Re: Physics Professor's Peer Reviewed Paper on WTC CONTROLLED DEMOLITIONS on 9/11

[Darkwing]

"TRUTH" > wrote in message
...
> Tenured Physics Professor Steven E Jones gave two seminars to hundreds of
> people on WTC controlled demolitions and how the government's version of
> events "defies physics". The Feb 1st seminar can be viewed on Google
> Video, or downloaded to your computer.
>
>
> The following is a excerpt from Jones' PEER REVIEWED paper:
>
> "I presented my objections to the "official" theory at a seminar at BYU
> on September 22, 2005, to about sixty people. I also showed evidence and
> scientific arguments for the controlled demolition theory. In attendance
> were faculty from Physics, Mechanical Engineering, Civil Engineering,
> Electrical Engineering, Psychology, Geology, and Mathematics - and
> perhaps other departments as I did not recognize all of the people
> present. A local university and college were represented (BYU and Utah
> Valley State College).
>
> The discussion was vigorous and lasted nearly two hours. It ended only
> when a university class needed the room. After presenting the material
> summarized here, including actually looking at and discussing the
> collapses of WTC 7 and the Towers, only one attendee disagreed (by hand-
> vote) that further investigation of the WTC collapses was called for.
> The next day, the dissenting professor said he had further thought about
> it and now agreed that more investigation was needed."
>
>
>
> Professor Jones now has dozens of people suporting him. His finding are
> based on scientific evidence and logical reasoning.
>
> In other words, you won't find any people using terms like kook, tin foil
> hat, or any other childish terms. The people who understand his
> scientific evidence are clear minded and not closed asshole headed like a
> lot of people in this newsgroup seem to be. You people are pathetic.
>
>
> You stupid people don't know anything about anything when it comes to
> 9/11.
>
> The airplanes were flown by remote control. The events were for the
> purpose of building public support to invade Afghanistan and Iraq. Some
> of you will still deny this fact. If so, it will be because your thinking
> process is too much filled with tin foil hat commments, and you're too
> stupid and brainwashed to understand real evidence


So when Atta come over the ATC frequency on accident instead of the onboard
PA that was just all computer controlled? What about the people on the
planes who said that they seen the hijackers enter the cockpit while on the
phones to their families? I guess all this "data" doesn't fit into the grand
conspiracy that you have cooked up.

Let's see. Muslim terrorists hijack airliners and crash then into buildings
because they can't get away from the death cult of Islam OR the goobermint
faked it all to start an unpopular war where nothing has been gained. Gee
that is a toughy.

-------------------------------------------
DW

[TRUTH]

"Darkwing" <theducksmail"AT"yahoo.com> wrote in
:

>
> "TRUTH" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Tenured Physics Professor Steven E Jones gave two seminars to
>> hundreds of people on WTC controlled demolitions and how the
>> government's version of events "defies physics". The Feb 1st seminar
>> can be viewed on Google Video, or downloaded to your computer.
>>
>>
>> The following is a excerpt from Jones' PEER REVIEWED paper:
>>
>> "I presented my objections to the "official" theory at a seminar at
>> BYU on September 22, 2005, to about sixty people. I also showed
>> evidence and scientific arguments for the controlled demolition
>> theory. In attendance were faculty from Physics, Mechanical
>> Engineering, Civil Engineering, Electrical Engineering, Psychology,
>> Geology, and Mathematics - and perhaps other departments as I did not
>> recognize all of the people present. A local university and college
>> were represented (BYU and Utah Valley State College).
>>
>> The discussion was vigorous and lasted nearly two hours. It ended
>> only when a university class needed the room. After presenting the
>> material summarized here, including actually looking at and
>> discussing the collapses of WTC 7 and the Towers, only one attendee
>> disagreed (by hand- vote) that further investigation of the WTC
>> collapses was called for. The next day, the dissenting professor said
>> he had further thought about it and now agreed that more
>> investigation was needed."
>>
>>
>>
>> Professor Jones now has dozens of people suporting him. His finding
>> are based on scientific evidence and logical reasoning.
>>
>> In other words, you won't find any people using terms like kook, tin
>> foil hat, or any other childish terms. The people who understand his
>> scientific evidence are clear minded and not closed asshole headed
>> like a lot of people in this newsgroup seem to be. You people are
>> pathetic.
>>
>>
>> You stupid people don't know anything about anything when it comes to
>> 9/11.
>>
>> The airplanes were flown by remote control. The events were for the
>> purpose of building public support to invade Afghanistan and Iraq.
>> Some of you will still deny this fact. If so, it will be because your
>> thinking process is too much filled with tin foil hat commments, and
>> you're too stupid and brainwashed to understand real evidence
>
>
> So when Atta come over the ATC frequency on accident instead of the
> onboard PA that was just all computer controlled? What about the
> people on the planes who said that they seen the hijackers enter the
> cockpit while on the phones to their families? I guess all this "data"
> doesn't fit into the grand conspiracy that you have cooked up.


