Rosie, pt 6 - Rosie 71.jpg (1/1)

[Mitchell Holman[_3_]]

[Charles Lindbergh[_2_]]

On Fri, 26 Aug 2016 07:07:13 -0500, Mitchell Holman > wrote:

This is a tough one, I think she might be working on the tail assembly of a Martin Mariner. At first I
thought it was a PBY, but it just doesn't look right.

[john szalay]

Charles Lindbergh > wrote in
:

> On Fri, 26 Aug 2016 07:07:13 -0500, Mitchell Holman
> > wrote:
>
> This is a tough one, I think she might be working on the tail assembly
> of a Martin Mariner. At first I thought it was a PBY, but it just
> doesn't look right.

PBY tail


foot pegs, fillit to the horizontal stabilizer and access panels match to
PBY , as does the US Navy logo location ( for the time period )


Lorena Craig is cowler under civil service at the Naval Air Base,
Corpus Christi, Texas
1942 August Hollem, Howard R.,, photographer.

[Charles Lindbergh[_2_]]

On Wed, 31 Aug 2016 15:43:11 -0500, john Szalay <john.szalayatatt.net> wrote:

>Charles Lindbergh > wrote in
:
>
>> On Fri, 26 Aug 2016 07:07:13 -0500, Mitchell Holman
>> > wrote:
>>
>> This is a tough one, I think she might be working on the tail assembly
>> of a Martin Mariner. At first I thought it was a PBY, but it just
>> doesn't look right.
>
>PBY tail
>
>
> foot pegs, fillit to the horizontal stabilizer and access panels match to
>PBY , as does the US Navy logo location ( for the time period )
>

Do you have a link to whatever reference material you used to come to your conclusion? I would enjoy
reviewing it.



>
> Lorena Craig is cowler under civil service at the Naval Air Base,
> Corpus Christi, Texas
> 1942 August Hollem, Howard R.,, photographer.

[john szalay]

Charles Lindbergh > wrote in
:

> On Wed, 31 Aug 2016 15:43:11 -0500, john Szalay <john.szalayatatt.net>
> wrote:
>
>>Charles Lindbergh > wrote in
:
>>
>>> On Fri, 26 Aug 2016 07:07:13 -0500, Mitchell Holman
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>> This is a tough one, I think she might be working on the tail
>>> assembly of a Martin Mariner. At first I thought it was a PBY, but
>>> it just doesn't look right.
>>
>>PBY tail
>>
>>
>> foot pegs, fillit to the horizontal stabilizer and access panels
>> match to
>>PBY , as does the US Navy logo location ( for the time period )
>>
>
> Do you have a link to whatever reference material you used to come to
> your conclusion? I would enjoy reviewing it.
>
>

http://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/oem2002007105/PP/resource/

http://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/oem2002005578/PP/

http://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/oem2002005571/PP/

http://cdn.loc.gov/service/pnp/fsac/1a34000/1a34800/1a34884v.jpg

http://www.gstatic.com/hostedimg/5e3cda2a07043acb_large

http://www.gstatic.com/hostedimg/0edf6c7e6312e146_large

http://www.gstatic.com/hostedimg/7e723e0c6a3b2364_large

http://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/fsa1992000919/PP/

http://www.loc.gov/pictures/resource/fsa.8b04593/



http://images.google.com/hosted/life/0edf6c7e6312e146.html

[john szalay]

Charles Lindbergh > wrote in
:

> On Wed, 31 Aug 2016 15:43:11 -0500, john Szalay <john.szalayatatt.net>
> wrote:
>
>>Charles Lindbergh > wrote in
:
>>
>>> On Fri, 26 Aug 2016 07:07:13 -0500, Mitchell Holman
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>> This is a tough one, I think she might be working on the tail
>>> assembly of a Martin Mariner. At first I thought it was a PBY, but
>>> it just doesn't look right.
>>
>>PBY tail
>>
>>
>> foot pegs, fillit to the horizontal stabilizer and access panels
>> match to
>>PBY , as does the US Navy logo location ( for the time period )
>>
>
> Do you have a link to whatever reference material you used to come to
> your conclusion? I would enjoy reviewing it.
>
>

[Charles Lindbergh]

On Thu, 01 Sep 2016 14:13:27 -0500, john Szalay <john.szalayatatt.net>
wrote:

>Charles Lindbergh > wrote in
:
>
>> On Wed, 31 Aug 2016 15:43:11 -0500, john Szalay <john.szalayatatt.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>Charles Lindbergh > wrote in
:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 26 Aug 2016 07:07:13 -0500, Mitchell Holman
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>> This is a tough one, I think she might be working on the tail
>>>> assembly of a Martin Mariner. At first I thought it was a PBY, but
>>>> it just doesn't look right.
>>>
>>>PBY tail
>>>
>>>
>>> foot pegs, fillit to the horizontal stabilizer and access panels
>>> match to
>>>PBY , as does the US Navy logo location ( for the time period )
>>>
>>
>> Do you have a link to whatever reference material you used to come to
>> your conclusion? I would enjoy reviewing it.
>>
>>
>
>http://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/oem2002007105/PP/resource/
>
>http://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/oem2002005578/PP/
>
>http://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/oem2002005571/PP/
>
>http://cdn.loc.gov/service/pnp/fsac/1a34000/1a34800/1a34884v.jpg
>
>http://www.gstatic.com/hostedimg/5e3cda2a07043acb_large
>
>http://www.gstatic.com/hostedimg/0edf6c7e6312e146_large
>
>http://www.gstatic.com/hostedimg/7e723e0c6a3b2364_large
>
>http://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/fsa1992000919/PP/
>
>http://www.loc.gov/pictures/resource/fsa.8b04593/
>
>
>
>http://images.google.com/hosted/life/0edf6c7e6312e146.html

Good job, thanks for posting. Looks like my first reaction was the
correct one and of course, you were right.