Scholars for 9/11 Truth -- HTTP://ST911.ORG

[TRUTH]

Scholars for 9/11 Truth

http://st911.org



other useful sites exposing the TRUTH about 9/11:


The Fake bin Laden Video Tape:
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/osamatape.html


The Official Government Reports were Nothing but a SHAM:

Building a Better Mirage (NIST Report Deception):
http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/nist/index.html

The FEMA WTC Building Performance Study (w/comments):
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/official/fema.html

The 9/11 Commission Report: An Elaborate Fiction:
http://911research.wtc7.net/post911/commission/report.html



www.911truth.org
www.911busters.com
www.911review.com
www.911proof.com
www.911truthseekers.org
www.911blimp.net
www.911blogger.com

http://www.question911.com/links.php
http://www.oilempire.us
http://911research.wtc7.net
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com
http://www.cooperativeresearch.org
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9/11_Truth_Movement

[Orval Fairbairn]

In article >,
TRUTH > wrote:

> Scholars for 9/11 Truth
>
> http://st911.org
>
>
>
> other useful sites exposing the TRUTH about 9/11:
>
>
> The Fake bin Laden Video Tape:
> http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/osamatape.html
>
>
> The Official Government Reports were Nothing but a SHAM:
>
> Building a Better Mirage (NIST Report Deception):
> http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/nist/index.html
>
> The FEMA WTC Building Performance Study (w/comments):
> http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/official/fema.html
>
> The 9/11 Commission Report: An Elaborate Fiction:
> http://911research.wtc7.net/post911/commission/report.html
>
>
>
> www.911truth.org
> www.911busters.com
> www.911review.com
> www.911proof.com
> www.911truthseekers.org
> www.911blimp.net
> www.911blogger.com
>
> http://www.question911.com/links.php
> http://www.oilempire.us
> http://911research.wtc7.net
> http://www.whatreallyhappened.com
> http://www.cooperativeresearch.org
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9/11_Truth_Movement

And ... just why should we believe these cockamamie websites? What do
they have to offer other than a bunch of Wahabbis attempting denial?

[Dan]

TRUTH wrote:
<snip>
>
> That comment comes from a closed minded idiot brainwashed by their
> cooperate CNN/FOX media. A person too stupid to look at real evidence

And you accuse others of childish behaviour.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

[TRUTH]

Dan > wrote in news:VXgLf.22576$Ug4.6510@dukeread12:

> TRUTH wrote:
> <snip>
>>
>> That comment comes from a closed minded idiot brainwashed by their
>> cooperate CNN/FOX media. A person too stupid to look at real evidence
>
> And you accuse others of childish behaviour.
>
> Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
>



And how do you expect to me respond when attacked?

[Dan]

TRUTH wrote:
> Dan > wrote in news:VXgLf.22576$Ug4.6510@dukeread12:
>
>> TRUTH wrote:
>> <snip>
>>> That comment comes from a closed minded idiot brainwashed by their
>>> cooperate CNN/FOX media. A person too stupid to look at real evidence
>> And you accuse others of childish behaviour.
>>
>> Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
>>
>
>
>
> And how do you expect to me respond when attacked?

I expect to to behave as an adult. I have seen how you have
insulted people who have tried calmly and politely to factually explain
where you are wrong.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

[TRUTH]

Dan > wrote in news:5NjLf.23566$Ug4.9287@dukeread12:

> TRUTH wrote:
>> Dan > wrote in news:VXgLf.22576$Ug4.6510@dukeread12:
>>
>>> TRUTH wrote:
>>> <snip>
>>>> That comment comes from a closed minded idiot brainwashed by their
>>>> cooperate CNN/FOX media. A person too stupid to look at real
evidence
>>> And you accuse others of childish behaviour.
>>>
>>> Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> And how do you expect to me respond when attacked?
>
> I expect to to behave as an adult. I have seen how you have
> insulted people who have tried calmly and politely to factually explain
> where you are wrong.
>
> Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
>



You have not provided any evidence showing that I am wrong. If you
believe you did, then paste it below:

[Gig 601XL Builder]

Stop replying to this idiot.