As I said before, the telephone calls were all faked, using new voice
synthesizer technology.


When was the last you called your mom and told her your last name?

"Mom, this is Mark Bingham"

http://www.thewebfairy.com/killtown/chart.html


>
> Let's see. Muslim terrorists hijack airliners and crash then into
> buildings because they can't get away from the death cult of Islam OR
> the goobermint faked it all to start an unpopular war where nothing
> has been gained. Gee that is a toughy.
>
> -------------------------------------------
> DW
>


I'm sorry, but the evil doers are in our own government

[Darkwing]

"TRUTH" > wrote in message
...
> "Darkwing" <theducksmail"AT"yahoo.com> wrote in
> :
>
>>
>> "TRUTH" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> Tenured Physics Professor Steven E Jones gave two seminars to
>>> hundreds of people on WTC controlled demolitions and how the
>>> government's version of events "defies physics". The Feb 1st seminar
>>> can be viewed on Google Video, or downloaded to your computer.
>>>
>>>
>>> The following is a excerpt from Jones' PEER REVIEWED paper:
>>>
>>> "I presented my objections to the "official" theory at a seminar at
>>> BYU on September 22, 2005, to about sixty people. I also showed
>>> evidence and scientific arguments for the controlled demolition
>>> theory. In attendance were faculty from Physics, Mechanical
>>> Engineering, Civil Engineering, Electrical Engineering, Psychology,
>>> Geology, and Mathematics - and perhaps other departments as I did not
>>> recognize all of the people present. A local university and college
>>> were represented (BYU and Utah Valley State College).
>>>
>>> The discussion was vigorous and lasted nearly two hours. It ended
>>> only when a university class needed the room. After presenting the
>>> material summarized here, including actually looking at and
>>> discussing the collapses of WTC 7 and the Towers, only one attendee
>>> disagreed (by hand- vote) that further investigation of the WTC
>>> collapses was called for. The next day, the dissenting professor said
>>> he had further thought about it and now agreed that more
>>> investigation was needed."
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Professor Jones now has dozens of people suporting him. His finding
>>> are based on scientific evidence and logical reasoning.
>>>
>>> In other words, you won't find any people using terms like kook, tin
>>> foil hat, or any other childish terms. The people who understand his
>>> scientific evidence are clear minded and not closed asshole headed
>>> like a lot of people in this newsgroup seem to be. You people are
>>> pathetic.
>>>
>>>
>>> You stupid people don't know anything about anything when it comes to
>>> 9/11.
>>>
>>> The airplanes were flown by remote control. The events were for the
>>> purpose of building public support to invade Afghanistan and Iraq.
>>> Some of you will still deny this fact. If so, it will be because your
>>> thinking process is too much filled with tin foil hat commments, and
>>> you're too stupid and brainwashed to understand real evidence
>>
>>
>> So when Atta come over the ATC frequency on accident instead of the
>> onboard PA that was just all computer controlled? What about the
>> people on the planes who said that they seen the hijackers enter the
>> cockpit while on the phones to their families? I guess all this "data"
>> doesn't fit into the grand conspiracy that you have cooked up.
>
>
> As I said before, the telephone calls were all faked, using new voice
> synthesizer technology.
>
>
> When was the last you called your mom and told her your last name?
>
> "Mom, this is Mark Bingham"
>
> http://www.thewebfairy.com/killtown/chart.html
>


The people on the other end sure seemed to be convinced they were talking to
their loved ones. Your "facts" are utter bull****. How convenient that we
have new voice synthesizer technology. The government is to incompetent to
do anything close to this magnitude.

