PDA

View Full Version : Idea for a story


jim.lynchehaun
March 17th 04, 05:18 PM
Idea for a story:

Jac Lynch had more than his fair share of problems when working for the
Pee-Bag Company. When he left his job he agreed to have the Corporate
Ombudsman of Pee-Bags's American parent company review his case. What
started out as a human resources issue, became a security crisis when the
American parent company identified Jac as a potential terrorist. Now, the
British Prime Minister is faced with the prospect that a glider pilot may be
intending to use a glider as a weapon against the interests of his former
employer. How can the PM pacify the Americans? Could foot-and-mouth disease
provide the answer? British intelligence don't believe Jac is a terrorist.
So sceptical are they of the American "concerns" they do nothing to prevent
Jac working as an IT Technician at East Kirby Grammar School for Girls. The
Member of Parliament for East Kirby - having had the situation brought to
his attention - is less than convinced. He voices his misgiving at the
highest level, but is overruled on the grounds of national security. Jac,
meanwhile, is struggling to work out how "national security" can be
improved by the intelligence services assisting the Pee-Bag Company to
nobble his case at the Employment Tribunal. It gets much worse before it
gets any better.

What do you think?

mrw
March 18th 04, 07:10 PM
WTF???????????
"jim.lynchehaun" > wrote in message
...
> Idea for a story:
>
> Jac Lynch had more than his fair share of problems when working for the
> Pee-Bag Company. When he left his job he agreed to have the Corporate
> Ombudsman of Pee-Bags's American parent company review his case. What
> started out as a human resources issue, became a security crisis when the
> American parent company identified Jac as a potential terrorist. Now, the
> British Prime Minister is faced with the prospect that a glider pilot may
be
> intending to use a glider as a weapon against the interests of his former
> employer. How can the PM pacify the Americans? Could foot-and-mouth
disease
> provide the answer? British intelligence don't believe Jac is a terrorist.
> So sceptical are they of the American "concerns" they do nothing to
prevent
> Jac working as an IT Technician at East Kirby Grammar School for Girls.
The
> Member of Parliament for East Kirby - having had the situation brought to
> his attention - is less than convinced. He voices his misgiving at the
> highest level, but is overruled on the grounds of national security. Jac,
> meanwhile, is struggling to work out how "national security" can be
> improved by the intelligence services assisting the Pee-Bag Company to
> nobble his case at the Employment Tribunal. It gets much worse before it
> gets any better.
>
> What do you think?
>
>

Nyal Williams
March 18th 04, 08:18 PM
Presuming this was recommended to John Shelton as something
for American consumption; it won't fly! Precious
(read: quaint) went out of style with Agatha Christie.

At 17:24 17 March 2004, Jim.Lynchehaun wrote:
>Idea for a story:
>
>Jac Lynch had more than his fair share of problems
>when working for the
>Pee-Bag Company. When he left his job he agreed to
>have the Corporate
>Ombudsman of Pee-Bags's American parent company review
>his case. What
>started out as a human resources issue, became a security
>crisis when the
>American parent company identified Jac as a potential
>terrorist. Now, the
>British Prime Minister is faced with the prospect that
>a glider pilot may be
>intending to use a glider as a weapon against the interests
>of his former
>employer. How can the PM pacify the Americans? Could
>foot-and-mouth disease
>provide the answer? British intelligence don't believe
>Jac is a terrorist.
>So sceptical are they of the American 'concerns' they
>do nothing to prevent
>Jac working as an IT Technician at East Kirby Grammar
>School for Girls. The
>Member of Parliament for East Kirby - having had the
>situation brought to
>his attention - is less than convinced. He voices his
>misgiving at the
>highest level, but is overruled on the grounds of national
>security. Jac,
>meanwhile, is struggling to work out how 'national
>security' can be
>improved by the intelligence services assisting the
>Pee-Bag Company to
>nobble his case at the Employment Tribunal. It gets
>much worse before it
>gets any better.
>
>What do you think?
>
>
>

Google