[Dan]

TRUTH wrote:
> Dan > wrote in news:5NjLf.23566$Ug4.9287@dukeread12:
>
>> TRUTH wrote:
>>> Dan > wrote in news:VXgLf.22576$Ug4.6510@dukeread12:
>>>
>>>> TRUTH wrote:
>>>> <snip>
>>>>> That comment comes from a closed minded idiot brainwashed by their
>>>>> cooperate CNN/FOX media. A person too stupid to look at real
> evidence
>>>> And you accuse others of childish behaviour.
>>>>
>>>> Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> And how do you expect to me respond when attacked?
>> I expect to to behave as an adult. I have seen how you have
>> insulted people who have tried calmly and politely to factually explain
>> where you are wrong.
>>
>> Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
>>
>
>
>
> You have not provided any evidence showing that I am wrong. If you
> believe you did, then paste it below:

I will not repeat myself.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

[TRUTH]

Dan > wrote in news:p1lLf.23577$Ug4.10109@dukeread12:

> TRUTH wrote:
>> Dan > wrote in news:5NjLf.23566$Ug4.9287@dukeread12:
>>
>>> TRUTH wrote:
>>>> Dan > wrote in news:VXgLf.22576$Ug4.6510@dukeread12:
>>>>
>>>>> TRUTH wrote:
>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>> That comment comes from a closed minded idiot brainwashed by
>>>>>> their cooperate CNN/FOX media. A person too stupid to look at
>>>>>> real
>> evidence
>>>>> And you accuse others of childish behaviour.
>>>>>
>>>>> Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> And how do you expect to me respond when attacked?
>>> I expect to to behave as an adult. I have seen how you have
>>> insulted people who have tried calmly and politely to factually
>>> explain where you are wrong.
>>>
>>> Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> You have not provided any evidence showing that I am wrong. If you
>> believe you did, then paste it below:
>
> I will not repeat myself.
>
> Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
>


You're fighting a loosing battle.

[Dan]

TRUTH wrote:
> Dan > wrote in news:p1lLf.23577$Ug4.10109@dukeread12:
>
>> TRUTH wrote:
>>> Dan > wrote in news:5NjLf.23566$Ug4.9287@dukeread12:
>>>
>>>> TRUTH wrote:
>>>>> Dan > wrote in news:VXgLf.22576$Ug4.6510@dukeread12:
>>>>>
>>>>>> TRUTH wrote:
>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>> That comment comes from a closed minded idiot brainwashed by
>>>>>>> their cooperate CNN/FOX media. A person too stupid to look at
>>>>>>> real
>>> evidence
>>>>>> And you accuse others of childish behaviour.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> And how do you expect to me respond when attacked?
>>>> I expect to to behave as an adult. I have seen how you have
>>>> insulted people who have tried calmly and politely to factually
>>>> explain where you are wrong.
>>>>
>>>> Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> You have not provided any evidence showing that I am wrong. If you
>>> believe you did, then paste it below:
>> I will not repeat myself.
>>
>> Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
>>
>
>
> You're fighting a loosing battle.

Well, it IS evident you don't understand science, math, logic and the
scientific method. It is further evident you don't proofread what you
write. The losing, not loosing, side is the one that is so blind he will
not see. I have tried to treat you as an adult, I have tried to answer
your questions honestly as you put them and I have tried to correct your
misunderstandings and you refuse to pay attention.

