Log in

View Full Version : Trammeling


January 24th 06, 10:58 AM
To All:

Every now & then you run into a repair that involves turning two
airplanes into one. Typical case is mating a tail-less airframe to the
aft fuselage of an identical airframe which lost its nose.

Doing so is fairly straight-forward but tends to be easier with steel
tube than aluminum. Basic chore is maintaining alignment of the parts
while you rebuild /re-attach the mating portion.

To facilitate that alignment you often use the floor of the hangar.
With steel tube, close enough was good enough. Using Bondo as a
temporary adhesive, you triangulate supports to keep the pieces of the
fuselage(s) well enough aligned to get your splices tacked. Depending
on how much of the original structure you have to work with, the repair
may involve some ugly -- but strong -- splices. Fortunately, with rag
& tube the finished appearance depends more on the stringers & fabric
than on the welded structure. But trying to mate monocoque
airframes, if you want your repair to be invisible, your positioning
fixtures will have to approach the accuracy of the factory jigs.

One method of achieving such accuracy is to make up a welded steel
fixture into which the fore- and aft- portions of the fuselages are
installed. The jig itself is usually portable and if you ask around,
you can generally track one down for the particular airframe of
interest. Coupla phone calls later, it falls off the back of a truck
outside the hangar and you're good to go... as soon as you figure out
how to secure the jig to the floor of the hangar.

Yep. The jig want's these humungous anchor-bolts.

Well... okay. (But Bondo would prolly work too.)

Hammar-drill zips through the concrete. That is, the sonofabitch zips
right THROUGH the concrete! Hangar floor is supposed to be 6" thick
but turns out to be about 3-3/4" And of course, the anchors are
about 4-1/2".

Okay, we could have started over; come up with a different anchoring
system. Except we've been planning this particular campaign for a
while, there's already six holes in the floor and pieces of Cherokees
are starting to arrive and we've got about three days to get them glued
back together and vanish before the Citation returns to its roost.

So that's what I used. Urethane glue. (Hint: Urethane expands as it
cures.) Squirted a healthy dollop of the stuff down into the holes --
and into the dirt -- then smeared it all over the anchors and drove
them into the holes. (Tight fit!)

I don't know if it's legal, moral or politically correct but it worked
okay. Jig got trammelled zero-zero on all three axies and things lined
up so nice that some of the holes even matched. After that it was
'round the clock assholes & elbows for a couple of days turning
write-offs into flying machines.

You know, given enough hurricanes a guy could earn a living fixin'
aeroplanes...

-R.S.Hoover

Rich S.
January 24th 06, 03:47 PM
> wrote in message
oups.com...
> I don't know if it's legal, moral or politically correct but it worked
> okay. Jig got trammelled zero-zero on all three axies and things lined
> up so nice that some of the holes even matched. After that it was
> 'round the clock assholes & elbows for a couple of days turning
> write-offs into flying machines.
>
> You know, given enough hurricanes a guy could earn a living fixin'
> aeroplanes...
>
> -R.S.Hoover

Friend of mine called me up yesterday. He owns both an Ercoupe and a 200 hp
Beech Musketeer. I knew something might be wrong when he asked me where he
could find, "a Musketeer fuselage and tail from the baggage compartment
back".

Seems he was trying to jump-start the engine, so he pulled the nose of his
truck up next to the fuselage. He got the engine started and was leaning
over (I don't know where his battery is located) to remove the jumper cables
when the engine, "went to full throttle". The Beech jumped the chocks,
straightened out the "S" hooks on the tiedown chains and the tail proceeded
up and over the hood of his truck.

I guess the fuselage looks like Spaceship One in dethermalizer mode. Shall I
send him down for your splicing service, Mr. Hoover?

Anyone know of an extra half-fuselage for sale?

Rich S.

Montblack
January 24th 06, 05:03 PM
("Rich S." wrote)
> I guess the fuselage looks like Spaceship One in dethermalizer mode. Shall
> I send him down for your splicing service, Mr. Hoover?


Learnt a new word t'day: Dethermalizer

http://www.theplanpage.com/Months/2403/dethermalizer.htm

http://www.atsrcplanes.com/easylander.htm


Montblack

.Blueskies.
January 25th 06, 12:51 AM
> wrote in message oups.com...
> To All:
>
> Every now & then you run into a repair that involves turning two
> airplanes into one. Typical case is mating a tail-less airframe to the
> aft fuselage of an identical airframe which lost its nose.
>
....
> You know, given enough hurricanes a guy could earn a living fixin'
> aeroplanes...
>
> -R.S.Hoover
>

How much are those hurricane write-offs going for these days?

Capt.Doug
February 4th 06, 12:42 AM
>".Blueskies." wrote in message
> How much are those hurricane write-offs going for these days?

"64 Aztec, mid-time engines, old radios = $8000

D.

.Blueskies.
February 4th 06, 01:29 PM
"Capt.Doug" > wrote in message ...
> >".Blueskies." wrote in message
>> How much are those hurricane write-offs going for these days?
>
> "64 Aztec, mid-time engines, old radios = $8000
>
> D.
>
>

Thanks....I bid $6000 for a flipped and crumpled C177 with more recent radios and mid time engine. Did not win and have
no idea what it went for. Any hints about how to estimate the value?


--
Dan DeVillers
http://www.ameritech.net/users/ddevillers/start.html


..

Google