the plane on fire

[touco]

hello

10 Tanker Air Carrier

http://www.airliners.net/open.file/860353/M/


touco

[Bob Gardner]

Are you sure that the picture is not that of a water tanker fighting a fire?
Doesn't look like a fuel-fed fire to me.

Bob Gardner

"touco" > wrote in message
...
> hello
>
> 10 Tanker Air Carrier
>
> http://www.airliners.net/open.file/860353/M/
>
>
> touco
>
>

[Newps]

It's a simple water bomber.



Bob Gardner wrote:

> Are you sure that the picture is not that of a water tanker fighting a fire?
> Doesn't look like a fuel-fed fire to me.
>
> Bob Gardner
>
> "touco" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>>hello
>>
>>10 Tanker Air Carrier
>>
>>http://www.airliners.net/open.file/860353/M/
>>
>>
>>touco
>>
>>
>
>
>

[Bob Gardner]

I don't think the OP is a troll, just someone who jumped to a conclusion
based on insufficient evidence.

Bob Gardner

"Newps" > wrote in message
...
> It's a simple water bomber.
>
>
>
> Bob Gardner wrote:
>
>> Are you sure that the picture is not that of a water tanker fighting a
>> fire? Doesn't look like a fuel-fed fire to me.
>>
>> Bob Gardner
>>
>> "touco" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>
>>>hello
>>>
>>>10 Tanker Air Carrier
>>>
>>>http://www.airliners.net/open.file/860353/M/
>>>
>>>
>>>touco
>>>
>>>
>>
>>

[Kai Glaesner]

Bob,

> I don't think the OP is a troll, just someone who jumped to a conclusion
> based on insufficient evidence.

No, I'm sure he just want to generate some hits on his pix at airliners.net,
and obviously it worked... ;-)

Best regards

Kai

[Andy Mckenzie]

"Kai Glaesner" > wrote in message
om...
> Bob,
>
>> I don't think the OP is a troll, just someone who jumped to a conclusion
>> based on insufficient evidence.
>
> No, I'm sure he just want to generate some hits on his pix at
> airliners.net,
> and obviously it worked... ;-)
>
> Best regards
>
> Kai

This is a classic grammatical/translation ambiguity - you all read 'the
plane on fire' as implying a plane on fire, rather than what I am sure the
OP meant ' a plane on A fire'.

Andy M