On the other hand as much fun as I have had with your game it saddens
me there are people out there who will believe your conspiracy theories.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

[TRUTH]

Dan > wrote in news:CylLf.23586$Ug4.12288@dukeread12:

> TRUTH wrote:
>> Dan > wrote in news:p1lLf.23577$Ug4.10109@dukeread12:
>>
>>> TRUTH wrote:
>>>> Dan > wrote in news:5NjLf.23566$Ug4.9287@dukeread12:
>>>>
>>>>> TRUTH wrote:
>>>>>> Dan > wrote in news:VXgLf.22576$Ug4.6510@dukeread12:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> TRUTH wrote:
>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>> That comment comes from a closed minded idiot brainwashed by
>>>>>>>> their cooperate CNN/FOX media. A person too stupid to look at
>>>>>>>> real
>>>> evidence
>>>>>>> And you accuse others of childish behaviour.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And how do you expect to me respond when attacked?
>>>>> I expect to to behave as an adult. I have seen how you have
>>>>> insulted people who have tried calmly and politely to factually
>>>>> explain where you are wrong.
>>>>>
>>>>> Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You have not provided any evidence showing that I am wrong. If you
>>>> believe you did, then paste it below:
>>> I will not repeat myself.
>>>
>>> Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
>>>
>>
>>
>> You're fighting a loosing battle.
>
> Well, it IS evident you don't understand science, math, logic and
the
> scientific method. It is further evident you don't proofread what you
> write. The losing, not loosing, side is the one that is so blind he
will
> not see. I have tried to treat you as an adult, I have tried to answer
> your questions honestly as you put them and I have tried to correct
your
> misunderstandings and you refuse to pay attention.
>
> On the other hand as much fun as I have had with your game it
saddens
> me there are people out there who will believe your conspiracy
theories.
>
> Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
>



What's saddening is that you don't know how to stop ignoring evidence.
Read Jones' paper and debunk all 17 arguments. If you actually believe
Bush's bull****, then debunk this
http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html

[Newps]

TRUTH wrote:


>
>
> You're fighting a loosing battle.

Nothing worse than a loose battle.

[Richard Lamb]

TRUTH wrote:

> Dan > wrote in news:p1lLf.23577$Ug4.10109@dukeread12:
>
>
>>TRUTH wrote:
>>
>>>Dan > wrote in news:5NjLf.23566$Ug4.9287@dukeread12:
>>>
>>>
>>>>TRUTH wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Dan > wrote in news:VXgLf.22576$Ug4.6510@dukeread12:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>TRUTH wrote:
>>>>>><snip>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>That comment comes from a closed minded idiot brainwashed by
>>>>>>>their cooperate CNN/FOX media. A person too stupid to look at
>>>>>>>real
>>>
>>>evidence
>>>
>>>>>> And you accuse others of childish behaviour.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>And how do you expect to me respond when attacked?
>>>>
>>>> I expect to to behave as an adult. I have seen how you have
>>>>insulted people who have tried calmly and politely to factually
>>>>explain where you are wrong.
>>>>
>>>>Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>You have not provided any evidence showing that I am wrong. If you
>>>believe you did, then paste it below:
>>
>> I will not repeat myself.
>>
>>Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
>>
>
>
>
> You're fighting a loosing battle.

Anf there, at final last, IS a grain of truth...

[george]

Newps wrote:
> TRUTH wrote:
>
>
> >
> >
> > You're fighting a loosing battle.
>
> Nothing worse than a loose battle.

well when you're loose with the truth of Truth you lose the loose
battle.
I just bent the needle on my irony meter

[Greg Schuler]

The only saving grace of these threads is that Teuton Arndt has not
come out with post after post claiming the Germans/Nazis did it first
and better before nayone else. I suspect he might be a tad upsect that
some some Glorious Ubermenschen didn't collapse a high rise with He-111
or some fantistic Wonder Weapon back in the Glory Days.

[mrtravel]

TRUTH wrote:
*********

Isn't one thread enough?

[Dan]

Greg Schuler wrote:
> The only saving grace of these threads is that Teuton Arndt has not
> come out with post after post claiming the Germans/Nazis did it first
> and better before nayone else. I suspect he might be a tad upsect that
> some some Glorious Ubermenschen didn't collapse a high rise with He-111
> or some fantistic Wonder Weapon back in the Glory Days.
>

Give him time. No one has ever accused him of being fast or clever.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

[Peter Skelton]

On Thu, 23 Feb 2006 16:10:56 -0600, Dan > wrote:

>Greg Schuler wrote:
>> The only saving grace of these threads is that Teuton Arndt has not
>> come out with post after post claiming the Germans/Nazis did it first
>> and better before nayone else. I suspect he might be a tad upsect that
>> some some Glorious Ubermenschen didn't collapse a high rise with He-111
>> or some fantistic Wonder Weapon back in the Glory Days.
>>
>
> Give him time. No one has ever accused him of being fast or clever.
>
He hasn't made the claime because it didn't happen. It didn't
happen because the British hadn't stolen German high-rise
technology yet and New York was out of reach.

