Log in

View Full Version : Wing Frequency measuring app now on iOS and Android


February 16th 17, 08:25 PM
I posted here some time ago about the app I wrote to measure glider wing frequencies - at that time it was only available for Android. It's now also on the App store for iPads and iPhones.

https://itunes.apple.com/au/app/wingfrequency/id1205219824?mt=8

More information here:

https://www.control-j.com/wingfrequency.php

Clyde.

Charlie M. (UH & 002 owner/pilot)
February 16th 17, 10:14 PM
Nice.

It states accurate to +/- 1 beat per second, that's +/- 60 beats per minute, is that correct?

Matt Herron Jr.
February 18th 17, 10:41 PM
On Thursday, February 16, 2017 at 12:25:30 PM UTC-8, wrote:
> I posted here some time ago about the app I wrote to measure glider wing frequencies - at that time it was only available for Android. It's now also on the App store for iPads and iPhones.
>
> https://itunes.apple.com/au/app/wingfrequency/id1205219824?mt=8
>
> More information here:
>
> https://www.control-j.com/wingfrequency.php
>
> Clyde.

I tried to buy this on the Apple App store, but could not find it listed

Jonathan St. Cloud
February 18th 17, 11:20 PM
On Saturday, February 18, 2017 at 2:41:06 PM UTC-8, Matt Herron Jr. wrote:
> On Thursday, February 16, 2017 at 12:25:30 PM UTC-8, wrote:
> > I posted here some time ago about the app I wrote to measure glider wing frequencies - at that time it was only available for Android. It's now also on the App store for iPads and iPhones.
> >
> > https://itunes.apple.com/au/app/wingfrequency/id1205219824?mt=8
> >
> > More information here:
> >
> > https://www.control-j.com/wingfrequency.php
> >
> > Clyde.
>
> I tried to buy this on the Apple App store, but could not find it listed
Just search for wingfrequency (that is right no space) ina search window of app store.

Charlie M. (UH & 002 owner/pilot)
February 19th 17, 01:10 AM
Post one, click the second link (info) and there are links to stores to download.

Bret Hess
February 21st 17, 02:13 AM
A variation of +-60 cycles per minute seems too high. Is that a typo? Why not gather more data until you get it below a tenth of that?

Google