Log in

View Full Version : Humpback whales - a source of new aerodynamics?


Martin Gregorie
May 26th 04, 05:25 PM
This was just posted on the SCAT Electronic News, a source of
information for the competitive model Free Flight community. Enjoy.

Martin
=================


Mimicking humpback whale flippers may improve airplane wing design

Public release date: 11-May-2004

Contact: Deborah Hill

919-401-0299
Duke University

Mimicking humpback whale flippers may improve airplane wing design
DURHAM, N.C. -- Wind tunnel tests of scale-model humpback whale
flippers have revealed that the scalloped, bumpy flipper is a more
efficient wing design than is currently used by the aeronautics
industry on airplanes. The tests show that bump-ridged flippers do not
stall as quickly and produce more lift and less drag than comparably
sized sleek flippers. The tests were reported by biomechanicist Frank
Fish of West Chester University, Penn., fluid dynamics engineer
Laurens Howle of the Pratt School of Engineering at Duke University
and David Miklosovic and Mark Murray at the U.S. Naval Academy. They
reported their findings in the May 2004 issue of Physics of Fluids ,
published in advance online on March 15, 2004.

In their study, the team first created two approximately 22-inch-tall
scale models of humpback pectoral flippers -- one with the
characteristic bumps, called tubercles, and one without. The models
were machined from thick, clear polycarbonate at Duke University.
Testing was conducted in a low speed closed-circuit wind tunnel at the
U.S. Naval Academy in Annapolis, Md.

The sleek flipper performance was similar to a typical airplane wing.
But the tubercle flipper exhibited nearly 8 percent better lift
properties, and withstood stall at a 40 percent steeper wind angle.
The team was particularly surprised to discover that the flipper with
tubercles produced as much as 32 percent lower drag than the sleek
flipper.

"The simultaneous achievement of increased lift and reduced drag
results in an increase in aerodynamic efficiency," Howle explains.

This new understanding of humpback whale flipper aerodynamics has
implications for airplane wing and underwater vehicle design.
Increased lift (the upward force on an airplane wing) at higher wind
angles affects how easily airplanes take off, and helps pilots slow
down during landing.

Improved resistance to stall would add a new margin of safety to
aircraft flight and also make planes more maneuverable. Drag -- the
rearward force on an airplane wing -- affects how much fuel the
airplane must consume during flight. Stall occurs when the air no
longer flows smoothly over the top of the wing but separates from the
top of the wing before reaching the trailing edge. When an airplane
wing stalls, it dramatically loses lift while incurring an increase in
drag.

As whales move through the water, the tubercles disrupt the line of
pressure against the leading edge of the flippers. The row of
tubercles sheers the flow of water and redirects it into the scalloped
valley between each tubercle, causing swirling vortices that roll up
and over the flipper to actually enhance lift properties.

"The swirling vortices inject momentum into the flow," said Howle.
"This injection of momentum keeps the flow attached to the upper
surface of the wing and delays stall to higher wind angles."

"This discovery has potential applications not only to airplane wings
but also on the tips of helicopter rotors, airplane propellers and
ship rudders," said Howle.

The purpose of the tubercles on the leading edge of humpback whale
flippers has been the source of speculation for some time, said Fish.
"The idea they improved flipper aerodynamics was so counter to our
current doctrine of fluid dynamics, no one had ever analyzed them," he
said.

Humpback whales maneuver in the water with surprising agility for
44-foot animals, particularly when they are hunting for food. By
exhaling air underwater as they turn in a circle, the whales create a
cylindrical wall of bubbles that herd small fish inside. Then they
barrel up through the middle of the "bubble net," mouth open wide, to
scoop up their prey.

According to Fish, the scalloped hammerhead shark is the only other
marine animal with a similar aerodynamic design. The expanded
hammerhead shark head may act like a wing.

The trick now is to figure out how to incorporate the advantage of the
tubercle flipper into manmade designs, said Fish.

The research team now plans to perform a systematic engineering
investigation of the role of scalloped leading edges on lift increase,
drag reduction and stall delay.



--
martin@ : Martin Gregorie
gregorie : Harlow, UK
demon :
co : Zappa fan & glider pilot
uk :

Martin Hellman
May 27th 04, 04:09 AM
Another possibility that I recently heard about that might help
increase our L/D: It seems that marine mammals may shed microscopic
amounts of their skin as the swim, disrupting the normal boundary
layer turbulence. I guess a whale that uses Head & Shoulders Shampoo
will not swim as fast as the others?

Anyone else hear of this theory? Or think I was being ribbed? Or have
any thoughts on how it might be used in sailplane wing designs?

Martin

Pete Russell
May 27th 04, 05:02 AM
I have thought of putting some type of soap on my glider when it may rain,
thinking it would help to level the water drops and maintain the airfoil
shape. This may be the thing for the Pik 20 owners and other airfoils that
suffer in the rain.