----------------------------------------------
DW

[TRUTH]

"Darkwing" <theducksmail"AT"yahoo.com> wrote in
:

>
> "TRUTH" > wrote in message
> ...
>> "Darkwing" <theducksmail"AT"yahoo.com> wrote in
>> :
>>
>>>
>>> "TRUTH" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> Tenured Physics Professor Steven E Jones gave two seminars to
>>>> hundreds of people on WTC controlled demolitions and how the
>>>> government's version of events "defies physics". The Feb 1st
>>>> seminar can be viewed on Google Video, or downloaded to your
>>>> computer.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The following is a excerpt from Jones' PEER REVIEWED paper:
>>>>
>>>> "I presented my objections to the "official" theory at a seminar at
>>>> BYU on September 22, 2005, to about sixty people. I also showed
>>>> evidence and scientific arguments for the controlled demolition
>>>> theory. In attendance were faculty from Physics, Mechanical
>>>> Engineering, Civil Engineering, Electrical Engineering, Psychology,
>>>> Geology, and Mathematics - and perhaps other departments as I did
>>>> not recognize all of the people present. A local university and
>>>> college were represented (BYU and Utah Valley State College).
>>>>
>>>> The discussion was vigorous and lasted nearly two hours. It ended
>>>> only when a university class needed the room. After presenting the
>>>> material summarized here, including actually looking at and
>>>> discussing the collapses of WTC 7 and the Towers, only one attendee
>>>> disagreed (by hand- vote) that further investigation of the WTC
>>>> collapses was called for. The next day, the dissenting professor
>>>> said he had further thought about it and now agreed that more
>>>> investigation was needed."
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Professor Jones now has dozens of people suporting him. His finding
>>>> are based on scientific evidence and logical reasoning.
>>>>
>>>> In other words, you won't find any people using terms like kook,
>>>> tin foil hat, or any other childish terms. The people who
>>>> understand his scientific evidence are clear minded and not closed
>>>> asshole headed like a lot of people in this newsgroup seem to be.
>>>> You people are pathetic.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You stupid people don't know anything about anything when it comes
>>>> to 9/11.
>>>>
>>>> The airplanes were flown by remote control. The events were for the
>>>> purpose of building public support to invade Afghanistan and Iraq.
>>>> Some of you will still deny this fact. If so, it will be because
>>>> your thinking process is too much filled with tin foil hat
>>>> commments, and you're too stupid and brainwashed to understand real
>>>> evidence
>>>
>>>
>>> So when Atta come over the ATC frequency on accident instead of the
>>> onboard PA that was just all computer controlled? What about the
>>> people on the planes who said that they seen the hijackers enter the
>>> cockpit while on the phones to their families? I guess all this
>>> "data" doesn't fit into the grand conspiracy that you have cooked
>>> up.
>>
>>
>> As I said before, the telephone calls were all faked, using new voice
>> synthesizer technology.
>>
>>
>> When was the last you called your mom and told her your last name?
>>
>> "Mom, this is Mark Bingham"
>>
>> http://www.thewebfairy.com/killtown/chart.html
>>
>
>
> The people on the other end sure seemed to be convinced they were
> talking to their loved ones. Your "facts" are utter bull****. How
> convenient that we have new voice synthesizer technology. The
> government is to incompetent to do anything close to this magnitude.
>
> ----------------------------------------------
> DW
>
>


Umm.. no they weren't. Some of them stated that they did not act like
their loved ones. The government version of 9/11 is utter bull****. There
are no facts to back them up.