Don't you know anything?

Peter Skelton

[[email protected]]

It doesn't really matter who was behind the attacks anymore now does
it. Whether the USG was just negligent,complacent or complicit -
history has already been written and the desired reaction to the 911
attacks have been achieved.

If you convince everybody you speak to or blog to, it still won't make
a **** of difference.

Truth, the USG is a juggernaut, just ride the wave man...ride the wave.

[[email protected]]

Anybody ever take into account the supply of oxygen on board the jet
transport aircraft? There's oxygen for the flight crew plus an
FAA-required minimum 15 minute supply for every seat aboard the
aircraft plus extra walkaround bottles for individual use and medical
emergency supplys for several passengers. Certainly enough to raise a
very hot blaze once the bird catches fire. I used to inspect all that
stuff way back when. Parenthetically, it is a shame when unqualified
people speak about aircraft and crashes just to get some attention.
Another shame is when people spout off and use anonymity as a shield. A
good word for that is cowardice.
Walt BJ

[Newps]

The oxygen for the passengers is not stored in oxygen form in bottles.
Remember the Valujet that crashed in Florida? It crashed when some
oxygen generators caught fire and burned the plane up. When needed
oxygen is made by mixing some chemicals. It's tremendously lighter.



wrote:
> Anybody ever take into account the supply of oxygen on board the jet
> transport aircraft? There's oxygen for the flight crew plus an
> FAA-required minimum 15 minute supply for every seat aboard the
> aircraft plus extra walkaround bottles for individual use and medical
> emergency supplys for several passengers. Certainly enough to raise a
> very hot blaze once the bird catches fire. I used to inspect all that
> stuff way back when. Parenthetically, it is a shame when unqualified
> people speak about aircraft and crashes just to get some attention.
> Another shame is when people spout off and use anonymity as a shield. A
> good word for that is cowardice.
> Walt BJ
>

[TRUTH]

Newps > wrote in news:lMqdnXAaROO2ZGDenZ2dnUVZ_s-
:

>
>
> TRUTH wrote:
>
>
>>
>>
>> You're fighting a loosing battle.
>
> Nothing worse than a loose battle.
>


yeah? I'm still waiting for evidence that a 757 hit the pentagon

[Pooh Bear]

TRUTH wrote:

> Orval Fairbairn > wrote in news:orfairbairn-
> :
>
> > And ... just why should we believe these cockamamie websites? What do
> > they have to offer other than a bunch of Wahabbis attempting denial?
>
> That comment comes from a closed minded idiot brainwashed by their
> cooperate CNN/FOX media. A person too stupid to look at real evidence

You wouldn't recognise or *acknowledge* real evidence if it walked up to
you and smacked you right in the face.

Graham

[Pooh Bear]

wrote:

> Anybody ever take into account the supply of oxygen on board the jet
> transport aircraft? There's oxygen for the flight crew plus an
> FAA-required minimum 15 minute supply for every seat aboard the
> aircraft plus extra walkaround bottles for individual use and medical
> emergency supplys for several passengers. Certainly enough to raise a
> very hot blaze once the bird catches fire

No actually. The amount is trivial. The atmosphere contains plenty enough
oxygen to maintain a seriosly hot fuel fire.

Graham

[Pooh Bear]

mrtravel wrote:

> Newps wrote:
>
> > The oxygen for the passengers is not stored in oxygen form in bottles.
> > Remember the Valujet that crashed in Florida? It crashed when some
> > oxygen generators caught fire and burned the plane up. When needed
> > oxygen is made by mixing some chemicals. It's tremendously lighter.
>
> Lighter? Is oxygen heavy?

