PDA

View Full Version : Flight test update - endpoints and elbows


nauga
June 24th 04, 04:01 AM
A few more hours in the past few days.
I took the Bud Dake news as a wakeup call and
pulled the airplane apart and inspected everything
on Monday. Nothing scared me, so it went back together.
Oil is still dark, so I figured I'm getting blowby
somewhere (more on that in a sec). More than one A&P
has suggested this is due to the engine not being fully
broken in, so I'm still running it hard. EGTs and CHTs
have come down nicely across the board, with EGT around 1350
and CHT ~360-380 in cruise. 150 deg split in EGTs, 80 deg
split in CHTs. I figured things were working out OK.

Did a post maintenance flight yesterday with speed runs and
a little maneuvering to make sure I got all the greasy bits
back in the right spots, and everything was fine. Came back
into the pattern, high and hot as usual, and worked like a
dog to slow down. I ended up high and tight abeam when I
finally got the flaps down, and rather than stretch final over a
housing development I turned in early and ended up way high
on final. Slipping didn't work (that's how high I was)
so at about midfield and several hundred feet AGL I started
to go around. I made a call, cobbed the power, and the engine
went "chugga...chugga...chugga..." Heck with this. I
made a call something along the lines of "everybody get
outta my way!" and started a turn to downwind when the engine
caught and started running normally. Made a circling approach
and landed on-speed, amazingly enough, but tailwheel-first,
then chirpchirpchirpchirp. Off the runway everything ran fine.
Runups, mag check, jam accels, no hesitation or rough running.
Checked it over closely, and found oil on the #2 plugs. Cleaned
and reinstalled, and everything checked fine on the ground.
Couple of flights today and everything was good until the last
landing, when I bumped the throttle to clear the engine and it
hesitated again. On the ground this time CHT showed the #2
bottom plug wasn't firing well or not at all. Pulled the plugs
again and could see a little oil in the #2 cylinder. It's hard
down until I get this worked out. I'll swap plugs tomorrow and
do the 25 hour checks and see if that works. If not, the
cylinder probably needs work. Dang.

Other than that flights are progressing well. Got a 6g endpoint
today, so envelope expansion is complete for g's, zero to six.
I don't have inverted oil or fuel injection, so while -3 is the
negative limit 0 will suffice for my purposes. Altitude and
speed to go. Been to 8.5K and 170 KIAS. I plan on going to
11K (maybe) and Vne (183 KIAS), but getting there gradually.
Everything everyone says about RV's being slick is true, and
getting under the Class B tier from 10 miles out and
while trying to keep the engine running hard is sometimes
challenging. Always fun, though.

Also cruising up the river this afternoon it was a little bumpy.
Best I can tell, I bumped the canopy lever with my left elbow.
I don't remember doing it, all I know is that I was zipping along
and all of a sudden the CANOPY UNLOCK light came on. I just
read an article in Van's newsletter about someone who did something
similar, but his first clue was a face full of canopy and a lot
of wind, noise, and blood. I looked at the handle AND CONFIRMED
THE RIGHT WAY TO MOVE IT (aft is lock, opposite of the normal
sense), and moved it. I expected that the contact switch had
shifted, but sure enough, the lever moved back about 1/2"
and the light went out. I'm glad I put that little light in.
I have no idea how much more travel would've been required to
fully unlock the canopy, nor do I want to find out. (I also have a
personal story about loose canopies and supersonic flight, but
that's for another time).

So the bottom line is: down for engine work after 24 flight
hours. I'll know tomorrow whether or not I have to pull the
cylinder.

Dave 'Daddy Lowbucks' Hyde

RV-4 in flight test, EAA tech counselor

Jerry Springer
June 24th 04, 04:12 AM
nauga wrote:
>
>
> Other than that flights are progressing well. Got a 6g endpoint
> today, so envelope expansion is complete for g's, zero to six.
>
> Dave 'Daddy Lowbucks' Hyde
>
> RV-4 in flight test, EAA tech counselor
>
>

Dave just so there is no confusion about flight testing, just because your g
limit is 6g's that does not mean you have to test to 6 g's during phase one.
Of course it is your choice to do if you want to.

Jerry (July 14, 15 years flying my RV-6) Springer

nauga
June 24th 04, 04:51 AM
Jerry Springer wrote...

> Dave just so there is no confusion about flight testing, just because your
g
> limit is 6g's that does not mean you have to test to 6 g's during phase
one.

Oh, absolutely. My only *required* testing for phase I
was climbs, stalls, and any aerobatics I want to do after
phase I. I wanted to open up the full envelope in phase I,
so 6g's and Vne was a personal decision, one I'm approaching
gradually and as safely as I know how.

I don't expect to revisit either limit post-test, but I do
want *tested* margins outside of the everyday envelope.

