Zoom fables on ANN ZZZZZZZZZZZZ

[ChuckSlusarczyk]

Todays ANN (Awful News Net) had this to say about the fearless Capt Zoom..

Credit for this article goes to ANN which was posted 7/14/04...
Quote:


"For over 30 years, Jim Campbell has told the world of
aviation what no one else dared to... the truth. He's worked
as a test pilot, stunt pilot, flight instructor
(CFI/A/I/ME/H), you name it... he flies fixed wing, rotorcraft,
single/multi-engine, gliders, balloons, ultralights, jets,
warbirds, antiques... the works. In addition to his highly
acclaimed flight tests, product reviews, personality profiles,
editorials, photo essays, exciting magazine covers, and amazing
stories about the world of aviation, Campbell also told the flying
public that there were products and manufacturers out there
who did not tell the truth or were actually dangerous, and that
many of the entities that we had learned to trust as Aviators,
especially the FAA, simply could not be trusted. To many, he was a
hero, to a few others, he was the loudmouth who screwed
up their scams... so he fought many battles, and
while he never actually lost a single fight, he sure got
his nose bloodied a few times... None-the-less, Campbell is the guy
that never gave up on doing the right thing for the world of
aviation... and all the flyers he's come to care so very much
about. That's why he's the guy "who takes the blame" at ANN."


End of Quote

Now that I've stopped laughing lets examine a few of his points.

"For over 30 years, Jim Campbell has told the world of
aviation what no one else dared to... the truth."


Lets see, the truth as in claiming to have fathered a non existent son? Truth as
in claiming to have flown food missions in Africa? Truth as to the hours he
claims to have logged? Truth as in how many types he claimed to fly. Go to
http://mywebpages.comcast.net/ousterj/zoom.html for
a bunch of "truths" as told by his zoomness.


"He's worked as a test pilot, stunt pilot, flight instructor
(CFI/A/I/ME/H), you name it..."


The word "worked" implies as in getting paid for.Who ever paid him to do any
test work? What credentials does he have to qualify him for testing? That is
other than his one week stint at a California familiarization school. Stunt
pilot ? What shows ,when, where.Flight instructor? I'll give him that one.I
guess 1 out of 3 ain't bad...in zooms world.


" he flies fixed wing, rotorcraft,
single/multi-engine, gliders, balloons, ultralights, jets,
warbirds, antiques... the works. "

Jets?,warbirds? and antiques? Once again he plays with words .."He flies"
implies PIC ,solo...not as a passenger going for a ride. Big difference.Once
again when ,where and who's?
and the rest is a hoot.

He still trying to convince people that he what he thinks he is. Sooner or later
people catch on and only the gullible fall for it .Takes some people longer then
others tho.

more quotes:
"In addition to his highly
acclaimed flight tests, product reviews, personality profiles,
editorials, photo essays, exciting magazine covers, and amazing
stories about the world of aviation, Campbell also told the flying
public that there were products and manufacturers out there
who did not tell the truth or were actually dangerous, and that
many of the entities that we had learned to trust as Aviators,
especially the FAA, simply could not be trusted."

This paragraph explains why I published this post. If zoom can tell the flying
public about people he claims to not have nbeen truth full .I can also tell the
flying public that zoom is not truthfull and not to be trusted. Every so often
he must be exposed for what he is and for what he has done .He should be exposed
for the harm to people and their reputations he has caused and never held
accountable. So for as long as he continues to play the role he does I will
continue to expose him for what he truly is, a "Phony". That's my and a lot of
other peoples opinion .....nuff said .You can read what they said about jaun
yourself it's another hoot...


See ya

Chuck S RAH-15/1 ret

"Credibility it was alwys about credibility" chuck s

[Richard Lamb]

>
> "Credibility it was alwys about credibility" chuck s

[ChuckSlusarczyk]

In article >, Richard Lamb says...
>
>
>>
>> "Credibility it was alwys about credibility" chuck s

Yes sir ,always was ,always will be with a little bit of Justice thrown in for
good measure.

See ya

Chuck S RAH-15/1 ret

"evil didn't prosper because good men spoke and evil was nuts" anon

[Richard Lamb]

ChuckSlusarczyk wrote:
>
> In article >, Richard Lamb says...
> >
> >
> >>
> >> "Credibility it was alwys about credibility" chuck s
>
> Yes sir ,always was ,always will be with a little bit of Justice thrown in for
> good measure.
>
> See ya
>
> Chuck S RAH-15/1 ret
>
> "evil didn't prosper because good men spoke and evil was nuts" anon


I like the original mo betta...

"The only thing necessary
for evil to triumph over good
is for good men to do nothing"

Edmund Blake

[Otto Lilienthal]

Richard Lamb > wrote in message >...
> ChuckSlusarczyk wrote:
> >
> > "evil didn't prosper because good men spoke and evil was nuts" anon
>
>
> I like the original mo betta...
>
> "The only thing necessary
> for evil to triumph over good
> is for good men to do nothing"
>
> Edmund Blake

Hello,

1. Edmund Burke, not Edmund Blake

2. He probably never said or wrote it. While my research was not as
extensive as this person's,

http://www.tartarus.org/~martin/essays/burkequote.html

I could also not find a single date or publication for the quote.
Chuck's paraphrase is as good as any other if there is no original.

Otto

[Veeduber]

(Otto Lilienthal) wrote...

---------------------------------------------------


Dear Otto,

Just heard about your crash. Hope everything is okay.

Wilbur

[ChuckSlusarczyk]

In article >, Otto Lilienthal
says...
>
>Richard Lamb > wrote in message
>...
>> ChuckSlusarczyk wrote:
>> >
>> > "evil didn't prosper because good men spoke and evil was nuts" anon
>>
>>
>> I like the original mo betta...
>>
>> "The only thing necessary
>> for evil to triumph over good
>> is for good men to do nothing"
>>
>> Edmund Blake
>
>Hello,
>
>1. Edmund Burke, not Edmund Blake
>
>2. He probably never said or wrote it. While my research was not as
>extensive as this person's,
>
>http://www.tartarus.org/~martin/essays/burkequote.html
>
>I could also not find a single date or publication for the quote.
>Chuck's paraphrase is as good as any other if there is no original.
>
>Otto

Hi Otto
Read your book but had some minor problems with the lift tables :-)
I know who "anon" is and he had 2 versions of the quote. The first was "evil
didn't triumph because good men spoke and evil was nuts" and the second was as
written above. I figured since "anon" wrote it he can tweak it as he wishes. The
fact remains that evil is still nuts :-)

Be careful at high alpha angles and low airspeed

See ya

Chuck S RAH-15/1 ret

"the longer I live the more time passes" chuck s

[Juan Jimenez]

ChuckSlusarczyk > wrote in
:

> This paragraph explains why I published this post. If zoom can tell
> the flying public about people he claims to not have nbeen truth full
> .I can also tell the flying public that zoom is not truthfull and not
> to be trusted.