It's heavier than air. But he meant it's lighter to use oxygen generating
cans than to store oxygen as pressurised gas in ( heavy ) oxy bottles.

Graham

[Pooh Bear]

TRUTH wrote:

> yeah? I'm still waiting for evidence that a 757 hit the pentagon

See the security cam 'video'.

I worked it out ages before the 'official' investigation did. I can't
fail to see the 757 every time now.

Graham

[TRUTH]

Pooh Bear > wrote in
:

>
>
> TRUTH wrote:
>
>> yeah? I'm still waiting for evidence that a 757 hit the pentagon
>
> See the security cam 'video'.
>
> I worked it out ages before the 'official' investigation did. I can't
> fail to see the 757 every time now.
>
> Graham
>
>
>


Those 5 framed do not show a 757. btw, where is the video that the FBI
confiscated from the store across the street? (I bet you'll ingore
explaining this)

[Newps]

TRUTH wrote:

> Newps > wrote in news:lMqdnXAaROO2ZGDenZ2dnUVZ_s-
> :
>
>
>>
>>TRUTH wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>You're fighting a loosing battle.
>>
>>Nothing worse than a loose battle.
>>
>
>
>
> yeah? I'm still waiting for evidence that a 757 hit the pentagon



No, you're not.

[Newps]

mrtravel wrote:

> Newps wrote:
>
>> The oxygen for the passengers is not stored in oxygen form in bottles.
>> Remember the Valujet that crashed in Florida? It crashed when some
>> oxygen generators caught fire and burned the plane up. When needed
>> oxygen is made by mixing some chemicals. It's tremendously lighter.
>
>
> Lighter? Is oxygen heavy?

All the bottles are.

[TRUTH]

Newps > wrote in
:

>
>
> TRUTH wrote:
>
>> Newps > wrote in news:lMqdnXAaROO2ZGDenZ2dnUVZ_s-
>> :
>>
>>
>>>
>>>TRUTH wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>You're fighting a loosing battle.
>>>
>>>Nothing worse than a loose battle.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> yeah? I'm still waiting for evidence that a 757 hit the pentagon
>
>
>
> No, you're not.
>



If you provide the evidence, I will definitely look at it

[khobar]

"TRUTH" > wrote in message
...
> Newps > wrote in
> :
>
> >
> >
> > TRUTH wrote:
> >
> >> Newps > wrote in news:lMqdnXAaROO2ZGDenZ2dnUVZ_s-
> >> :
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>>TRUTH wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>You're fighting a loosing battle.
> >>>
> >>>Nothing worse than a loose battle.
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> yeah? I'm still waiting for evidence that a 757 hit the pentagon
> >
> >
> >
> > No, you're not.
> >
>
>
>
> If you provide the evidence, I will definitely look at it

As I've already pointed out, and you've acknowledged, YOU have already
provided your own proof on this matter.

Paul Nixon

[TRUTH]

"khobar" > wrote in news:tD_Lf.4562$Sp2.8@fed1read02:

> "TRUTH" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Newps > wrote in
>> :
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > TRUTH wrote:
>> >
>> >> Newps > wrote in
news:lMqdnXAaROO2ZGDenZ2dnUVZ_s-
>> >> :
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>>
>> >>>TRUTH wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>You're fighting a loosing battle.
>> >>>
>> >>>Nothing worse than a loose battle.
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> yeah? I'm still waiting for evidence that a 757 hit the pentagon
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > No, you're not.
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> If you provide the evidence, I will definitely look at it
>
> As I've already pointed out, and you've acknowledged, YOU have already
> provided your own proof on this matter.
>
> Paul Nixon
>
>
>


That's right. I have shown that there's no evidence that a 757 hit the
Pentagon

[Scott M. Kozel]

TRUTH > wrote:
>
> "khobar" > wrote
> > "TRUTH" > wrote
> >
> >> If you provide the evidence, I will definitely look at it
> >
> > As I've already pointed out, and you've acknowledged, YOU have already
> > provided your own proof on this matter.
>
> That's right. I have shown that there's no evidence that a 757 hit the
> Pentagon

Bwahawhawhawhawhawhawhawhawhawhawhawhawhawhawhawha whawhawhawhaw !!!!

