Oshkosh RAH RAP Frequencies (Final ... sort of)

[Jim Weir]

Since I have no verified or observed data from which to work, here are the final
suggested frequencies for the RAH/RAP group to use going to, coming from, and
while on the field:



FRS -- Channel 3 with no PL (no tone encoding)

Amateur 2-meter -- 145.75 simplex no PL. Use the local repeaters (download the
frequency chart at www.rstengineering.com) for off-field purposes.

Air-To-Air, Air-To-Ground, Air-To-Honeck -- 122.75 MHz.



If anybody has any other suggestions, now is the time to make them, or forever
for 2004 hold your peace...

Jim
Jim Weir (A&P/IA, CFI, & other good alphabet soup)
VP Eng RST Pres. Cyberchapter EAA Tech. Counselor
http://www.rst-engr.com

[Jim Weir]

That's 146.75, my typo.

Jim



Jim Weir >
shared these priceless pearls of wisdom:


->
->Amateur 2-meter -- 14x.75 simplex no PL. Use the local repeaters (download
the
->frequency chart at www.rstengineering.com) for off-field purposes.

Jim Weir (A&P/IA, CFI, & other good alphabet soup)
VP Eng RST Pres. Cyberchapter EAA Tech. Counselor
http://www.rst-engr.com

[Scott]

I vote for 10368.1 MHz ;)

Very little interference or intermod...

Scott
N0EDV


Jim Weir wrote:
> Since I have no verified or observed data from which to work, here are the final
> suggested frequencies for the RAH/RAP group to use going to, coming from, and
> while on the field:
>
>
>
> FRS -- Channel 3 with no PL (no tone encoding)
>
> Amateur 2-meter -- 145.75 simplex no PL. Use the local repeaters (download the
> frequency chart at www.rstengineering.com) for off-field purposes.
>
> Air-To-Air, Air-To-Ground, Air-To-Honeck -- 122.75 MHz.
>
>
>
> If anybody has any other suggestions, now is the time to make them, or forever
> for 2004 hold your peace...
>
> Jim
> Jim Weir (A&P/IA, CFI, & other good alphabet soup)
> VP Eng RST Pres. Cyberchapter EAA Tech. Counselor
> http://www.rst-engr.com

[Jim Weir]

But damned few of us carry around X-band gear to chatter with.

Jim




Scott >
shared these priceless pearls of wisdom:

->I vote for 10368.1 MHz ;)
->
->Very little interference or intermod...



Jim Weir (A&P/IA, CFI, & other good alphabet soup)
VP Eng RST Pres. Cyberchapter EAA Tech. Counselor
http://www.rst-engr.com

[Russell Kent]

Scott > shared these priceless pearls of wisdom:
> I vote for 10368.1 MHz ;)
>
> Very little interference or intermod...

"Jim Weir" > responded:
> But damned few of us carry around X-band gear to chatter with.

And you(*) thought COM freqs were line-of-sight... yeesh!

Russell Kent
(*) That's a generic "you", not a "you, Jim Weir," reference. I'm no
sparky.