PDA

View Full Version : Cheap aircraft covering materials


December 31st 04, 06:07 PM
Awhile back, several group members were experimenting with cheaper ways
to cover a fabric-covered aircraft. I am currently constructing one
such aircraft, a Wag-A-Bond and want to cover it with something
affordable. Anyone have some ideas?

Drew

Deane
January 3rd 05, 04:25 PM
wrote:
> Awhile back, several group members were experimenting with cheaper
ways
> to cover a fabric-covered aircraft. I am currently constructing one
> such aircraft, a Wag-A-Bond and want to cover it with something
> affordable. Anyone have some ideas?
>
> Drew

Drew,
Try using Coroplast. It is cheap, strong, light and comes in 4x8
panels.
I am using it for an iceboat wing.
Deane Williams

Dave Schneider
January 3rd 05, 05:19 PM
"Deane" > wrote in message
ups.com...
>
> wrote:
> > Awhile back, several group members were experimenting with cheaper
> ways
> > to cover a fabric-covered aircraft. I am currently constructing one
> > such aircraft, a Wag-A-Bond and want to cover it with something
> > affordable. Anyone have some ideas?
> >
> > Drew
>
> Drew,
> Try using Coroplast. It is cheap, strong, light and comes in 4x8
> panels.
> I am using it for an iceboat wing.
> Deane Williams
>

Are you a member of?
http://groups.msn.com/LandsailerandIceboatdesignandconstruction
We would love to see what you are up to!!!!

Dave

Tim Ward
January 4th 05, 03:37 AM
"Deane" > wrote in message
ups.com...
>
> wrote:
> > Awhile back, several group members were experimenting with cheaper
> ways
> > to cover a fabric-covered aircraft. I am currently constructing one
> > such aircraft, a Wag-A-Bond and want to cover it with something
> > affordable. Anyone have some ideas?
> >
> > Drew
>
> Drew,
> Try using Coroplast. It is cheap, strong, light and comes in 4x8
> panels.
> I am using it for an iceboat wing.
> Deane Williams
>

What are you using to bond it?

Tim Ward

flybynightkarmarepair
January 4th 05, 05:20 AM
It's not light compared to aircraft Dacron, doped. It's also damn near
impossible to bond to (Polypropylene). Most manufactured stuff using
it (post office bins) use "spot welds". Bicyclists using it for
fairings mechanically fasten it. Contact cement is the only
sem-reliable way to glue it that I've found. Paint doesn't stick to it
for S__t either. It doesn't do well in the sun.

Need I continue? It's a fun material, but not to cover an airplane!

Veeduber tried all sorts of things, and settled on uncertified Dacron
from Aircraft spruce, lacquer from Home Depot, aluminum paste, and oil
based enamel, also from Home Depot. He also outlined how he came to
his conclusions, and how you might come to your own. Go to
http://Groups.google.com/group/rec.aviation.homebuiilt and use Advanced
Groups Search to find out more.

January 5th 05, 02:40 AM
That URL was dead. Anyway, I understand that Veeduber removed all his
material from this group. I was wondering if anyone out there has used
unshrunk cotton, instead of dacron.

Ed Sullivan
January 5th 05, 02:47 AM
On 4 Jan 2005 18:40:24 -0800, wrote:

>That URL was dead. Anyway, I understand that Veeduber removed all his
>material from this group. I was wondering if anyone out there has used
>unshrunk cotton, instead of dacron.
>
I used grade A cotton about 55 years ago, and that is far to recent
for my taste.

Ed Sullivan

GyroMike
January 5th 05, 03:26 AM
wrote:
> That URL was dead. Anyway, I understand that Veeduber removed all
his
> material from this group. I was wondering if anyone out there has
used
> unshrunk cotton, instead of dacron.

I just did a search on Google groups for Veeduber's post and they still
showed up.

Click here:
http://groups-beta.google.com/groups?enc_author=GHUz1RAAAAAamgTU8sjeg9ubkBZKeMAR

Ron Wanttaja
January 5th 05, 04:55 AM
On 4 Jan 2005 19:26:31 -0800, "GyroMike" > wrote:

>
wrote:
>> That URL was dead. Anyway, I understand that Veeduber removed all
>his
>> material from this group. I was wondering if anyone out there has
>used
>> unshrunk cotton, instead of dacron.
>
>I just did a search on Google groups for Veeduber's post and they still
>showed up.
>
>Click here:
>http://groups-beta.google.com/groups?enc_author=GHUz1RAAAAAamgTU8sjeg9ubkBZKeMAR

I've got individual links to Veeduber's stuff (with his permission) at:

http://www.wanttaja.com/avlinks/index.html#tech

"Fabric-Covered Dreams" is toward the end of the list.

Ron Wanttaja

Deane
January 5th 05, 08:22 PM
It's true it is tough to bond to. Try a sample by glueing to wood using
ProBond polyurethane glue and small brads. It seems to stick. Too
experiemental to use on aircraft just now.

Morgans
January 6th 05, 04:12 AM
"Deane" > wrote in message
ups.com...
> It's true it is tough to bond to. Try a sample by glueing to wood using
> ProBond polyurethane glue and small brads. It seems to stick. Too
> experiemental to use on aircraft just now.
>
Agreed.

In the model airplane world, you prepare an edge to be bonded, by heating it
with a flame, to burn off the waxy surface. Then us CA glue. So I'm told.
--
Jim in NC

BeaglePig
January 7th 05, 05:33 AM
wrote in news:1104892824.885855.147790
@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com:

> That URL was dead. Anyway, I understand that Veeduber removed all his
> material from this group.
>

Yeah, that's TOO funny,

He posts messages to a public forum then claims "copyright" to his publicly
posted print.... Don't think Google went for that.

BeaglePig

January 13th 05, 03:45 AM
Not to flame, but he's absolutely right. Just like you couldn't clip
an article from a newspaper, market it without permission, or claim it
is yours, you cannot take someone else's post and do the same.

veeduber has put out some really good stuff. It's amazing that people
like you are so fickle about it. What great ideas have YOU put on this
board????

Harry Burns
January 19th 05, 06:59 AM
I used unshrunk 100% cotton muslin on my Wright 1902 glider. Purchased from
Ross Walton at Vintage Aero. The specs were 1.7oz, 213 tpi, unbleached,
slightly off-white. This fabric was custom-milled in Belgium to match the
specs. of the Wrights' Pride of the West fabric.

1.7oz is waaay too light to use on anything other than a pioneer-era machine,
but heavier denier might suffice. Here are the down-sides: this fabric was 3
times the price of similar dacron, its not doped, so it absolutely can't get
wet, it does not shrink unless you don't want it to, its very porious, it has a
lower strength and lower abraision tollerance than dacron. Cheaper cotton
muslin fabric from a fabric store was tried by another builder with very poor
results. The tension in the threads was uneven, and when his wings got wet,
they shrank into parallelograms.

You might be able to negate some of these problems by doping the fabric. But I
would only use cotton if the situation dictated it, such as in an historic
restoration.

Harry Frey
Wright Brothers Enterprises
http:\\hometown.aol.com\wright1902glider\airshow.h tml

Google