View Full Version : Arcus vs
December 19th 17, 08:30 PM
Hi,
How does Arcus compare (any and all aspects) to other modern two seaters?
Does anyone have any experience with Arcus EL?
S
Dave Nadler
December 19th 17, 09:09 PM
On Tuesday, December 19, 2017 at 3:30:26 PM UTC-5, wrote:
> How does Arcus compare (any and all aspects) to other modern two seaters?
Arcus is easy to fly, a bit harder to fly well.
Fantastic performance, as good as older open-class two-seaters.
Easy to deal with (rig/derig/taxi/take-off/land).
Duo better choice for lower time pilots but experienced pilots
have no problems flying mine.
I flew ASG-32 and Arcus prior buying ArcusM (formerly owned Duo share).
> Does anyone have any experience with Arcus EL?
Arcus EL is no longer offered.
If you fly one, you'll probably buy one ;-)
Hope that helps,
Best Regards, Dave
December 19th 17, 09:24 PM
Why did you choose Arcus over ASG-32?
We really want electric self launch or at least sustained...
S
Dave Nadler
December 19th 17, 09:34 PM
On Tuesday, December 19, 2017 at 4:24:37 PM UTC-5, wrote:
> Why did you choose Arcus over ASG-32?
Enough power for high density altitude self-launch and self-retrieve,
sensible steerable tailwheel (actually steers and not broken when I test-flew),
IIRC bigger rear seat cockpit.
> We really want electric self launch or at least sustained...
Be careful there is enough energy stored to do what you need.
Look at total climb altitude from a charge.
Hope that helps,
Best Regards, Dave
Dave Walsh
December 19th 17, 09:45 PM
At 20:30 19 December 2017, wrote:
>Hi,
>
>How does Arcus compare (any and all aspects) to other
modern two seaters?
>Does anyone have any experience with Arcus EL?
>Very, very few electric Arcus were ever built. I know of one
that was crashed in the French Alps, it was spun-in, so that's
one less.
You may wait a long time for first hand information on the
Arcus E. However lots of generally good things are said about
the Arcus, Arcus T and Arcus M: there are lots of them at
Sisteron in the summer. The two stroke self launch Arcus M
and the Arcus E both have much higher wing loadings, opinion
on whether this is a real problem depends on who you ask.
Lots of information out there on the Lange Antares 20E/23E
electric propulsion system, this is pretty much the same as the
system in the Arcus E. In climb you've probably got 11 -13
minutes total engine run time so if you use 6 minutes climbing
out you've got 6 minutes of run time left; this is NOT going to
get you back from the far end of a failed 500K. This is probably
a significant factor for many buyers? On the plus side you have
a reliable electric motor not a complex smelly petrol engine.
I'd guess Dave Nadler would be your best source of
information.
Dave Walsh
December 19th 17, 10:16 PM
So it looks like ASG-32 is the only electric powered two seater made nowadays?
Should make any decisions easy if electric engine is the base factor :)
S
Dave Nadler
December 19th 17, 10:47 PM
On Tuesday, December 19, 2017 at 5:00:07 PM UTC-5, Dave Walsh wrote:
> >Very, very few electric Arcus were ever built.
IIRC only 3.
> ...one was crashed in the French Alps...
wing-tip into a rock-face, bad way to go...
> You may wait a long time for first hand information on the
> Arcus E.
There's one rented in Africa; google by whom and contact
them for information. They'll sell it to you ;-)
> However lots of generally good things are said about
> the Arcus, Arcus T and Arcus M
Yup!
> The two stroke self launch Arcus M
> and the Arcus E both have much higher wing loadings, opinion
> on whether this is a real problem depends on who you ask.
ArcusM handles the weight just fine; not a big problem
even in pretty weak weather.
> I'd guess Dave Nadler would be your best source of
> information.
Bummer.
Dave Nadler
December 19th 17, 10:50 PM
On Tuesday, December 19, 2017 at 4:24:37 PM UTC-5, wrote:
> We really want electric self launch or at least sustained...
