EA-6B vs. Insurgents

[[email protected]]

The EA-6B and its USQ-113 jammer are proving surprisingly useful
against the
insurgents. See:

http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?F=1207372&C=america

Though all the jamming and other emissions from Army IED jammers,
EA-6B's and
other sources, is causing an electromagnetic "pollution" problem. See:

http://aviationnow.com/avnow/news/channel_awst_story.jsp?id=news/11075p2.xml

[John Doe]

> wrote in message
oups.com...
> The EA-6B and its USQ-113 jammer are proving surprisingly useful
> against the
> insurgents. See:
>
> http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?F=1207372&C=america
>
> Though all the jamming and other emissions from Army IED jammers,
> EA-6B's and
> other sources, is causing an electromagnetic "pollution" problem. See:
>
> http://aviationnow.com/avnow/news/channel_awst_story.jsp?id=news/11075p2.xml
>

Correction:

"WAS" useful against the insurgents. I'm sure after they read this, they'll
change their tactics......

[Paul J. Adam]

In message <0Ibcf.1622$om5.617@dukeread04>, John Doe >
writes
>
> wrote in message
oups.com...
>> The EA-6B and its USQ-113 jammer are proving surprisingly useful
>> against the
>> insurgents. See:
>>
>> http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?F=1207372&C=america
>>
>> Though all the jamming and other emissions from Army IED jammers,
>> EA-6B's and
>> other sources, is causing an electromagnetic "pollution" problem. See:
>>
>> http://aviationnow.com/avnow/news/channel_awst_story.jsp?id=news/11075p2.xml
>>
>
>Correction:
>
>"WAS" useful against the insurgents. I'm sure after they read this, they'll
>change their tactics......

Yeah, because they wouldn't notice what's happening around them, they've
never heard of force-protection ECM, they haven't been adapting their
TTPs all along, and only a stray post on Usenet tipped them off.

--
He thinks too much: such men are dangerous.
Julius Caesar I:2

Paul J. Adam MainBox<at>jrwlynch[dot]demon{dot}co(.)uk