PDA

View Full Version : Maxim Gorki


Byker
January 11th 16, 12:38 AM

Byker
January 11th 16, 06:06 PM
"DAN" wrote in message ...
>
> This one is not the Maksim Gorki. It's the Tupolev ANT-20bis.
>
> It has 6 engines, vs the Maksim's 8, without the additional 2 in the pod
> above the fuselage.

That pic could be an early test flight, when they discovered it was so
underpowered that two more engines had to be added.

Aviation-Safety.net lists the -bis as having eight engines:
http://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=19421214-2

The ANT-20bis survived considerably longer than the Maxim, only to prang
during WWII in typical Soviet fashion: "During the investigation it was
discovered that the pilot was not at the controls when the aircraft crashed.
It seems that he gave the controls to a passenger who disconnected the
autopilot and lost control."

Byker
January 11th 16, 07:34 PM
Of the 833 F-105s built, 395 "Thuds" were lost in Vietnam, including 334
(296 F-105Ds and 38 two-seaters) lost to enemy action and 61 lost in
operational accidents

Byker
January 11th 16, 07:35 PM
"Charles Lindbergh" wrote in message
...
>
> I enjoyed your still images, thanks for posting.

Cleaning out a folder, I found those and other goodies

Byker
January 11th 16, 07:35 PM
Of the 833 F-105s built, 395 "Thuds" were lost in Vietnam, including 334
(296 F-105Ds and 38 two-seaters) lost to enemy action and 61 lost in
operational accidents

Jess Lurkin[_10_]
January 11th 16, 10:08 PM
"Byker" > wrote in
:

> "DAN" wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> This one is not the Maksim Gorki. It's the Tupolev ANT-20bis.
>>
>> It has 6 engines, vs the Maksim's 8, without the additional 2 in the
>> pod above the fuselage.
>
> That pic could be an early test flight, when they discovered it was so
> underpowered that two more engines had to be added.
>
> Aviation-Safety.net lists the -bis as having eight engines:
> http://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=19421214-2
>
> The ANT-20bis survived considerably longer than the Maxim, only to prang
> during WWII in typical Soviet fashion: "During the investigation it was
> discovered that the pilot was not at the controls when the aircraft
> crashed. It seems that he gave the controls to a passenger who
> disconnected the autopilot and lost control."
>
>

"typical Soviet fashion" HAHAHA! LMAO!

Thanks Byker. And welcome back! Snagged those Soviet
space posters. Forget if they were here or in that
"other" group. Full translations available if needed.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

Byker
January 11th 16, 10:40 PM
"Jess Lurkin" wrote in message ...
>
> "typical Soviet fashion" HAHAHA! LMAO!

Nor would it be the last time a passenger at the controls ruined everything:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QEQWwU6yUMw

"Cockpit voice and flight data recorders revealed the presence of the
pilot's 12-year-old daughter and 16-year-old son on the flight deck. One of
the children had unknowingly disabled the A310 autopilot's control of the
aircraft's ailerons while seated at the controls. The aircraft had then
rolled into a steep bank and near-vertical dive from which the pilots were
unable to regain control." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aeroflot_Flight_593

Crash animation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RrttTR8e8-4

More: http://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=19940323-0

Bob (not my real pseudonym)[_2_]
January 12th 16, 09:24 AM
On Mon, 11 Jan 2016 16:40:58 -0600, "Byker" > wrote:

>"Jess Lurkin" wrote in message ...
>>
>> "typical Soviet fashion" HAHAHA! LMAO!
>
>Nor would it be the last time a passenger at the controls ruined everything:
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QEQWwU6yUMw
>
>"Cockpit voice and flight data recorders revealed the presence of the
>pilot's 12-year-old daughter and 16-year-old son on the flight deck. One of
>the children had unknowingly disabled the A310 autopilot's control of the
>aircraft's ailerons while seated at the controls. The aircraft had then
>rolled into a steep bank and near-vertical dive from which the pilots were
>unable to regain control." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aeroflot_Flight_593
>
>Crash animation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RrttTR8e8-4
>
>More: http://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=19940323-0

"...F*ck! Not again!"

How many times had he pranged in the past?

Or was that the bowl of petunias that inexplicably appeared in the
cockpit?

Google