A few snaps at KLIA [1/9] - DSC_6672.jpg (1/1)

[Indrek[_6_]]

[Ri©ardo[_2_]]

On 07/03/2015 00:49, Indrek wrote:

Thank you Indrek, good stuff yet again. However, do take care:

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/mar/03/dubai-british-plane-spotters-arrested-uae-national-security-claims

--
Moving Things In Still Pictures

[Indrek[_7_]]

"Ri©ardo" > wrote in message
...
> On 07/03/2015 00:49, Indrek wrote:
>
> Thank you Indrek, good stuff yet again. However, do take care:
>
> http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/mar/03/dubai-british-plane-spotters-arrested-uae-national-security-claims
>
> --
> Moving Things In Still Pictures

Thanks Ricardo.

Thankfully, Malaysia is a very tolerant country so I encountered no problems
while taking photos at the airport. Clearly, other countries have a
different attitude. I seem to recall a British anorak plane-spotter was
arrested fairly recently in Greece, for example. Many years ago I was in
Entebbe and saw a large notice at the airport forbidding photography of
military aircraft. The only military aircraft in sight were a couple of
decrepit Dakotas. I did wonder what possible significance could be attached
to them, but dutifully obeyed the injunction.

Cheers,

Indrek Aavisto




---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

[Ri©ardo[_2_]]

On 07/03/2015 15:31, Charles Lindbergh wrote:
> On Sat, 07 Mar 2015 11:39:48 +0000, Ri©ardo > wrote:
>
>> On 07/03/2015 00:49, Indrek wrote:
>>
>> Thank you Indrek, good stuff yet again. However, do take care:
>>
>> http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/mar/03/dubai-british-plane-spotters-arrested-uae-national-security-claims
>
> Wow, that is just nuts!
>

It pays to be cautious!

:-(

Ri©ardo

--
Moving Things In Still Pictures

[Savageduck[_3_]]

On 2015-03-07 13:35:28 +0000, Indrek said:

> "Ri©ardo" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On 07/03/2015 00:49, Indrek wrote:
>>
>> Thank you Indrek, good stuff yet again. However, do take care:
>>
>> http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/mar/03/dubai-british-plane-spotters-arrested-uae-national-security-claims
>>
>>
>> --
>> Moving Things In Still Pictures
>
> Thanks Ricardo.
>
> Thankfully, Malaysia is a very tolerant country so I encountered no
> problems while taking photos at the airport. Clearly, other countries
> have a different attitude. I seem to recall a British anorak
> plane-spotter was arrested fairly recently in Greece, for example. Many
> years ago I was in Entebbe and saw a large notice at the airport
> forbidding photography of military aircraft. The only military aircraft
> in sight were a couple of decrepit Dakotas. I did wonder what possible
> significance could be attached to them, but dutifully obeyed the
> injunction.

Good thing they weren't watching me with my load of camera gear too
closely at AMS.


--
Regards,

Savageduck

[Savageduck[_3_]]

On 2015-03-12 05:48:34 +0000, Savageduck said:

> On 2015-03-07 13:35:28 +0000, Indrek said:
>
>> "Ri©ardo" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On 07/03/2015 00:49, Indrek wrote:
>>>
>>> Thank you Indrek, good stuff yet again. However, do take care:
>>>
>>> http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/mar/03/dubai-british-plane-spotters-arrested-uae-national-security-claims
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Moving Things In Still Pictures
>>
>> Thanks Ricardo.
>>
>> Thankfully, Malaysia is a very tolerant country so I encountered no
>> problems while taking photos at the airport. Clearly, other countries
>> have a different attitude. I seem to recall a British anorak
>> plane-spotter was arrested fairly recently in Greece, for example. Many
>> years ago I was in Entebbe and saw a large notice at the airport
>> forbidding photography of military aircraft. The only military aircraft
>> in sight were a couple of decrepit Dakotas. I did wonder what possible
>> significance could be attached to them, but dutifully obeyed the
>> injunction.
>
> Good thing they weren't watching me with my load of camera gear too
> closely at AMS.

Oops! Lets try that againn.



--
Rega
ds,

Savageduck

[Savageduck[_3_]]

On 2015-03-12 05:54:31 +0000, Savageduck said:

> On 2015-03-12 05:48:34 +0000, Savageduck said:
>> On 2015-03-07 13:35:28 +0000, Indrek said:
>>> "Ri©ardo" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> On 07/03/2015 00:49, Indrek wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Thank you Indrek, good stuff yet again. However, do take care:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/mar/03/dubai-british-plane-spotters-arrested-uae-national-security-claims
>>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks Ricardo.
>>>
>>> Thankfully, Malaysia is a very tolerant country so I encountered no
>>> problems while taking photos at the airport. Clearly, other countries
>>> have a different attitude. I seem to recall a British anorak
>>> plane-spotter was arrested fairly recently in Greece, for example. Many
>>> years ago I was in Entebbe and saw a large notice at the airport
>>> forbidding photography of military aircraft. The only military aircraft
>>> in sight were a couple of decrepit Dakotas. I did wonder what possible
>>> significance could be attached to them, but dutifully obeyed the
>>> injunction.
>>
>> Good thing they weren't watching me with my load of camera gear too
>> closely at AMS.
>
> Oops! Lets try that again.