[Dan]

Scott M. Kozel wrote:
> TRUTH > wrote:
>> "khobar" > wrote
>>> "TRUTH" > wrote
>>>
>>>> If you provide the evidence, I will definitely look at it
>>> As I've already pointed out, and you've acknowledged, YOU have already
>>> provided your own proof on this matter.
>> That's right. I have shown that there's no evidence that a 757 hit the
>> Pentagon
>
> Bwahawhawhawhawhawhawhawhawhawhawhawhawhawhawhawha whawhawhawhaw !!!!

Don't laugh, that's cruel. The poor boy is obviously ill.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

[george]

Dan wrote:
> Scott M. Kozel wrote:
> > TRUTH > wrote:
> >> "khobar" > wrote
> >>> "TRUTH" > wrote
> >>>
> >>>> If you provide the evidence, I will definitely look at it
> >>> As I've already pointed out, and you've acknowledged, YOU have already
> >>> provided your own proof on this matter.
> >> That's right. I have shown that there's no evidence that a 757 hit the
> >> Pentagon
> >
> > Bwahawhawhawhawhawhawhawhawhawhawhawhawhawhawhawha whawhawhawhaw !!!!
>
> Don't laugh, that's cruel. The poor boy is obviously ill.
>
No. It's not cruel to laugh at the obvious troll.
In fact it may shock him/her/it back into a semblance of rationality

Quoted:
Maj. Leibner drove in and made it as far as the south parking lot,
where he got out on foot. "I heard the plane first," he said. "I
thought it was a flyover Arlington cemetery." From his vantage point,
Maj. Leibner looked up and saw the plane come in. "I was about 100
yards away," he said. "You could see through the windows of the
aircraft. I saw it hit." The plane came in hard and level and was flown
full throttle into the building, dead center mass, Maj. Leibner said.
"The plane completely entered the building," he said. "I got a little
repercussion, from the sound, the blast. I've heard artillery, and that
was louder than the loudest has to offer. I started running toward the
site. I jumped over a fence. I was probably the first person on the
scene." A tree and the backend of a crash truck at the heliport near
the crash site were on fire and the ground was scorched, Maj. Leibner
recounted. "The plane went into the building like a toy into a birthday
cake," he said. "The aircraft went in between the second and third
floors." At that point, no one was outside. Spotting a Pentagon door
that had been blown off its hinges, Maj. Leibner went in and out
several times, helping rescue several people. "The very first person
was right there," he said. "She could walk. I walked her out onto the
grass." Maj. Leibner said a police officer pulled up onto the grass and
began to help. "Everybody was hurt," Maj. Leibner said. "They were all
civilian females. Everybody was burned on their hands and faces.
http://www.usmedicine.com/article.cfm?articleID=384&issueID=38

[khobar]

"TRUTH" > wrote in message
...
> "khobar" > wrote in news:tD_Lf.4562$Sp2.8@fed1read02:
>
> > "TRUTH" > wrote in message
> > ...
> >> Newps > wrote in
> >> :
> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > TRUTH wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Newps > wrote in
> news:lMqdnXAaROO2ZGDenZ2dnUVZ_s-
> >> >> :
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>TRUTH wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>You're fighting a loosing battle.
> >> >>>
> >> >>>Nothing worse than a loose battle.
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> yeah? I'm still waiting for evidence that a 757 hit the pentagon
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > No, you're not.
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> If you provide the evidence, I will definitely look at it
> >
> > As I've already pointed out, and you've acknowledged, YOU have already
> > provided your own proof on this matter.
> >
> > Paul Nixon
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> That's right. I have shown that there's no evidence that a 757 hit the
> Pentagon

Hmm, your memory seems to be faulty. You (yes, YOU) posted proof that a 757
did hit the Pentagon. There is no escaping that fact.