Still making up stories as usual. I suppose you're still lining up those
little ducks of yours, eh? We waited with the charcoal and sauce, and you
never showed up. Like the say where I come from, "perro que ladra no
muerde." Must be your family crest motto. :)

> So for as long as he continues to play the role he does I will continue
> to expose him for what he truly is, a "Phony". That's my and a lot of
> other peoples opinion .....nuff said .You can read what they said
> about jaun yourself it's another hoot...

Sure is! One thing's for sure, it doesn't talk about children suing their
parents to get their salaries paid, or about tales of never bringing what
you own to places down south because it could get taken away, or about drug
addicted family members losing their children's custody and publishing
their whining stories on the Internet. :)

I guess it's true what they say, useless people never change. You're living
proof of that. It's all about the credibility that you've never had. :)

Juan

<plonk!>

[John Ammeter]

On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 02:24:21 GMT, Juan Jimenez
> wrote:

>ChuckSlusarczyk > wrote in
:
>
>> This paragraph explains why I published this post. If zoom can tell
>> the flying public about people he claims to not have nbeen truth full
>> .I can also tell the flying public that zoom is not truthfull and not
>> to be trusted.
>
>Still making up stories as usual. I suppose you're still lining up those
>little ducks of yours, eh? We waited with the charcoal and sauce, and you
>never showed up. Like the say where I come from, "perro que ladra no
>muerde." Must be your family crest motto. :)
>
>> So for as long as he continues to play the role he does I will continue
>> to expose him for what he truly is, a "Phony". That's my and a lot of
>> other peoples opinion .....nuff said .You can read what they said
>> about jaun yourself it's another hoot...
>
>Sure is! One thing's for sure, it doesn't talk about children suing their
>parents to get their salaries paid, or about tales of never bringing what
>you own to places down south because it could get taken away, or about drug
>addicted family members losing their children's custody and publishing
>their whining stories on the Internet. :)
>
>I guess it's true what they say, useless people never change. You're living
>proof of that. It's all about the credibility that you've never had. :)
>
>Juan
>
><plonk!>

Juan,

If any of that is true then simply post the names/places
details, etc. You, of all people, should know that TRUTH is
the best defense to a slander libel charge.

IF you're telling the truth then simply post the details.

In other words, PUT UP OR SHUT UP.....

How does that little jet of yours fly?? Maybe you can have
Jimbo take it for its first flight if you're not ready for
that experience....

John

[Richard Lamb]

Otto Lilienthal wrote:
>
> Richard Lamb > wrote in message >...
> > ChuckSlusarczyk wrote:
> > >
> > > "evil didn't prosper because good men spoke and evil was nuts" anon
> >
> >
> > I like the original mo betta...
> >
> > "The only thing necessary
> > for evil to triumph over good
> > is for good men to do nothing"
> >
> > Edmund Blake
>
> Hello,
>
> 1. Edmund Burke, not Edmund Blake
>
> 2. He probably never said or wrote it. While my research was not as
> extensive as this person's,
>
> http://www.tartarus.org/~martin/essays/burkequote.html
>
> I could also not find a single date or publication for the quote.
> Chuck's paraphrase is as good as any other if there is no original.
>
> Otto

Well, that's what I get for trying to use those 1960 brain cells.

Close, but no cigar...

Still, it's a catchy turn of phrase.

Richard

[Juan Jimenez]

John Ammeter > wrote in
:

> Juan,
>
> If any of that is true then simply post the names/places
> details, etc. You, of all people, should know that TRUTH is
> the best defense to a slander libel charge

Got more interesting and useful things to do, John. Besides, Chuck has
never been interested in the truth, that's why he's still mouthing off
about ducks and hoots and other assorted BS. :) It's actually a pitiful
sight -- a grown man, reduced to inane whining on Usenet while the rest of
the world continues to revolve, just not around him.

> How does that little jet of yours fly??

We're going find out, very soon, thanks for asking. I'm looking for a 10-
516000-1 to replace an underpowered 10-378340-1 and get a reliable engine
start (0.3 joule vs 2.0 joule), care to donate one to the cause? :)

Juan

[RobertR237]

>
>I guess it's true what they say, useless people never change. You're living
>proof of that. It's all about the credibility that you've never had. :)
>
>Juan
>

You really shouldn't look in the mirror while you are typing replies. You
always end up talking about yourself when you do.


Bob Reed
www.kisbuild.r-a-reed-assoc.com (KIS Builders Site)
KIS Cruiser in progress...Slow but steady progress....

"Ladies and Gentlemen, take my advice,
pull down your pants and Slide on the Ice!"
(M.A.S.H. Sidney Freedman)

[B2431]

>From: Juan Jimenez
>Date: 7/19/2004 9:24 PM Central Daylight Time
>Message-id: <

Hey, juan, ever sell or finish and fly that BD-5?

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

[B2431]

>From: Juan Jimenez
>Date: 7/19/2004 10:21 PM Central Daylight Time
>Message-id: >
>
>John Ammeter > wrote in
:
>
>> Juan,
>>
>> If any of that is true then simply post the names/places
>> details, etc. You, of all people, should know that TRUTH is
>> the best defense to a slander libel charge
>
>Got more interesting and useful things to do, John. Besides, Chuck has
>never been interested in the truth, that's why he's still mouthing off
>about ducks and hoots and other assorted BS. :) It's actually a pitiful
>sight -- a grown man, reduced to inane whining on Usenet while the rest of
>the world continues to revolve, just not around him.

In other words you have no proof.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

[Barnyard BOb -]

>>I guess it's true what they say, useless people never change. You're living
>>proof of that. It's all about the credibility that you've never had. :)
>>
>>Juan
>>
>
>You really shouldn't look in the mirror while you are typing replies. You
>always end up talking about yourself when you do.
>
>
>Bob Reed
>www.kisbuild.r-a-reed-assoc.com (KIS Builders Site)

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Bob,

It's my opinion that Jaun is a low life character assassin with
a penchant to smear those that confront him and/or his boss.


Barnyard BOb - All you get when you wrestle with a pig is get dirty.

[ChuckSlusarczyk]

In article >, Juan Jimenez says...

