilga have shutters in front of the engine which you can
> close to prevent shock cooling during a rapid descent?
>
Yes. There is/was one at HusBos, 70km NW of us which has visited and
towed at our Regionals, so it is somewhat familiar. I've been told that
its typically Soviet-era front cowl shutters are very effective and that
after releasing the glider you can shut the throttle and shutters without
any risk of cracking cylinders and that, if you know what you're doing,
the engine temp stays within a 30 degree C(?) temperature band through a
number of launch cycles.

The worst I've heard said about them is that the usual radial, a 260 hp
Ivchenko AI-14 is a relatively short-life engine. Its also used on a lot
of light aircraft, including the Yak 12 and 18A.

Apparently there are some Wilgas fitted with Lycoming O-540s. Possibly
they're mostly on your side of the pond since I've never seen one.


--
martin@ | Martin Gregorie
gregorie. | Essex, UK
org |

[Eric]

On Sun, 23 Feb 2014 07:37:34 -0800 (PST), wrote:

>Em terça-feira, 9 de julho de 2002 21h23min16s UTC+1, Bruce escreveu:
>> Does anyone have any experience using a Wilga as a towplane?
>
>Yes, most if not all airclubs in Eastern Europe use Wilga as a towplane. The aircraft was specially built for this purpose. The rear window and the flying atitude of the aircraft allows excellent visibility for the glider behind.
>
>It was built to be a STOL (short take off and landing) aircraft, and the wings are having slats for this purpose. It is able to tow your glider from a 200 yeards field. With good headwind, the aicraft can take off within 100 feet run only!
>It is not very well suited for air tours, because it has a glide ratio of only 1/4. Its main strengths are climb and landing as fast as possible, in other words, putting as much gliders as possible in the air.
>
>When the engine is cut off, you can put the aircraft nose dive and bring it to the ground within 2-3 minutes from an altitude of 2000 feet, without being being worried about exceeding the maximum speed. Shorter time = less fuel spent.
>
>When towing, its fuel consumption is of approx. of 60 liter per hour. Probably the best towing aircraft in the world.

I think the Wilga is a poor towplane for a modern glider fleet. Has
high drag and so likes to tow slower than most modern gliders like to
be towed. The fuel consumption increases and the climb rate decreases
rapidly with speed. The high lift devices cause alot of downwash
which causes poor aileron control for the following gliders unless
they are towed faster than usual.

Their only good point is that they are cheap to buy.

[Chris Rollings[_2_]]

At 15:11 25 February 2014, eric wrote:
>On Sun, 23 Feb 2014 07:37:34 -0800 (PST), wrote:
>
>>Em ter�a-feira, 9 de julho de 2002 21h23min16s UTC+1, Bruce escreveu:
>>> Does anyone have any experience using a Wilga as a towplane?
>>
>>Yes, most if not all airclubs in Eastern Europe use Wilga as a towplane.
>The aircraft was specially built for this purpose. The rear window and
the
>flying atitude of the aircraft allows excellent visibility for the glider
>behind.
>>
>>It was built to be a STOL (short take off and landing) aircraft, and the
>wings are having slats for this purpose. It is able to tow your glider
from
>a 200 yeards field. With good headwind, the aicraft can take off within
100
>feet run only!
>>It is not very well suited for air tours, because it has a glide ratio
of
>only 1/4. Its main strengths are climb and landing as fast as possible,
in
>other words, putting as much gliders as possible in the air.
>>
>>When the engine is cut off, you can put the aircraft nose dive and bring
>it to the ground within 2-3 minutes from an altitude of 2000 feet,
without
>being being worried about exceeding the maximum speed. Shorter time =
less
>fuel spent.
>>
>>When towing, its fuel consumption is of approx. of 60 liter per hour.
>Probably the best towing aircraft in the world.
>
>I think the Wilga is a poor towplane for a modern glider fleet. Has
>high drag and so likes to tow slower than most modern gliders like to
>be towed. The fuel consumption increases and the climb rate decreases
>rapidly with speed. The high lift devices cause alot of downwash
>which causes poor aileron control for the following gliders unless
>they are towed faster than usual.
>
>Their only good point is that they are cheap to buy.
>

The Wilga short take-off ability is pretty good, climb rate no better than
a Pawnee. I did a test once, got one back on the ground in 30 seconds from
2,000 feet on base leg.

Problem is, if you drop the glider two or three miles up-wind of the field,
where they usually want to be, you burn an extra gallon of fuel getting
back.