Paul Nixon

[Scott M. Kozel]

Dan > wrote:
>
> Scott M. Kozel wrote:
> > TRUTH > wrote:
> >> "khobar" > wrote
> >>> "TRUTH" > wrote
> >>>
> >>>> If you provide the evidence, I will definitely look at it
> >>> As I've already pointed out, and you've acknowledged, YOU have already
> >>> provided your own proof on this matter.
> >> That's right. I have shown that there's no evidence that a 757 hit the
> >> Pentagon
> >
> > Bwahawhawhawhawhawhawhawhawhawhawhawhawhawhawhawha whawhawhawhaw !!!!
>
> Don't laugh, that's cruel. The poor boy is obviously ill.

I couldn't help it! :-)

[TRUTH]

CHECKOUT THIS PICTURE:
http://www.indybay.org/uploads/calltoaction.jpg


Report on Question 9-11- A Call to Action Event
http://www.indybay.org/news/2006/02/1804867.php

Harry Belafonte Questions 9/11 And Asks Us To Redefine Terror
http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20060226141732380

9/11 Revisited: Were Explosives Used To Bring Down The Buildings?
http://www.911revisited.com/ and http://911revisited.infad.net/video.html
to watch the movie...

Just so you know, Dr. David Ray Griffin has said this about the movie...

"Colleagues,

Here's new video, which probably provides the best case yet of this type
for the controlled demolition of the WTC. It's about 30 minutes."


9-11: Can the Truth Set Us Free?
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article12062.htm

Destruction of 9/11 Records--EPA Set to Close Library Network and
Electronic Catalog
http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20060221173610962

Article to come about this development...

Judicial Watch sues DoD for Videos of Attack on Pentagon
http://www.911citizenswatch.org/modules.php?
op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=827&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0

Carol Brouillet's website is http://www.communitycurrency.org/

[khobar]

"TRUTH" > wrote in message
...
> CHECKOUT THIS PICTURE:
> http://www.indybay.org/uploads/calltoaction.jpg
>
>
> Report on Question 9-11- A Call to Action Event
> http://www.indybay.org/news/2006/02/1804867.php
>
> Harry Belafonte Questions 9/11 And Asks Us To Redefine Terror
> http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20060226141732380
>
> 9/11 Revisited: Were Explosives Used To Bring Down The Buildings?
> http://www.911revisited.com/ and http://911revisited.infad.net/video.html
> to watch the movie...
>
> Just so you know, Dr. David Ray Griffin has said this about the movie...
>
> "Colleagues,
>
> Here's new video, which probably provides the best case yet of this type
> for the controlled demolition of the WTC. It's about 30 minutes."
>
>
> 9-11: Can the Truth Set Us Free?
> http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article12062.htm
>
> Destruction of 9/11 Records--EPA Set to Close Library Network and
> Electronic Catalog
> http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20060221173610962
>
> Article to come about this development...
>
> Judicial Watch sues DoD for Videos of Attack on Pentagon
> http://www.911citizenswatch.org/modules.php?
> op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=827&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0
>
> Carol Brouillet's website is http://www.communitycurrency.org/

And your point in posting links to all this stuff is...what exactly? You've
already demonstrated that these theories have literally dozens of supporters
around the world. And???

Paul Nixon

[Dan]

TRUTH wrote:
> CHECKOUT THIS PICTURE:
> http://www.indybay.org/uploads/calltoaction.jpg
>
>
> Report on Question 9-11- A Call to Action Event
> http://www.indybay.org/news/2006/02/1804867.php
>
> Harry Belafonte Questions 9/11 And Asks Us To Redefine Terror
> http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20060226141732380
>
> 9/11 Revisited: Were Explosives Used To Bring Down The Buildings?
> http://www.911revisited.com/ and http://911revisited.infad.net/video.html
> to watch the movie...
>
> Just so you know, Dr. David Ray Griffin has said this about the movie...
>
> "Colleagues,
>
> Here's new video, which probably provides the best case yet of this type
> for the controlled demolition of the WTC. It's about 30 minutes."
>
>
> 9-11: Can the Truth Set Us Free?
> http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article12062.htm
>
> Destruction of 9/11 Records--EPA Set to Close Library Network and
> Electronic Catalog
> http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20060221173610962
>
> Article to come about this development...
>
> Judicial Watch sues DoD for Videos of Attack on Pentagon
> http://www.911citizenswatch.org/modules.php?
> op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=827&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0
>
> Carol Brouillet's website is http://www.communitycurrency.org/