I hate to say this but something isn't working quite right here. So
here is attempt #3.
If it doesn't fly this time I will switch Usenet clients and give it a
final try.



>
> <image>


--
Regards,

Savageduck

[Savageduck[_4_]]

On 2015-03-12 06:00:11 +0000, Savageduck > said:
>
> On 2015-03-12 05:54:31 +0000, Savageduck said:
>> On 2015-03-12 05:48:34 +0000, Savageduck said:
>>> On 2015-03-07 13:35:28 +0000, Indrek said:
>>>> "Ri©ardo" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> On 07/03/2015 00:49, Indrek wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you Indrek, good stuff yet again. However, do take care:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/mar/03/dubai-british-plane-spotters-arrested-uae-national-security-claims

Thanks
>>>>>
>>>> Ricardo.
>>>>
>>>> Thankfully, Malaysia is a very tolerant country so I encountered no
>>>> problems while taking photos at the airport. Clearly, other countries
>>>> have a different attitude. I seem to recall a British anorak
>>>> plane-spotter was arrested fairly recently in Greece, for example. Many
>>>> years ago I was in Entebbe and saw a large notice at the airport
>>>> forbidding photography of military aircraft. The only military aircraft
>>>> in sight were a couple of decrepit Dakotas. I did wonder what possible
>>>> significance could be attached to them, but dutifully obeyed the
>>>> injunction.
>>>
>>> Good thing they weren't watching me with my load of camera gear too
>>> closely at AMS.
>>
>> Oops! Lets try that again.
>
> I hate to say this but something isn't working quite right here. So
> here is attempt #3.
> If it doesn't fly this time I will switch Usenet clients and give it a
> final try.
Sorry for the messy posts folks. :-(
....and here is that final try:




> <image>


--
Regards,

Savageduck

[Ri©ardo[_2_]]

On 12/03/2015 06:10, Savageduck wrote:
> On 2015-03-12 06:00:11 +0000, Savageduck
> > said:
>>
>> On 2015-03-12 05:54:31 +0000, Savageduck said:
>>> On 2015-03-12 05:48:34 +0000, Savageduck said:
>>>> On 2015-03-07 13:35:28 +0000, Indrek said:
>>>>> "Ri©ardo" > wrote in message
>>>>> ...
>>>>>> On 07/03/2015 00:49, Indrek wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you Indrek, good stuff yet again. However, do take care:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/mar/03/dubai-british-plane-spotters-arrested-uae-national-security-claims
>>>>>>
>
> Thanks
>>>>>>
>>>>> Ricardo.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thankfully, Malaysia is a very tolerant country so I encountered no
>>>>> problems while taking photos at the airport. Clearly, other countries
>>>>> have a different attitude. I seem to recall a British anorak
>>>>> plane-spotter was arrested fairly recently in Greece, for example.
>>>>> Many
>>>>> years ago I was in Entebbe and saw a large notice at the airport
>>>>> forbidding photography of military aircraft. The only military
>>>>> aircraft
>>>>> in sight were a couple of decrepit Dakotas. I did wonder what possible
>>>>> significance could be attached to them, but dutifully obeyed the
>>>>> injunction.
>>>>
>>>> Good thing they weren't watching me with my load of camera gear too
>>>> closely at AMS.
>>>
>>> Oops! Lets try that again.
>>
>> I hate to say this but something isn't working quite right here. So
>> here is attempt #3.
>> If it doesn't fly this time I will switch Usenet clients and give it a
>> final try.
> Sorry for the messy posts folks. :-(
> ...and here is that final try:
>
>
>
>> <image>
>
>

That's a dramatic picture - great stuff. It was worth the wait.

