M B
September 22nd 03, 07:29 PM
Boy, if I were competing, I would look hard at buying
a motorglider and then learn how to remove and install
the engine correctly. It sure sounds like a win-win
to me. Two gliders for the price of one? Hmmm...I
guess I'd also want one with ballast so I could have
that option with the motor removed. I suppose it would
be little trouble to design a ballast tank to replace
the motor. Hey Apis, are you listening? How about
putting that in your design? As far as competing goes,
a glider contest is about gliding. If one can tell
the thing has a motor at any part of the soaring performance,
it isn't a glider. As far as self-launching, or whether
restarts are scored as landouts or worse, I've noticed
some pilots avoid the whole question by flying as a
pure glider for the whole flight, including getting
a tow up, just to avoid this ambiguity. But there
are clearly other nuances and the discussion has been
awesome, enlightening, and passionately argued (thanks
JJ and Eric and Judy, among others). Mark Boyd
a motorglider and then learn how to remove and install
the engine correctly. It sure sounds like a win-win
to me. Two gliders for the price of one? Hmmm...I
guess I'd also want one with ballast so I could have
that option with the motor removed. I suppose it would
be little trouble to design a ballast tank to replace
the motor. Hey Apis, are you listening? How about
putting that in your design? As far as competing goes,
a glider contest is about gliding. If one can tell
the thing has a motor at any part of the soaring performance,
it isn't a glider. As far as self-launching, or whether
restarts are scored as landouts or worse, I've noticed
some pilots avoid the whole question by flying as a
pure glider for the whole flight, including getting
a tow up, just to avoid this ambiguity. But there
are clearly other nuances and the discussion has been
awesome, enlightening, and passionately argued (thanks
JJ and Eric and Judy, among others). Mark Boyd