Here are some 9/11 FACTS. They are indisputable. You disagree? Prove it.
Believe me, you won't be able to.



FACT: Never before in world history has a steel framed building
completely collapsed from fire. Not before 9/11, not after 9/11.
Never!

FACT: WTC 7 was ***NOT*** hit by an airplane!

FACT: WTC 7 collapsed from "fire and debris", according to the government

FACT: The WTC 7 collapse mimicked controlled demolition, as did the
Towers. They all collapsed almost symmetrically, near free fall speed,
into their own footprints.

FACT: There were small puffs of smoke (known as squibs) coming out of
all three buildings, a sign of controlled demolitions.

FACT: Explosives expert Van Romero said just days after 9/11 that he
could tell all three buildings collapsed from controlled demolition just
by watching the video footage

FACT: Romero recanted just a few days later without giving any scientific
explanation as to why. He was then promoted.

FACT: WTC 7 leaseholder Larry Silverstein bought a 99 yr lease on the
entire WTC complex just six weeks before 9/11, which just happened to
include terrorist attack insurance

FACT: The structural engineer that worked for Silverstein's insurance
company told the Discovery Channel that the Towers' massive vertical
columns all failed simultaneously, and mimicked controlled demolition

FACT: Silverstein said WTC7 was "pulled" on a PBS documentary

FACT: In that same documentary, a construction worker used the word
"pull" as slang for "professionally demolish"

FACT: The WTC7 fire alarm was put into "test mode" the morning of 9/11

FACT: Silverstein was absent from his 88th floor office in the North
Tower on the morning of 9/11 due to a "doctors appointment"

FACT: Over a hundred witnesses have made statements of explosions

FACT: The FBI was going under the assumption that bombs were in the
buildings.

FACT: The FDNY Chief Of Safely told an NBC reporter there might be a
secondary device in the building

FACT: FDNY personnel (including Fire Commissioners, Fire Marshals,
Captains, and Lieutenants) reported flashes, bombs, and explosions
that they compared to controlled demolitions.

FACT: Many of the FDNY personnel above stated that controlled demolition
was their gut instinct.

FACT: The NIST investigators made the assumption that collapse initiation
would "inevitably" lead to global collapse, despite the fact that it
never happened before in world history.

FACT: The NIST investigators performed little analysis of the structural
behavior of the Towers following collapse initiation

FACT: The NIST investigators altered the data for their computer
simulations

FACT: The NIST investigators refuse to show their computer simulation
model despite calls from leading structural and fire engineers.

[Darkwing]