Pete




"Martin Hellman" > wrote in message
om...
> Another possibility that I recently heard about that might help
> increase our L/D: It seems that marine mammals may shed microscopic
> amounts of their skin as the swim, disrupting the normal boundary
> layer turbulence. I guess a whale that uses Head & Shoulders Shampoo
> will not swim as fast as the others?
>
> Anyone else hear of this theory? Or think I was being ribbed? Or have
> any thoughts on how it might be used in sailplane wing designs?
>
> Martin

Nyal Williams
May 27th 04, 05:35 AM
At 04:18 27 May 2004, Pete Russell wrote:
>I have thought of putting some type of soap on my glider
>when it may rain,
>thinking it would help to level the water drops and
>maintain the airfoil
>shape. This may be the thing for the Pik 20 owners
>and other airfoils that
>suffer in the rain.
>
>
What other gliders are known to have this problem with
water or turbulent air? Seems I have heard that one
of the ASW series was similarly affected.
>
>Pete
>
>
>
>
>'Martin Hellman' wrote in message
om...
>> Another possibility that I recently heard about that
>>might help
>> increase our L/D: It seems that marine mammals may
>>shed microscopic
>> amounts of their skin as the swim, disrupting the
>>normal boundary
>> layer turbulence. I guess a whale that uses Head &
>>Shoulders Shampoo
>> will not swim as fast as the others?
>>
>> Anyone else hear of this theory? Or think I was being
>>ribbed? Or have
>> any thoughts on how it might be used in sailplane
>>wing designs?
>>
>> Martin
>
>
>

Peter Harvey
May 27th 04, 08:45 AM
For years, when expecting rain, it has been normal
to wipe a soapy chamois over the leading edges of hang
gliders before takeoff. The difference is staggering
to those wings more affected by the droplets - a huge
improvement.
I've had some stuff in my bag for the glider, but haven't
tried it, since gliders seem to avoid the rain better.
Also the difference in speeds must change things -
any aerofoil experts care to comment?
Pete Harvey



At 04:48 27 May 2004, Nyal Williams wrote:
>At 04:18 27 May 2004, Pete Russell wrote:
>>I have thought of putting some type of soap on my glider
>>when it may rain,
>>thinking it would help to level the water drops and
>>maintain the airfoil
>>shape. This may be the thing for the Pik 20 owners
>>and other airfoils that
>>suffer in the rain.
>>
>>
>What other gliders are known to have this problem with
>water or turbulent air? Seems I have heard that one
>of the ASW series was similarly affected.
>>
>>Pete
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>'Martin Hellman' wrote in message
om...
>>> Another possibility that I recently heard about that
>>>might help
>>> increase our L/D: It seems that marine mammals may
>>>shed microscopic
>>> amounts of their skin as the swim, disrupting the
>>>normal boundary
>>> layer turbulence. I guess a whale that uses Head &
>>>Shoulders Shampoo
>>> will not swim as fast as the others?
>>>
>>> Anyone else hear of this theory? Or think I was being
>>>ribbed? Or have
>>> any thoughts on how it might be used in sailplane
>>>wing designs?
>>>
>>> Martin
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>

Martin Gregorie
May 28th 04, 03:44 PM
On 26 May 2004 20:09:29 -0700, (Martin Hellman)
wrote:

>Another possibility that I recently heard about that might help
>increase our L/D: It seems that marine mammals may shed microscopic
>amounts of their skin as the swim, disrupting the normal boundary
>layer turbulence. I guess a whale that uses Head & Shoulders Shampoo
>will not swim as fast as the others?
>
>Anyone else hear of this theory? Or think I was being ribbed? Or have
>any thoughts on how it might be used in sailplane wing designs?
>
Yes, I saw that too, in New Scientist IIRC.

--
martin@ : Martin Gregorie
gregorie : Harlow, UK
demon :
co : Zappa fan & glider pilot
uk :

Arbr64
May 28th 04, 08:47 PM
> >
> What other gliders are known to have this problem with
> water or turbulent air? Seems I have heard that one
> of the ASW series was similarly affected.
> >
> >Pete

Pete,

I posted this about a month ago.
Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2004 7:14 PM
Subject: Re: Pic 20's in the rain


> Max,
>
> Most gliders of that generation use the Wortmann FX 67 airfoil, which has
> degraded performance when wet.
> Some examples are :
> Kestrel, DG-400, Pik-20, Nimbus 2, Lak-12, LS-3, Janus, HP-18, Jantar 2B
>
> Apparently some are worse than others, I suppose this is due to the fact
> that some use this profile on the wing roots only, with a different
profile
> towards the wingtips (these being "better" or more "tolerant"), while some
> use the FX-67 from root to tip. But it could be something else.
>
> Apparently the laminar flow is disturbed very easily on this profile, so
not
> only water, but bugs will degrade their performance as well.
>
> Reading Dick Johnson's flight tests, especially some from the 70s, will
tell
> you a little bit more about this.
> If you go to this link (http://www.ssa.org/Magazines/Johnson.asp) and
scroll
> down, there are 3 reports about the Pik-20, very illuminating.
>

Google