Belefonte is in no way a scholar, he's an entertainer.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

[mrtravel]

TRUTH wrote:

>
> That's right. I have shown that there's no evidence that a 757 hit the
> Pentagon

YOU (TRUTH) posted this link which indicate the story of "NO Boeing
hitting the Pentagon" is a hoax. That is to say, a Boeing DID hit the
Pentago. Don't blame us, you posted the link to the proof.

http://www.oilempire.us/bogus.html

Now, correct me if I am wrong, but doesn't this website show that a 757
DID hit the Pentagon?

From the website:

"it is subtle, but if you look at the photos you can see the damage to
the facade matches the width of a 757 - full size photos at
www.oilempire.us/pentagon.html
The "no Boeing hit the Pentagon" claim is the most important and
widespread 9/11 hoax"

[Orval Fairbairn]

In article >,
TRUTH > wrote:

> mrtravel > wrote in news:QkyMf.25472$_S7.7736
> @newssvr14.news.prodigy.com:
>
> > TRUTH wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> That's right. I have shown that there's no evidence that a 757 hit the
> >> Pentagon
> >
> > YOU (TRUTH) posted this link which indicate the story of "NO Boeing
> > hitting the Pentagon" is a hoax. That is to say, a Boeing DID hit the
> > Pentago. Don't blame us, you posted the link to the proof.
> >
> > http://www.oilempire.us/bogus.html
> >
> > Now, correct me if I am wrong, but doesn't this website show that a 757
> > DID hit the Pentagon?
> >
> > From the website:
> >
> > "it is subtle, but if you look at the photos you can see the damage to
> > the facade matches the width of a 757 - full size photos at
> > www.oilempire.us/pentagon.html
> > The "no Boeing hit the Pentagon" claim is the most important and
> > widespread 9/11 hoax"
> >
>
> That's what I get for not checking into it first

That seems to be an endemic problem with the "9/11 Truth Movement."

The signal/noise ratio there approaches zero.

[Dan]

TRUTH wrote:
> mrtravel > wrote in news:QkyMf.25472$_S7.7736
> @newssvr14.news.prodigy.com:
>
>> TRUTH wrote:
>>
>>> That's right. I have shown that there's no evidence that a 757 hit the
>>> Pentagon
>> YOU (TRUTH) posted this link which indicate the story of "NO Boeing
>> hitting the Pentagon" is a hoax. That is to say, a Boeing DID hit the
>> Pentago. Don't blame us, you posted the link to the proof.
>>
>> http://www.oilempire.us/bogus.html
>>
>> Now, correct me if I am wrong, but doesn't this website show that a 757
>> DID hit the Pentagon?
>>
>> From the website:
>>
>> "it is subtle, but if you look at the photos you can see the damage to
>> the facade matches the width of a 757 - full size photos at
>> www.oilempire.us/pentagon.html
>> The "no Boeing hit the Pentagon" claim is the most important and
>> widespread 9/11 hoax"
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> That's what I get for not checking into it first

Or checking into what a squib is or checking into whether airliners
fly on diesel oil or..etc. Time to quit before you lose anymore ground.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

[george]

Dan wrote:

> Or checking into what a squib is or checking into whether airliners
> fly on diesel oil or..etc. Time to quit before you lose anymore ground.
>

You'll love one of the claims posted elsewhere on the net and it went
something like this:.
:
One of the aircraft must have had a cabin decompression because it was
at 30K+ and 'suddenly' lost 600 feet...
:
Dunno about you but I'd expect the 'sudden' loss of altitude to be more
in the 20K range
:-)