How to bomb Paris ???

[Tristan Beeline]

I want to punish the French because they are a bunch of traitors.

What do I need ?

[Starshiy Nemo]

Tristan Beeline a écrit :

>I want to punish the French because they are a bunch of traitors.
>
>What do I need ?
>
>
Just put your nose in your asshole!!!!
Connard!!!!

[Juan Jimenez]

A life.

"Tristan Beeline" > wrote in message
om...
>I want to punish the French because they are a bunch of traitors.
>
> What do I need ?

[Jeroen Wenting]

>I want to punish the French because they are a bunch of traitors.
>
> What do I need ?

Not a lot. The Germans managed quite well in WW1 and the French haven't
improved since :)

[Starshiy Nemo]

>
>
>
IMBECILE !!!
1ére GM = 9 000 hommes français morts PAR JOUR !!!!

[Brian Whatcott]

On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 08:16:15 -0700, Fred Langton
> wrote:

>On 14 Jun 2005 02:46:54 -0700, (Tristan
>Beeline) wrote:
>
>:I want to punish the French because they are a bunch of traitors.
>:
>:What do I need ?
>
>They aren't traitors. They're just on the other side. The same way
>they were in WW2. Thank God (or Allah, in their case) they're utterly
>incompetent or we'd have to worry about them.


I know it's hard to swallow, folks, but we became upset with the
French because they wanted no part of preemptively invading Iraq
because of their presumed Weapons of Mass Destruction.

It's hard to swallow, I know, but they were right: there were no
Weapons of Mass Destruction there. That makes us and the
British wrong.

It wasn't the first time we've been wrong , and it won't be the last,
I expect.
We were mad that a simple low cost conspiracy killed 1000's of US
citizens at work in the US - and we wanted to lash out at the
perpetrators, and we DID lash out at the perpetrators in Afghanistan -
but then we took our eye off of that particular ball.....

Brian Whatcott Altus OK

p.s. Note: My real name: and a real place: wonder if the secret police
are going to come for me? I don't think so!

[Jeroen Wenting]

>>
>>They aren't traitors. They're just on the other side. The same way
>>they were in WW2. Thank God (or Allah, in their case) they're utterly
>>incompetent or we'd have to worry about them.
>
The French are always on the same side: their own.
They can't be trusted.

>
> I know it's hard to swallow, folks, but we became upset with the
> French because they wanted no part of preemptively invading Iraq
> because of their presumed Weapons of Mass Destruction.
>
You mean they wanted no part in the world learning of their secret oil and
weapons deals with Saddam.

> It's hard to swallow, I know, but they were right: there were no
> Weapons of Mass Destruction there. That makes us and the
> British wrong.
>
No, it doesn't matter.
The disposal of the Baath regime was called for under UN resolutions dating
back to 1991 in case Iraq did not comply with UNSC resolutions for arms
inspection and demilitarisation. Iraq had not been in compliance with those
resolutions since at least 1995.


> Brian Whatcott Altus OK
>
> p.s. Note: My real name: and a real place: wonder if the secret police
> are going to come for me? I don't think so!

Indeed not, given that they don't exist.
Besides, idiots are harmless. Better to keep them around to make noise...