>Still making up stories as usual. I suppose you're still lining up those
>little ducks of yours, eh? We waited with the charcoal and sauce, and you
>never showed up. Like the say where I come from, "perro que ladra no
>muerde." Must be your family crest motto. :)

The ducks are more then lined up .I suppose by now you know that G Conn LOST his
suit against me. The truth is as I and Tony said it was but you still can't
accept that.Conn lost and zoom was wrong about the facts. :-) As far as family
mottos go say it in english your in America now. :-)

>Sure is! One thing's for sure, it doesn't talk about children suing their
>parents to get their salaries paid, or about tales of never bringing what
>you own to places down south because it could get taken away, or about drug
>addicted family members losing their children's custody and publishing
>their whining stories on the Internet. :)

How about making it perfectly clear to me, are you saying that my children sued
my wife and I to get salaries paid? Or I brought things I owned to places down
south because "someone" would take it? Or that I was a drug addicted parent who
had lost custody of my children? Say it plain mister don't be your usual vague
self.
How about some proof to back up what you say? Be a man and if your so sure of
your facts,show them right here. If you have the courage of your convictions
then you have nothing to fear ,if you have the truth on your side then lets have
the times,dates and locations of what you say :-)

>I guess it's true what they say, useless people never change. You're living
>proof of that. It's all about the credibility that you've never had. :)

Time to prove yur credibility lets see the facts about your inuendos either your
right or your a liar :-) Lets have a credibility check, are you man enough or
are you a girly man when it comes to the truth? :-)


Chuck S

[ChuckSlusarczyk]

In article >, B2431 says...
>>Got more interesting and useful things to do, John. Besides, Chuck has
>>never been interested in the truth, that's why he's still mouthing off
>>about ducks and hoots and other assorted BS. :) It's actually a pitiful
>>sight -- a grown man, reduced to inane whining on Usenet while the rest of
>>the world continues to revolve, just not around him.
>
>In other words you have no proof.
>
>Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Exactly right Dan .Right now there are two of us who know the truth, me and
jaun.
One of us is lying ,I can't prove a negative but he can prove (If he's telling
the truth) that I lost my kids in a custody trial it would be a matter of public
record.It would be simple to post that document. I know what and who he's
talking about ,same last name no relation. Same as if I would say that his kid
was fathered by a different man and offered no proof or said that because there
is another Jiminiz out there it must be his family. Sheesh what a joke and he
talks about credibility ,especially when he works for the least credible
publication out there.

See ya

Chuck RAH-15/1 ret

[ChuckSlusarczyk]

In article >, Richard Lamb says...
>
>Well, that's what I get for trying to use those 1960 brain cells.
>
>Close, but no cigar...
>
>Still, it's a catchy turn of phrase.

Ahhh ...1960's brain cells exactly when was that ? :-)

I like catching phrases turning as well :-)

See ya

Chuck (ex hippy) S

[Barnyard BOb -]

>How about making it perfectly clear to me, are you saying that my children sued
>my wife and I to get salaries paid? Or I brought things I owned to places down
>south because "someone" would take it? Or that I was a drug addicted parent who
>had lost custody of my children? Say it plain mister don't be your usual vague
>self.
>How about some proof to back up what you say? Be a man and if your so sure of
>your facts,show them right here. If you have the courage of your convictions
>then you have nothing to fear ,if you have the truth on your side then lets have
>the times,dates and locations of what you say :-)
>
>Time to prove yur credibility lets see the facts about your inuendos either your
>right or your a liar :-) Lets have a credibility check, are you man enough or
>are you a girly man when it comes to the truth? :-)
>
>
>Chuck S
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Dear Nefoo Chuck,

It is my opinion that bloodsuckers, leeches and scum
without a pot to **** in or a window to throw it out of,
use whatever freebies are at their disposal to bolster
their despicable lot at the expense of truth, justice
and the American way.

At times like this...
I'm sorry that Gore invented the Internet. <g>


Unka' BOb -

[Juan Jimenez]

(RobertR237) wrote in
:

> You really shouldn't look in the mirror while you are typing replies.
> You always end up talking about yourself when you do.

Still running around with that brown, smelly nose, eh? :)

[[email protected]]

In article >,
Juan Jimenez > wrote:
[[ nothing worth repeating ]]


Hey Juan!!! remember this?

> Newsgroups: rec.aviation.homebuilt
> Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 14:17:22 +0000
> Subject: Juan Jiminez is a liar and a fraud (was:Re: Quack, quack! It's all ab
> out credibility you don't have, Duckboy!)
>
>
> In article <Z9Wyb.278857$ao4.989051@attbi_s51>,
> Juan..E.-Jimenez <b*d&5^-@-*b(d)5+.!c#o$m> wrote:
> >Don't forget, we're still waiting for the proof you'll never show, Duckboy!
> >:)
> >
> >
>
> Don't forget, we're *still* waiting for the proof that YOU'LL never show -- the
> proof that you are *not* a liar and a fraud, yourself, Jimmy, baby.
>
> You have repeatedly claimed that Chuck either:
> A) Wasn't at SNF at all
> B) Was there, but didn't have any vehicle there
> C) Was there with a vehicle, but didn't own it.
>
> You made the claim; the onus is on _you_ to provide proof.
>
> If you don't have proof, you're a fraud.
>
> If you're wrong, you're a liar.
>
> Your ONGOING REFUSAL to address this issue goes to _your_ credibility.
>
> At this point, you *don't* have ANY credibility on this issue, and as a
> result of -that-, your credibility on _anything_else_ is also called into
> question.
>
> And the available evidence says that you're a LIAR AND A FRAUD.
>
>
> Now, *prove*me*wrong*. If you _CAN_.
>
> Show your proof.
>
> If you can't/won't, you *are* _what_you_claim_ Chuck is.
>
>
>

We're *still* waiting for your proof.

Where is *YOUR* credibility??

[Juan Jimenez]

wrote in
ervers.com:

<snip!>

Can't even get the story right, but then again that's par for the RAH
gaggle. :)

Go back and read the thread, then you'll find what you are looking for. You
might even learn a thing or two about credibility, you know, the kind it's
all about and he doesn't have?

[B2431]

>From: Juan Jimenez

Juan, I have no dog in this fight, but I have seen Chuck and others provide
proof of their claims while you have not. Resorting to insults and innuendo
instead of making your case simply makes you appear to have no credibility.

What I would like to see you do is provide verifiable cites for your claims. If
you can't do that please stop with the innuendo, insults and "I don't want to
responds" and just back off.

Let's assume for the sake of discussion Chuck is all wrong. Your behaviour just
makes him look as if he is correct.

Let's change the assumption and say Chuck is correct. Your behaviour then
becomes untenable and quite possibly prosecutable.

