Re: ProtoBike VTOL Flying Motorcycle thingy

[George Black]

"ops" > wrote in message
...
:
: The hard drives are for Matt - an over the phone update (MTOG)
:
: Wonder what happens it the company after the 25th January 2004?
:
: rm
:
A firm that builds hard drives is a reputable aircraft builder ?
Looking at the presentation it's very airy fairy with no details.
And its not even April 1

[ops]

The hard drives are for Matt - an over the phone update (MTOG)

Wonder what happens it the company after the 25th January 2004?

rm

John Smith wrote:

> There's a company named ProtoScience in the U.S.A. that is making "personal
> VTOL" vehicles that look like a flying motorcycle. Seems they are building
> a couple hundred of them for the military (known as VerLiVee's) and will
> also make them available to civilians under the name ProtoBike VTOL. I sure
> would like to have one. Looks like fun. Protoscience isn't really
> advertising them, but supposedly they can be bought by civilians for a mere
> 65 grand. Visit www.ProtoScience.com/protobike.html for information.
>
> Enjoy!
>
> John (When emailing me directly, remove the underscores from my posted
> email address)
>
>
>
>

[Ron Natalie]

"George Black" > wrote in message ...
>
> "ops" > wrote in message
> ...
> :
> : The hard drives are for Matt - an over the phone update (MTOG)
> :
> : Wonder what happens it the company after the 25th January 2004?
> :
> : rm
> :
> A firm that builds hard drives is a reputable aircraft builder ?
> Looking at the presentation it's very airy fairy with no details.
> And its not even April 1

They don't seem to be building hard drives either. Their whole
web page is full of vaporware.

[ops]

George Black wrote:
> "ops" > wrote in message
> ...
> :
> : The hard drives are for Matt - an over the phone update (MTOG)
> :
> : Wonder what happens it the company after the 25th January 2004?
> :
> : rm
> :
> A firm that builds hard drives is a reputable aircraft builder ?
> Looking at the presentation it's very airy fairy with no details.
> And its not even April 1
>
>


Its the domain name that expires then.