;-)

Ri©ardo

--
Moving Things In Still Pictures

[Indrek[_7_]]

"Savageduck" > wrote in message
news:2015031123103280979-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom...
> On 2015-03-12 06:00:11 +0000, Savageduck >
> said:
>>
>> On 2015-03-12 05:54:31 +0000, Savageduck said:
>>> On 2015-03-12 05:48:34 +0000, Savageduck said:
>>>> On 2015-03-07 13:35:28 +0000, Indrek said:
>>>>> "Ri©ardo" > wrote in message
>>>>> ...
>>>>>> On 07/03/2015 00:49, Indrek wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you Indrek, good stuff yet again. However, do take care:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/mar/03/dubai-british-plane-spotters-arrested-uae-national-security-claims
>
> Thanks
>>>>>>
>>>>> Ricardo.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thankfully, Malaysia is a very tolerant country so I encountered no
>>>>> problems while taking photos at the airport. Clearly, other countries
>>>>> have a different attitude. I seem to recall a British anorak
>>>>> plane-spotter was arrested fairly recently in Greece, for example.
>>>>> Many
>>>>> years ago I was in Entebbe and saw a large notice at the airport
>>>>> forbidding photography of military aircraft. The only military
>>>>> aircraft
>>>>> in sight were a couple of decrepit Dakotas. I did wonder what possible
>>>>> significance could be attached to them, but dutifully obeyed the
>>>>> injunction.
>>>>
>>>> Good thing they weren't watching me with my load of camera gear too
>>>> closely at AMS.
>>>
>>> Oops! Lets try that again.
>>
>> I hate to say this but something isn't working quite right here. So
>> here is attempt #3.
>> If it doesn't fly this time I will switch Usenet clients and give it a
>> final try.
> Sorry for the messy posts folks. :-(
> ...and here is that final try:
>



>
>
>
>> <image>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Savageduck

That's certainly an atmospheric picture. Was it HDR from multiple exposures,
or from a single exposure?

Cheers,

Indrek Aavisto


--
"The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and
hence clamorous to be led to safety), by menacing it with an endless series
of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary."

- H.L. Mencken



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

[Savageduck[_3_]]

On 2015-03-12 21:50:22 +0000, Indrek said:

> "Savageduck" > wrote in message
> news:2015031123103280979-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom...
>> On 2015-03-12 06:00:11 +0000, Savageduck > said:
>>> On 2015-03-12 05:54:31 +0000, Savageduck said:
>>>> On 2015-03-12 05:48:34 +0000, Savageduck said:
>>>>> On 2015-03-07 13:35:28 +0000, Indrek said:
>>>>>> "Ri�ardo" > wrote in message
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>> On 07/03/2015 00:49, Indrek wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thank you Indrek, good stuff yet again. However, do take care:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/mar/03/dubai-british-plane-spotters-arrested-uae-national-security-claims
>>>>>>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ricardo.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thankfully, Malaysia is a very tolerant country so I encountered no
>>>>>> problems while taking photos at the airport. Clearly, other countries
>>>>>> have a different attitude. I seem to recall a British anorak
>>>>>> plane-spotter was arrested fairly recently in Greece, for example. Many
>>>>>> years ago I was in Entebbe and saw a large notice at the airport
>>>>>> forbidding photography of military aircraft. The only military aircraft
>>>>>> in sight were a couple of decrepit Dakotas. I did wonder what possible
>>>>>> significance could be attached to them, but dutifully obeyed the
>>>>>> injunction.
>>>>>
>>>>> Good thing they weren't watching me with my load of camera gear too
>>>>> closely at AMS.
>>>>
>>>> Oops! Lets try that again.
>>>
>>> I hate to say this but something isn't working quite right here. So
>>> here is attempt #3.
>>> If it doesn't fly this time I will switch Usenet clients and give it a
>>> final try.
>> Sorry for the messy posts folks. :-(
>> ...and here is that final try:
>
>>>
>
> That's certainly an atmospheric picture. Was it HDR from multiple
> exposures, or from a single exposure?

That was a 5 exposure HDR. I was waiting to board and just tried an
opportunistic capture in what was questionable light.
You can definitely get a bit more out of the HDR than this:






--
Regards,

Savageduck

[Savageduck[_4_]]

On 2015-03-13 06:33:15 +0000, Savageduck > said:
>
> On 2015-03-12 21:50:22 +0000, Indrek said:
>> "Savageduck" > wrote in message
>> news:2015031123103280979-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom...
>>> On 2015-03-12 06:00:11 +0000, Savageduck > said:
>>>> On 2015-03-12 05:54:31 +0000, Savageduck said:
>>>>> On 2015-03-12 05:48:34 +0000, Savageduck said:
>>>>>> On 2015-03-07 13:35:28 +0000, Indrek said:
>>>>>>> "Ri�ardo" > wrote in message
>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>> On 07/03/2015 00:49, Indrek wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thank you Indrek, good stuff yet again. However, do take care:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/mar/03/dubai-british-plane-spotters-arrested-uae-national-security-claims


Thanks

Ricardo.