Why not simply provide verifiable proofs for your accusations? Your abusive
responses are just childish and makes you look bad.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

[Snowbird]

ChuckSlusarczyk > wrote in message >...
> One of us is lying ,I can't prove a negative but he can prove (If he's telling
> the truth) that I lost my kids in a custody trial it would be a matter of public
> record.It would be simple to post that document. I know what and who he's
> talking about ,same last name no relation. Same as if I would say that his kid
> was fathered by a different man and offered no proof or said that because there
> is another Jiminiz out there it must be his family. Sheesh what a joke and he
> talks about credibility ,especially when he works for the least credible
> publication out there.

Hey Chuck, if'n we're googling for your relatives, are you related to
her:
http://www.jurgita.com/models-id14811.html

I figure you must be. Same last name, same profession (you having
proved you were really a tshirt model)...

don't be shy, 'fess up :) :)

Sydney

[Bob Chilcoat]

And make sure you have proof of your relationship.

She's only 15. What's the age of consent in Ohio (or Poland)?

--
Bob (Chief Pilot, White Knuckle Airways)

I don't have to like Bush and Cheney (Or Kerry, for that matter) to love
America

"Snowbird" > wrote in message
...

>
> Hey Chuck, if'n we're googling for your relatives, are you related to
> her:
> http://www.jurgita.com/models-id14811.html
>
> I figure you must be. Same last name, same profession (you having
> proved you were really a tshirt model)...
>
> don't be shy, 'fess up :) :)
>
> Sydney

[Juan Jimenez]

(B2431) wrote in
:

>>From: Juan Jimenez
>
> Juan, I have no dog in this fight, but I have seen Chuck and others
> provide proof of their claims while you have not.

No, you haven't. What you saw was Chuck twist and turn and come up with
little pieces of unrelated this and that, waiting for the thread to do the
usual usenet morph and then announce he's provided what's what asked,
counting on the fact that few people remember the original thread.

Unfortunately, that doesn't work with me. And since he continues his inane
attacks, I'll continue to remind him every once in a while that it's not
pleasant having someone forcefeed him his own BS. I can hear squealing, so
I know I hit my mark. Mission accomplished.

You've been repeating this little ditty of yours for quite some time. Get
over it, Dan. :)

Juan

[B2431]

>From: Juan Jimenez
>Date: 7/20/2004 4:04 PM Central Daylight Time
>Message-id: >
>
(B2431) wrote in
:
>
>>>From: Juan Jimenez
>>
>> Juan, I have no dog in this fight, but I have seen Chuck and others
>> provide proof of their claims while you have not.
>
>No, you haven't. What you saw was Chuck twist and turn and come up with
>little pieces of unrelated this and that, waiting for the thread to do the
>usual usenet morph and then announce he's provided what's what asked,
>counting on the fact that few people remember the original thread.
>
>Unfortunately, that doesn't work with me. And since he continues his inane
>attacks, I'll continue to remind him every once in a while that it's not
>pleasant having someone forcefeed him his own BS. I can hear squealing, so
>I know I hit my mark. Mission accomplished.
>
>You've been repeating this little ditty of yours for quite some time. Get
>over it, Dan. :)
>
>Juan


Juan, I still haven't heard your side. All I have seen is you doing exactly
what you accuse Chuck of doing. If you can't provide proof say so. If you have
proof I'd like to see it.

The original post in this thread was about campbell not you.


Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

[Juan Jimenez]

(B2431) wrote in
:

>>From: Juan Jimenez
>>Date: 7/20/2004 4:04 PM Central Daylight Time
>>Message-id: >
>>
(B2431) wrote in
:
>>
>>>>From: Juan Jimenez
>>>
>>> Juan, I have no dog in this fight, but I have seen Chuck and others
>>> provide proof of their claims while you have not.
>>
>>No, you haven't. What you saw was Chuck twist and turn and come up
>>with little pieces of unrelated this and that, waiting for the thread
>>to do the usual usenet morph and then announce he's provided what's
>>what asked, counting on the fact that few people remember the original
>>thread.
>>
>>Unfortunately, that doesn't work with me. And since he continues his
>>inane attacks, I'll continue to remind him every once in a while that
>>it's not pleasant having someone forcefeed him his own BS. I can hear
>>squealing, so I know I hit my mark. Mission accomplished.
>>
>>You've been repeating this little ditty of yours for quite some time.
>>Get over it, Dan. :)
>>
>>Juan
>
>
> Juan, I still haven't heard your side. All I have seen is you
> doing exactly
> what you accuse Chuck of doing. If you can't provide proof say so. If
> you have proof I'd like to see it.
>
> The original post in this thread was about campbell not you.

That's because you're not even remotely interested in my side, after it
having been pointed out to you, repeatedly, where to go read it. Simple
proof: this issue is not about any post in this thread.

So, this useless thread having reached the end of its life, is...

<plonk!>

[RobertR237]

>
>
>>>I guess it's true what they say, useless people never change. You're living
>
>>>proof of that. It's all about the credibility that you've never had. :)
>>>
>>>Juan
>>>
>>
>>You really shouldn't look in the mirror while you are typing replies. You
>>always end up talking about yourself when you do.
>>
>>
>>Bob Reed
>>www.kisbuild.r-a-reed-assoc.com (KIS Builders Site)
>
>++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
>Bob,
>
>It's my opinion that Jaun is a low life character assassin with
>a penchant to smear those that confront him and/or his boss.
>
>
>Barnyard BOb - All you get when you wrestle with a pig is get dirty.
>

I totally agree BOb, but that one was just too good to pass up.


Bob Reed
www.kisbuild.r-a-reed-assoc.com (KIS Builders Site)
KIS Cruiser in progress...Slow but steady progress....

"Ladies and Gentlemen, take my advice,
pull down your pants and Slide on the Ice!"
(M.A.S.H. Sidney Freedman)

[ChuckSlusarczyk]

In article >, Snowbird says...
>Hey Chuck, if'n we're googling for your relatives, are you related to
>her:
> http://www.jurgita.com/models-id14811.html
>
>I figure you must be. Same last name, same profession (you having
>proved you were really a tshirt model)...
>
>don't be shy, 'fess up :) :)
>
>Sydney

OK OK Syd ya got me, she must be a relation.Same last name lives in Poland and
a beauty. Now if you single guys are nice to me I can introduce you to her
LOL!!!

Your right I was in fact a fashion model years ago (for 2 shoots) that was when
I was a "hunk" now I'm a "chunk" :-)

see ya

Chuck s

[ChuckSlusarczyk]

In article >, Barnyard BOb - says...
>Dear Nefoo Chuck,
>
>It is my opinion that bloodsuckers, leeches and scum
>without a pot to **** in or a window to throw it out of,
>use whatever freebies are at their disposal to bolster
>their despicable lot at the expense of truth, justice
>and the American way.
>
>At times like this...
>I'm sorry that Gore invented the Internet. <g>

Hi Unka Bob

Gore invented it?!! I thought zoomie did LOL!!!