I have a nice Antares 20E I'll sell you after 2018 USA 18m nationals ;-)
Dave Walsh
December 19th 17, 11:14 PM
At 22:50 19 December 2017, Dave Nadler wrote:
>On Tuesday, December 19, 2017 at 4:24:37 PM UTC-5,
>wrote:
>> We really want electric self launch or at least sustained...
>
>I have a nice Antares 20E I'll sell you after 2018 USA 18m
nationals ;-)
>
Go for it! In America, land of the free, the Antares 20E can be
flown in both 18m and 20m mode. In Europe, land of the
actual designer and builder, only 20m mode is legal - go figure.
krasw
December 20th 17, 08:49 AM
We have Arcus E in our airfield. Owners seem to be happy with it and it flies a lot and never lands out. It is very heavy which makes it impossible to fly in 20m class (800kg MTOW) competitions. All self-launchers in this class (and ASG 32EL which has similar empty weight) fly very close to 800kg MTOW without any water ballast. In WGC level competitions lighter Arcus T's (or those few non-engined ships) have edge in weak weather. I think the general consensus between 32Mi and Arcus M pilots is that both consider their ships to be little better than others...
Craig Lowrie
December 20th 17, 09:42 AM
There is a third 20m flapped 2 seater worth considering... The 20m
TwinShark... Take a look on the HPH website.... www.hph.cz.
It is much lighter than the other two 20m flapped two seaters and has a
higher aspect ratio as well as latest generation aerodynamics.
Craig
At 08:49 20 December 2017, krasw wrote:
>We have Arcus E in our airfield. Owners seem to be happy with it and it
>fli=
>es a lot and never lands out. It is very heavy which makes it impossible
>to=
> fly in 20m class (800kg MTOW) competitions. All self-launchers in this
>cla=
>ss (and ASG 32EL which has similar empty weight) fly very close to 800kg
>MT=
>OW without any water ballast. In WGC level competitions lighter Arcus T's
>(=
>or those few non-engined ships) have edge in weak weather. I think the
>gene=
>ral consensus between 32Mi and Arcus M pilots is that both consider their
>s=
>hips to be little better than others...
>
Muttley
December 20th 17, 01:14 PM
If you are looking for a 20m 2 seater electric you may also consider the following
http://www.rs-uas.com/products/sk10e-elfin/preface/
the original manufacturer of the Stemme s10 but this is now a new company
Muttley
Dan Marotta
December 20th 17, 03:43 PM
Is that some sort of fuel driven engine turning a generator under the
left wing?Â* How can you call that an "electric"?Â* Seems to me they've
just put another layer of complexity between the gas and the prop.
BTW, I love my car gas fueled S10-VT.
On 12/20/2017 6:14 AM, Muttley wrote:
> If you are looking for a 20m 2 seater electric you may also consider the following
>
> http://www.rs-uas.com/products/sk10e-elfin/preface/
>
> the original manufacturer of the Stemme s10 but this is now a new company
>
> Muttley
--
Dan, 5J
Jonathan St. Cloud
December 20th 17, 10:02 PM
On Tuesday, December 19, 2017 at 12:30:26 PM UTC-8, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> How does Arcus compare (any and all aspects) to other modern two seaters?
> Does anyone have any experience with Arcus EL?
>
> S
The ASG-32 has a sustainer electric on a stick. If I am not mistaken this is technology developed in conjunction with the German government.
Dave Nadler
December 20th 17, 10:20 PM
On Tuesday, December 19, 2017 at 6:15:07 PM UTC-5, Dave Walsh wrote:
> At 22:50 19 December 2017, Dave Nadler wrote:
> Go for it! In America, land of the free, the Antares 20E can be
> flown in both 18m and 20m mode.
I didn't track, but I may have more time in 18m configuration.
> In Europe, land of the actual designer and builder,
> only 20m mode is legal - go figure.
Would not be a problem if manufacturer had completed certification as promised...
Some 18m tips are flown in Europe despite that ;-)
vBulletin® v3.6.4, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.