Re: ATTENTION PROCRASTINATORS - SSA CONTEST RULES COMMITTEE POLL AND ELECTION

[Dave Walsh]

Brilliant Mk VIII description & video and I just love the quote: -

"No solution is too complicated for a Lange glider, right Axel".

But the MkVIII itself clearly need to be updated, I mean using
actual panel switches is so last century: what's wrong with
voice actuation? Surely modern software could integrate the
extraction/retraction mechanism via the CAN bus to the
airspeed and undercarriage to prevent the dim witted pilot
from extending the wand when on the ground or when landing
(or, worse, when the glider was on its fuselage dolly)?
Extension at speeds above 120 knots could be accompanied by
a verbal warning that the airfoil has now gone non-laminar and
isn't the circular cross section of the existing carbon tube far
too draggy, shouldn't it be a special streamlined NACA section
type "PPP"?
As the carbon tube is already conductive this would allow the
software to administer appropriate warning voltages to the
(older Open class) pilot when it detected sloppy thermal
technique? The possibilities are endless; I hope Dave N has
patented the MkVIII
PS Is the parrot an extra?

[Dave Nadler]

On Monday, October 15, 2018 at 5:15:04 PM UTC-4, Dave Walsh wrote:
> Brilliant Mk VIII description & video and I just love the quote: -
> "No solution is too complicated for a Lange glider, right Axel".

As only another long-suffering Antares owner can really, truly appreciate...

> But the MkVIII itself clearly need to be updated, I mean using
> actual panel switches is so last century: what's wrong with
> voice actuation?

Couple years ago I bought a new car. Took my wife for a ride, and
proudly showed her the new-fangled voice-activated controls.
"Drive Home" I commanded.
The car, sadly, did NOT turn on the navigation system and route to home.
Instead, it turned on the radio and selected a new-to-us jazz station.
My wife is still laughing about that (rightly so).
But we do like that station.

See ya, Dave

[John Godfrey (QT)[_2_]]

On Monday, October 15, 2018 at 5:15:04 PM UTC-4, Dave Walsh wrote:
> Brilliant Mk VIII description & video and I just love the quote: -
>
> "No solution is too complicated for a Lange glider, right Axel".
>
> But the MkVIII itself clearly need to be updated, I mean using
> actual panel switches is so last century: what's wrong with
> voice actuation? Surely modern software could integrate the
> extraction/retraction mechanism via the CAN bus to the
> airspeed and undercarriage to prevent the dim witted pilot
> from extending the wand when on the ground or when landing
> (or, worse, when the glider was on its fuselage dolly)?
> Extension at speeds above 120 knots could be accompanied by
> a verbal warning that the airfoil has now gone non-laminar and
> isn't the circular cross section of the existing carbon tube far
> too draggy, shouldn't it be a special streamlined NACA section
> type "PPP"?
> As the carbon tube is already conductive this would allow the
> software to administer appropriate warning voltages to the
> (older Open class) pilot when it detected sloppy thermal
> technique? The possibilities are endless; I hope Dave N has
> patented the MkVIII
> PS Is the parrot an extra?

Yes, the panel switches are very retro. With the conductive tube, all sorts of possibilities emerge - pressure based activation/retraction, hydration sensing, and "feedback" for sloppy airmanship. With enhancements like these I may be convinced to drop my opposition.

[JS[_5_]]

On Monday, October 15, 2018 at 3:16:18 PM UTC-7, John Godfrey (QT) wrote:
> On Monday, October 15, 2018 at 5:15:04 PM UTC-4, Dave Walsh wrote:
> > Brilliant Mk VIII description & video and I just love the quote: -
> >
> > "No solution is too complicated for a Lange glider, right Axel".
> >
> > But the MkVIII itself clearly need to be updated, I mean using
> > actual panel switches is so last century: what's wrong with
> > voice actuation? Surely modern software could integrate the
> > extraction/retraction mechanism via the CAN bus to the
> > airspeed and undercarriage to prevent the dim witted pilot
> > from extending the wand when on the ground or when landing
> > (or, worse, when the glider was on its fuselage dolly)?
> > Extension at speeds above 120 knots could be accompanied by
> > a verbal warning that the airfoil has now gone non-laminar and
> > isn't the circular cross section of the existing carbon tube far
> > too draggy, shouldn't it be a special streamlined NACA section
> > type "PPP"?
> > As the carbon tube is already conductive this would allow the
> > software to administer appropriate warning voltages to the
> > (older Open class) pilot when it detected sloppy thermal
> > technique? The possibilities are endless; I hope Dave N has
> > patented the MkVIII
> > PS Is the parrot an extra?
>
> Yes, the panel switches are very retro. With the conductive tube, all sorts of possibilities emerge - pressure based activation/retraction, hydration sensing, and "feedback" for sloppy airmanship. With enhancements like these I may be convinced to drop my opposition.

Heard the new SN-20 will have a MOP (method of ****ing) sensor.
Jim