Your right it just proves a point that those who haven't accomplished any thing
in life attack those who did,and it's because of envy. I have to keep telling
myself my Uncle Frankie died in the Battle of the Bulge and my Father and his
other Brothers served during WW II so guys like him can have freedom of speech
Sheesh!

See ya at Oshkosh
Stop by the tent for a cool glass of H2O :-)

See ya
Nefoo Chuck

[ChuckSlusarczyk]

In article >, B2431 says...
> Juan, I still haven't heard your side. All I have seen is you doing exactly
>what you accuse Chuck of doing. If you can't provide proof say so. If you have
>proof I'd like to see it.
>
> The original post in this thread was about campbell not you.
>
>
>Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Don't hold your breath Dan he has no proof of anything .Like his hero zoom he's
all sizzle and no bacon. I showed proof of my truck title and anything else that
needed showing. He lacks the testicular fortitude to back up his claims. Sister
Mary Holy Smoke was right "empty cans make the most noise" and I wrote it in
english.

See ya

Chuck S

[Lennie the Lurker]

Juan Jimenez > wrote in message >...
>
> No, you haven't. What you saw was Chuck twist and turn and come up with
> little pieces of unrelated this and that, waiting for the thread to do the
> usual usenet morph and then announce he's provided what's what asked,
> counting on the fact that few people remember the original thread.

Sorry juan, but the only word twisting I've seen here has come from
one named juan jimemez. Simple fact, Chuck has facts, you have
nothing but bull**** parroted from your master, ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.
>
> Unfortunately, that doesn't work with me.

Common sense has never worked with you, nor have court records, nor
will they ever until you get what you now lack, a brain.

Have a nice pout, mr. bd-5 neverfly.

[B2431]

>From: Juan Jimenez
>Date: 7/20/2004 7:18 PM Central Daylight Time
>Message-id: >
>
(B2431) wrote in
:
>
>>>From: Juan Jimenez
>>>Date: 7/20/2004 4:04 PM Central Daylight Time
>>>Message-id: >
>>>
(B2431) wrote in
:
>>>
>>>>>From: Juan Jimenez
>>>>
>>>> Juan, I have no dog in this fight, but I have seen Chuck and others
>>>> provide proof of their claims while you have not.
>>>
>>>No, you haven't. What you saw was Chuck twist and turn and come up
>>>with little pieces of unrelated this and that, waiting for the thread
>>>to do the usual usenet morph and then announce he's provided what's
>>>what asked, counting on the fact that few people remember the original
>>>thread.
>>>
>>>Unfortunately, that doesn't work with me. And since he continues his
>>>inane attacks, I'll continue to remind him every once in a while that
>>>it's not pleasant having someone forcefeed him his own BS. I can hear
>>>squealing, so I know I hit my mark. Mission accomplished.
>>>
>>>You've been repeating this little ditty of yours for quite some time.
>>>Get over it, Dan. :)
>>>
>>>Juan
>>
>>
>> Juan, I still haven't heard your side. All I have seen is you
>> doing exactly
>> what you accuse Chuck of doing. If you can't provide proof say so. If
>> you have proof I'd like to see it.
>>
>> The original post in this thread was about campbell not you.
>
>That's because you're not even remotely interested in my side, after it
>having been pointed out to you, repeatedly, where to go read it. Simple
>proof: this issue is not about any post in this thread.
>

I sure would like to know when and where I was told where to read juan's side.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

[B2431]

>From: ChuckSlusarczyk
>Date: 7/20/2004 8:47 PM Central Daylight Time
>Message-id: >
>
>In article >, B2431 says...
>> Juan, I still haven't heard your side. All I have seen is you doing
>exactly
>>what you accuse Chuck of doing. If you can't provide proof say so. If you
>have
>>proof I'd like to see it.
>>
>> The original post in this thread was about campbell not you.
>>
>>
>>Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
>
>Don't hold your breath Dan he has no proof of anything .Like his hero zoom
>he's
>all sizzle and no bacon. I showed proof of my truck title and anything else
>that
>needed showing. He lacks the testicular fortitude to back up his claims.
>Sister
>Mary Holy Smoke was right "empty cans make the most noise" and I wrote it in
>english.
>
>See ya
>
>Chuck S
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

>From: ChuckSlusarczyk
>Date: 7/20/2004 8:47 PM Central Daylight Time
>Message-id: >
>
>In article >, B2431 says...
>> Juan, I still haven't heard your side. All I have seen is you doing
>exactly
>>what you accuse Chuck of doing. If you can't provide proof say so. If you
>have
>>proof I'd like to see it.
>>
>> The original post in this thread was about campbell not you.
>>
>>
>>Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
>
>Don't hold your breath Dan he has no proof of anything .Like his hero zoom
>he's
>all sizzle and no bacon. I showed proof of my truck title and anything else
>that
>needed showing. He lacks the testicular fortitude to back up his claims.
>Sister
>Mary Holy Smoke was right "empty cans make the most noise" and I wrote it in
>english.
>
>See ya
>
>Chuck S

I am beginning to think you may be right. He tried to tell me he has told me
several times where to find his side. Either he never did or I missed it. Do
you have any of his cites?

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

[ChuckSlusarczyk]

In article >, B2431 says...
>I am beginning to think you may be right. He tried to tell me he has told me
>several times where to find his side. Either he never did or I missed it. Do
>you have any of his cites?
>
>Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

That's the typical ploy that he and zoom have used for years, you didn't miss a
thing. You'll notice that if you ever research posts by zoom and later those by
jaun one thing becomes readily apparent. Both of them will make vague charges
designed to create an impression that their target has done something
Illegal,dishonest,criminal,fraudulent etc. and when they are pressed for the
facts and proof of their claims they will reverse course start name calling
and doing what jaun just did to you.

The fact is that they usually go just short of liable ,that's why they won't
make a definitive charge just some vague accusation.You'll note that zoom and
jaun for that matter won't answer my questions about details. jaun made some
vague comments designed to create the impression that I had my kids taken out of
my custody and some drug charges but he wouldn't get specific when I pressed him
..If he had truth on his side he wouldn't fear making true statements and he
certainly would have proof of those claims. But since he's lying he has to avoid
making statements that would be actionable and he cuts and runs or changes
course. He's a phony just like zoom is and both of them have to be exposed for
what they are. Unfortunately there are people here that act as enablers and know
what zoom is but get a kick out of stroking him enough to get his attention and
airshow credentials.