"TRUTH" > wrote in message
...
> "Darkwing" <theducksmail"AT"yahoo.com> wrote in
> :
>
>>
>> "TRUTH" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> "Darkwing" <theducksmail"AT"yahoo.com> wrote in
>>> :
>>>
>>>>
>>>> "TRUTH" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> Tenured Physics Professor Steven E Jones gave two seminars to
>>>>> hundreds of people on WTC controlled demolitions and how the
>>>>> government's version of events "defies physics". The Feb 1st
>>>>> seminar can be viewed on Google Video, or downloaded to your
>>>>> computer.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The following is a excerpt from Jones' PEER REVIEWED paper:
>>>>>
>>>>> "I presented my objections to the "official" theory at a seminar at
>>>>> BYU on September 22, 2005, to about sixty people. I also showed
>>>>> evidence and scientific arguments for the controlled demolition
>>>>> theory. In attendance were faculty from Physics, Mechanical
>>>>> Engineering, Civil Engineering, Electrical Engineering, Psychology,
>>>>> Geology, and Mathematics - and perhaps other departments as I did
>>>>> not recognize all of the people present. A local university and
>>>>> college were represented (BYU and Utah Valley State College).
>>>>>
>>>>> The discussion was vigorous and lasted nearly two hours. It ended
>>>>> only when a university class needed the room. After presenting the
>>>>> material summarized here, including actually looking at and
>>>>> discussing the collapses of WTC 7 and the Towers, only one attendee
>>>>> disagreed (by hand- vote) that further investigation of the WTC
>>>>> collapses was called for. The next day, the dissenting professor
>>>>> said he had further thought about it and now agreed that more
>>>>> investigation was needed."
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Professor Jones now has dozens of people suporting him. His finding
>>>>> are based on scientific evidence and logical reasoning.
>>>>>
>>>>> In other words, you won't find any people using terms like kook,
>>>>> tin foil hat, or any other childish terms. The people who
>>>>> understand his scientific evidence are clear minded and not closed
>>>>> asshole headed like a lot of people in this newsgroup seem to be.
>>>>> You people are pathetic.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You stupid people don't know anything about anything when it comes
>>>>> to 9/11.
>>>>>
>>>>> The airplanes were flown by remote control. The events were for the
>>>>> purpose of building public support to invade Afghanistan and Iraq.
>>>>> Some of you will still deny this fact. If so, it will be because
>>>>> your thinking process is too much filled with tin foil hat
>>>>> commments, and you're too stupid and brainwashed to understand real
>>>>> evidence
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So when Atta come over the ATC frequency on accident instead of the
>>>> onboard PA that was just all computer controlled? What about the
>>>> people on the planes who said that they seen the hijackers enter the
>>>> cockpit while on the phones to their families? I guess all this
>>>> "data" doesn't fit into the grand conspiracy that you have cooked
>>>> up.
>>>
>>>
>>> As I said before, the telephone calls were all faked, using new voice
>>> synthesizer technology.
>>>
>>>
>>> When was the last you called your mom and told her your last name?
>>>
>>> "Mom, this is Mark Bingham"
>>>
>>> http://www.thewebfairy.com/killtown/chart.html
>>>
>>
>>
>> The people on the other end sure seemed to be convinced they were
>> talking to their loved ones. Your "facts" are utter bull****. How
>> convenient that we have new voice synthesizer technology. The
>> government is to incompetent to do anything close to this magnitude.
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------
>> DW
>>
>>
>
>
> Umm.. no they weren't. Some of them stated that they did not act like
> their loved ones. The government version of 9/11 is utter bull****. There
> are no facts to back them up.
>
>
> Here are some 9/11 FACTS. They are indisputable. You disagree? Prove it.
> Believe me, you won't be able to.
>
>
>
> FACT: Never before in world history has a steel framed building
> completely collapsed from fire. Not before 9/11, not after 9/11.
> Never!

No building has ever had a terrorist fly a completely loaded B757 into it
either.

>
> FACT: WTC 7 was ***NOT*** hit by an airplane!

Falling debris took that down.

>
> FACT: WTC 7 collapsed from "fire and debris", according to the government

Good call.

>
> FACT: The WTC 7 collapse mimicked controlled demolition, as did the
> Towers. They all collapsed almost symmetrically, near free fall speed,
> into their own footprints.

It fell after the damage finally took its toll, big whoop.

>
> FACT: There were small puffs of smoke (known as squibs) coming out of
> all three buildings, a sign of controlled demolitions.

That is the levels pancaking on top of one another, the building didn't
simply "fall over".

>
> FACT: Explosives expert Van Romero said just days after 9/11 that he
> could tell all three buildings collapsed from controlled demolition just
> by watching the video footage

There are plenty of "experts" that are wrong.

>
> FACT: Romero recanted just a few days later without giving any scientific
> explanation as to why. He was then promoted.
>

And.....

> FACT: WTC 7 leaseholder Larry Silverstein bought a 99 yr lease on the
> entire WTC complex just six weeks before 9/11, which just happened to
> include terrorist attack insurance

That was not the first time the WTC had been terrorist attacked, DUH!

>
> FACT: The structural engineer that worked for Silverstein's insurance
> company told the Discovery Channel that the Towers' massive vertical
> columns all failed simultaneously, and mimicked controlled demolition
>

Mimicked doesn't mean is.


> FACT: Silverstein said WTC7 was "pulled" on a PBS documentary
>

They decided to not try and save it, once again big whoop.


