Re: Re The C-132...they wound up with C-97 and C-124 [4/8] - C-124 GlobeMaster.jpg

[[email protected]]

A friend of my Dad (101st) told me that the C124 had a nasty prop blast when
using the port side door for a jump. Was it?

[john szalay]

wrote in
:

> A friend of my Dad (101st) told me that the C124 had a nasty prop
> blast when using the port side door for a jump. Was it?
>

Yea it was a bit , we lost a guy out the C-124 door on a night jump, when
his reserve opened inside the plane , the airflow by the door grabbed it
and out he went, just about broke his back, we didn,t find him for hours..
light duty for months while he recovered..
( dummy forgot to keep the reserve handle covered with his hand. )

[[email protected]]

Yikes! That story reminds me of why my Dad didn't join the paras, something
about how nuts it is to leave a perfectly good airplane.

[john szalay]

wrote in
:

> Yikes! That story reminds me of why my Dad didn't join the paras,
> something about how nuts it is to leave a perfectly good airplane.
>


As anyone involved with flying will tell you
there never is or ever will be a "perfectly good airplane"

they all have a squawk sheet, to tell the mechanics what needs to be
fixed... or let the pilot knows which parts are on order...or back-order.

[Jess Lurkin[_10_]]

john szalay <john.szalayatatt.net> wrote in
31:

> wrote in
> :
>
>> Yikes! That story reminds me of why my Dad didn't join the paras,
>> something about how nuts it is to leave a perfectly good airplane.
>>
>
>
> As anyone involved with flying will tell you
> there never is or ever will be a "perfectly good airplane"
>
> they all have a squawk sheet, to tell the mechanics what needs to be
> fixed... or let the pilot knows which parts are on order...or back-
order.
>

Thanks John for the B-17 pics. But on this current subject,
do you have that funny document about orders for repairs
which the mechs sent back with humorous responses?
Lost my copy during an upgrade. Too much fun! TIA!

[Byker]

"Jess Lurkin" wrote in message ...
>
> Bless your Heart. Thank You Very Much!

Speaking of the cancelled C-132, the Soviets came out with this megapropper
in the early '60s. The An-22 was about the same in engine horsepower,
specifications, and projected performance. When it was unveiled at the Paris
Air Show in 1965, the Russkies allegedly said to U.S. military officials,
"You don't have one." The brass replied, "We don't need one."

[Byker]

[Byker]

[Byker]

[Byker]

[Miloch]

In article >, Byker says...
>
>This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
>
>"Jess Lurkin" wrote in message ...
>>
>> Bless your Heart. Thank You Very Much!
>
>Speaking of the cancelled C-132, the Soviets came out with this megapropper
>in the early '60s. The An-22 was about the same in engine horsepower,
>specifications, and projected performance. When it was unveiled at the Paris
>Air Show in 1965, the Russkies allegedly said to U.S. military officials,
>"You don't have one." The brass replied, "We don't need one."
>

With big-ass tires like those, I guess they don't have to worry about anyone
stealing 'em and their hub caps.

Eventually replaced with the 225...six engines and a ****-pot full o' tires!



*

[Miloch]

In article >, Byker says...
>
>This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
>
>"Jess Lurkin" wrote in message ...
>>
>> Bless your Heart. Thank You Very Much!
>
>Speaking of the cancelled C-132, the Soviets came out with this megapropper
>in the early '60s. The An-22 was about the same in engine horsepower,
>specifications, and projected performance. When it was unveiled at the Paris
>Air Show in 1965, the Russkies allegedly said to U.S. military officials,
>"You don't have one." The brass replied, "We don't need one."
>

With big-ass tires like those, I guess they don't have to worry about anyone
stealing 'em and their hub caps.

Eventually replaced with the 225...six engines and a ****-pot full o' tires!



*

[Miloch]

In article >, Byker says...
>
>This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
>
>"Jess Lurkin" wrote in message ...
>>
>> Bless your Heart. Thank You Very Much!
>
>Speaking of the cancelled C-132, the Soviets came out with this megapropper
>in the early '60s. The An-22 was about the same in engine horsepower,
>specifications, and projected performance. When it was unveiled at the Paris
>Air Show in 1965, the Russkies allegedly said to U.S. military officials,
>"You don't have one." The brass replied, "We don't need one."
>

With big-ass tires like those, I guess they don't have to worry about anyone
stealing 'em and their hub caps.

Eventually replaced with the 225...six engines and a ****-pot full o' tires!



*

[Miloch]

In article >, Byker says...
>
>This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
>
>"Jess Lurkin" wrote in message ...
>>
>> Bless your Heart. Thank You Very Much!
>
>Speaking of the cancelled C-132, the Soviets came out with this megapropper
>in the early '60s. The An-22 was about the same in engine horsepower,
>specifications, and projected performance. When it was unveiled at the Paris
>Air Show in 1965, the Russkies allegedly said to U.S. military officials,
>"You don't have one." The brass replied, "We don't need one."
>

With big-ass tires like those, I guess they don't have to worry about anyone
stealing 'em and their hub caps.

Eventually replaced with the 225...six engines and a ****-pot full o' tires!



*