The example I use is,suppose someone rapes my wife and gets away with it,
however everyone knows he did it. Would friends stay friends with the rapist by
saying "gee I can see your reason for not liking him but he never raped my
wife". Or would friends after seeing the facts say "keep that ******* away from
me and my family" I want nothing to do with him. Enabling the rapist by not
holding him accountable for his actions only gives him tacit approval to do it
again.I can only hope that the next victim is the person that supported him not
some poor innocent person.

Your getting a little taste of how they operate and you can't deal with them on
normal rational terms, they operate on a different plane of perception and
reality. An example would be ,zoom stating in an article that "police are
investigating you," creating the perception to people reading the article that
you've done something criminal.The reality is "he" called the police and makes a
report on you that you threatened him.

One thing they're not, is credible,honest journalists and both of them are
jealous of those who have achieved some level of accomplishment in life .That's
just my opinion :-)

See ya

Chuck S RAH-15/1 ret

"evil didn't prosper because good men spoke and both evils were nuts" anon

[Barnyard BOb -]

ChuckSlusarczyk > wrote:

>The fact is that they usually go just short of liable ,that's why they won't
>make a definitive charge just some vague accusation.You'll note that zoom and
>jaun for that matter won't answer my questions about details. jaun made some
>vague comments designed to create the impression that I had my kids taken out of
>my custody and some drug charges but he wouldn't get specific when I pressed him
>.If he had truth on his side he wouldn't fear making true statements and he
>certainly would have proof of those claims. But since he's lying he has to avoid
>making statements that would be actionable and he cuts and runs or changes
>course. He's a phony just like zoom is and both of them have to be exposed for
>what they are. Unfortunately there are people here that act as enablers and know
>what zoom is but get a kick out of stroking him enough to get his attention and
>airshow credentials.
>
>The example I use is,suppose someone rapes my wife and gets away with it,
>however everyone knows he did it. Would friends stay friends with the rapist by
>saying "gee I can see your reason for not liking him but he never raped my
>wife". Or would friends after seeing the facts say "keep that ******* away from
>me and my family" I want nothing to do with him. Enabling the rapist by not
>holding him accountable for his actions only gives him tacit approval to do it
>again.I can only hope that the next victim is the person that supported him not
>some poor innocent person.
>
>See ya
>
>Chuck S RAH-15/1 ret
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Dear Nefoo Chuck,

I never thought about ENABLERS before this post of yours.

It is striking that there are TWO types;
The ones that stroke... and the ones that could help combat
the raping of one's good name, but choose not to get involved.

I have a mental list of folks that I consider prominent in
this group that, so far, won't say **** if they a mouthful.
Both are worthy of maximum contempt, IMO.

Sometimes, human nature really sucks.


Barnyard BOb -
The more people I meet,
the more I love my dog
and George Carlin humor.

[Russell Kent]

Chuck Sluzach, Sloozerch, Slucher, #%$^&. The fat guy(*) that makes
ultralights & muzzleloader wrote:
> The example I use is,suppose someone rapes my wife and gets away with it,
> however everyone knows he did it. Would friends stay friends with the
rapist by
> saying "gee I can see your reason for not liking him but he never raped my
> wife". Or would friends after seeing the facts say "keep that ******* away
from
> me and my family" I want nothing to do with him. Enabling the rapist by
not
> holding him accountable for his actions only gives him tacit approval to
do it
> again.I can only hope that the next victim is the person that supported
him not
> some poor innocent person.

Illuminating and disturbing analogy. That will definitely stick in a few
minds, including the one on this end. See ya in Osh in a few days.

Russell Kent
(*) I'm a portly 240 lbs, so I can say that. :-)

[Dennis Fetters]

Barnyard BOb - wrote:
> I never thought about ENABLERS before this post of yours.
>
> It is striking that there are TWO types;
> The ones that stroke... and the ones that could help combat
> the raping of one's good name, but choose not to get involved.
>
> I have a mental list of folks that I consider prominent in
> this group that, so far, won't say **** if they a mouthful.
> Both are worthy of maximum contempt, IMO.


Count yourself as one of them.


> Sometimes, human nature really sucks.

[B2431]

>From: "D. Grunloh"
>Date: 7/18/2004 12:29 AM Central Daylight Time
>Message-id: >
>
>
>
>ChuckSlusarczyk wrote:
>
>> Todays ANN (Awful News Net) had this to say about the fearless Capt Zoom..
>>
>> Credit for this article goes to ANN which was posted 7/14/04...
>> Quote:
>>
>> "For over 30 years, Jim Campbell has told the world of
>> aviation what no one else dared to... the truth. He's worked
>> as a test pilot, stunt pilot, flight instructor
>> (CFI/A/I/ME/H), you name it... he flies fixed wing, rotorcraft,
>> single/multi-engine, gliders, balloons, ultralights, jets,
>> warbirds, antiques... the works. In addition to his highly
>> acclaimed flight tests, product reviews, personality profiles,
>> editorials, photo essays, exciting magazine covers, and amazing
>> stories about the world of aviation, Campbell also told the flying
>> public that there were products and manufacturers out there
>> who did not tell the truth or were actually dangerous, and that
>> many of the entities that we had learned to trust as Aviators,
>> especially the FAA, simply could not be trusted. To many, he was a
>> hero, to a few others, he was the loudmouth who screwed
>> up their scams... so he fought many battles, and
>> while he never actually lost a single fight,.......
>
>My favorite.
>
>BTW who writes this stuff? Zoom himself?
>
>--Dan Grunloh

Probably.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

[Barnyard BOb -]

Dennis Fetters > wrote:

>
>Barnyard BOb - wrote:
>> I never thought about ENABLERS before this post of yours.
>>
>> It is striking that there are TWO types;
>> The ones that stroke... and the ones that could help combat
>> the raping of one's good name, but choose not to get involved.
>>
>> I have a mental list of folks that I consider prominent in
>> this group that, so far, won't say **** if they a mouthful.
>> Both are worthy of maximum contempt, IMO.
>
>
>Count yourself as one of them.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Anybody need a PITA?

Isn't it amazing how I seem to stick in Fetters
craw with absolutely no provocation on my part?
Just think what I could do if I went back to addressing
select bottom feeders. Although I gave up preaching to them
some time ago, it seems some are slow to give up on me. <g>

It is my opinion this random attack from Fetters indicates
he has yet to come to terms with his conscience and....
a possible inability to comprehend my written words.
IIRC, Fetters had trouble spelling some of the single
syllable words that I use to toss his way.

Anybody want to buy him books and send him to school?


Barnyard BOb -- Ignorance is bliss?

..