Thankfully,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Malaysia is a very tolerant country so I encountered no
>>>>>>> problems while taking photos at the airport. Clearly, other countries
>>>>>>> have a different attitude. I seem to recall a British anorak
>>>>>>> plane-spotter was arrested fairly recently in Greece, for example. Many
>>>>>>> years ago I was in Entebbe and saw a large notice at the airport
>>>>>>> forbidding photography of military aircraft. The only military aircraft
>>>>>>> in sight were a couple of decrepit Dakotas. I did wonder what possible
>>>>>>> significance could be attached to them, but dutifully obeyed the
>>>>>>> injunction.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Good thing they weren't watching me with my load of camera gear too
>>>>>> closely at AMS.
>>>>>
>>>>> Oops! Lets try that again.
>>>>
>>>> I hate to say this but something isn't working quite right here. So
>>>> here is attempt #3.
>>>> If it doesn't fly this time I will switch Usenet clients and give it a
>>>> final try.
>>> Sorry for the messy posts folks. :-(
>>> ...and here is that final try:
>>
>>>>
>>
>> That's certainly an atmospheric picture. Was it HDR from multiple
>> exposures, or from a single exposure?
>
> That was a 5 exposure HDR. I was waiting to board and just tried an
> opportunistic capture in what was questionable light.
> You can definitely get a bit more out of the HDR than this:
>
> <image>

Oh! No! Not again!
Here we go for try #2, again this is what I had to deal with in the bad light.




--
Regards,

Savageduck

[Indrek[_7_]]

"Savageduck" > wrote in message
news:2015031223383774933-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom...
> On 2015-03-13 06:33:15 +0000, Savageduck >
> said:
>>
>> On 2015-03-12 21:50:22 +0000, Indrek said:
>>> "Savageduck" > wrote in message
>>> news:2015031123103280979-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom...
>>>> On 2015-03-12 06:00:11 +0000, Savageduck
>>>> > said:
>>>>> On 2015-03-12 05:54:31 +0000, Savageduck said:
>>>>>> On 2015-03-12 05:48:34 +0000, Savageduck said:
>>>>>>> On 2015-03-07 13:35:28 +0000, Indrek said:
>>>>>>>> "Ri�ardo" > wrote in message
>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>> On 07/03/2015 00:49, Indrek wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thank you Indrek, good stuff yet again. However, do take care:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/mar/03/dubai-british-plane-spotters-arrested-uae-national-security-claims
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Ricardo.
>
> Thankfully,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Malaysia is a very tolerant country so I encountered no
>>>>>>>> problems while taking photos at the airport. Clearly, other
>>>>>>>> countries
>>>>>>>> have a different attitude. I seem to recall a British anorak
>>>>>>>> plane-spotter was arrested fairly recently in Greece, for example.
>>>>>>>> Many
>>>>>>>> years ago I was in Entebbe and saw a large notice at the airport
>>>>>>>> forbidding photography of military aircraft. The only military
>>>>>>>> aircraft
>>>>>>>> in sight were a couple of decrepit Dakotas. I did wonder what
>>>>>>>> possible
>>>>>>>> significance could be attached to them, but dutifully obeyed the
>>>>>>>> injunction.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Good thing they weren't watching me with my load of camera gear too
>>>>>>> closely at AMS.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Oops! Lets try that again.
>>>>>
>>>>> I hate to say this but something isn't working quite right here. So
>>>>> here is attempt #3.
>>>>> If it doesn't fly this time I will switch Usenet clients and give it a
>>>>> final try.
>>>> Sorry for the messy posts folks. :-(
>>>> ...and here is that final try:
>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>> That's certainly an atmospheric picture. Was it HDR from multiple
>>> exposures, or from a single exposure?
>>
>> That was a 5 exposure HDR. I was waiting to board and just tried an
>> opportunistic capture in what was questionable light.
>> You can definitely get a bit more out of the HDR than this:
>>
>> <image>
>
> Oh! No! Not again!
> Here we go for try #2, again this is what I had to deal with in the bad
> light.
>



>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Savageduck

Thanks for that.

It looks pretty gloomy. You must have very steady hands (or a tripod) to
have used shutter speeds low enough to get the brighter exposures.

Cheers,

Indrek Aavisto


--
“The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and
hence clamorous to be led to safety), by menacing it with an endless series
of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.�

– H.L. Mencken



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

[Savageduck[_3_]]

On 2015-03-14 15:16:28 +0000, Indrek said:

> "Savageduck" > wrote in message
> news:2015031223383774933-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom...

>> Oh! No! Not again!
>> Here we go for try #2, again this is what I had to deal with in the bad light.
>
> Thanks for that.
>
> It looks pretty gloomy. You must have very steady hands (or a tripod)
> to have used shutter speeds low enough to get the brighter exposures.

With the D300S I get 5-7 frames/second depending on exposure time. I
have hone my technique for shooting handheld HDR exposure bracket sets.
Personally I prefer better light to shoot in.
With that set the brightest exposure was 1/30 sec @ f/6.3, the darkest,
1/500 sec @ f/6.3. The normal 0 EV exposure was 1/250 sec @ f/6.3.

--
Regards,

Savageduck