> FACT: In that same documentary, a construction worker used the word
> "pull" as slang for "professionally demolish"

See above.

>
> FACT: The WTC7 fire alarm was put into "test mode" the morning of 9/11
>

And this could of been standard issue or bad timing, happens every day.


> FACT: Silverstein was absent from his 88th floor office in the North
> Tower on the morning of 9/11 due to a "doctors appointment"
>

Oh my god he went to the doctor???!


> FACT: Over a hundred witnesses have made statements of explosions
>

All sorts of **** was going crazy, eyewitness testimony is notoriously
BOGUS.


> FACT: The FBI was going under the assumption that bombs were in the
> buildings.
>

As well they should in any kind of terrorist incident.


> FACT: The FDNY Chief Of Safely told an NBC reporter there might be a
> secondary device in the building

MIGHT doesn't mean WAS.


>
> FACT: FDNY personnel (including Fire Commissioners, Fire Marshals,
> Captains, and Lieutenants) reported flashes, bombs, and explosions
> that they compared to controlled demolitions.
>

Once again it doesn't prove ****.


> FACT: Many of the FDNY personnel above stated that controlled demolition
> was their gut instinct.
>

See above. Experts are wrong a lot.


> FACT: The NIST investigators made the assumption that collapse initiation
> would "inevitably" lead to global collapse, despite the fact that it
> never happened before in world history.

When 30% of the upper part of a high rise building has tons of JetA on fire
as well as office equipment and more on fire it is no wonder that the
buildings couldn't take that weight and structual damage.

>
> FACT: The NIST investigators performed little analysis of the structural
> behavior of the Towers following collapse initiation
>

The building fell down and the reason was pretty ****ing easy to see, fully
loaded jets heading aross the country full of Jet A hit the building at high
speed and exploded. Doesn't take a rocket scientist.

> FACT: The NIST investigators altered the data for their computer
> simulations
>

Says the conspiracy nut....

> FACT: The NIST investigators refuse to show their computer simulation
> model despite calls from leading structural and fire engineers.

Bull****.

[Chad Irby]

In article >,
TRUTH > wrote:

> WTC7 was NOT hit by an airplane.

Neither were the other buildings in the area, but the fires and other
damage sure affected them, too.

[TRUTH]

Chad Irby > wrote in news:cirby-195812.22014022022006
@news-server1.tampabay.rr.com:

> In article >,
> TRUTH > wrote:
>
>> WTC7 was NOT hit by an airplane.
>
> Neither were the other buildings in the area, but the fires and other
> damage sure affected them, too.
>



WTC7 collapsed in classic controlled demolition style.

[Chad Irby]

In article >,
TRUTH > wrote:

> Chad Irby > wrote in news:cirby-195812.22014022022006
> @news-server1.tampabay.rr.com:
>
> > In article >,
> > TRUTH > wrote:
> >
> >> WTC7 was NOT hit by an airplane.
> >
> > Neither were the other buildings in the area, but the fires and other
> > damage sure affected them, too.
>
> WTC7 collapsed in classic controlled demolition style.

Nope. I saw the tapes. It collapsed in classic "steel weakened by
damage and fires" style.

Some fools have tried to claim otherwise, but it's just more crap from
the looneytoons brigade.

[TRUTH]

Chad Irby > wrote in news:cirby-A53043.00160223022006
@news-server1.tampabay.rr.com:

> In article >,
> TRUTH > wrote:
>
>> Chad Irby > wrote in news:cirby-195812.22014022022006
>> @news-server1.tampabay.rr.com:
>>
>> > In article >,
>> > TRUTH > wrote:
>> >
>> >> WTC7 was NOT hit by an airplane.
>> >
>> > Neither were the other buildings in the area, but the fires and
other
>> > damage sure affected them, too.
>>
>> WTC7 collapsed in classic controlled demolition style.
>
> Nope. I saw the tapes. It collapsed in classic "steel weakened by
> damage and fires" style.
>
> Some fools have tried to claim otherwise, but it's just more crap from
> the looneytoons brigade.
>


You're now resorting to childish comments because you obviously know I'm
right.