[Dennis Fetters]

Barnyard BOb - wrote:
>
> Dennis Fetters > wrote:
>
>
>>Barnyard BOb - wrote:
>>
>>>I never thought about ENABLERS before this post of yours.
>>>
>>>It is striking that there are TWO types;
>>>The ones that stroke... and the ones that could help combat
>>>the raping of one's good name, but choose not to get involved.
>>>
>>>I have a mental list of folks that I consider prominent in
>>>this group that, so far, won't say **** if they a mouthful.
>>>Both are worthy of maximum contempt, IMO.
>>
>>
>>Count yourself as one of them.
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> Anybody need a PITA?
>
> Isn't it amazing how I seem to stick in Fetters
> craw with absolutely no provocation on my part?
> Just think what I could do if I went back to addressing
> select bottom feeders. Although I gave up preaching to them
> some time ago, it seems some are slow to give up on me. <g>
>
> It is my opinion this random attack from Fetters indicates
> he has yet to come to terms with his conscience and....
> a possible inability to comprehend my written words.
> IIRC, Fetters had trouble spelling some of the single
> syllable words that I use to toss his way.
>
> Anybody want to buy him books and send him to school?


Yes, you are such a good human. All the room in the world to talk and
judge.... I mean, when you discount the fact that you are a hypocrite
that lives in a glass house, guilty of exactly what you condemn others
for, and so on. What's wrong, you made a statement judging people, but
then you didn't realize that you ARE one of those type of people you
just condemned, in fact one of the worse. I just pointed out the fact.
Can't take it? Then don't be a hypocrite.

[ChuckSlusarczyk]

In article >, Barnyard BOb - says...
>>Dear Nefoo Chuck,
>
>I never thought about ENABLERS before this post of yours.
>
>It is striking that there are TWO types;
>The ones that stroke... and the ones that could help combat
>the raping of one's good name, but choose not to get involved.

It's the enablers that let guys like zoom persist .All zoom needs is one fan and
his life is justified. Tony was a fountain of wisdom for me during our many
phone calls explaining to me the ways of human nature. He was wise to some of
the folks on RAH even those in the RAH 15 who enabled zoom to carry on. He
warned me to not trust certain people because they would turn on you in a second
and he was right.

>
>I have a mental list of folks that I consider prominent in
>this group that, so far, won't say **** if they a mouthful.
>Both are worthy of maximum contempt, IMO.

So do I :-) Hey Unka Bob ya going to Osh? If ya do be sure to stop by.

See ya

Nefoo Chuck RAH-15/1 ret
>
>Sometimes, human nature really sucks.

[ChuckSlusarczyk]

In article >, Russell Kent says...
>
>Chuck Sluzach, Sloozerch, Slucher, #%$^&. The fat guy(*) that makes
>ultralights & muzzleloader wrote:

SNIP

>
>Illuminating and disturbing analogy. That will definitely stick in a few
>minds, including the one on this end. See ya in Osh in a few days.
>
>Russell Kent
>(*) I'm a portly 240 lbs, so I can say that. :-)

Yep that's me but you forgot to mention that I'm the cutest fat guy in aviation
....with teeth!!

All I wanted my analogy to do was give some folks a thought to ponder especially
when they wonder why I bring zoom up from time to time.

240 # that's the weight of the average Hawk Owner :-) I'm a bit altitudinally
challenged,that is to short for my weight :-)

See ya at Osh.

Chuck (once a hunk,now a chunk) S
>
>

[Barnyard BOb -]

On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 20:40:19 GMT, Dennis Fetters
> wrote:

>
>> It is my opinion this random attack from Fetters indicates
>> he has yet to come to terms with his conscience and....
>> a possible inability to comprehend my written words.
>> IIRC, Fetters had trouble spelling some of the single
>> syllable words that I use to toss his way.
>>
>> Anybody want to buy him books and send him to school?
>
>
>Yes, you are such a good human. All the room in the world to talk and
>judge....
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Yes, I am a pretty good human...
but how would you know?
You don't know **** from Shinola about my life, Dennis....
so, let me help you out more than is your rightful business.

Nobody ever died where my name is involved.
No police record here - not even a traffic violation.
I've never defaulted on a loan.
Never stiffed anyone a dime.
I've paid every bill that I ever ran up.
I have multiple honorable military discharges.
My credit rating is A-1, allowing me to borrow
substantial capital, even on a handshake.
[I won't even ask where you rank in comparison.]

I've raised two successful kids. Under my parentage
they earned graduate degrees in engineering and
business. I even enabled my wife to earn an MS in nursing.
The list goes on, Dennis, but I'll quit here since I fully expect
you to demonize whatever I have done to make the world a
better place. Continue barking at my heels, puppy dog style,
if you must. Nobody but you appears to give an ignorant ****.
I'd like to suggest that you get a life, but what are the odds
of that happening?

P.S
Since the first grade my kids have known the difference between
hay and hey.... which is more than I have seen you demonstrate
as an adult. Until you learn the difference, I believe that you're
missing requisite brain cells for further conversation with me....
meaningful or otherwise.

Ta-ta, moron.


R.R. Urban - Ignorance is bliss?

[RobertR237]

>>
>> No, you haven't. What you saw was Chuck twist and turn and come up with
>> little pieces of unrelated this and that, waiting for the thread to do the
>> usual usenet morph and then announce he's provided what's what asked,
>> counting on the fact that few people remember the original thread.
>
>Sorry juan, but the only word twisting I've seen here has come from
>one named juan jimemez. Simple fact, Chuck has facts, you have
>nothing but bull**** parroted from your master, ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.
>>
>> Unfortunately, that doesn't work with me.
>
>Common sense has never worked with you, nor have court records, nor
>will they ever until you get what you now lack, a brain.
>
>Have a nice pout, mr. bd-5 neverfly.
>

Danm lennie, haven't seen you around in a while but when you show up you sure
know how to call them as they are!


Bob Reed
www.kisbuild.r-a-reed-assoc.com (KIS Builders Site)
KIS Cruiser in progress...Slow but steady progress....

"Ladies and Gentlemen, take my advice,
pull down your pants and Slide on the Ice!"
(M.A.S.H. Sidney Freedman)

[RobertR237]

>>
>> "For over 30 years, Jim Campbell has told the world of
>> aviation what no one else dared to... the truth. He's worked
>> as a test pilot, stunt pilot, flight instructor
>> (CFI/A/I/ME/H), you name it... he flies fixed wing, rotorcraft,
>> single/multi-engine, gliders, balloons, ultralights, jets,
>> warbirds, antiques... the works. In addition to his highly
>> acclaimed flight tests, product reviews, personality profiles,
>> editorials, photo essays, exciting magazine covers, and amazing
>> stories about the world of aviation, Campbell also told the flying
>> public that there were products and manufacturers out there
>> who did not tell the truth or were actually dangerous, and that
>> many of the entities that we had learned to trust as Aviators,
>> especially the FAA, simply could not be trusted. To many, he was a
>> hero, to a few others, he was the loudmouth who screwed
>> up their scams... so he fought many battles, and
>> while he never actually lost a single fight,.......
>
>My favorite.
>
>BTW who writes this stuff? Zoom himself?
>
>--Dan Grunloh
>
>

Either Zoom or an ass-kisser like Jaun. Enough to make you puke isn't it?


