View Full Version : Shock Mounting Gyros
Doug Palmer
December 26th 05, 04:30 PM
I am starting the planning of my panel and wondering how many people have
shock-mounted their gyros. Please also comment if you have NOT done so, and
weather or not you think it actually helped. I am working with limited
panel space (aren't we all) and the shock mounts will take up valuable real
estate. I am considering using the smaller lord mounts but would also like
to hear of other solutions people have found to accomplish the mission using
minimal extra panel space.
Thanks
JKimmel
December 28th 05, 10:42 PM
Doug Palmer wrote:
> I am starting the planning of my panel and wondering how many people have
> shock-mounted their gyros. Please also comment if you have NOT done so, and
> weather or not you think it actually helped. I am working with limited
> panel space (aren't we all) and the shock mounts will take up valuable real
> estate. I am considering using the smaller lord mounts but would also like
> to hear of other solutions people have found to accomplish the mission using
> minimal extra panel space.
>
> Thanks
>
>
How about shock mounting the entire instrument panel?
--
J Kimmel
www.metalinnovations.com
"Cuius testiculos habes, habeas cardia et cerebellum." - When you have
their full attention in your grip, their hearts and minds will follow.
Doug Palmer
December 30th 05, 03:16 AM
I considered this, however as doing the whole panel is a heavier item to
isolate, you end up using more/larger mounts and it becomes something of a
wash
D
"JKimmel" > wrote in message
et...
> Doug Palmer wrote:
> > I am starting the planning of my panel and wondering how many people
have
> > shock-mounted their gyros. Please also comment if you have NOT done so,
and
> > weather or not you think it actually helped. I am working with limited
> > panel space (aren't we all) and the shock mounts will take up valuable
real
> > estate. I am considering using the smaller lord mounts but would also
like
> > to hear of other solutions people have found to accomplish the mission
using
> > minimal extra panel space.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> How about shock mounting the entire instrument panel?
>
> --
> J Kimmel
>
> www.metalinnovations.com
>
> "Cuius testiculos habes, habeas cardia et cerebellum." - When you have
> their full attention in your grip, their hearts and minds will follow.
Morgans
December 30th 05, 03:39 AM
"Doug Palmer" > wrote in message
ink.net...
>I considered this, however as doing the whole panel is a heavier item to
> isolate, you end up using more/larger mounts and it becomes something of a
> wash
Yes, but......
As the whole panel is heavier, if it is isolated as a whole, the weight is
more, it will be less likely to vibrate, since the resonate frequency will
be lower.
Pros and cons both ways. Another pro is, if the whole panel is isolated,
all of the other instruments will possibly last longer, too.
--
Jim in NC
Fly
December 30th 05, 06:21 AM
Consider a subpanel of the gyro instruments.
Modern gyros are much lighter than the one of the WWII generation!
Cessna use a 3/8" dia with 10-32 double stud. Granger carries a double
stud of 10-32 1/2 diameter
which is rated for about 17 pound in shear.
Numbers off the top of my head, need to actually look in the catalog.
Any type of vibration isolation will benenfit.
Kent Felkins
Tulsa
"JKimmel" > wrote in message
et...
> Doug Palmer wrote:
> > I am starting the planning of my panel and wondering how many people
have
> > shock-mounted their gyros. Please also comment if you have NOT done so,
and
> > weather or not you think it actually helped. I am working with limited
> > panel space (aren't we all) and the shock mounts will take up valuable
real
> > estate. I am considering using the smaller lord mounts but would also
like
> > to hear of other solutions people have found to accomplish the mission
using
> > minimal extra panel space.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> How about shock mounting the entire instrument panel?
>
> --
> J Kimmel
>
> www.metalinnovations.com
>
> "Cuius testiculos habes, habeas cardia et cerebellum." - When you have
> their full attention in your grip, their hearts and minds will follow.
Roger
December 30th 05, 09:24 AM
On Mon, 26 Dec 2005 16:30:07 GMT, "Doug Palmer"
> wrote:
>I am starting the planning of my panel and wondering how many people have
>shock-mounted their gyros. Please also comment if you have NOT done so, and
>weather or not you think it actually helped. I am working with limited
>panel space (aren't we all) and the shock mounts will take up valuable real
>estate. I am considering using the smaller lord mounts but would also like
>to hear of other solutions people have found to accomplish the mission using
>minimal extra panel space.
Just bolt 'em in.
Old panels used to be isolated, then the gyros. I don't think the
modern panels do at all. Besides a few unusual attitudes without
caging is probably harder on them than the vibration.
Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member)
(N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair)
www.rogerhalstead.com
>
>Thanks
>
Stealth Pilot
December 30th 05, 09:50 AM
On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 04:24:35 -0500, Roger
> wrote:
>On Mon, 26 Dec 2005 16:30:07 GMT, "Doug Palmer"
> wrote:
>
>>I am starting the planning of my panel and wondering how many people have
>>shock-mounted their gyros. Please also comment if you have NOT done so, and
>>weather or not you think it actually helped. I am working with limited
>>panel space (aren't we all) and the shock mounts will take up valuable real
>>estate. I am considering using the smaller lord mounts but would also like
>>to hear of other solutions people have found to accomplish the mission using
>>minimal extra panel space.
>
>Just bolt 'em in.
>
>Old panels used to be isolated, then the gyros. I don't think the
>modern panels do at all. Besides a few unusual attitudes without
>caging is probably harder on them than the vibration.
>
>Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member)
>(N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair)
>www.rogerhalstead.com
>>
>>Thanks
>>
my panel has no vibration mounts.
instruments are still all serviceable after 20 years and 550hours.
the key to success is to make sure the prop and spinner are balanced
and to rebalance them if any vibration seems to be starting.
oh, that and keeping the exhaust pipes off the frames.
Stealth Pilot
David Koehler
December 30th 05, 06:22 PM
Hi, I don't understand, are you building a Classic type of plane? If not,
why use 1930 and 1940 technology? I'm not to the point of building my panel
yet, but I'm going glass.
If you are rebuilding a panel, it's not cost effective, but if your going
from scatch.... I priced the GRT's EFIS & full engine monitor for the same
price as a vacumm system. You get a lot more than a Six pack system for the
same price. If you haven't purchased parts of your system, you may want to
check the features.
david
"Doug Palmer" > wrote in message
k.net...
> I am starting the planning of my panel and wondering how many people have
> shock-mounted their gyros. Please also comment if you have NOT done so,
and
> weather or not you think it actually helped. I am working with limited
> panel space (aren't we all) and the shock mounts will take up valuable
real
> estate. I am considering using the smaller lord mounts but would also
like
> to hear of other solutions people have found to accomplish the mission
using
> minimal extra panel space.
>
> Thanks
>
>
Roger
January 1st 06, 01:08 AM
On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 12:22:14 -0600, "David Koehler" >
wrote:
>Hi, I don't understand, are you building a Classic type of plane? If not,
>why use 1930 and 1940 technology? I'm not to the point of building my panel
>yet, but I'm going glass.
For a *basic* VFR panel you can't beat a few mechanical gages for cost
and return.
OTOH my G-III if I ever get it done will be full, dual, redundant
glass with the required mechanical backups.
>If you are rebuilding a panel, it's not cost effective, but if your going
>from scatch.... I priced the GRT's EFIS & full engine monitor for the same
Engine monitor?
Even in the Deb I only have one CHT and one EGT probe.
Again on the G-III everything will be monitored complete with trends.
Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member)
(N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair)
www.rogerhalstead.com
>price as a vacumm system. You get a lot more than a Six pack system for the
>same price. If you haven't purchased parts of your system, you may want to
>check the features.
>david
>"Doug Palmer" > wrote in message
k.net...
>> I am starting the planning of my panel and wondering how many people have
>> shock-mounted their gyros. Please also comment if you have NOT done so,
>and
>> weather or not you think it actually helped. I am working with limited
>> panel space (aren't we all) and the shock mounts will take up valuable
>real
>> estate. I am considering using the smaller lord mounts but would also
>like
>> to hear of other solutions people have found to accomplish the mission
>using
>> minimal extra panel space.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>
Richard Lamb
January 4th 06, 08:38 PM
I used 4 AN-1000-8's (IIRC) on the red parasol.
It worked well, for a small panel (under 10 pounds).
I also found a steel cup washer that fit the AN-1000's and used
a couple of them to "tune" the panel response rate a little higher.
For the Tailwind I woas gonna do the panel in sections using the
same tricks....
Richard
Morgans wrote:
> "Doug Palmer" > wrote in message
> ink.net...
> >I considered this, however as doing the whole panel is a heavier item to
> > isolate, you end up using more/larger mounts and it becomes something of a
> > wash
>
> Yes, but......
> As the whole panel is heavier, if it is isolated as a whole, the weight is
> more, it will be less likely to vibrate, since the resonate frequency will
> be lower.
>
> Pros and cons both ways. Another pro is, if the whole panel is isolated,
> all of the other instruments will possibly last longer, too.
> --
> Jim in NC
vBulletin® v3.6.4, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.