[Denny]

WHACKO!

[Matt Barrow]

"Darkwing" <theducksmail"AT"yahoo.com> wrote in message
...
>
> "TRUTH" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Tenured Physics Professor Steven E Jones gave two seminars to hundreds of
>> people on WTC controlled demolitions and how the government's version of
>> events "defies physics". The Feb 1st seminar can be viewed on Google
>> Video, or downloaded to your computer.

This crap wa debunked over a year ago (Popular Mechanics, amongst others)
and the psycho is still trowelling it out.

DON'T FEED THE TROLLS!

[Johnny Bravo]

On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 20:58:19 -0500, "Darkwing" <theducksmail"AT"yahoo.com>
wrote:

>The people on the other end sure seemed to be convinced they were talking to
>their loved ones. Your "facts" are utter bull****. How convenient that we
>have new voice synthesizer technology. The government is to incompetent to
>do anything close to this magnitude.

This being the same government that couldn't even break into a hotel room at
the Watergate hotel and keep it secret. Yet somehow they managed to fake
several hijackings, kill 3,000 people and sneak a hundred man ninja team armed
with tons of explosives into WTC-7 to perform a controlled demolition inside a
burning building in less than 7 hours without a single person blowing the lid
off.

And he thinks we're crazy?!?!?

[Johnny Bravo]

On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 21:34:00 -0500, "Darkwing" <theducksmail"AT"yahoo.com>
wrote:

>> FACT: The WTC7 fire alarm was put into "test mode" the morning of 9/11
>>
>
>And this could of been standard issue or bad timing, happens every day.

Not to mention completely irrelevant. The sprinkler system for WTC-7 was fed
by a 20 inch water main under the street under the buildings. Falling debris
from the impacts of the airliners ruptured that main, there was no water
available in the building. The same ruptured main also prevented firefighters
from using city water to fight the fire and the NYFD had better things to do
that day than try to clear the streets enough to get trucks in there to fight a
fire that wasn't a clear danger to human life.

[Darkwing]

"TRUTH" > wrote in message
...
> Chad Irby > wrote in news:cirby-195812.22014022022006
> @news-server1.tampabay.rr.com:
>
>> In article >,
>> TRUTH > wrote:
>>
>>> WTC7 was NOT hit by an airplane.
>>
>> Neither were the other buildings in the area, but the fires and other
>> damage sure affected them, too.
>>
>
>
>
> WTC7 collapsed in classic controlled demolition style.

Says the idiot that is off his meds.

-------------------------------------------
DW

[Darkwing]

"TRUTH" > wrote in message
...
> Chad Irby > wrote in news:cirby-A53043.00160223022006
> @news-server1.tampabay.rr.com:
>
>> In article >,
>> TRUTH > wrote:
>>
>>> Chad Irby > wrote in news:cirby-195812.22014022022006
>>> @news-server1.tampabay.rr.com:
>>>
>>> > In article >,
>>> > TRUTH > wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> WTC7 was NOT hit by an airplane.
>>> >
>>> > Neither were the other buildings in the area, but the fires and
> other
>>> > damage sure affected them, too.
>>>
>>> WTC7 collapsed in classic controlled demolition style.
>>
>> Nope. I saw the tapes. It collapsed in classic "steel weakened by
>> damage and fires" style.
>>
>> Some fools have tried to claim otherwise, but it's just more crap from
>> the looneytoons brigade.
>>
>
>
> You're now resorting to childish comments because you obviously know I'm
> right.

No one thinks you are right, in fact many here would claim that you do not
in fact think at all. Now go back to your conspiracy NG's and leave us alone
k00k.

-------------------------------------
DW

[EatMe]

>>As I said before, the telephone calls were all faked, using new voice
synthesizer technology.

When was the last you called your mom and told her your last name?

"Mom, this is Mark Bingham" <<

The only synt tech is barking out of your own asshole, asshole.

What a freak show!!

LOONBOY!! GIT YOUR LOONBOY HERE!!!!