Bob Reed
www.kisbuild.r-a-reed-assoc.com (KIS Builders Site)
KIS Cruiser in progress...Slow but steady progress....

"Ladies and Gentlemen, take my advice,
pull down your pants and Slide on the Ice!"
(M.A.S.H. Sidney Freedman)

[ChuckSlusarczyk]

In article >, Richard Riley says...
>:Common sense has never worked with you, nor have court records, nor
>:will they ever until you get what you now lack, a brain.
>:
>:Have a nice pout, mr. bd-5 neverfly.
>
>Heh. Nicely said.
>
>I *thought* I had Zippy Jr. in my kill file, but he keeps changing his
>return address. Gots to go plonk him again.

Hey Ricardo
I had a request today for a "I've been zoomed and survived T shirt" do you
remember where we got them? You'll be surprised who it is :-) It will be
revealed at OSH when he proudly wears it at the show...probably near the Press
booth :-)

See ya

Chuck S

[Anthony]

"ChuckSlusarczyk" > wrote in message
...
> Like his hero zoom he's
> all sizzle and no bacon. I showed proof of my truck title and anything
else that
> needed showing. He lacks the testicular fortitude to back up his claims.
Sister
> Mary Holy Smoke was right "empty cans make the most noise" and I wrote it
in
> english.
>
> See ya
>
> Chuck S

How do you know they're not the same person? Has anybody ever seen them
together. ;o)

Tony

[Dennis Fetters]

Barnyard BOb - wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 20:40:19 GMT, Dennis Fetters
> > wrote:
>
>
>>>It is my opinion this random attack from Fetters indicates
>>>he has yet to come to terms with his conscience and....
>>>a possible inability to comprehend my written words.
>>>IIRC, Fetters had trouble spelling some of the single
>>>syllable words that I use to toss his way.
>>>
>>>Anybody want to buy him books and send him to school?
>>
>>
>>Yes, you are such a good human. All the room in the world to talk and
>>judge....
>
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> Yes, I am a pretty good human...


I was being sarcastic, as if you didn't know.


> but how would you know?
> You don't know **** from Shinola about my life, Dennis....
> so, let me help you out more than is your rightful business.


You would be surprise at what I know. Even nervous. I've had more time
on my hands these last few years. I make it a point to know everything
about you and a few other people like you. Besides, what makes you so
high and mighty as to interfere so freely in my business, as you did in
the past?


> Nobody ever died where my name is involved.


Me neither. But at least I had the balls and talent to come out with a
product, you didn't, couldn't.


> No police record here - not even a traffic violation.


Me neither. Although I do have some speeding tickets. Happens when a
Californian goes to another state.


> I've never defaulted on a loan.
> Never stiffed anyone a dime.
> I've paid every bill that I ever ran up.


Here too, I have personally paid every bill I ever had. The Corporation
RHCI was only forced to not do so partially by you and others, but not
by me. You have more blame for RHCI not being able to continue than
RHCI, from your unfounded attacks on it's and my credibility. You are no
angel in this respect.

> I have multiple honorable military discharges.


So do I.


> My credit rating is A-1, allowing me to borrow
> substantial capital, even on a handshake.
> [I won't even ask where you rank in comparison.]


I only have one spot, and that was only because I was out of the country
at the time and was not here to defend myself. My own fault and
carelessness. Other than that, I'm with you.


> I've raised two successful kids. Under my parentage
> they earned graduate degrees in engineering and
> business. I even enabled my wife to earn an MS in nursing.


I hope you raised them to not act like you, and feel the need to lower
other people to elevate yourself.

My girl is just about to finish college. My girl I helped raise knows to
be kind and respectful, and not to criticize people for their faults. No
one can say you were raised like that, can they!

My wife has a masters in business, graduated number one in her entire
country, received a solid gold medal from the country's ruler. Nicest
woman you could ever know.


> The list goes on, Dennis, but I'll quit here since I fully expect
> you to demonize whatever I have done to make the world a
> better place.


No, I'll take you for your word. I'm sure face to face you are a good
person to people you meet. But I'll tell you something, you have nothing
on me, your certainly no better than me, and you have accomplished
nothing near what I have. But yet you feel the need here to place
yourself on some pedestal to compare yourself to me. Well buddy, you
loose, because my list goes on a long way from where you left off.


Continue barking at my heels, puppy dog style,
> if you must. Nobody but you appears to give an ignorant ****.
> I'd like to suggest that you get a life, but what are the odds
> of that happening?


Wait just a second. You are the one that was attacking me, you started
the battle between us. I didn't know you from a **** ant until you
started blasting me here. I keep to myself when I read this news group,
unless I have something to share. In this case you put yourself above
others in a statement you made, when you were as guilty as the people
you condemned. I only pointed it out you were wrong to do so. You are
the dog that just got his spot ****ed on, you started the barking.
Buddy, I have a life, I'm doing just what I want to do. And that's
building, designing and experimenting with aircraft.

I truly believe that the problem here is you. You are so jealous of me
and others because we can do and accomplish what we want, while you are
tied down to the farm. I guess if anyone around here was needing to get
a life, it would be you. You're doing all the comparing here to see how
you measure up to me and others.


> P.S
> Since the first grade my kids have known the difference between
> hay and hey.... which is more than I have seen you demonstrate
> as an adult. Until you learn the difference, I believe that you're
> missing requisite brain cells for further conversation with me....
> meaningful or otherwise.
>
> Ta-ta, moron.


There you go again. Just can't help criticizing someone for any fault,
spelling error or typo. I would hate to see you when a crippled person
rolls by. You just have to try and clim up above others by using their
shoulders. Yet you still don't get it, do you? By lowering me, you only
place yourself lower on the totem pole. The 1700 aircraft I designed and
manufactured didn't grow on trees. They came from me and my mind. So,
where in the scale of things accomplished does that put you? You are a
jealous person Bob. You need to accept your place in life or do
something about it. Design and build your own ladder to use in your
clim, not the shoulders of others taller than you.

Hey, there ya go. Hope my advise helps.