Re: Are we terrorists?

[Ernest Christley]

Richard Lamb wrote:
> from AvWeb news feed this morning...
>
>
> ...PLANE PAPERWORK UNDER MICROSCOPE
> Your personal paperwork isn't the only object of the government's
> security watchdogs. The FAA has announced it is going through its
> aircraft registry, one plane at a time, to ensure that all the documents
> are in the right place at the right time. Any registration that doesn't
> meet requirements -- for any reason -- will be flagged as a possible
> security threat and followed up on by the FAA. The solution for aircraft
> owners is simple and that's to make sure that all the paperwork is
> properly done, especially with ownership transfers and other status
> changes. But AOPA also wants to make sure the FAA is not overzealous in
> its review. "AOPA's concern is that aircraft owners not be branded
> potential terrorists due to a clerical error or other innocent mistake,"
> said AOPA VP Melissa Bailey.
> http://www.avweb.com/newswire/9_27a/complete/185237-1.html

Big government has to do something to cajole the masses. Got to make
them think they're being protected.

--
----Because I can----
http://www.ernest.isa-geek.org/
------------------------

[Mark Hickey]

Ernest Christley > wrote:

>Richard Lamb wrote:
>> from AvWeb news feed this morning...
>>
>> ...PLANE PAPERWORK UNDER MICROSCOPE
>> Your personal paperwork isn't the only object of the government's
>> security watchdogs. The FAA has announced it is going through its
>> aircraft registry, one plane at a time, to ensure that all the documents
>> are in the right place at the right time. Any registration that doesn't
>> meet requirements -- for any reason -- will be flagged as a possible
>> security threat and followed up on by the FAA. The solution for aircraft
>> owners is simple and that's to make sure that all the paperwork is
>> properly done, especially with ownership transfers and other status
>> changes. But AOPA also wants to make sure the FAA is not overzealous in
>> its review. "AOPA's concern is that aircraft owners not be branded
>> potential terrorists due to a clerical error or other innocent mistake,"
>> said AOPA VP Melissa Bailey.
>> http://www.avweb.com/newswire/9_27a/complete/185237-1.html
>
>Big government has to do something to cajole the masses. Got to make
>them think they're being protected.

If you've got a better idea to look for "low hanging fruit", feel free
to share it. The concept of looking over aircraft registration for
possible ownership/registration glitches seems like one that could be
productive with very little effort.

Or we could just wait until some bonehead DOES pull off some terrorist
action using a GA aircraft and deal with it then...

Mark Hickey

[Ernest Christley]

Mark Hickey wrote:

>>Big government has to do something to cajole the masses. Got to make
>>them think they're being protected.
>
>
> If you've got a better idea to look for "low hanging fruit", feel free
> to share it. The concept of looking over aircraft registration for
> possible ownership/registration glitches seems like one that could be
> productive with very little effort.
>
> Or we could just wait until some bonehead DOES pull off some terrorist
> action using a GA aircraft and deal with it then...
>
> Mark Hickey

Plan to take over world with aircraft that will do less damage than my
Dodge pickup:

Step 1) **** up the paperwork so that lots of flags are raised.

--
----Because I can----
http://www.ernest.isa-geek.org/
------------------------

[Del Rawlins]

On 01 Jul 2003 05:20 PM, posted the following:

> Can your Dodge pickup get past the barriers that surround federal
> buildings?

Give me enough channel iron and welding rod and I'll build you a front
bumper that will brush the barrier aside, penetrate the building and
come out the other side, starting with enough speed. Alternatively, low
gearing and big enough tires ought to get him over plenty of barriers.

The war on terror would seem like a piece of cake compared to fighting a
war on rednecks. 8^)

----------------------------------------------------
Del Rawlins-
Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/

[Quill]

Snipped....
> I'll assume that your Dodge pickup and your Cessna 182 can each carry
enough
> stuff to make a pretty large boom.
>
> Can your Dodge pickup get past the barriers that surround federal
buildings?
>
The WTC was not a fed building. No barriers.

> If you use your Dodge pickup to kill a bunch of people, is every newspaper
in
> America going to have editorials about how Dodge pickups contribute
nothing to
> the country, are the playtoy of rich white men and should be banned
because
> they're a danger to everyone else?
Thats it, always accept your rulers spiel and repeat it faithfully. Never
stand up to them. Wouldn't want to draw attention. Need to be seen as a
loyalist.
Oooooh that feels gooood! Don't ya just love it when your Master pats you on
the head and rubs your ears?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
"... But whether the Constitution really be one thing, or another, this much
is certain -- that it has either authorized such a government as we have
had, or has been powerless to prevent it. In either case, it is unfit to
exist."
From the Appendix, "NO Treason" by Lysander Spooner

"America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system,
but too early to shoot the *******s. On the road to tyranny, we've gone so
far that polite political action is about as useless as a miniskirt in a
convent."
- Claire Wolfe, _101 Things To Do 'Til The Revolution
---------------------------------------------------------------------------