Dave 'learn to press, press to test' Hyde

Richard Lamb
June 24th 04, 05:05 AM
nauga wrote:
>
>
> So the bottom line is: down for engine work after 24 flight
> hours. I'll know tomorrow whether or not I have to pull the
> cylinder.
>
> Dave 'Daddy Lowbucks' Hyde
>
> RV-4 in flight test, EAA tech counselor

Well, since you are already bummed out from having to down baby
for engine work, this shouldn't hurt too much....

Total build cost divided by 24 hours flying time
works out to (OMYGOD!) how much per hour????

Richard (the evil) Lamb :^)

Richard Lamb
June 24th 04, 05:12 AM
nauga wrote:
>
> Jerry Springer wrote...
>
> > Dave just so there is no confusion about flight testing, just because your
> g
> > limit is 6g's that does not mean you have to test to 6 g's during phase
> one.
>
> Oh, absolutely. My only *required* testing for phase I
> was climbs, stalls, and any aerobatics I want to do after
> phase I. I wanted to open up the full envelope in phase I,
> so 6g's and Vne was a personal decision, one I'm approaching
> gradually and as safely as I know how.
>
> I don't expect to revisit either limit post-test, but I do
> want *tested* margins outside of the everyday envelope.
>
> Dave 'learn to press, press to test' Hyde
>

Not being critical, Dave.
Just in the interest of discussion...

I've heard that the Navy absolutely prohibits rolling high G pull ups.
Pulling to the G limit, then adding a sharp roll input can and has bent
some wings.

Smooth, baby, smooth....

Richard

nauga
June 24th 04, 01:11 PM
Richard Lamb wrote:

> I've heard that the Navy absolutely prohibits rolling high G pull ups.
> Pulling to the G limit, then adding a sharp roll input can and has bent
> some wings.

Not taken as critical. I'm not doing that either.

Dave 'shed' Hyde

nauga
June 25th 04, 02:54 AM
Richard Riley wrote:

> On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 03:01:19 GMT, "nauga" > wrote:
>
> :Other than that flights are progressing well. Got a 6g endpoint
> :today, so envelope expansion is complete for g's, zero to six.
>
> At max gross?

No, at as close to aerobatic weight (1375 lb) as I could get
without exceeding it, taking into account my distrust of the
fuel gauges at other than empty and full. Gross (for my RV-4)
is 1600 lb. It's only rated for 6g's at and below aerobatic
weight.

Dave 'NzW' Hyde

nafod40
June 28th 04, 02:58 PM
nauga wrote:
> Other than that flights are progressing well. Got a 6g endpoint
> today, so envelope expansion is complete for g's, zero to six.

Did you put on your extra tight underwear? Three or four pair? Borrow
the wife's girdle? Practice the "Hook" maneuver last week while sitting
at your desk (you've seen the video of the geek with the dork eyewear)?

Duct taping your legs so the feet turn beet red can increase g-tolerance.

Bob Olds
June 29th 04, 03:25 AM
nafod40 > wrote in message >...
> nauga wrote:
> > Other than that flights are progressing well. Got a 6g endpoint
> > today, so envelope expansion is complete for g's, zero to six.
>
> Did you put on your extra tight underwear? Three or four pair? Borrow
> the wife's girdle? Practice the "Hook" maneuver last week while sitting
> at your desk (you've seen the video of the geek with the dork eyewear)?
>
> Duct taping your legs so the feet turn beet red can increase g-tolerance.



************************************************** ******************************


Screaming like a band of wild banshees will help the 'G' tolerance
too. I have run to 5 1/2 positive this way. Maintained 4 1/2 + in
flight testing without problems in this manner. Just don't hold the
xmit button down - it excites ATC !!!

Bob Olds RV-4
Charleston,Arkansas


************************************************** ******************************

bryan chaisone
June 29th 04, 02:36 PM
LOL. I don't know you, Bob, but I like you already.

LOL...

(Bob Olds) wrote in message
> Screaming like a band of wild banshees will help the 'G' tolerance
> too. I have run to 5 1/2 positive this way. Maintained 4 1/2 + in
> flight testing without problems in this manner. Just don't hold the
> xmit button down - it excites ATC !!!
>
> Bob Olds RV-4
> Charleston,Arkansas
>
>
> ************************************************** ******************************

nauga
June 30th 04, 03:33 AM
Bob Olds wrote...

> Screaming like a band of wild banshees will help the 'G' tolerance
> too.

I probably sound like I'm being mauled.
"UUUnnnnaaauuunnnnggghhh!"

> Just don't hold the xmit button down - it excites ATC !!!

I leave the video camera out of the cockpit for most flights
now because I got tired of hearing myself say stupid stuff.
An example:

"You got it, Dave? Yeah, I got it. Up is that way. Oh
yeah, I see it. Roll out, don't do nuthin' stupid."

....and my singing voice is terrible.

Dave "me, myself, and I" Hyde

Google