No Medical Required

[[email protected]]

Aeronca Champ - 1946 7AC NO MEDICAL REQ'D under light sport aircraft
rule - approximately 2550 TT, 550 SMOH, 250 STOH. Email for pictures.
Meticulously restored in 1984 and hangared since. Excellent Fabric;
paint is in great shape and has very good gloss but has a few cracks
that could be dressed and touched up from where people have grabbed the
tail to move it, etc. Glass is EXCELLENT. Engine runs super well.
Interior/Ext 7.5/7.5 -- a head turner yes, but not quite a show plane.
Other features: MA-3SPA Carburetor with mixture control. Glider
tow-hook for safe and easy solo starting! New tires. Hooker shoulder
harness front seat. Two place intercom. Stick grips with built-in push
to talk buttons. New Sensenich wood prop W72CK-42. I would like to
trade for a nice 7ECA Citabria but would also consider an RV-3 or
older/uglier but safe RV-4 - Brett (803)968-5300. Email:

[xyzzy]

wrote:

> Aeronca Champ - 1946 7AC NO MEDICAL REQ'D under light sport aircraft
> rule - approximately 2550 TT, 550 SMOH, 250 STOH. Email for pictures.

even though this is spam, it does bring to mind a question I often have
reading ads like htis. It appears that this plane needed a top overhaul
300 hours after the major. Is that a red flag? or does it indicate
perhaps a former hangar queen that has recently been topped and is now
flying regularly? I guess you'd have to see the overhaul and top
overhaul dates to guess on that one...

[W P Dixon]

Don't get rid of it until after I come fly it next weekend Brett! ;) Heck
maybe you can sell it to me HAHAHA

Patrick
student SPL
aircraft structural mech

[Dude]

"xyzzy" > wrote in message
...
> wrote:
>
>> Aeronca Champ - 1946 7AC NO MEDICAL REQ'D under light sport aircraft
>> rule - approximately 2550 TT, 550 SMOH, 250 STOH. Email for pictures.
>
> even though this is spam,

Unadulterated, and not even apologetically, SPAM. Though if many of the
users here were selling their birds we would all want to know first :)

it does bring to mind a question I often have
> reading ads like htis. It appears that this plane needed a top overhaul
> 300 hours after the major. Is that a red flag?

Yes!

or does it indicate
> perhaps a former hangar queen that has recently been topped and is now
> flying regularly?

Possibly

I guess you'd have to see the overhaul and top
> overhaul dates to guess on that one...


Either way extra diligence is called for, and chances of reaching TBO and
beyond are less likely.

[[email protected]]

First, my apologies -- I forgot there was a rec.aviation.marketplace
for such things. (At least I'm not selling Viagra or stock tips!) The
plane only flew 100 hours in twenty years, that's why the top. The
engine runs great, uses less than a quart between changes, and has
absolutely zero metal in the screen. I have flown it 175 hours since I
bought it. When my A&P IA did the first annual he did the compression
check three times, tried another tester on the plane and then tested a
different plane with both testers--to make sure the results were
accurate--78s and a 79! He said they were the highest numbers he'd
seen on a Continental. I think the key is that it is flown regularly,
and leaned in flight and for taxi. (MA3 carb with mixture control.)

This is the 5th plane I've owned. All have always scored well on the
compression tests during annuals, including two other Continentals. I
try to never let a plane sit more than four days without flying it--the
more the better, (for me and for the plane).

- Brett

[Dude]

Brett,

I will accept your apology, as I am sure many others here will as well.

Here is the trick with your engine. Let's say everyone agrees that it seems
to have not suffered badly from storage. Still, the plane is likely to be
sold a few more times before it gets to TBO. And, each time, extra
diligence will be needed (just like you and your AP so wisely did).

That sort of thing reduces value of the plane even if it passes every time.
There are buyers unwilling to do the diligence. It's just the way it is.
You may sell it for a good price, and so may the next guy, but someone is
going to have a hard time selling it at some point.

If I were you, I would lessen concerns by pointing out that you will
discount the plane for the price of a top overhaul, or for a few hundred
hours that it may come up short in the end. That way, the new buyer gets
the upside if it keeps on ticking, and has already saved the downside up
front.


> wrote in message
ps.com...
> First, my apologies -- I forgot there was a rec.aviation.marketplace
> for such things. (At least I'm not selling Viagra or stock tips!) The
> plane only flew 100 hours in twenty years, that's why the top. The
> engine runs great, uses less than a quart between changes, and has
> absolutely zero metal in the screen. I have flown it 175 hours since I
> bought it. When my A&P IA did the first annual he did the compression
> check three times, tried another tester on the plane and then tested a
> different plane with both testers--to make sure the results were
> accurate--78s and a 79! He said they were the highest numbers he'd
> seen on a Continental. I think the key is that it is flown regularly,
> and leaned in flight and for taxi. (MA3 carb with mixture control.)
>
> This is the 5th plane I've owned. All have always scored well on the
> compression tests during annuals, including two other Continentals. I
> try to never let a plane sit more than four days without flying it--the
> more the better, (for me and for the plane).
>
> - Brett
>